[000000] Filing Information | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
Filing Information | |
Legal Entity Identifier | |
GRI Company Identifier Number |
|
Level of accordance | In accordance |
Sectors Standards used |
|
[020000] GRI 2 - General Disclosures | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI-2 General Disclosure 2021 | |
Disclosure 2-1 Organizational Details | |
2-1-a: Legal name |
|
2-1-b: Nature of ownership | Publicly Owned |
2-1-b: Other nature of ownership | |
2-1-b: Legal form | Incorporated Entity |
2-1-b: Other legal form | |
2-1-c: Location of headquarters |
|
2-1-d: Countries of operation |
|
Disclosure 2-2 Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting | |
2-2-a: List of all entities included in the sustainability reporting | Ref #1 |
The organization has audited consolidated financial statements or financial information filed on public record | True |
2-2-b: Differences between the list of entities included in financial reporting and the list included in sustainability reporting | Ref #2 |
The organization consists of multiple entities | True |
2-2-c: Explanation of the approach used for consolidating the information across multiple entities | Ref #3 |
2-2-c-i: The approach used for consolidating the information involves adjustments to information for minority interests | True |
2-2-c-ii: Explanation of how the approach takes into account mergers, acquisitions, and disposal of entities or parts of entities | Ref #4 |
2-2-c-iii: The approach used for consolidating the information is different across the disclosures in GRI 2 and across material topics | False |
2-2-c-iii: Explanation of how the approach differs across the disclosures in GRI 2 and across material topics | |
Disclosure 2-3 Reporting period, frequency and contact point | |
2-3-a: Start date for sustainability reporting * | 31-12-2023 |
2-3-a: End date for sustainability reporting * | 30-12-2024 |
2-3-a: Frequency of sustainability reporting | Annual |
2-3-b: Start date for financial reporting | 01-01-2024 |
2-3-b: End date for financial reporting | 31-12-2024 |
2-3-b: If the sustainability and financial reporting periods do not align, explanation of the reason for this | |
2-3-c: Publication date of the report or reported information | 14-02-2025 |
2-3-d: Contact point for questions about the report or reported information | Ref #5 |
Disclosure 2-4 Restatements of information |
• [020010] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-4 Restatements of information |
Disclosure 2-5 External assurance | |
2-5-a: Description of policy and practice for seeking external assurance | Ref #6 |
2-5-a: Are the highest governance body and senior executives involved? | Yes |
2-5-a: Description of how the highest governance body and senior executives are involved | Ref #7 |
The sustainability reporting has been externally assured | True |
2-5-b-i: Link or reference to the external assurance report(s) or assurance statement(s) | Ref #8 |
2-5-b-ii: Description of what has been assured and on what basis | Ref #9 |
2-5-b-ii: Description of the assurance standards used | Ref #10 |
2-5-b-ii: Description of the level of assurance obtained | Ref #11 |
2-5-b-ii: Description of any limitations of the assurance process | Ref #12 |
2-5-b-iii: Description of the relationship between the organization and the assurance provider | Ref #13 |
Disclosure 2-6 Activities, value chain and other business relationships | |
2-6-a: Sector(s) in which the organization is active | Ref #14 |
2-6-b: Description of the organization's value chain | Ref #15 |
2-6-b-i: Description of activities | Ref #16 |
2-6-b-i: Description of products and services | Ref #17 |
2-6-b-i: Description of markets served | Ref #18 |
2-6-b-ii: Description of supply chain | Ref #19 |
2-6-b-iii: Description of entities downstream and their activities | Ref #20 |
2-6-c: Other relevant business relationships | Ref #21 |
2-6-d: Description of significant changes in 2-6-a, 2-6-b and 2-6-c compared to the previous reporting period | Ref #22 |
Disclosure 2-7 Employees | |
2-7-a: Total number of employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-7-b-i: Total number of permanent employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-7-b-ii: Total number of temporary employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-7-b-iii: Total number of non-guaranteed hours employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-7-b-iv: Total number of full-time employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-7-b-v: Total number of part-time employees |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Disclosure of Employees, Breakdown By Gender |
• [020020] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-7 Employees - Breakdown by Gender |
Disclosure of Employees, Breakdown By Region |
• [020030] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-7 Employees - Breakdown by Region |
2-7-c: Description of methodologies and assumptions used to compile employee data | Ref #23 |
2-7-c-i: Are employee numbers reported in head count, full-time equivalent (FTE), or using another methodology? | Head count |
2-7-c-i: Description of methodology, if employee numbers are reported using another methodology | |
2-7-c-ii: Are employee numbers reported at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology? | At the end of the reporting period |
2-7-c-ii: Description of methodology, if employee numbers are reported using another methodology | |
2-7-d: Contextual information necessary to understand the data reported under 2-7-a and 2-7-b | Ref #24 |
2-7-e: Description of significant fluctuations in the number of employees during the reporting period | Ref #25 |
2-7-e: Description of significant fluctuations in the number of employees between reporting periods | Ref #26 |
Disclosure 2-8 Workers who are not employees | |
2-8-a: Total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-8-a-i: Description of the most common types of worker and their contractual relationship with the organization | Ref #27 |
2-8-a-ii: Description of the type of work performed | Ref #28 |
2-8-b: Description of methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data for workers who are not employees | Ref #29 |
2-8-b-i: Is the number of workers who are not employees reported in head count, full-time equivalent (FTE), or using another methodology? | Head count |
2-8-b-i: Description of methodology, if number of workers who are not employees is reported using another methodology | |
2-8-b-ii: Is the number of workers who are not employees reported at the end of the reporting period, or as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology? | At the end of the reporting period |
2-8-b-ii: Description of methodology, if number of workers who are not employees is reported using another methodology | |
2-8-c: Description of significant fluctuations in the number of workers who are not employees during the reporting period | Ref #30 |
2-8-c: Description of significant fluctuations in the number of workers who are not employees between reporting periods | Ref #31 |
Disclosure 2-9 Governance structure and composition | |
2-9-a: Description of governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body | Ref #32 |
2-9-b: List of committees of the highest governance body that are responsible for decision-making on and overseeing the management of the organization’s impacts | Ref #33 |
2-9-c-i: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by executive and non-executive members | Ref #34 |
2-9-c-ii: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by independence | Ref #35 |
2-9-c-iii: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by tenure of members on the governance body | Ref #36 |
2-9-c-iv: Description of composition by number of other significant positions and commitments held by each member, and the nature of the commitments | Ref #37 |
2-9-c-v: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by gender | Ref #38 |
2-9-c-vi: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by under-represented social groups | Ref #39 |
2-9-c-vii: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by competencies relevant to impacts of the organization | Ref #40 |
2-9-c-viii: Description of composition of the highest governance body and its committees by stakeholder representation | Ref #41 |
Disclosure 2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | |
2-10-a: Description of nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees | Ref #42 |
2-10-b: Description of the criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | Ref #43 |
2-10-b-i: The views of stakeholders (including shareholders) are taken into consideration during the nomination and selection of highest governance body members | True |
2-10-b-i: Description of how the views of stakeholders (including shareholders) are taken into consideration for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | Ref #44 |
2-10-b-ii: Diversity is taken into consideration during the nomination and selection of the highest governance body's members | True |
2-10-b-ii: Description of how diversity is taken into consideration for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | Ref #45 |
2-10-b-iii: Independence is taken into consideration during the nomination and selection of the highest governance body's members | True |
2-10-b-iii: Description of how independence is taken into consideration for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | Ref #46 |
2-10-b-iv: Competencies relevant to the impacts of the organization are taken into consideration during the nomination and selection of the highest governance body's members | True |
2-10-b-iv: Description of how competencies relevant to the impacts of the organization are taken into consideration for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | Ref #47 |
Disclosure 2-11 Chair of the highest governance body | |
2-11-a: The chair of the highest governance body is also a senior executive in the organization | False |
2-11-b: If the chair is also a senior executive, explanation of their function within the organization’s management | |
2-11-b: If the chair is also a senior executive, explanation of the reasons for this arrangement | |
2-11-b: If the chair is also a senior executive, explanation of how conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated | |
Disclosure 2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | |
2-12-a: Description of role of the highest governance body and of senior executives in developing, approving, and updating the organization’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies, and goals related to sustainable development | Ref #48 |
2-12-b: Description of role of the highest governance body in overseeing the organization’s due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization’s impacts | Ref #49 |
2-12-b-i: The highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization's impacts | True |
2-12-b-i: Description of how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support the due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization’s impacts | Ref #50 |
2-12-b-ii: Description of how the highest governance body considers the outcomes of the due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization’s impacts | Ref #51 |
2-12-c: Description of the role of the highest governance body in reviewing effectiveness of the organization’s processes as described in 2-12-b | Ref #52 |
2-12-c: Frequency of review by the highest governance body in reviewing effectiveness of the organization’s processes as described in 2-12-b |
|
Disclosure 2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | |
2-13-a: Description of how the highest governance body delegates responsibility for managing the organization’s impacts | Ref #53 |
2-13-a-i: The highest governance body has appointed one or more senior executives with responsibility for the management of impacts | True |
2-13-a-ii: The highest governance body has delegated responsibility for the management of impacts to other employees | True |
2-13-b: Description of process for senior executives or other employees to report back to the highest governance body on the management of the organization’s impacts | Ref #54 |
2-13-b: Frequency for senior executives or other employees to report back to the highest governance body on the management of the organization’s impacts |
|
Disclosure 2-14 Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | |
2-14-a: The highest governance body is responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organization’s material topics | True |
2-14-a: Description of process for reviewing and approving the reported information by the highest governance body | Ref #55 |
2-14-b: If the highest governance body is not responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, explanation of the reason for this | |
Disclosure 2-15 Conflicts of interest | |
2-15-a: Description of processes for the highest governance body to ensure that conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated | Ref #56 |
2-15-b: Any conflicts of interest arising for members of the highest governance body are disclosed to stakeholders | True |
2-15-b-i: Conflicts of interest relating to cross-board membership are disclosed to stakeholders | True |
2-15-b-ii: Conflicts of interest relating to cross-shareholding with suppliers and other stakeholders are disclosed to stakeholders | True |
2-15-b-iii: Conflicts of interest relating to existence of controlling shareholders are disclosed to stakeholders | True |
2-15-b-iv: Conflicts of interest relating to related parties, their relationships, transactions, and outstanding balances are disclosed to stakeholders | True |
Disclosure 2-16 Communication of critical concerns | |
2-16-a: Critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body | True |
2-16-a: Description of how critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body | Ref #57 |
2-16-b: Total number of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-16-b: Nature of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period | Ref #58 |
Disclosure 2-17 Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | |
2-17-a: Measures taken to advance the collective knowledge, skills, and experience of the highest governance body on sustainable development | Ref #59 |
Disclosure 2-18 Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | |
2-18-a: Description of processes for evaluating performance of the highest governance body in overseeing management of the organization’s impacts | Ref #60 |
2-18-b: Evaluations of the highest governance body are independent | True |
2-18-b: Frequency of evaluations of the highest governance body |
|
2-18-c: Description of actions taken in response to the evaluations, including changes to the composition of the highest governance body and organizational practices | Ref #61 |
Disclosure 2-20 Process to determine remuneration | |
2-20-a: Description of process for designing remuneration policies | Ref #62 |
2-20-a: Description of process for determining remuneration | Ref #63 |
2-20-a-i: The process for determining remuneration is overseen by independent highest governance body members or an independent remuneration committee | True |
2-20-a-ii: Description of how the views of stakeholders (including shareholders) regarding remuneration are sought and taken into consideration | Ref #64 |
2-20-a-iii: Remuneration consultants are involved in determining remuneration | True |
2-20-a-iii: Remuneration consultants are independent of the organization, the highest governance body and senior executives | False |
2-20-b: Results of votes of stakeholders (including shareholders) on remuneration policies and proposals, if applicable | Ref #65 |
Disclosure 2-21 Annual total compensation ratio | |
2-21-a: Ratio of the annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-21-b: Ratio of the percentage increase in annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual to the median percentage increase in annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-21-c: Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | Ref #66 |
Disclosure 2-22 Statement on sustainable development strategy | |
2-22-a: Statement from the highest governance body or most senior executive about relevance of sustainable development to the organization and its strategy for contributing to sustainable development | Ref #67 |
Disclosure 2-23 Policy commitments | |
2-23-a: Description of policy commitments for responsible business conduct | Ref #68 |
2-23-a-i: The authoritative intergovernmental instruments the commitments reference | Ref #69 |
2-23-a-ii: The commitments stipulate conducting due diligence | True |
2-23-a-iii: The commitments stipulate applying the precautionary principle | False |
2-23-a-iv: The commitments stipulate respecting human rights | True |
2-23-b: Description of the specific policy commitment to respect human rights | Ref #70 |
2-23-b-i: The internationally recognized human rights that the commitment covers | Ref #71 |
2-23-b-ii: The categories of stakeholders, including at-risk or vulnerable groups, that are given particular attention to in the commitment | Ref #72 |
The policy commitments are publicly available | True |
2-23-c: Links to the policy commitments if publicly available | Ref #73 |
2-23-c: If the policy commitments are not publicly available, explanation of the reason for this | |
2-23-d: The level at which each of the policy commitments was approved within the organization | Ref #74 |
2-23-d: The policy commitments were approved at the most senior level within the organization | True |
2-23-e: The extent to which the policy commitments apply to the activities and business relationships | Ref #75 |
2-23-f: Description of how the policy commitments are communicated to workers, business partners, and other relevant parties | Ref #76 |
Disclosure 2-24 Embedding policy commitments | |
2-24-a: Description of how each of the policy commitments for responsible business conduct is embedded throughout the activities and business relationships | Ref #77 |
2-24-a-i: Description of how the responsibility to implement the commitments is allocated across different levels within the organization | Ref #78 |
2-24-a-ii: Description of how the commitments are integrated into organizational strategies, operational policies, and operational procedures | Ref #79 |
2-24-a-iii: Description of how the commitments are implemented with and through its business relationships | Ref #80 |
2-24-a-iv: Description of training that is provided for implementing the commitments | Ref #81 |
Disclosure 2-25 Processes to remediate negative impacts | |
2-25-a: Description of commitments to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts that the organization identifies it has caused or contributed to | Ref #82 |
2-25-b: Description of the approach to identify and address grievances, including the grievance mechanisms that the organization has established or participates in | Ref #83 |
2-25-c: Description of other processes by which the organization provides for or cooperates in the remediation of negative impacts that it identifies it has caused or contributed to | Ref #84 |
2-25-d: Description of how stakeholders who are the intended users of the grievance mechanisms are involved in the design, review, operation, and improvement of these mechanisms | Ref #85 |
2-25-e: Description of how the organization tracks the effectiveness of the grievance mechanisms and other remediation processes | Ref #86 |
2-25-e: Examples of the effectiveness of the grievance mechanisms and other remediation processes, including stakeholder feedback | Ref #87 |
Disclosure 2-26 Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | |
2-26-a-i: Description of the mechanisms for individuals to seek advice on implementing the organization’s policies and practices for responsible business conduct | Ref #88 |
2-26-a-ii: Description of the mechanisms for individuals to raise concerns about the organization’s business conduct | Ref #89 |
Disclosure 2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations | |
2-27-a: Total number of significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-a-i: Number of significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations for which fines were incurred during the reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-a-ii: Number of significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations for which non-monetary sanctions were incurred during the reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-b: Total number of fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that were paid during the reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-b-i: Number of fines paid during the reporting period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-b-ii: Number of fines paid during the reporting period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in previous reporting periods |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
2-27-b: Total monetary value of fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that were paid during the reporting period |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
2-27-b-i: Monetary value of fines paid during the reporting period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
2-27-b-ii: Monetary value of fines paid during the reporting period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in previous reporting periods |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
2-27-c: Description of the significant instances of non-compliance | Ref #90 |
2-27-d: Description of how significant instances of non-compliance were determined | Ref #91 |
Disclosure 2-28 Membership associations | |
2-28-a: Industry associations, other membership associations, and national or international advocacy organizations in which the organization participates in a significant role | Ref #92 |
Disclosure 2-29 Approach to stakeholder engagement | |
2-29-a: Description of the approach to engaging with stakeholders | Ref #93 |
2-29-a-i: Categories of stakeholders engaged with | Ref #94 |
2-29-a-i: Description of how the categories of stakeholders to engage with are identified | Ref #95 |
2-29-a-ii: Description of the purpose of stakeholder engagement | Ref #96 |
2-29-a-iii: Description of how the organization seeks to ensure meaningful engagement with stakeholders | Ref #97 |
Disclosure 2-30 Collective bargaining agreements | |
2-30-a: Percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements |
pure
pure
|
2-30-b: For employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, does the organization determine their working conditions and terms of employment based on collective bargaining agreements that cover its other employees or based on collective bargaining agreements from other organizations? | Ref #98 |
# 1
Hydro Extrusion Argentina SA
Hydro Building Systems France SARL (Branch)
Hydro Aluminium Australia Pty. Limited
Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri Pty. Limited
Hydro Building Systems Austria GmbH
Hydro Extrusion Nenzing GmbH
Hydro Holding Austria GmbH
Hydro Building Systems Middle East WLL
Norsk Hydro EU Sprl
Hydro Extrusion Lichtervelde NV
Hydro Allease N
Hydro Building Systems Belgium NV
Hydro Extrusion Eupen SA
Hydro Extrusion Raeren S.A.
Hueck Service d.o.o.
ALBRAS - Alumínio Brasileiro SA
ALUNORTE - Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A.
Hydro Alumina Holdings Ltda
Atlas Alumínio SA
CAP - Companhia de Alumina do Pará SA
Hydro Extrusion Brasil S.A
Mineração Paragominas SA
Norsk Hydro Brasil Ltda
Norsk Hydro Energia Ltda.
Hydro Enrein Ltda.
Hydro Rein Brasil Soluções Renováveis Ltda
Hydro Aluminium Canada & Co. Ltd.
Hydro Aluminium Canada Inc.
Hydro Extrusion Canada Inc.
Hydro REIN Energy Solutions Canada Ltd.
Hydro Aluminium Beijing Ltd.
Hydro Building Systems (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
Hydro Aluminium Fabrication (Taicang) Ltd
Hydro Precision Tubing (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
Sapa Extrusion (Jiangyin) Co. Ltd.
Hycast Technology Shanghai Co., Ltd
Hydro Building Systems Croatia d.o.o.
Hydro Building Systems Czechia sro
Hydro Extrusion Denmark A/S
Hydro Holding Denmark A/S
Hydro Precision Tubing Tønder A/S
Hydro Rein Solar Holding DK 1 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar BidCo DK 1 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar General Partner DK 1 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar 1 K/S
Hydro Rein Solar Holding DK 2 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar BidCo DK 2 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar General Partner DK 2 ApS
Hydro Rein Solar 2 K/S
Hydro Extrusion Baltics AS
Hydro Extrusion Finland Oy
Extrusion Services S.a.r.l
Hydro Building Systems France Sarl
Hydro Extrusion Albi SAS
Hydro Extrusion Lucé/Châteauroux SAS
Hydro Extrusion Puget SAS
Hydro Holding France SAS
Hydro Tool Center SAS
Hydro Shared Services France
Hydrovolt France SAS
Hydro Extrusion Deutschland GmbH
Hydro Building Systems Extrusion GmbH
Hydro Extrusion Offenburg GmbH
Hydro Extrusion Lüdenscheid GmbH
Hydro Building Systems Germany GmbH
Eugen Notter GmbH
Eduard Hueck GmbH & Co. KG
Hydro Aluminium Deutschland GmbH
Hueck Geschäftsführungsgesellschaft mbH
Hydro REIN Energy Solutions Germany Gmbh
Hydro Holding Offenburg GmbH
Hydro Building Systems Lüdenscheid GmbH
Hydro Building Systems Coating GmbH
Hydro Aluminium Gießerei Rackwitz GmbH
Hydro Aluminium High Purity GmbH
VAW-Innwerk Unterstützungs-Gesellschaft GmbH
Hydro Aluminium Recycling Deutschland GmbH
Hydro Building Systems A.E
Hydro Extrusion Hungary Kft
Alumetal Group Hungary Kft
Hydro BS India Private Limited
Hydro Aluminium Metal Products S.r.l.
Hydro Building Systems Italy S.P.A.
Hydro Extrusion Italy S.r.l.
Hydro Building Systems Atessa s.r.l.
Hydro Aluminium Japan KK
Hydro Building Systems Lithuania UAB
Hydro Extrusion Lithuania UAB
Hydro Aluminium Clervaux S.A.
Hydro Precision Tubing Monterrey S. de R.L. de C.V.
Hydro Precision Tubing Reynosa S. de R.L. de C.V.
Hydro Building Systems France Sarl (Branch)
Hydro Aluminium Brasil Investment B.V.
Hydro Albras B.V.
Enerein Holding BV
Hydro REIN Feijão Solar Holding B.V.
Norsk Hydro Holland B.V.
Hydro Aluminium Qatalum Holding B.V.
Hydro REIN Feijão Holding B.V
Hydro REIN Irupé Holding B.V.
Hydro REIN Netherlands B.V.
Hydro Aluminium Investment B.V.
Hydro Rein Vista Alegre Holding B.V.
Hydro Paragominas B.V.
Hydro Extrusion Netherlands B.V.
Hydro Building Systems Netherlands B.V.
Hydro Aluminium Netherlands B.V.
Hydro Aluminium Pará B.V.
Hydro REIN Boa Sorte Holding B.V.
Hycast AS
Hydro Aluminium AS
Hydro Energi AS
Hydro Energi Anode AS
Hydrovolt AS
Hydro Energi Invest AS
Hydro Extruded Solutions AS
Hydro Extrusion Norway AS
Hydro Kapitalforvaltning AS
Hydro Vigelands Brug AS
Hydro REIN AS
Hydro REIN Holding AS
Industriforsikring AS
Norsk Hydro ASA
Hydro REIN Invest AS
Hydro Rein Norway Holding AS
Hydro REIN Energy Solutions AS
Svelgfos AS
Sør-Norge Aluminium AS
Hydro HAVRAND AS
Hydro Building Systems Middle East (FZC) LLC
Hydro Building Systems Poland Sp. z o.o.
Hydro Building Systems Poland Sp. z o.o.
Hydro Extrusion Poland Sp. z o.o.
Alumetal Poland Sp. z o.
Alumetal S.A
T+S Sp. z o.o.
Hydro Aluminium Extrusion Portugal HAEP S.A.
Hydro Building Systems Portugal (HBSPT) SA
Hydro Building Systems Beograd d.o.o.
Hydro Aluminium Asia Pte. Ltd.
Hydro Holding Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Hydro Extrusion Slovakia a.s.
Slovalco a.s.
ZSNP DA, s.r.o.
Technal Systems South Africa (Pty) Ltd.
Hydro Aluminium Iberia S.A.U
Hydro Building Systems Spain S.L.U.
Hydro Extrusion Spain S.A.U.
Hydro REIN Energy Solution Spain
Hydro Torija S.L.U
Hydro Building Systems Sweden AB
Hydro Extruded Solutions AB
Hydro Extrusion Sweden AB
Hydro Rein Energy Services AB
Hydro REIN Solar Holding AB
Hydro REIN Solar 1 AB
Hydro REIN Solar 2 AB
Hydro REIN Sweden AB
Hydro Aluminium International SA
Hydro Building Systems Switzerland AG
Hydro Yapi Sistem Sanayi VE Ticaret AS
Hydro Building Systems Middle East FZE
Hydro Aluminium Deeside Ltd.
Hydro Building Systems UK Ltd.
Hydro Components UK Ltd.
Hydro Aluminium UK Ltd.
Hydro Holdings UK Ltd.
Hueck UK Ltd.
EMC Ashtabula Inc
EMC Metals Inc
Hydro Aluminium Metals USA, LLC
Hydro Building Systems North America LLC
Hydro Extrusion Portland Inc.
Hydro Extrusion USA LLC
Hydro Holding North America Inc.
Norsk Hydro USA LLC
Hydro Precision Tubing Louisville Inc.
Hydro Precision Tubing Monterrey LLC
Hydro Precision Tubing USA LLC
# 2
The sustainability statements are prepared on the same consolidated basis as the financial statements.
# 3
The purpose of Hydro's reporting is to provide stakeholders with a fair and balanced picture of relevant aspects, engagements, practices, and results for 2024. The sustainability statements are prepared on the same consolidated basis as the financial statements. Sustainability information that relates to business relationships in non-consolidated entities, including Hydro’s upstream or downstream value chain, is clearly identified as such. No specific information corresponding to intellectual property, know how or the results of innovation that is considered material for users of the integrated annual report, has been omitted. Quantitative metrics included in the sustainability statements include a description of reporting principles, measurement and calculation methodology, assumptions and basis for presentation, including an evaluation of accuracy if the data is estimated using sector averages or other proxies and planned actions to improve accuracy in the future. Metrics subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty are clearly identified as such. The sustainability statements, including additional notes and disclosures pursuant to the Norwegian Equality Act in the appendix, are approved by the Board of Directors.
# 4
No specific information corresponding to intellectual property, know how or the results of innovation that is considered material for users of the integrated annual report, has been omitted. Quantitative metrics included in the sustainability statements include a description of reporting principles, measurement and calculation methodology, assumptions and basis for presentation, including an evaluation of accuracy if the data is estimated using sector averages or other proxies and planned actions to improve accuracy in the future. Metrics subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty are clearly identified as such.
# 6
Hydro regularly assesses risk and controls over its sustainability reporting process. The risks are reviewed with the Board Audit Committee and discussed with Hydro’s external auditors who provide limited assurance over the sustainability statement. The external assurance process is risk based, and the external auditors provide feedback on their assessment of risks to the Board Audit Committee and Hydro’s management. The auditors also provide feedback to the Board of Directors in relation to the Board’s review and approval of the integrated annual report. Hydro is exposed to risks associated with incomplete or inconsistent reporting on sustainability topics, including risks associated with greenwashing. There are also risks related to the accuracy of data inputs and manual errors in the reporting process from aggregating data from multiple systems into the corporate disclosure management system. Hydro has developed and implemented formalized processes to determine material sustainability disclosures for the integrated annual report 2024. Material sustainability matters are covered by Hydro’s sustainability reporting manual, which formalizes roles, responsibilities and definitions for the information reported in the sustainability statement. Hydro has also implemented controls based on the assessment of risks in the sustainability statements, including review controls for quantitative and qualitative data in the sustainability statements by business area, group functions and Hydro’s disclosure committee, as well as access controls and automated input controls in sustainability reporting systems. Hydro’s external auditors perform testing on Hydro’s sustainability reporting as part of the limited assurance provided over the company’s sustainability statements in the integrated annual report. The assurance activities performed by the external auditor are described in the assurance statement.
# 7
Hydro regularly assesses risk and controls over its sustainability reporting process. The risks are reviewed with the Board Audit Committee and discussed with Hydro’s external auditors who provide limited assurance over the sustainability statement.
# 8
Hydro’s external auditors perform testing on Hydro’s sustainability reporting as part of the limited assurance provided over the company’s sustainability statements in the integrated annual report. The assurance activities performed by the external auditor are described in the assurance statement.
# 9
The sustainability reporting, covering the contents in the Sustainability statements of the annual report, are subject to limited assurance in accordance with the international audit standard ISAE 3000 (revised), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
# 10
The sustainability reporting, covering the contents in the Sustainability statements of the annual report, are subject to limited assurance in accordance with the international audit standard ISAE 3000 (revised), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
# 11
Hydro regularly assesses risk and controls over its sustainability reporting process. The risks are reviewed with the Board Audit Committee and discussed with Hydro’s external auditors who provide limited assurance over the sustainability statement. The external assurance process is risk based, and the external auditors provide feedback on their assessment of risks to the Board Audit Committee and Hydro’s management. The auditors also provide feedback to the Board of Directors in relation to the Board’s review and approval of the integrated annual report.
# 12
Hydro is exposed to risks associated with incomplete or inconsistent reporting on sustainability topics, including risks associated with greenwashing. There are also risks related to the accuracy of data inputs and manual errors in the reporting process from aggregating data from multiple systems into the corporate disclosure management system.
# 14
Mining - Hydro Bauxite & Alumina, Energy, Aluminium Metal, Metal Markets, Extrusions
Solar sector, Building and construction, Renewable power production, transport, electrification, production of renewable energy and thermal technologies,electricity, real estate, automotive and heating, ventilation and air conditioning, Oil and gas, Coal.
# 15
Hydro’s supply chain Most of Hydro’s suppliers are located in the same countries as Hydro’s production facilities. This includes bauxite and the majority of the alumina, which both are produced in Hydro’s mine and refinery in Brazil. Beyond Hydro’s direct suppliers, Hydro’s value chain cuts across a number of countries, with the characteristics of the global aluminium value chain informing the company’s approach and impact assessments. Mines, refineries and smelters are located only in fixed geographically areas, making selection opportunities limited, which again influence the risk situation.
Hydro is a leading aluminium and renewable energy company committed to a sustainable future. Hydro’s purpose is to create more viable societies by developing natural resources into products and solutions in innovative and efficient ways. Hydro is present throughout the global aluminium value chain, from energy to bauxite mining and alumina refining, primary aluminium, aluminium extrusions and aluminium recycling.
Hydro Bauxite & Alumina represents the first two steps in the aluminium value chain through bauxite mining and alumina refining. Hydro Aluminium Metal is a leading supplier of extrusion ingots, sheet ingots, foundry alloys, wire rods, forge stock and high purity aluminium with a global production network. Hydro Extrusions delivers tailored aluminium components and solutions to customers around the world. Hydro Energy is a major renewables producer, market operator and developer of businesses for the energy transition.
Value chain concentration
Description Hydro sources almost all alumina from its own operations in Brazil, whereby the bauxite mine at Paragominas supplies the majority of raw materials to the Alunorte alumina refinery through a 244 kilometer long pipeline. Hydro experienced in the past some challenges with respect to its operations in Brazil due to a combination of factors involving physical climate incidents, asset integrity as well as a complex political and social environment. In response, the company has made significant efforts over several years to enhance the robustness of its operations in the region.
Consequences Hydro’s integrated aluminium value chain offers advantages in terms of end to end management and product traceability. Value chain concentration also has downside risk where upstream disruptions in bauxite and alumina production could negatively impact metal production.
Developments Significant investments in community relations continue, including the building of a technical school and peace houses. Hydro’s mapping of sustainability trends and expectations indicates that interconnectedness and complexity between nature, environment, and social themes will only increase in and outside Brazil. The strength of Hydro’s integrated value chain is increasingly valuable to Hydro customers that require sustainable and traceable raw materials. COP30 in Belem in 2025 will be an important arena for Hydro to demonstrate how it works in a responsible way, including showcasing concrete initiatives supporting its sustainability roadmap on climate, nature and social.
Mitigation In Brazil, initiatives continue to improve Hydro’s asset integrity with significant investments in its bauxite pipeline, tailings management, wastewater treatment and security of power supply. Alongside this, Hydro also invests in initiatives to strengthen community relationships and reduce its long-term environmental impact. The fuel switch to LNG at the Alunorte refinery came online in 2024, reducing CO2 and other emissions to air. The development of electrical boilers and use of local biomass also reduce the footprint and utilize local waste streams. Mercedes-Benz has joined Hydro in the Corridor program to create a collaborate network that drives local sustainable development, demonstrating the value of Hydro’s integrated value chain from a customer perspective. Hydro is engaged in a systematic dialogue with political, governmental, non-governmental, and local communities regarding the social and regulatory challenges facing its operations and the communities in which it operates. The physical adaptation of assets and supply chain robustness are important mitigating factors against the risks posed by climate change related incidents such as floods, landslides, droughts, the implications these may have on the local environment as well as Hydro’s ongoing ability to operate safely, and access raw materials and markets. Overall, Hydro has a sufficiently long alumina position to provide flexibility and security of supply for its smelters. Commercial activities within alumina and other raw materials provide access to key markets and additional sources as tools to further manage the risk of supply disruption.
# 16
Hydro Bauxite & Alumina
Strengthen low-carbon aluminium position Hydro Bauxite & Alumina is working continuously to improve its position on the alumina industry cost and carbon curves, with Alunorte targeting to move from the first quartile of alumina refineries in terms of carbon intensity, to the first decile by 2025. To reach the targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, Hydro is replacing fuel oil with liquid natural gas at the Alunorte alumina refinery and installing two more electrical boilers that use renewable electricity. This will enable the growth in sales of low-carbon alumina and aluminium at an expected growing premium. See the section on Climate Change for more details. Hydro’s bauxite mine is located in an area comprising primary and secondary forest and agricultural land in Pará State. To minimize and restore the impacts of mining activities on biodiversity, including local fauna and flora species, Hydro has developed a reforestation program to mitigate forest removal and aims to start restoration of mined areas that are released for rehabilitation within two hydrological seasons. In 2023, Hydro increased its no net loss ambition for biodiversity for the bauxite mine. In addition to achieving no net loss for the future expansion of the mine, Hydro will also include impacts that have occurred since 2020 for the existing mining footprint. Hydro also renewed the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway for a further five years, to secure a science based approach to biodiversity management and forest rehabilitation. To reduce the environmental impact of its operations, Hydro has developed the tailings dry backfill methodology at the Paragominas mine, which eliminates the need for new permanent tailings storage facilities and permits rehabilitating areas affected by mining operations faster. Hydro also supports social and economic development in the communities where it operates. Read more about the skills development, community investments and efforts to support just transition in the sections on Affected communities and Human rights
Hydro Energy
Powering the green aluminium transition Hydro Energy’s captive renewable energy production, competitive sourcing of renewable power and energy solutions enable Hydro and other industrial companies to succeed in the transition to a net-zero society. The carbon footprint of aluminium is highly dependent on the source of energy, and Hydro Energy enables the production of lowcarbon aluminium. In June 2024, the transaction with Macquarie Asset Management for the sale of 49.9 percent of Hydro Rein was finalized. Hydro Rein offers renewable energy solutions for more sustainable industries, and the Hydro Rein JV with Macquarie enables further development of renewable power production and pursuit of profitable renewable power projects. To strengthen the focus on Hydro’s 2030 strategy and address challenging market conditions in the batteries and green hydrogen sectors, battery materials and green hydrogen will no longer be strategic growth areas for Hydro and no further capital will be allocated. Battery and Havrand businesses will therefore be phased out. Hydro will continue to support Hydrovolt as an industrial owner in close link with the recycling business and strategic partners. Within green hydrogen, Hydro will continue to test the technology at the recycling unit in Høyanger for internal decarbonization. Energy supports Hydro’s strategic objectives of developing renewable energy solutions and decarbonizing the industry, while aiming to limit impacts to nature and creating a positive outcome for the communities where Energy operates.
Hydro Aluminium Metal
Strengthen low-carbon aluminium position Hydro’s presence in the primary value chain, combined with access to renewable power, are important enablers on Hydro’s decarbonization pathway and key in delivering its low-carbon aluminium Hydro REDUXA. Hydro REDUXA offers customers a fully transparent value chain and a certified carbon footprint below 4 kg CO2e per kg aluminium, corresponding to about one quarter of the world average. By entering into strategic partnerships with leading customers in the automotive, buildings and construction, electricity, and consumer goods markets, Hydro Aluminium Metal works to decarbonize the industries where aluminium is used. Hydro Aluminium Metal has an ambitious sustainability strategy with dedicated roadmaps to address decarbonization, energy efficiency, and impact on nature and circular economy. Hydro Aluminium Metal’s decarbonization roadmap aims to create multiple pathways toward net-zero and to decarbonize both its casthouses through the use of direct electrification, hydrogen or bio-methane, and the electrolysis process through both carbon capture and storage and the development of Hydro’s new proprietary HalZero zero emission process. Read more about Hydro’s pathways to net-zero in the section on Climate change.
Hydro Metal Markets
Strengthen low-carbon aluminium position Aluminium recycling requires 95 percent less energy than primary aluminium production and aluminium can be recycled infinitely without degradation in quality. Metal Markets recyclers offer a range of lowcarbon, recycled products to the customers, such as Hydro CIRCAL, with a minimum post-consumer scrap (PCS) of 75 percent and a carbon footprint of 1.9 kg CO2 per kg aluminium. Going forward, Metal Markets will grow the portfolio of lower-carbon aluminium products, demanding higher premium pricing. This is supported by Hydro’s recycling ambitions to materially increase the use of post-consumer scrap usage. Recycling growth strategy is focused on diversifying and high grading the recycled product portfolio, developing advanced sorting capabilities as well as realizing full synergy potential in the Aluminium Metal network, including the recently acquired Alumetal. As part of this strategy, Recycling has several greenfield and brownfield projects under development. HySort equipment is being installed in the recycling plant in Wrexham, UK as well as in Alumetal’s Nowa Sol sorting hub. Furthermore, Hydro has announced an investment in a new specialty recycling casthouse in Torija, Spain with a total capacity of 120,000 tonnes, including 60,000 tonnes of Hydro CIRCAL capabilities.
Hydro Extrusions
Strengthen low-carbon aluminium position Sustainability is an integrated part of the business and Hydro Extrusions is working closely with customers across most industries to deliver products and solutions that help its customers reduce their carbon footprint and improve sustainability and transparency in their supply chain. This includes the Hydro EcoDesign process which helps customers create better products with increased functionality and a lower-carbon footprint. In 2024, Hydro Extrusions added recycling capacity in Europe and North America through upgrades of existing facilities in Cressona, Pennsylvania, USA, and the addition of a new recycling facility in Hungary. These two projects added 140,000 tonnes of annual recycling capacity, supporting Hydro’s 2030 strategy of growth in recycling. Hydro Extrusions applies additional levers to reduce its carbon footprint, including sourcing of aluminium with a carbon footprint that is lower than average, increased recycling and reducing the emissions from own operations. See the section on Climate change for more details on how the recycling sourcing strategy can reduce upstream greenhouse gas emissions and the carbon footprint of products. Several of Hydro Extrusions’ plants have installed or are considering installation of on-site renewable power generation, while others have signed power purchase agreements with renewable power producers. In 2024, Hydro Extrusions started onsite renewable energy production with battery storage in Sweden and Germany, supported by Hydro Rein.
# 17
Hydro Bauxite & Alumina
Hydro Energy
Hydro Aluminium Metal
Hydro Metal Markets
Hydro Extrusions
# 18
140+ locations
42 countries
Europe -Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Serbia Slovakia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom
Asia and Oceania - Australia Bahrain China India Japan Qatar Singapore South Korea Turkey United Arab Emirates
Americas - Argentina Brazil Canada Mexico USA
# 19
Hydro Bauxite & Alumina
Operations Hydro Bauxite & Alumina covers Hydro’s bauxite mining activities in Paragominas and the company’s 62 percent interest in the Brazilian alumina refinery, Alunorte, both located in Pará State, North of Brazil. Alunorte is the biggest alumina refinery in the world outside China, with nameplate capacity of 6.3 million tonnes per year. Hydro mines bauxite from Paragominas using strip mining technology where bauxite is sorted and crushed before being transported as a slurry through a 244-kilometer long pipeline to its refinery Alunorte, before being refined into alumina. Approximately 30 percent of Alunorte’s long-term bauxite requirements are supplied from Mineracão Rio do Norte (MRN) through an agreement with Glencore and transported to Alunorte by ship.
Hydro Energy
Operations Hydro Energy is one of the three largest operators of hydropower production in Norway, and a large power market player in the Nordic region and Brazil. As Hydro’s energy competence center, Hydro Energy provides support to the company’s business areas on large and complex industrial projects, market analytics, power contracts, supply security and energy framework conditions. Hydro Energy continues development of hydropower and renewables both within the fully owned portfolio and through partnerships such as Hydro Rein. In Norway, Hydro Energy operates 40 renewable power plants, with combined installed capacity of 2.8 GW. In a normal year, Hydro Energy operate 13.7 TWh production, of which 9.4 TWh is captive power. This includes Tonstad windfarm (208 MW/0.7 TWh), where Hydro Energy purchases all volumes and power assets owned by Lyse Kraft DA in Røldal-Suldal and the Stavanger region. In addition, Hydro Energy purchases more than 9 TWh of renewable power annually in the Nordic market, mainly under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) resulting in a total market portfolio of 18 TWh per year in the Nordics in a normal year. In late 2024, and as part of a reorganization plan for Markbygden Ett AB, Hydro agreed to a settlement for its long-term PPA with the company. In the settlement, Hydro is entitled to a compensation of up to EUR 248 million for its voluntary termination of the PPA. The sourcing situation at Hydro’s Norwegian smelters remains robust through 2030. Hydro is actively pursuing available alternatives for renewable power sourcing, including onshore wind, to meet the need for cost competitive power for its industrial operations. Hydro Energy enables achievement of Hydro’s strategic ambitions in renewable energy through focus on core business and through partnerships such as Hydro Rein.
Hydro Aluminium Metal
Operations Hydro Aluminium Metal is the world’s (excluding China) sixth largest producer and supplier of primary aluminium and value added casthouse products. The business area consists of five wholly owned aluminium metal plants in Norway, five partly owned plants in Qatar, Brazil, Canada, Australia, and Slovakia (currently curtailed), in addition to several advanced R&D facilities. Hydro’s total annual primary aluminium capacity is about 2.1 million tonnes. Hydro’s primary aluminium operations extract aluminium from aluminium oxide (alumina) by way of electrolysis to produce liquid aluminium. Recycled post-consumer scrap is also remelted to liquid aluminium which in turn is converted into value added products such as extrusion ingot, primary foundry alloys, sheet ingot and wire rod as well as standard ingot. Hydro’s primary plants have also built-up capacities to process additional quantities of post-consumer scrap in their casthouses, including the purpose-built recycling facility near the primary aluminium plant in Høyanger.
Hydro Metal Markets
Operations Hydro Metal Markets, which is organized as part of the business area Aluminium Metal, consists of the Recycling and Commercial business units. Recycling The Recycling business unit consists of 12 recyclers in Europe and the U.S., producing extrusion ingot and recycled foundry alloys with a total annual capacity of 995,000 tonnes. The four Alumetal plants acquired in 2023 are located in Hungary and Poland, contributing with 275,000 tonnes. In 2023, Hydro started a new recycling plant in Cassopolis, Michigan as well as a new HyForge line in Rackwitz, Germany that have been ramping-up during 2024. The recycling plants provide customers with high-quality, value added casthouse products. About 270,000 tonnes of post-consumer scrap (PCS) was used in Metal Market’s 2024 recycling operations. To secure access to scrap and enable increased usage of PCS, Hydro also owns three scrap sorting facilities with a total annual capacity of ~160,000 tonnes, where 36,000 tonnes come from the Dormagen facility, 100,000 tonnes from the Alumetal Nowa Sol hub and ~20,000 tonnes in the newly commissioned Alusort JV in the U.S. Commercial Metal Markets supplies Hydro’s value added products to a global market through a wide range of product offerings and services, including low-carbon aluminium products. Hydro’s portfolio of production plants allows for a flexible, multi-sourcing system that enables significant, rapid and cost effective volume adjustments for customers. Hydro possesses leading research and development competence in value added casthouse products, supporting customers in achieving their goals and in developing new products. Commercial activities include sourcing and trading of standard ingots from third parties for remelt in Hydro’s recyclers and primary casthouses, and to secure margins through execution of Hydro’s strategic hedge program.
Hydro Extrusions
Operations Hydro Extrusions operates the world’s largest network of aluminium extrusion and recycling plants, counting 70 production sites in 20 countries. Through a combination of local expertise, a global network, and advanced product development capabilities, Hydro Extrusions is future-proofing its customers’ businesses. The extrusion production capacity amounts to 1.4 million tonnes annually, and the market shares are 16 percent in Europe and 19 percent in North America in 2024, in addition to solid positions in South America and Asia. Hydro Extrusions operates 22 recycling facilities in total in Europe, North America and South America. The combined annual capacity of these facilities is approximately 1.5 million tonnes. The business area is organized in four business units: Extrusion Europe, Extrusion North America, Precision Tubing and Building Systems. These units are responsible for their respective value chains, from recycling, aluminium extrusion and value adding operations to commercial activities such as product development and sales.
# 20
Hydro’s downstream operations have a strong local presence in both Europe and North America. Demand in downstream segments increased throughout 2024 in most sectors, except building and construction. Upstream business areas and Energy delivered returns above their cost of capital during 2024, while downstream segments delivered below in challenging markets. Hydro’s downstream segments have a clearer currency profile with a net long exposure to USD and EUR reflecting the main currencies in the markets in which they operate.
# 21
Note 9.1 Related party information As of December 31, 2024, The Norwegian state had ownership interests of 34.8 percent of total shares outstanding (2023: 34.8 percent) in Hydro through the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. In addition, Folketrygdfondet, which manages the Government Pension Fund – Norway1) held 7.0 percent (2023: 6.3 percent). There are no preferential voting rights associated with the shares held by the Norwegian State. Hydro has concluded that the Norwegian state's shareholding represents a significant interest in Hydro, and that the State thus is a related party. Hydro’s share buyback program authorized at the extraordinary general meeting in September 2023 had as a prerequisite for buybacks and subsequent cancellation of shares that these transactions would not result in a change to the ownership interest of 34.26 percent of issued shares of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. Share redemptions from the Norwegian state was carried out at the same price terms as for the buybacks via the stock exchange. The share buyback program authorized at the ordinary general meeting in May 2024 has the same prerequisite for buybacks and subsequent cancellation of shares that these transactions do not result in a change to the ownership interest of 34.26 percent of issued shares of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. Share redemptions from the Norwegian state will be carried out at the same price terms as for the buybacks via the stock exchange. The Norwegian state has ownership interests in a substantial number of companies. The ownership interests in 69 companies are managed by the ministries and covered by public information from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries2) . We have not assessed which of these companies that are controlled by the State. Hydro has business transactions with a number of these companies, including purchase of power from Statkraft and bank services from DNB. Generally, transactions are agreed independently of the possible control exercised by the State. A significant share of Hydro's defined benefit post-employment plans is managed by the independent pension trust, Norsk Hydros Pensjonskasse. Employees managing and operating the pension trust are employees of Norsk Hydro ASA. Their salaries and other benefits are reimbursed by the pension trust on a monthly basis, in total NOK 12 million for 2024 and NOK 12 million for 2023. Further, the pension trust is located in Hydro's head office. Office costs, including heating and administrative services, are charged with a total of NOK 1 million for both 2024 and 2023. The pension trust provides services to Hydro for administration of unfunded pension plans with NOK 6 million for 2024 and NOK 5 million for 2023.
The pension trust owns some of the office space rented by Hydro. The current rental arrangement was entered into in 2015 representing a partial continuation of a rental agreement from 2006, and priced based on market price benchmarks at the time of the agreement in 2006. Hydro has paid a rental of NOK 94 million and NOK 86 million for 2024 and 2023, respectively. The current term of the rental contract expires in February 2027. A new contract for premises in the same office complex covering a ten-year period with options for two additional five-year periods from 2026 was entered into during 2023. Hydro also sold electricity to the pension trust for its operational needs at the same office site for a total amount of NOK 5 million in 2024 and NOK 8 million in 2023. As of the end of 2024, Hydro’s outstanding receivables on Norsk Hydros Pensjonskasse were NOK 2 million, while Hydro’s payable to Norsk Hydros Pensjonskasse amounted to NOK 34 million, all settled in early 2025. Hydro's significant joint arrangements and associates; and transactions with those entities are described in note 3.1 Investments in joint arrangements and associates. Hydro’s relationship with partners in joint arrangements are generally limited to a combined effort within a limited area. Hydro considers the joint venture partners as competitors in other business transactions, and do not see these relationships as related party relationships. Entities that are associates or joint ventures of Hydro’s joint venture Hydro Rein are also considered related parties of Hydro. Hydro has transactions with some of those entities. The main transaction type is purchase of electrical power under long-term power purchase agreements, for the majority of the agreements at fixed prices subject to inflation adjustment. Such purchases will, for the wind project Stor-Skälsjön in Northern Sweden, and the solar and wind projects in Brazil start during 2025. In 2024, some power volumes have been purchased on spot terms at prevailing prices in the relevant markets. Hydro Rein also provided construction services to the Stor-Skälsjön project with a revenue of NOK 101 million in the period prior to Hydro’s sale of the controlling interest in Hydro Rein in June 2024. Some of the board members or their close members of family serve as board members or executive directors in other companies. In addition, some members of Hydro's executive leadership team or their close members of family serve as board members in other companies. Hydro has transactions with some of those companies; however, have not identified any transactions where the relationship is known to have influenced the transaction. Some close family members of members of Hydro’s management are employed in non-executive positions in Hydro. Transactions with related parties are at arm’s length principles. Executive management remuneration is disclosed in the table below. The members of Hydro’s executive leadership team and the members of Hydro's board of directors during 2024 and 2023 and their individual remuneration is reported in Norsk Hydro ASA Report on executive remuneration 2024.
# 22
Significant subsidiaries and changes to the group Significant accounting policies Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include Norsk Hydro ASA and subsidiaries, which are entities in which Hydro has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the entity (control). Control is normally achieved through ownership, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the voting power. Currently, Hydro has more than 50 percent of the voting power in close to all subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are included from the date control commences until the date control ceases. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Profit and loss resulting from intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Non-controlling interests Non-controlling interests represent equity interests in subsidiaries held by other owners than Hydro. Noncontrolling interests are reported as a separate section of the Group's equity in accordance with IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. Results attributed to non-controlling interests are based on ownership interest, or other method of allocation if required by contract. Transactions between non-controlling shareholders and the group Sales and purchases of equity interests and equity contributions not resulting in Hydro gaining or losing control of a subsidiary are reported as equity transactions in accordance with IFRS 10. No gain, loss or remeasurement of values of recognized assets, liabilities or goodwill are recognized as a result of such transactions. Foreign currency translation For consolidation purposes, the financial statements of subsidiaries with a functional currency other than Norwegian kroner (NOK) are translated into NOK. Assets and liabilities, including investment in associates, joint ventures and goodwill, are translated using the rate of exchange as of the balance sheet date. Income, expenses and cash flows are translated using the average exchange rate on a monthly basis. Goodwill is recognized in the predominant functional currencies in the acquired businesses. Translation adjustments are recognized in Other comprehensive income and accumulated in Currency translation differences in Other components of equity. On disposal of such subsidiary, joint venture or associate, the cumulative translation adjustment of the disposed entity is recognized in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal. Business combinations Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations. Consideration is the sum of the fair values, as of the date of exchange, of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued in exchange for control of the acquiree. The fair value of Hydro's pre-existing ownership interest in an acquiree is included in the consideration, with any gain or loss recognized in Other income, net. The acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are recognized separately at the acquisition date at their fair value irrespective of any non-controlling interest, and goodwill recognized to the extent the consideration exceeds identified net assets. The interest of non-controlling shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured as the non-controlling interests' proportion of the fair value of the net assets recognized (partial goodwill method, see note 2.3Goodwill). Non-controlling interests are subsequently adjusted for changes in equity of the subsidiary after the acquisition date. Assets held for sale and Income from discontinued operations Assets held for sale are reported separately in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, provided that the sale is highly probable, which includes the criteria that management is committed to the sale, and that the sale will be completed within one year. Assets held for sale are not depreciated but are measured at the lower of carrying value and the fair value less costs to sell for the asset group. Assets are not reclassified in prior period balance sheets. Immaterial disposal groups are not reclassified. A discontinued operation is a component of Hydro that is held for sale or has been disposed of. A discontinued operation is a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations. Related cash flows, results of operations and gain or loss from disposal are reported separately as Income (loss) from discontinued operations. Assets held for sale, liabilities in disposal groups and income and expense from discontinued operations are excluded from specifications presented in the notes unless otherwise stated.
Significant judgment in determining whether an entity is a controlled subsidiary or not Control is derived from rights. The majority of Hydro’s subsidiaries are clearly controlled through ownership of all, or a significant majority of, the voting shares. For some companies, control is analyzed through understanding the rights derived from the combination of voting shares held by Hydro and other shareholders, and agreements influencing how business decisions are made, mainly in the form of shareholder agreements. Hydro has no significant subsidiaries where Hydro does not hold the majority of voting shares. In some subsidiaries, non-controlling interests holds significant decision rights through the combination of significant, though not majority, of ownership interests, and requirements for affirmative vote set out in shareholder agreements. For all of these subsidiaries, Hydro has carefully analyzed the decision-making process and concluded that the rights allocated to Hydro are sufficient to direct the activities most important for the entities’ return, and thus supports the conclusion that those entities are subsidiaries. Assessment related to the more significant such subsidiaries are discussed below. Significant judgment in accounting for business combinations In a business combination, consideration, assets and liabilities are recognized at estimated fair value, and any excess purchase price included in goodwill. Where Hydro had an existing ownership interest in the acquiree, that interest is also reassessed to determine its acquisition date estimated fair value, resulting in an acquisition date gain or loss. In the businesses Hydro operates, fair values of individual assets and liabilities are normally not readily observable in active markets. Estimation of fair values requires the use of valuation models for acquired assets and liabilities as well as ownership interests. Such valuations are subject to numerous assumptions and are thus uncertain. The quality of fair value estimates may impact periodic depreciation and amortization of fixed assets, and assessment of possible impairment of assets and/or goodwill in future periods.
# 23
Data on employees are retrieved from Hydro’s human resources SAP system. Gender data are based on the employees’ self-reporting in Hydro’s SAP system. Head count per country is based on which country the employees perform their work. Temporary employees include apprentices but exclude contractor employees. Employee turnover covers permanent employees only and includes resignations, retirements and manning reductions, but excludes closures and divestments. Hydro also engages a small number of non-employee workers and consultants that are not included in Hydro's employee data. Data presented represents head count at year end, December 31. See also note 9.2 to the financial statements on the reporting entity.
# 24
Data on employees are retrieved from Hydro’s human resources SAP system. Gender data are based on the employees’ self-reporting in Hydro’s SAP system. Head count per country is based on which country the employees perform their work. Temporary employees include apprentices but exclude contractor employees. Employee turnover covers permanent employees only and includes resignations, retirements and manning reductions, but excludes closures and divestments. Hydro also engages a small number of non-employee workers and consultants that are not included in Hydro's employee data. Data presented represents head coun
# 27
Workers who are not employed consists mainly of contractors, apprentices and agency workers. Apprentices and agency workers are reported as temporary employees in the Own workforce chapter of the Sustainability statements in the annual report and the Country-byCountry report in Appendix to the annual report).
# 28
Contractors are typically hired to assist in operations and handle maintenance of equipment that requires specialized competences. Apprentices and agency workers are mostly employed in production processes, including to handle temporary production peaks.
# 29
Data on employees are retrieved from Hydro’s human resources SAP system. Gender data are based on the employees’ self-reporting in Hydro’s SAP system. Head count per country is based on which country the employees perform their work. Temporary employees include apprentices but exclude contractor employees. Employee turnover covers permanent employees only and includes resignations, retirements and manning reductions, but excludes closures and divestments. Hydro also engages a small number of non-employee workers and consultants that are not included in Hydro's employee data. Data presented represents head count at year end, December 31. See also note 9.2 to the financial statements on the reporting entity
# 32
General information Hydro is a public limited liability company organized with a governance structure based on Norwegian corporate law. Hydro’s corporate governance provides a foundation for value creation and good control mechanisms in the form of global directives that describe mandatory requirements for all parts of the organization. Hydro follows the most recent Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance (NUES) dated October 14, 2021. The Board of Directors’ report in relation to the Code can be found in the appendix. Information regarding shareholder policy can be found in the Hydro Share section of the Our Performance chapter. Hydro’s strategic direction is described in the Our business chapter. Global directives and Code of Conduct Hydro’s governance structure is based on applicable laws and regulations, and Hydro’s corporate directives, with delegation of responsibility to the business areas and to corporate functions whose duties include finance, tax and accounting, social responsibility, environment, governance, legal and compliance. To maintain uniformly high standards, Hydro sets common requirements in the form of constituting documents and global directives. Constituting documents are approved by Hydro’s Board of Directors or the general meeting of shareholders, while global directives are approved by the President & CEO. This information is made available to all employees. Hydro’s governing documents and global directives help ensure that all employees carry out their activities in an ethical manner, and in accordance with current legislation and Hydro standards. The Code of Conduct addresses compliance with laws and matters, such as handling of conflicts of interest and a commitment to equal opportunities for all employees. The defined programs contribute to compliance with anti-corruption and basic human rights, and other relevant governance areas. Hydro’s Code of Conduct is a constituting document and applies to all Hydro employees throughout the world, as well as to board members of Hydro and its subsidiaries. For legal entities where Hydro holds less than 100 percent of the voting rights, Hydro’s representatives in the Boards of Directors or in other governing bodies, shall act in compliance with Hydro’s Code of Conduct and endeavor to implement the principles as laid down therein. For information about Hydro’s Code of Conduct, other constituting documents and global directives see Hydro.com/principles. For information about Hydro’s whistleblowing procedures, see Business Conduct in the sustainability statement. Governing bodies General Meeting of Shareholders Hydro’s shareholders exercise ultimate authority through the general meeting. Persons who own shares on the fifth business day prior to the general meeting are entitled to attend and vote at the general meeting, either in person or by proxy. The General Meeting of Shareholders elects the shareholders representatives of the Board and determines the remuneration of the Board. It elects the company’s external auditor and approves the auditor’s remuneration. It also approves the integrated annual report and the statutory report according to Norwegian requirements, including the dividend proposed by the Board. It elects the Nomination Committee and determines their remuneration, and deals with any other matters listed in the notice convening the meeting. Shareholders may, at least four weeks before an ordinary general meeting, request in writing that a question with proposal for resolutions are submitted to the general meeting, or explanation for adding a question to the agenda. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee consists of three to four members who shall be shareholders or shareholder’s representatives. The members and its chairperson are elected by the general meeting of shareholders for periods of up to two years at a time. The committee makes its recommendation to the general meeting of shareholders regarding the election of shareholder elected members on the Board of Directors, remuneration to the members and deputies of the Board, the election of the members and chairperson of the committee, and remuneration to the members of the committee. The guidelines for the Nomination Committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders and include Hydro’s requirements for independence, shareholder interests, competence, capacity, and diversity. The Nomination Committee consist of the following members: • Berit Ledel Henriksen (Chair) • Karl Mathisen • Susanne Munch Thore • Muriel Bjørseth Hansen Board of Directors The Board held 11 members as of December 31, 2024. Seven are elected by the general meeting of shareholders, four are elected by and among the company’s employees in Norway. All shareholder elected board members are elected for a period of up to two years. The employee representatives on the Board each have a personal deputy. In accordance with Norwegian law, the Board assumes the overall governance of the company, ensures that appropriate management and control systems are in place, and supervises the day to day management as carried out by the President & CEO. The Board has established procedures for its own work. These are set out in the Rules of Procedures for the Board of Directors of Norsk Hydro ASA. The Rules of Procedures has a particular emphasis on clear internal allocation of responsibilities and duties vis-à-vis the Board and the President & CEO. The Board has an annual work plan with particular emphasis on objectives, strategy and implementation. It includes recurring topics such as strategy review, business planning, risk and compliance oversight, financial reporting, people strategy, succession planning as well as health and safety, and sustainability, including social responsibility, climate and environment. The Board is closely following the market and macroeconomic developments relevant for the aluminium industry. The Board works to ensure that sustainability is considered in the company’s activities and value creation, and is regularly informed by the President & CEO about material impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters. In 2024, the Board also had a deep dive on the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The Board oversees that Hydro has appropriate global directives for issues including risk management, business conduct, health and safety, people management, social responsibility and human rights. Impact, risks and opportunities related to sustainability, including environment and climate change, social responsibility, diversity, health, safety and compliance, are integrated into the group’s risk management and strategy processes, and are at the center of the Board’s considerations and decision making throughout the year. All shareholder elected members were in 2024, deemed to be independent according to the Norwegian standards. None of the company’s non-employee board members had any other service contractual agreements with the company. No members elected by and among the employees, are part of the company’s executive management. Employee elected directors have no other service contractual agreements with the company outside of their employee contracts, though they are subject to their duties as board members. All new board members take part in an onboarding process focusing on Hydro’s industries, operating model, risk management and sustainability approach, including its Code of Conduct. Regular orientations and discussions are performed in the board on the same topics. The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of its work, competence, skills and expertise, and cooperation with management. This assessment also includes an assessment of the chairperson.
Board People and Remuneration Committee The committee consists of three members of the Board of Directors. The committee shall assist the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility in relation to compensation matters pertaining to the President & CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT). They also assist in other compensation issues of principal importance, and strategic people processes in the company such as succession planning, leadership and talent, and diversity and inclusion. The committee shall regularly consider the appropriateness and competitiveness of the remuneration arrangements for the President & CEO and other members of the ELT. Board Audit Committee The Board Audit committee consists of four of the Board members and meets the Norwegian requirements for independence and competence. The committee assists the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of the company’s financial statements and sustainability reporting, the financial and sustainability reporting processes, internal controls, systems of risk management, and the compliance system. In addition, the committee oversees qualifications, independence, and performance of the external auditor and Hydro’s internal audit function. As part of overseeing the external auditor’s independence and performance, the audit committee maintains a pre-approval policy governing the external auditor’s engagement. The Board Audit Committee performs an annual self-assessment. To ensure the independence of the internal audit function, the Chief Audit Executive reports to the Board through the audit committee and meets with the Board of Directors for approval of the audit plan and annual report. The Chief Compliance Officer has a dotted reporting line to and meets regularly with the audit committee. President & CEO and the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) According to Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, the President & CEO constitutes a formal governing body responsible for the day to day management of the company. The President & CEO leads Hydro with the assistance of the Executive Leadership Team. The division of functions and responsibilities between the President & CEO and the Board is defined in greater detail in the rules of procedures for the Board of Directors, a governing document established and approved by the Board. The ELT, including the President & CEO, has a shared responsibility for promoting Hydro’s objectives and securing the company’s property, organization, and reputation. Members of the ELT are also Executive Vice Presidents (EVPs) with responsibility for the respective business areas and corporate staffs. The ELT oversees the management of Hydro, including governance processes and business conduct, controls and procedures to monitor sustainability related impacts, risks and opportunities. The ELT is regularly informed about such sustainability related impacts, and risks and opportunities which are considered in all major business decisions, including new projects and major changes to existing facilities. Hydro’s corporate directives and procedures delegate responsibility for sustainability due diligence, and managing sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities to corporate staff and line management in the business areas. Corporate staff and the Business Areas report on Hydro’s performance against targets and KPIs on a quarterly basis. In 2024, the ELT had several deep dives, including, but not limited to, Risk Management, Cyber, HSE, People, Human Rights, and operational and safety deep dives on Energy, Bauxite & Alumina and Recycling. The ELT also received introductions to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Management and Board remuneration Please refer to the Remuneration report for information concerning remuneration and remuneration policies, share ownership, loans outstanding and loan policy relating to Hydro’s Board of Directors and Executive Leadership Team.
# 33
agenda. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee consists of three to four members who shall be shareholders or shareholder’s representatives. The members and its chairperson are elected by the general meeting of shareholders for periods of up to two years at a time. The committee makes its recommendation to the general meeting of shareholders regarding the election of shareholder elected members on the Board of Directors, remuneration to the members and deputies of the Board, the election of the members and chairperson of the committee, and remuneration to the members of the committee. The guidelines for the Nomination Committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders and include Hydro’s requirements for independence, shareholder interests, competence, capacity, and diversity. The Nomination Committee consist of the following members: • Berit Ledel Henriksen (Chair) • Karl Mathisen • Susanne Munch Thore • Muriel Bjørseth Hansen
Board People and Remuneration Committee The committee consists of three members of the Board of Directors. The committee shall assist the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility in relation to compensation matters pertaining to the President & CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT). They also assist in other compensation issues of principal importance, and strategic people processes in the company such as succession planning, leadership and talent, and diversity and inclusion. The committee shall regularly consider the appropriateness and competitiveness of the remuneration arrangements for the President & CEO and other members of the ELT. Board Audit Committee The Board Audit committee consists of four of the Board members and meets the Norwegian requirements for independence and competence. The committee assists the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of the company’s financial statements and sustainability reporting, the financial and sustainability reporting processes, internal controls, systems of risk management, and the compliance system. In addition, the committee oversees qualifications, independence, and performance of the external auditor and Hydro’s internal audit function. As part of overseeing the external auditor’s independence and performance, the audit committee maintains a pre-approval policy governing the external auditor’s engagement. The Board Audit Committee performs an annual self-assessment. To ensure the independence of the internal audit function, the Chief Audit Executive reports to the Board through the audit committee and meets with the Board of Directors for approval of the audit plan and annual report. The Chief Compliance Officer has a dotted reporting line to and meets regularly with the audit committee.
# 34
All shareholder elected members were in 2024, deemed to be independent according to the Norwegian standards. None of the company’s non-employee board members had any other service contractual agreements with the company. No members elected by and among the employees, are part of the company’s executive management. Employee elected directors have no other service contractual agreements with the company outside of their employee contracts, though they are subject to their duties as board members.
President & CEO and the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) According to Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, the President & CEO constitutes a formal governing body responsible for the day to day management of the company. The President & CEO leads Hydro with the assistance of the Executive Leadership Team. The division of functions and responsibilities between the President & CEO and the Board is defined in greater detail in the rules of procedures for the Board of Directors, a governing document established and approved by the Board. The ELT, including the President & CEO, has a shared responsibility for promoting Hydro’s objectives and securing the company’s property, organization, and reputation. Members of the ELT are also Executive Vice Presidents (EVPs) with responsibility for the respective business areas and corporate staffs. The ELT oversees the management of Hydro, including governance processes and business conduct, controls and procedures to monitor sustainability related impacts, risks and opportunities. The ELT is regularly informed about such sustainability related impacts, and risks and opportunities which are considered in all major business decisions, including new projects and major changes to existing facilities. Hydro’s corporate directives and procedures delegate responsibility for sustainability due diligence, and managing sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities to corporate staff and line management in the business areas. Corporate staff and the Business Areas report on Hydro’s performance against targets and KPIs on a quarterly basis. In 2024, the ELT had several deep dives, including, but not limited to, Risk Management, Cyber, HSE, People, Human Rights, and operational and safety deep dives on Energy, Bauxite & Alumina and Recycling. The ELT also received introductions to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).
Executive Leadership Team
Eivind Kallevik President and Chief Executive Officer
Trond Olaf Christophersen EVP and Chief Financial Officer Responsible for strategy, sustainability, technology, risk management, IT and cyber security, supply chain policy, and shaping and safeguarding portfoli
Hilde Vestheim Nordh EVP People & HSE Responsible for people strategy, including health, safety, security, and environment
Anne-Lene Midseim EVP Compliance, IP & General Counsel Responsible for Hydro’s governance system and compliance processes
Therese Rød Holm EVP Communication & Public Affairs Responsible for communication and interaction with authorities
John Thuestad EVP Hydro Bauxite & Alumina
Kari Ekelund Thørud EVP Hydro Energy
Hanne Karine Simensen EVP Hydro Aluminium Metal
Paul Warton EVP Hydro Extrusions
Board of Directors
Jane Toogood Director Non-executive director
Espen Gundersen Director Non-executive director
Philip New Director Non-executive director
# 35
The guidelines for the Nomination Committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders and include Hydro’s requirements for independence, shareholder interests, competence, capacity, and diversity.
All shareholder elected members were in 2024, deemed to be independent according to the Norwegian standards. None of the company’s non-employee board members had any other service contractual agreements with the company
The Board Audit committee consists of four of the Board members and meets the Norwegian requirements for independence and competence.
# 36
Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee consists of three to four members who shall be shareholders or shareholder’s representatives. The members and its chairperson are elected by the general meeting of shareholders for periods of up to two years at a time
The Board held 11 members as of December 31, 2024. Seven are elected by the general meeting of shareholders, four are elected by and among the company’s employees in Norway. All shareholder elected board members are elected for a period of up to two years.
# 37
The employee representatives on the Board each have a personal deputy. In accordance with Norwegian law, the Board assumes the overall governance of the company, ensures that appropriate management and control systems are in place, and supervises the day to day management as carried out by the President & CEO. The Board has established procedures for its own work. These are set out in the Rules of Procedures for the Board of Directors of Norsk Hydro ASA. The Rules of Procedures has a particular emphasis on clear internal allocation of responsibilities and duties vis-à-vis the Board and the President & CEO. The Board has an annual work plan with particular emphasis on objectives, strategy and implementation. It includes recurring topics such as strategy review, business planning, risk and compliance oversight, financial reporting, people strategy, succession planning as well as health and safety, and sustainability, including social responsibility, climate and environment. The Board is closely following the market and macroeconomic developments relevant for the aluminium industry. The Board works to ensure that sustainability is considered in the company’s activities and value creation, and is regularly informed by the President & CEO about material impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters. In 2024, the Board also had a deep dive on the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The Board oversees that Hydro has appropriate global directives for issues including risk management, business conduct, health and safety, people management, social responsibility and human rights. Impact, risks and opportunities related to sustainability, including environment and climate change, social responsibility, diversity, health, safety and compliance, are integrated into the group’s risk management and strategy processes, and are at the center of the Board’s considerations and decision making throughout the year. All shareholder elected members were in 2024, deemed to be independent according to the Norwegian standards. None of the company’s non-employee board members had any other service contractual agreements with the company. No members elected by and among the employees, are part of the company’s executive management. Employee elected directors have no other service contractual agreements with the company outside of their employee contracts, though they are subject to their duties as board members. All new board members take part in an onboarding process focusing on Hydro’s industries, operating model, risk management and sustainability approach, including its Code of Conduct. Regular orientations and discussions are performed in the board on the same topics. The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of its work, competence, skills and expertise, and cooperation with management. This assessment also includes an assessment of the chairperson.
Board People and Remuneration Committee The committee consists of three members of the Board of Directors. The committee shall assist the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility in relation to compensation matters pertaining to the President & CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT). They also assist in other compensation issues of principal importance, and strategic people processes in the company such as succession planning, leadership and talent, and diversity and inclusion. The committee shall regularly consider the appropriateness and competitiveness of the remuneration arrangements for the President & CEO and other members of the ELT.
Board Audit Committee The Board Audit committee consists of four of the Board members and meets the Norwegian requirements for independence and competence. The committee assists the Board in exercising its oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of the company’s financial statements and sustainability reporting, the financial and sustainability reporting processes, internal controls, systems of risk management, and the compliance system. In addition, the committee oversees qualifications, independence, and performance of the external auditor and Hydro’s internal audit function. As part of overseeing the external auditor’s independence and performance, the audit committee maintains a pre-approval policy governing the external auditor’s engagement. The Board Audit Committee performs an annual self-assessment. To ensure the independence of the internal audit function, the Chief Audit Executive reports to the Board through the audit committee and meets with the Board of Directors for approval of the audit plan and annual report. The Chief Compliance Officer has a dotted reporting line to and meets regularly with the audit committee.
meets regularly with the audit committee. President & CEO and the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) According to Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, the President & CEO constitutes a formal governing body responsible for the day to day management of the company. The President & CEO leads Hydro with the assistance of the Executive Leadership Team. The division of functions and responsibilities between the President & CEO and the Board is defined in greater detail in the rules of procedures for the Board of Directors, a governing document established and approved by the Board. The ELT, including the President & CEO, has a shared responsibility for promoting Hydro’s objectives and securing the company’s property, organization, and reputation. Members of the ELT are also Executive Vice Presidents (EVPs) with responsibility for the respective business areas and corporate staffs. The ELT oversees the management of Hydro, including governance processes and business conduct, controls and procedures to monitor sustainability related impacts, risks and opportunities. The ELT is regularly informed about such sustainability related impacts, and risks and opportunities which are considered in all major business decisions, including new projects and major changes to existing facilities. Hydro’s corporate directives and procedures delegate responsibility for sustainability due diligence, and managing sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities to corporate staff and line management in the business areas. Corporate staff and the Business Areas report on Hydro’s performance against targets and KPIs on a quarterly basis. In 2024, the ELT had several deep dives, including, but not limited to, Risk Management, Cyber, HSE, People, Human Rights, and operational and safety deep dives on Energy, Bauxite & Alumina and Recycling. The ELT also received introductions to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).
# 38
Gender balance Hydro targets 25 percent women employees in permanent and temporary positions combined, and 25 percent women in leadership positions by 2025. Hydro’s overall gender balance improved one percentage point from 2023, with 24 percent of the Hydro workforce comprising women at the end of 2024. The share of women in management has also increased by one percentage point in the same period, with 21 percent of leadership positions in Hydro comprising women at the end of 2024
Hydro also monitors gender distribution across additional staffing categories. In women leadership positions, with at least one person is reporting directly to them, we have a target of 25 percent by 2025. We also monitor women in white-collar staff positions. For this group the data include level 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 managers. We have set a target of 35% by 2025 in this category.
# 39
The guidelines for the Nomination Committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders and include Hydro’s requirements for independence, shareholder interests, competence, capacity, and diversity.
Diversity in management
Diversity data for the Board of Directors and Executive Leadership Team (ELT) for Hydro are counted per year end. Diversity in management is reported for levels 0, 1, 2 and 3. Level 0 refers to the CEO, level 1 refers to Corporate Management Board (CMB), level 2 refers to persons reporting to CMB, and level 3 refers to persons that report to level 2.
# 40
The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of its work, competence, skills and expertise, and cooperation with management. This assessment also includes an assessment of the chairperson.
Board People and Remuneration Committee - The committee shall regularly consider the appropriateness and competitiveness of the remuneration arrangements for the President & CEO and other members of the ELT.
The Board Audit Committee performs an annual self-assessment. To ensure the independence of the internal audit function, the Chief Audit Executive reports to the Board through the audit committee and meets with the Board of Directors for approval of the audit plan and annual report. The Chief Compliance Officer has a dotted reporting line to and meets regularly with the audit committee.
# 41
Stakeholder representation: Employees have 4 representatives while shareholders elect 7 representatives. See Our governance in the annual report.
# 42
Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee consists of three to four members who shall be shareholders or shareholder’s representatives. The members and its chairperson are elected by the general meeting of shareholders for periods of up to two years at a time. The committee makes its recommendation to the general meeting of shareholders regarding the election of shareholder elected members on the Board of Directors, remuneration to the members and deputies of the Board, the election of the members and chairperson of the committee, and remuneration to the members of the committee. The guidelines for the Nomination Committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders and include Hydro’s requirements for independence, shareholder interests, competence, capacity, and diversity. The Nomination Committee consist of the following members: • Berit Ledel Henriksen (Chair) • Karl Mathisen • Susanne Munch Thore • Muriel Bjørseth Hansen Board of Directors The Board held 11 members as of December 31, 2024. Seven are elected by the general meeting of shareholders, four are elected by and among the company’s employees in Norway. All shareholder elected board members are elected for a period of up to two years. The employee representatives on the Board each have a personal deputy. In accordance with Norwegian law, the Board assumes the overall governance of the company, ensures that appropriate management and control systems are in place, and supervises the day to day management as carried out by the President & CEO.
Board of Directors’ report in relation to the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance This chapter provides a detailed overview of how Norsk Hydro ASA (“Hydro” or the “company”) follows the Norwegian code of practice for corporate governance (“Norsk Anbefaling for Eierstyring og Selskapsledelse”) (the “Code of Practice”) dated October 14, 2021 (the “NUES Report” or “Report”). Information that Hydro must provide in accordance with the Norwegian Accounting Act, Section 3-3b is also included when this Report is read together with the general corporate governance report. The Board of Directors of Hydro (the “Board”) actively supports sound management principles of corporate governance. The Code of Practice covers 15 topics, and this Report covers each of these topics and describes Hydro’s adherence to the Code of Practice. Shareholders and other interested parties may note that although the Report aims to provide an overview of how the Company has organized its corporate governance, the Report may refer to more detailed information elsewhere in the Integrated Annual Report or on the Company’s website. Relevant references are included throughout, as and if applicable. More detailed information can be found on the company’s website.
# 43
All shareholder elected members were in 2024, deemed to be independent according to the Norwegian standards. None of the company’s non-employee board members had any other service contractual agreements with the company. No members elected by and among the employees, are part of the company’s executive management. Employee elected directors have no other service contractual agreements with the company outside of their employee contracts, though they are subject to their duties as board members
# 44
Shareholders may propose candidates for the nomination committee at any time. In order to be considered at the next ordinary election, proposals must be submitted by the end of November in the year before the election year.
According to its mandate, the nomination committee shall be receptive to external views and shall ensure that any deadlines for proposals regarding members of the nomination committee and the Board are published well in advance on the company’s website. In carrying out its duties the nomination committee actively maintains contact with the shareholder community and strives to ensure that its recommendations are anchored with major shareholders. Shareholders may contact the nomination committee via an electronic form available at the company’s website. The nomination committee regularly has discussions with members of the Board
The nomination committee aims to achieve a board composition that protects the interests of the shareholder community and the company’s need for expertise capacity and diversity. Emphasis is placed on the members complementing each other professionally and the Board’s ability to function as a collegiate body.
# 45
The nomination committee ensures that due attention is paid to the interests of the shareholder community and the company’s requirements for competence, capacity and diversity
The nomination committee aims to achieve a board composition that protects the interests of the shareholder community and the company’s need for expertise capacity and diversity. Emphasis is placed on the members complementing each other professionally and the Board’s ability to function as a collegiate body.
# 46
The nomination committee also takes account of relevant statutory requirements regarding the composition of the company’s governing bodies
# 47
The nomination committee aims to achieve a board composition that protects the interests of the shareholder community and the company’s need for expertise capacity and diversity. Emphasis is placed on the members complementing each other professionally and the Board’s ability to function as a collegiate body.
# 48
The Board has an annual work plan with particular emphasis on objectives, strategy and implementation. It includes recurring topics such as strategy review, business planning, risk and compliance oversight, financial reporting, people strategy, succession planning as well as health and safety, and sustainability, including social responsibility, climate and environment. The Board is closely following the market and macroeconomic developments relevant for the aluminium industry. The Board works to ensure that sustainability is considered in the company’s activities and value creation, and is regularly informed by the President & CEO about material impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters. In 2024, the Board also had a deep dive on the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The Board oversees that Hydro has appropriate global directives for issues including risk management, business conduct, health and safety, people management, social responsibility and human rights. Impact, risks and opportunities related to sustainability, including environment and climate change, social responsibility, diversity, health, safety and compliance, are integrated into the group’s risk management and strategy processes, and are at the center of the Board’s considerations and decision making throughout the year.
# 49
In accordance with Norwegian corporate law, the Corporate Management Board (Hydro's executive board) is responsible for the company's due diligence processes, with the overall oversight by the board of directors. Our process to identify our material impacts is described in the General information chapter in the annual report. See also the section on Human rights of the annual report
# 50
The stakeholder engagement process in Hydro is generally managed at an administrative level in the organization and is a line responsibility at all levels. Under special circumstances the board, represented by the chairperson, may conduct dialogue with investors. The board of directors communicates indirectly - and in certain cases directly - with shareholders through the corporate assembly and directly through the general meeting of shareholders. Through the employee representatives, the board also communicates directly with the employee organizations. See General information chapter in the annual report.
# 51
All elements of Hydro's sustainability performance are integrated in Hydro's overall group strategy. Hydro’s human rights due diligence is integrated in relevant business processes including the enterprise risk management process. Mitigating actions or activity plans are developed and included in business plans in the business areas where relevant. Business plans are monitored, followed up and evaluated through the year in regular internal board meetings.
# 52
Risk management is an integral part of all Hydro’s business activities and decisions. The Board of Directors (BoD) sets expectations, oversees Hydro’s system of risk management and reviews key risks through biannual updates which serve as an important foundation for the strategy and business planning processes. In addition, specific risk topics are subject to more frequent updates. Progress on risk mitigation is reflected in the remuneration schemes of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Executive Leadership Team (ELT). The Board Audit Committee supports the BoD’s supervisory role. The ELT is responsible for Hydro’s risk management framework at group level and assists the CEO in its execution. The framework is based on international standards, and Hydro more specifically applies the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s ‘COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework’ (2013) with respect to Financial Reporting. The further attribution of risk management roles in Hydro are supported by the development of a three lines of defense (3LoD) governance model.
The first line of defense resides with managers at all levels. Business areas and group functions have the responsibility for and ownership of business and HSE risks. They ensure that risks within their respective areas of accountability are identified, analyzed, adequately mitigated, documented and reported. The frequency of updates is dependent on the nature of each risk as well as the pace of internal or external change. The second line comprises governance owners and subject matter experts on different risk areas as well as an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) function. They assess the need for, develop policies and procedures for managing risk as well as coordinate biannual risk updates. More broadly, the second line supports, challenges and monitors the first line of defense. The third line comprises Group Internal Audit & Investigation. This department independently evaluates whether Hydro’s risk management, control, and governance processes, as designed and implemented by management, are adequate and contribute to the achievement of the organization’s objectives.
Through the 3LoD model, major risks are managed according to Hydro’s risk appetite and consolidated at group level through the annual strategy process, with a status update provided in the business planning process, while mitigating plans progress on an ongoing basis. An overview of key risks, including developments during the last 12 months and related mitigating actions, is included below. This overview is derived from Hydro’s risk matrix which facilitates risk oversight and prioritization. Overall, Hydro has seen an evolution of the company’s risk profile rather than a material change, with emphasis on the new strategic direction in a context of increasing sustainability expectations as well as an uncertain geopolitical and regulatory landscape. Despite Hydro’s best efforts, the risk mitigating initiatives may fail or prove to be inadequate to mitigate all risks. As risks increase, decrease, or change and new risks emerge over time, the information contained in this section should be carefully considered by investors.
# 53
Hydro’s governance system is based on the delegation of responsibility from the board of directors to the President and CEO and from the President and CEO to the executive vice presidents (EVPs) of the business areas and to EVPs of corporate functions. Hydro’s governance system is the system by which Hydro is directed and controlled. At the core of the governance system is Hydro’s constituting documents and global directives, including Hydro’s Code of Conduct. These documents include governance of economic, environmental and social topics and describe how legal entities and employees are expected to carry out activities and operations, including the management of impacts.
# 54
The frequency of meetings is reported under Governance bodies and President & CEO and Corporate Management Board in the annual report.
# 55
The annual report 2024, including the Sustainability statements, has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.
Hydro follows the most recent Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance (NUES) dated October 14, 2021. The Board of Directors’ report in relation to the Code can be found in the appendix.
All new board members take part in an onboarding process focusing on Hydro’s industries, operating model, risk management and sustainability approach, including its Code of Conduct. Regular orientations and discussions are performed in the board on the same topics. The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of its work, competence, skills and expertise, and cooperation with management. This assessment also includes an assessment of the chairperson.
# 56
Disclosure of conflicts of interests is a requirement in Hydro's Code of Conduct which is valid even to the board of directors. All board meetings are started by evaluating any possible conflict of interest related to the agenda items. See also Code of Conduct at https://www.hydro.com/governance
# 57
The status of Hydro's AlertLine, as well as significant non-compliance issues, are reported annually to the Board of Directors and every quarter to the Board Audit Committee. The President and CEO reports about critical concerns to the board of directors at a running basis when relevant. See Our Governance chapter and section on Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance in the appendicies, as well as section on Business conduct in the Sustainability chapter of the annual report.
# 58
All concerns reported through the AlertLine are also reported to the Board of Directors at an aggregated level and when relevant also on a case by case level. See the Business conduct section in the Sustainability chapter of the annual report.
# 59
All new board members take part in an onboarding process focusing on Hydro’s industries, operating model, risk management and sustainability approach, including its Code of Conduct. Regular orientations and discussions are performed in the board on the same topics. The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of its work, competence, skills and expertise, and cooperation with management. This assessment also includes an assessment of the chairperson.
The Board works to ensure that sustainability is considered in the company’s activities and value creation, and is regularly informed by the President & CEO about material impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters. In 2024, the Board also had a deep dive on the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).
# 60
The board of directors conducts a private session following each board meeting that includes evaluation of the efficiency of the meeting. In addition, a self-assessment facilitated by a corporate advisory firm is conducted annually. The reviews include all parts of the board's responsibility. See Governance and section on the Board of Directors & Board selfassessment of their competencies in the annual report.
# 61
The Board works to ensure that sustainability is considered in the company’s activities and value creation, and is regularly informed by the President & CEO about material impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters. In 2024, the Board also had a deep dive on the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The Board oversees that Hydro has appropriate global directives for issues including risk management, business conduct, health and safety, people management, social responsibility and human rights. Impact, risks and opportunities related to sustainability, including environment and climate change, social responsibility, diversity, health, safety and compliance, are integrated into the group’s risk management and strategy processes, and are at the center of the Board’s considerations and decision making throughout the year.
# 62
Management and Board remuneration Please refer to the Remuneration report for information concerning remuneration and remuneration policies, share ownership, loans outstanding and loan policy relating to Hydro’s Board of Directors and Executive Leadership Team.
# 66
Hydro analyzed global pay statistics in 2024 and found an unadjusted gender pay gap of six percent. Hydro analyzes equal pay by accounting for factors such as job type, job level and complexity, experience, education, tenure, performance and work location, in addition to gender. The analysis shows an adjusted pay gap of seven percent, due to gender and other potentially unidentified factors. Hydro will address this pay gap and work to ensure equitable compensation for work of equal value. To identify areas for improvement and gain actionable insight, the company conducted a detailed analysis across 42 business units in 21 countries. The ratio of the highest base salary to the median base salary for all permanent employees was 17.4. For more information, see the Remuneration report. See also note S1.6 for detailed pay gap analysis specific to Norwegian employees, based on the Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Act. All Hydro employees are covered by the social security systems in their respective countries. At a minimum, all employees receive (in combination with statutory benefits and social security) business travel insurance, benefits covering work related events (accidents and illnesses), and retirement benefit. As part of the global reward strategy, Hydro introduced a global minimum standard of 16 weeks fully paid parental leave for primary caregiver and four weeks fully paid leave for secondary caregiver in 2024.
# 67
Letter to stakeholders Accelerating the green aluminium transition 2024 was a year characterized by increasing geopolitical tensions and unpredictability. Despite challenging market conditions, we are strengthening our position in the market, supporting our conviction that the long-term opportunities in aluminium remain strong. Hydro is on a solid path executing on our 2030 ambition of pioneering the green aluminium transition, powered by renewable energy. The green transition is progressing and aluminium demand from sectors supporting it remains robust. To realize the low-carbon circular economy is not easy, but we consider the green transition a fundamental megatrend. Hydro will make bold moves and is determined to accelerate the green aluminium transition. Our people are our top priority Hydro’s most important asset is our 32,000 employees. Their health and safety are our single most important priority. Over the years we have made significant improvements maintaining a consistently low incident rate. In 2024, average Total Recordable Injuries (TRI) per million hours worked was 2.0 compared to 2.4 in 2023. This is the lowest level ever reported in Hydro. Despite our work on fatality prevention procedures and life saving behaviors we experienced a slight increase in the number of high-risk incidents. Tragically, we suffered a fatality at Albras in Brazil in July. We use all high-risk and life changing incidents to learn and change the way operations are performed. Succeeding with Hydro’s 2030 strategy relies on our ability to accelerate and grow while at the same time removing risks and driving our level of incidents to zero. The wellbeing of our employees is fundamental to our success. Achieving our strategic ambition of pioneering the green aluminium transition requires significant efforts across the organization. While machines, technology, and solutions can be bought, our people remain the key differentiator. Their competence, engagement and wellbeing are essential to Hydro’s competitive advantage. To strengthen this foundation, we launched a new people strategy in November 2024. This strategy supports Hydro’s overall ambitions by placing leadership, growth, innovation, and belonging at the center - ensuring our employees are well supported and equipped to drive our agenda forward. Additionally, we have a clear roadmap for diversity, equality, and inclusion, reinforcing our commitment to a strong and inclusive work environment. A good work environment leads to better results, and we work systematically to make this a reality. Growth in challenging markets In 2024, challenging market conditions created headwinds in meeting our EBITDA targets. We delivered an adjusted EBITDA of NOK 26,318 million, and corresponding adjusted return on average capital employed (ARoaCE) of 8.5 percent, below our target of 10 percent over the cycle. We delivered NOK 10.1 billion from our improvement program since 2018, surpassing the NOK 9.5 billion target set last year. Our commercial initiatives have generated NOK 2.6 billion in value. These initiatives and improvement programs enhance Hydro’s competitive edge and support earnings resilience across economic cycles. Improved earnings allow for competitive shareholder returns. Since 2019, we have distributed NOK 35.7 billion to shareholders, with a proposal to pay out another NOK 4.5 billion for 2024, representing 50 percent of adjusted net income. We have worked actively on capital allocation over the past years. Hydro’s strategic agenda continues to guide capital allocation and capital discipline remains a key financial priority towards 2030. Sales of our greener products continued to grow in 2024 despite a sluggish market. We have remained steadfast in our commitment to position Hydro for the long term and have invested almost 40 percent of our total capex over the last year in growth and return-seeking initiatives to continue to execute on our strategic ambition of pioneering the green aluminium transition. Reaching strategic milestones The four main pillars of our strategy towards 2030 are stepping up growth investments in Recycling and Extrusions, stepping up ambitions within renewable power generation, executing on the decarbonization road map, and contributing to a nature positive and just transition, while shaping the market for greener aluminium through partnerships. In 2024, we revisited our strategy to ensure it remains fit for purpose in changing markets. While the core elements remain, we did make adjustments to address challenging market conditions in the battery materials and green hydrogen sectors. As a result, these areas are no longer considered strategic growth priorities, and no further capital will be allocated to them. The strategy adjustments ensure more focused capital allocation to more profitable growth opportunities. Adaptability is key, and we will continue to refine our strategy to stay competitive in a shifting market landscape. We are committed to execute on our strategy. Important milestones driving the green aluminium transition have been reached in all parts of the value chain and we are well positioned to reach our ambitions for 2030.
Stepping up growth investments in Recycling and Extrusions Since late 2023, recycling margins have been under pressure driven by both weak end-product demand combined with tight scrap markets driven by low economic activity in key segments for scrap generation. Despite short-term challenges, our conviction in the long-term opportunities remains unchanged. We expect growing demand for more sustainable materials, and we see that many customers increasingly value both reliability and responsible value chains. As customer demand for recycled material is increasing, Hydro is ready to meet this demand with our unique capabilities along the complex recycling value chain. Most importantly, Hydro has developed advanced sorting technology, HySort. This technology, in combination with a diversified product portfolio, allows us to upcycle more complex types of post-consumer aluminium scrap into the highest value products, including advanced and low-carbon recycled offerings. In 2024, we continued to invest in our core competitive advantages in recycling. On the sorting side, we started commercial HySort operations in Hydro’s Alusort JV with Padnos in Michigan and decided to invest NOK 180 million in a scrap sorting facility at the recycling plant in Wrexham, UK. We continued to further high-grade our product portfolio as we opened our new recycling plant in Székesfehérvár, Hungary, and made the decision to invest EUR 180 million in an advanced specialty recycling plant in Torija, Spain. In Extrusions we see current market downturns, but we are continuously improving, modernizing, and optimizing the flexibility of our globally leading extrusion network. Staying competitive requires improvement efforts across the network. These efforts are centered around automation, operational enhancements, and procurement excellence. Managing short-term volatility enables Extrusions to continue positioning for long-term growth with the customers, and three new original equipment manufacturer (OEM) contracts were added to the portfolio during the fourth quarter, accumulating contracts worth EUR 3.5-3.8 billion since the beginning of 2023. Extrusions is experiencing market share growth through our greener offerings in the marketplace. Hydro CIRCAL has been a tremendous success in the market. This is particularly evident in Hydro Building Systems which has been instrumental in shaping the market for premium recycled materials with our Hydro CIRCAL offerings and now raising the bar for delivering projects containing Hydro CIRCAL 100R. In addition, we are investing in press and fabrication consolidation. We are confident that these investments will reinforce our competitive edge, enabling Hydro to deliver more value and meet the expectations of the most advanced customers. Execution towards 2030 is driven by increasing improvement efforts and targeted commercial initiatives. Additionally, we see further potential for uplift from planned growth projects. Executing on our ambitions within renewable power generation Access to affordable renewable energy has been fundamental for our business for more than 120 years and it is at the core of succeeding with our ambition of pioneering the green aluminium transition. We are working on several routes to secure power at competitive prices for our aluminium operations. Within our hydropower portfolio, important projects in 2024 are the Illvatn pumped storage plant in Sogn and one together with our partner Lyse where we have applied for a concession to upgrade and expand the hydropower plants in RøldalSuldal, both in Norway. Together with partners we are developing onshore wind projects close to our Norwegian smelters. Likewise, in the Nordics and in Brazil assets are partly owned by the joint venture Hydro Rein as well as Albras, Alunorte and Paragominas. The aim is to conclude renewable power purchase agreements (PPA) between these projects and our industrial activities, all the time observing prevailing market conditions. Hydro Rein is an important contributor to Hydro’s renewable growth ambition, and we are pleased to have Macquarie as our joint venture partner since late June 2024. Hydro Rein will be instrumental in supporting Hydro with the energy we need to reduce CO2 emissions. Advancing our social initiatives and the decarbonization roadmap We have already reached our 2025 decarbonization targets and in 2024 we hit key milestones on the path to our 2030 and 2050 targets. One of the key drivers of this is the successful implementation of the switch from heavy fuel oil to natural gas at Alunorte, Brazil. In addition to reducing Alunorte’s CO2 intensity, the fuel switch has a substantial positive effect on the plant’s cost position, yielding some USD 160-190 millions in cost savings per year based on forward and spot prices. With the fuel switch and the installation of 120 MW of electrical boilers in 2024, Bauxite and Alumina has reduced its emissions by almost 30 percent against the baseline. We continue to pursue multiple initiatives to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions within smelting, casting and recycling. In 2024, we started construction of a pilot to test hydrogen at our Høyanger recycling plant, we made an investment decision to build a plasma pilot, based on direct electrification of the casting process, at our R&D center in Sunndal, Norway, and we started to utilize biogas at our casthouse in Sunndal. Our strategy outlines our ambition to contribute to the global nature positive goal, and we have made progress in several key areas. We are advancing the roadmap for achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity at our bauxite mine in Paragominas, Brazil. While Brazil remains a focal point, there is also work to be done in other regions. This year, we announced our first no net loss project outside of Brazil, centered around the Illvatn hydropower pumped storage project in Norway. On our pathway in the green aluminium transition, our goal is that it happens in a fair and just way for the people impacted. Our Just Transition framework is implemented across the company. In 2024, we continued to improve our management of human rights due diligence in our own operations, our value chain and affected communities. We also launched the Just Transition Program globally which has led to more than 30 new projects. The aim of the program is to engage employees and strengthen local support to initiatives emphasizing equal opportunities, local resilience, and education. Collaboration is an important mean on our way to a just transition. One example is our customer Mercedes-Benz, which signed on as the first commercial partner in the Corridor Project in Brazil. In collaboration with leading NGOs, we are working to deliver social, nature, and climate benefits to the region surrounding the Bauxite Pipeline between Paragominas and Alunorte. Historic events in the industry have shown that inferior tailings facility management can in the worst-case compromise public safety. The safety of our tailings operations are of utmost importance. We are therefore pleased that in December 2024, we achieved external verification of our Bauxite & Alumina tailings facilities in Brazil, including all Hydro’s facilities in the highest consequence classes, in conformance with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) and our International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) commitment.
Shaping the market for greener aluminium in partnership with our customers End-consumers are increasingly concerned about the embedded emissions of the products they purchase. As a result, our customers are responding by shifting their attention towards how aluminium is produced. We expect demand for low-carbon aluminium to outpace overall market demand towards 2030. Our close cooperation with our customers ensures we stay aligned with evolving demand, supported by a decarbonization agenda which is already delivering results. We also work closely with industry associations to ensure standardization and continuous improvements across the whole industry. Collaborating with customers to develop an early market for our leading products is a crucial element of our strategy. Over the past years, we have entered into strategic partnerships with some of the world’s leading companies. And in 2024 we have made big steps towards increasing partnerships. In July, we signed a long-term agreement that opens for Hydro to deliver low-carbon aluminium for Porche’s vehicle production in the years to come. This business model is a game changer in the aluminium industry, demonstrating how low-carbon aluminium is increasingly perceived as a scarce and valuable resource in the market. We also partnered up with Brompton which launched their line of city bikes with wheel rims made entirely from post-consumer aluminium scrap, in the shape of Hydro CIRCAL 100R. In addition, together with the VELUX Group, we are exploring a potential long-term commercial agreement as they seek reliable access to low-carbon aluminium. We are also working closely with Volvo Group, exploring opportunities for Volvo to adopt low-carbon aluminium, and we have partnered with Siemens Mobility and a national railway company to enable a closed loop recycling solution, integrating post-consumer recycled aluminium into new trains. Further, we are engaged in earlystage discussions about material substitution, including moving from copper and steel to aluminium. Positioned to succeed towards 2030 Aluminium demand is set to increase significantly towards 2050, driven by electrical vehicles, renewable energy, and infrastructure, creating opportunities for Hydro's low-carbon and recycled products. Hydro continue to thrive in a decarbonizing world with certified, traceable, and low-carbon solutions. Hydro is well positioned for its journey towards the 2030 strategy, and we constantly adapt to an evolving geopolitical and macro-economic landscape. Going forward our dedicated employees will continue to push on executing growth, value creation and sustainability through collaboration. Over the last 15 years, we’ve delivered more than NOK 17 billion in improvements. In November, we launched a new improvement program which is designed to be even more effective and visible on the bottom line. This program is built on three pillars: commercial excellence, procurement improvement and operational improvement. The total target is NOK 6.5 billion by 2030. This program will enable us to continue to invest in our growth ambitions in recycling, extrusions, and renewable energy, while continuing to deliver attractive shareholder returns. We experience a growing demand of sustainable materials, and partnerships help us position to accelerate greener earnings uplift. Hydro continues to be robust while improving efficiency and sustainability through technology and innovation. We are on track towards the ambitions in our 2030 strategy pioneering the green aluminium transition powered by renewable energy.
# 68
Hydro is a public limited liability company organized with a governance structure based on Norwegian corporate law. Hydro’s corporate governance provides a foundation for value creation and good control mechanisms in the form of global directives that describe mandatory requirements for all parts of the organization. Hydro follows the most recent Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance (NUES) dated October 14, 2021. The Board of Directors’ report in relation to the Code can be found in the appendix. Information regarding shareholder policy can be found in the Hydro Share section of the Our Performance chapter. Hydro’s strategic direction is described in the Our business chapter.
Global directives and Code of Conduct Hydro’s governance structure is based on applicable laws and regulations, and Hydro’s corporate directives, with delegation of responsibility to the business areas and to corporate functions whose duties include finance, tax and accounting, social responsibility, environment, governance, legal and compliance. To maintain uniformly high standards, Hydro sets common requirements in the form of constituting documents and global directives. Constituting documents are approved by Hydro’s Board of Directors or the general meeting of shareholders, while global directives are approved by the President & CEO. This information is made available to all employees. Hydro’s governing documents and global directives help ensure that all employees carry out their activities in an ethical manner, and in accordance with current legislation and Hydro standards. The Code of Conduct addresses compliance with laws and matters, such as handling of conflicts of interest and a commitment to equal opportunities for all employees. The defined programs contribute to compliance with anti-corruption and basic human rights, and other relevant governance areas. Hydro’s Code of Conduct is a constituting document and applies to all Hydro employees throughout the world, as well as to board members of Hydro and its subsidiaries. For legal entities where Hydro holds less than 100 percent of the voting rights, Hydro’s representatives in the Boards of Directors or in other governing bodies, shall act in compliance with Hydro’s Code of Conduct and endeavor to implement the principles as laid down therein. For information about Hydro’s Code of Conduct, other constituting documents and global directives see Hydro.com/principles. For information about Hydro’s whistleblowing procedures, see Business Conduct in the sustainability statement.
# 69
Hydro's commitments are based on a wide range of intergovernmental instruments. These are described in the respective sections of the Sustainability statements in the annual report and include, amount others, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (for climate change), the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct (for human rights management), the IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability
# 70
Hydro continues to implement Human Rights due diligence in its business processes including own operations, procurement activities and projects, as well as building its internal competence on human rights management based on the OECD Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Human rights related reporting, including disclosures required by the Norwegian Transparency Act 2021, the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018, and the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 are provided in the sections on Own Workforce, Workers in the value chain, and Affected communities. The reporting requirements in these regulations apply to Hydro as an enterprise resident in Norway with total assets of more than NOK 35 million combined with, on average, more than 50 full time employees, a supplier of goods with a total turnover of more than AUD 100 million in Australia and GBP 36 million or more in the UK, respectively. The human rights related disclosures are prepared based on information collected from all consolidated entities in Hydro. Hydro’s Human Rights Policy and further information about the company’s human rights management approach is available on Hydro.com. Hydro’s Code of Conduct sets out the company’s position on human rights in all operations, including the opposition to all forms of modern slavery. Entities that are not fully owned by, but are controlled by Hydro, can have different policies. Hydro expects that their relevant policies are aligned with the ones of Hydro. The Modern Slavery Transparency Statement is approved and signed by the Board of Directors of the parent company Norsk Hydro ASA. See also Hydro’s separate statements based on the Norwegian Transparency act at Hydro.com.
Hydro’s commitment to respect the human rights of affected communities associated with our operations and value chain, and to manage any potential or actual adverse impacts is set out in the company’s Human Rights Policy, which is approved by the Executive Leadership Team (ELT). The operational responsibility for ensuring that engagement with affected communities is conducted as set out in the policy is delegated to the business areas.
# 71
Hydro continues to implement Human Rights due diligence in its business processes including own operations, procurement activities and projects, as well as building its internal competence on human rights management based on the OECD Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Hydro collaborates on industry initiatives and invests in partnerships for supporting human rights and positive social development, such as through its ICMM membership as well as partnership with Amnesty International in Norway
Human rights related reporting, including disclosures required by the Norwegian Transparency Act 2021, the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018, and the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 are provided in the sections on Own Workforce, Workers in the value chain, and Affected communities.
# 75
Hydro’s approach to human rights due diligence in relation to the rights of communities and indigenous peoples specifically is also set out in Hydro’s Human Rights Policy, and detailed further in the Position Statement on Human Rights Due Diligence. Potential or actual adverse impacts on local communities are managed through this process. If Hydro identifies adverse human rights impact that the company has caused or contributed to, Hydro works to cooperate in, promote access to and/or provide remediation.
Specific processes for stakeholder engagement exist in areas of the business where the potential impacts on affected communities have been considered salient.
# 76
Policy commitments are communicated to workers through various training programs, annually. Refer to Note G1.3 on Compliance training in the Appendix to the annual report. Policy commitments are communicated to business partners through Hydro's Supplier Code of Conduct and through regular stakeholder dialogue
# 77
The aluminium industry is subject to a broad range of local and global regulatory frameworks, including mining regulations, tariffs, labor laws and power industry regulations. Additionally, EU climate related regulations such as the implementation of national and regional CO2 taxes and increased attention on similar regulations in the U.S. are at the forefront of the current uncertainty. The growing pressure to meet climate goals is driving the pace of new regulations and their increased scope regarding all aspects of sustainability.
# 78
See descriptions in each respective policy for responsible business available at https://www.hydro.com/principles
# 79
See descriptions in each respective policy for responsible business available at https://www.hydro.com/principles
# 80
See descriptions in each respective policy for responsible business available at https://www.hydro.com/principles
# 81
Hydro continues to actively engage with regulators and industry associations, where appropriate, to ensure that aluminium’s position is taken into consideration. Hydro has been involved in the development of international frameworks on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions as well as raw materials policies supporting the establishment of a level playing field for the industry. For power industry regulations, Hydro engages in various activities to support and promote sustainable energy policies in the regions in which it operates, in addition to securing competitive energy supplies for its own operations.
# 82
Hydro uses stakeholder dialogue and grievance mechanisms to identify negative impacts resulting from its activities and business relationships, and to identify necessary remediating actions.
Hydro is committed to applying ethical business practices and compliance throughout its organization and supply chain. Hydro’s board approved Code of Conduct creates the foundation that supports its efforts to do the right things, and to always act with integrity throughout its global organization, wherever it operates and conducts business, on behalf of Hydro. In Hydro, compliance is defined as adherence to applicable laws and regulations as well as Hydro’s governance documents. Specific policies and procedures as well as guidelines have been established to assist line management to adhere to Hydro’s compliance requirements. Special emphasis is made on reducing the risk of noncompliance within financial reporting, anti-corruption, competition, data privacy, economic sanctions, human rights, security, health, safety and environment. Hydro’s compliance system is based on a clear governance structure defining roles and responsibilities regarding compliance and all compliance related activities undertaken throughout the company. Compliance risk governance owners define group wide policies and procedures and are responsible for a establishing a training and awareness plans. For legal entities where Hydro holds less than 100 percent of the voting rights, Hydro is working through their boards of directors to promote the principles in Hydro’s Code of Conduct and its governance documents. In 2024, Hydro continued to strengthen the compliance program through various updates and improvements. The management of compliance risks are integrated in Hydro’s business planning, enterprise risk management and follow up process, including relevant risk-mitigating actions and relevant key performance indicators. The progress of actions as well as any noncompliance matters are addressed in the quarterly internal board meetings that each business area has with the CEO, and an annual compliance report is submitted to the Board of Directors. The chief compliance officer reports to the Board of Directors through the Board Audit Committee at his own discretion. In addition, he participates in all Board Audit Committee meetings and provides quarterly compliance updates to the audit committee. He also meets with the Board of Directors periodically Hydro monitors business conduct incidents through cases reported to line management, supporting staff functions, Hydro’s grievance mechanism, AlertLine, quarterly and year-end compliance reporting from its business areas, and information collected from Hydro’s legal and compliance departments. Hydro’s employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor, benchmarks employee perception of Hydro’s integrity culture. The score is measured against external benchmarks and is part of the KPIs of the CEO scorecard. In 2024, the integrity culture index was measured again and the scores showed a positive trend since 2020. Hydro is committed to building a culture of trust where employees are comfortable to ask questions, seek guidance, raise concerns, and report suspected violations to the Code of Conduct, applicable laws or regulations or Hydro’s obligations. Concerns and complaints can be raised with local management, but employees may also raise the issue directly with Human Resources, HSE, union representatives, Compliance or Legal. Employees, on-site contractors, and others may also use Hydro’s confidential reporting channel, the AlertLine, where concerns can be reported to Group Internal Audit & Investigation. The AlertLine allows anonymous reporting and is available in several languages. Reports can be made online or via toll-free phone numbers listed at Hydro’s intranet and on Hydro.com. Hydro does not tolerate retaliation against anyone who speaks up in good faith to ask a question, raises a concern, reports a suspected violation or participates in an internal company investigation. For further information about the use of Hydro’s global reporting channel and the AlertLine, see Note G1. The Chief Audit Executive (CAE) is independent from the line organization and reports to Hydro’s Board of Directors and the Board Audit Committee. The CAE participates in all Board Audit Committee meetings and provides quarterly updates to the Committee and Corporate Management on matters reported through the AlertLine and internal audit activities. Hydro’s Group Internal Audit & Investigation has resources in Norway, Brazil, and North America.
# 83
Grievance mechanism Canal Direto is Hydro’s operational level grievance mechanism open to all external stakeholders in Brazil and targeted specifically at affected communities. The mechanism allows community members to raise their concerns anonymously. Grievances are assessed according to the criticality of each case. The process follows the criteria for effective grievance mechanisms set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The effectiveness of the grievance mechanism is monitored through dialogue with the affected communities, monitoring of the type and volume of cases received, as well as through a satisfaction survey for users. In 2024, the Canal Direto registered 633 grievances via telephone, online form and email. Of the registrations, 92 percent were identified and eight percent anonymous. 84 percent were related to requests for information and the most frequently registered topics were sponsorships, job and career opportunities at Hydro, visits to operations, donations, commercial matters, auctions and interest in research, innovation and new technologies. See also note G1.1 for further details about grievances received through Canal Direto in 2024.
# 84
Human Rights Impact Assessment Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas began the implementation of a Human Rights Action Plan to mitigate risks in the operations in 2020. A new Human Rights Impact Assessment of Hydro’s operations in the state of Pará is currently underway, conducted by an external consultancy. As part of this process, a baseline study has been conducted, and the findings and recommendations are expected in 2025. Community dialogue Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas have implemented a structured approach to effective and inclusive engagement with diverse communities in the region. Hydro engages in dialogue with community groups, traditional groups and civil society organizations which represent women, children, human rights defenders or other underrepresented and at risk groups in the local communities. Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives Since 2018 Hydro has supported, by Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives, the Sustainable Barcarena Initiative (SBI) to enhance community dialogue. This is an independent forum to support sustainable development in Barcarena. The overall aim is to bring local stakeholders together to discuss challenges and opportunities, strengthen capabilities and decide about the main social investments supported by the Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF). In 2024, about 178 community leaders participated in meetings, dialogues, or programs organized by the initiative. SBI also plays an important role coordinating the financing rounds of Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF) to ensure Hydro’s social investments meet the local community’s needs. In 2024, HSF supported 36 community based projects. In November 2024, Hydro launched the Corridor Program with Mercedes-Benz. This is a strategic partnership and initiative to promote the social and economic development in the pipeline area, expanding the collaboration to create positive social and environmental impact in the Amazon. Working together with the Brazilian NGOs IPAM, Imazon, and CEA and other partners, Hydro aims to strengthen territorial development by fostering economic opportunities and biodiversity conservation in the communities where it operates, and promoting human rights. The program is aimed at generating social positive impact in the region along the pipeline. The program is in an initial phase and projects, activities and targets are still to be developed. In addition, Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas have a volunteering program for employees to increase internal engagement and address community needs. In 2024, over 3,700 employees participated in the volunteer programs in Brazil. The volunteers organized over 290 different actions, including food basket donations, fundraising, seed planting and training for community leaders. The activities reached approximately 27 000 people.
# 85
Hydro engages regulators, local authorities and communities directly on its environmental management and potential incidents of pollution. Potentially affected stakeholders or communities can use Hydro's grievance mechanism, AlertLine, to report environmental and social issues concerning Hydro operations. Hydro also engages civil society on environmental issues.
# 86
Grievances are assessed according to the criticality of each case. The process follows the criteria for effective grievance mechanisms set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The effectiveness of the grievance mechanism is monitored through dialogue with the affected communities, monitoring of the type and volume of cases received, as well as through a satisfaction survey for users.
Hydro monitors business conduct incidents through cases reported to line management, supporting staff functions, Hydro’s grievance mechanism, AlertLine, quarterly and year-end compliance reporting from its business areas, and information collected from Hydro’s legal and compliance departments
# 87
In addition to AlertLine, the grievance mechanism Canal Direto in Brazil registered 633 reports, of which 84 percent were related to requests for information and the most frequently registered topics were sponsorships, job and career opportunities at Hydro, visits to operations, donations, commercial matters, auctions and interest in research, innovation and new technologies.
# 88
Hydro’s people strategy Hydro’s ambitious people strategy towards 2030 focuses on learning and development, innovation, leadership, and belonging. These global strategic priorities are supported by targets and activities that address the specific needs and challenges of the business areas. We grow Hydro’s purpose is to create a viable organization that empowers people to grow. The company invests in skills development aligned with both business and individual needs to achieve its business strategy and to be an attractive employer. Hydro provides opportunities for personal and professional growth opportunities, aiming to foster a continuous learning culture based on growth mindset among leaders and employees, where learning is integrated into daily work. Learning and development is offered through a blend of on the job training, social initiatives such as networking, mentoring and peer-topeer learning, along with formal learning programs. Hydro’s learning platform offers content from various learning providers and esteemed universities. In addition, every employee engages in an annual appraisal dialogue with their leader to discuss and document development goals and activities. See Note S1.4 for metrics related to completed training activities in 2024. We lead Leadership is a key lever for Hydro’s organizational success. Hydro has developed a leadership framework that combines valid research with Hydro’s unique needs, enabling leaders to effectively deliver the business strategy and embody Hydro’s values. This framework underpins Hydro’s leadership processes, development programs and tools. In 2024, Hydro continued to deploy this framework through its people processes, with established leadership criteria supporting the selection, development and succession of leaders. Leadership development and succession planning for critical positions remain strategic people priorities as Hydro moves towards 2030. To cultivate a strong pipeline of leaders with diverse experience, Hydro aims to rotate leaders across different parts of the organization, and offer development initiatives and programs tailored to the needs of both leaders and specialists. We innovate Innovation is the third pillar of the People Strategy, where technology and digital tools serve as enablers for better decision making and help freeing up time for value adding activities. We belong Belonging is the final pillar of the new people strategy. The ambition is that together Hydro creates a healthy and inclusive environment where everybody's contributions matter.
# 89
Non-compliance cases are normally reported to line management and/or supporting staff functions including Group Compliance, Group Internal Audit and Investigations, Human Resources, Legal, HSE, Finance and Accounting. Non-compliances can also be reported through Hydro’s confidential reporting channel, the AlertLine. Every report made through the AlertLine is classified as a case, meaning that several cases could be related to the same issue. The number of dismissals due to breach of Hydro policy is limited to cases reported to Hydro’s Internal Audit. The number of dismissals due to breach of Hydro policy is limited to cases reported to Hydro’s Internal Audit.
Since 2022, Hydro have had several awareness raising campaigns about AlertLine, which might be a reason for the significant increase in total number of cases reported in the following years.
# 90
Significant non-compliance cases are defined as all material pending or threatened litigation and claims to which a consolidated Hydro company is party. Instances of non-compliance with laws or regulations that have resulted in a fine of NOK 1 million being issued by a public authority, as well as relevant cases that could have a material reputational or financial impact, are reported below.
# 91
Cases are reported by the compliance and legal functions in each business area. Total fines received are calculated based on the monetary value of fines issued in the reporting year. Fines issued in the reporting year may be paid in full or may be subject to further consideration by a court or other legal body.
# 92
Partnerships and third parties Hydro can contribute to responsible business conduct through its regular engagement with suppliers, customers, and business partners. By being vocal about compliance and ESG topics, consistently acting with integrity, following ethical standards, and requiring counterparts to adhere to the same standards, Hydro can have a positive impact on business conduct more broadly. Hydro also aims to have a positive impact on the fight against bribery, corruption, and human rights breaches through participation in partnerships and industry associations, and by actively engaging with public authorities and other stakeholders on these issues. Hydro works through industry and aluminium associations to improve the ESG standards within its industry and to establish a level playing field for global aluminium production. Hydro is a member of the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), which gives the company the opportunity to participate in the development of industry practices on the environmental and social issues and to share best practices. Hydro is also a founding member of the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI). To increase Hydro’s knowledge and secure a science-based approach to rehabilitation, the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC) was established in 2013. Please see the chapter on Biodiversity and ecosystems for more information on BRC Joining forces in collective action is critical in the fight against corruption. Hydro has had a partnership with Transparency International Norway for many years. Hydro is also a member of the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network (MACN), which provides valuable insight into the maritime industry – an important part of Hydro’s supply chain. Through Alunorte, Albras, Paragominas and Norsk Hydro Brasil, Hydro has been a signatory of the Business Pact for Integrity and Against Corruption since 2018. The Pact is developed by the Ethos Institute in partnership with global organizations such as the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, seeking to unite companies with the objective of promoting a more ethical market and to eradicate bribery and corruption in Brazil. Hydro companies in Brazil had improvements in their integrity results reported in the Integrity Ethos Indicators. In Norway, Hydro participates in numerous research, development and innovation projects and centers supported financially by public Norwegian or EU agencies. These include The Research Council of Norway, Enova, Innovation Norway, SIVA and EU Horizon. Financial support from The Research Council of Norway is mainly paid to reimburse R&D costs in projects where Hydro is partnering with academia and research institutes such as the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and the research institute SINTEF. These projects are also often done in partnership with other industrial actors and technology developers in the process industry and energy field. Financial support from Enova is mainly received for projects in Hydro seeking to demonstrate new technologies in small industrial scale. Hydro was in 2024 also partner in 11 research and innovation centers partly funded by the Research Council of Norway under the Centers for Environment-friendly Energy Research: • HighEFF - Centre for an Energy Efficient and Competitive Industry for the Future • InterPlay - Integrated Hub for Energy System Analyses • ZeMe - Zero Emission Metal Production, • NTRANS - Norwegian Centre for Energy Transition Strategies • HydroCen - Norwegian Research Centre for Hydropower Technology • HYDROGENi – Norwegian centre for hydrogen and ammonia research innovation • MoZEES - Mobility Zero Emission Energy Systems • NorthWind - Norwegian Research Centre on Wind Energy • BLUES - Floating structures for the next generation ocean industries • NORCICS - Norwegian Center for Cybersecurity in Critical Sectors • PhysMet - Centre for sustainable and competitive metallurgical and manufacturing industry. The research centers engage in cross disciplinary activities with a time frame of up to eight years, and with a wide range of partners from industry, technology and academia. Hydro also participates in other national and EU-funded R&D projects on post-consumer scrap recycling technology, following market demand for products with a low-carbon footprint. Hydro’s R&D program includes joint projects with external research institutes such as SINTEF, NTNU, IFE and the University of Oslo in Norway and the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Hydro has had a long standing partnership with Amnesty International Norway since 2002. The partnership is based on human rights education and dialogue meetings on relevant human rights dilemmas. Hydro is also an active member of the Nordic Business Network for Human Rights coordinated by the Danish Institute for Human Rights. To contribute to the development and strengthening of the human rights management and procedures, Hydro participates in other relevant forums, such as ICMM, ASI and UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. For information about Hydro’s community investments and social programs, see the Community investments and social programs in Note S3. In addition, Hydro cooperates with global and local industry organizations, NGOs and other organizations. See Note G1.6 in the appendix and Hydro.com more information on partnerships. Public affairs and lobbying Hydro recognizes the value of engaging with public authorities and other stakeholders in relation to the development of various policy initiatives that impact its industry. Hydro interacts primarily with decision makers in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union institutions and the relevant EU Member States. These interactions are mainly related to securing competitive, stable and predictable industry framework conditions, taxes and legislation that affect Hydro’s activities. Hydro’s public affairs activities are generally focused on issues related to energy, industry policy, climate, sustainability, and trade. Hydro promotes its views on issues of importance either through direct interaction with public authorities and other stakeholders, or through various industry associations. See GRI Standards 2-29 in the GRI Index at Hydro.com/gri. In addition, Hydro participates in think tanks, especially in Brussels and Washington D.C., and engage regularly in discussions with various NGOs. Most resources are dedicated to advocacy activities within the EU, Brazil, the U.S. and Norway, through business associations, and to direct dialogue with authorities and decision makers. When relevant, Hydro is in dialogue with applicable tax authorities in Norway, the EU and Brazil. Hydro may also discuss fundamental tax developments and issues with other enterprises. Hydro supports the principles of free and fair trade, and efforts to create a global level playing field. In advocacy, Hydro also supports the climate targets set in the Paris Agreement. Hydro supports market-based solutions for pricing of carbon emissions, like the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). A decisive part of the EU regulation is the ability to compensate for the extra cost occurring within the EU, in order to maintain competitiveness for global industries like aluminium. Pricing of emissions from imported products through the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is scheduled to be phased-in starting in 2026. The reporting period started on October 1, 2023. Hydro believes it is important for the aluminium industry that CBAM is reviewed and tested both before final implementation and continuously during the live phase, that loopholes in the mechanism are closed and that indirect cost compensation remains as an important carbon leakage instrument. The European Green Deal is a roadmap on policies to achieve carbon neutrality in the EU by 2050 and includes policies to develop markets for low-carbon and circular products, in combination with stricter targets for emission reduction. Hydro sees interesting opportunities in both this roadmap, and the Critical Raw Materials Act and Net Zero Industry Act. The political agenda of the EU is shifting. Hydro assumes that the EU Green Deal will be a major building block for the new European Commission, but expects a stronger emphasis on competitiveness, resilience, and defense. The Commission has announced that it will launch a Clean Industrial Deal and Circular Economy Act, including an Industrial Decarbonization Accelerator Act. The initiatives are expected to contain elements that supports Hydro’s strategic direction and 2050 roadmap on decarbonization. Hydro’s position on EU energy policy is that Europe first and foremost needs more renewable energy production capacity, and that market interventions should be temporary and targeted at alleviating costs for vulnerable consumers. In the long term, electricity markets should be allowed to function to provide the right pricing signals for investments in renewable energy production. In Norway Hydro works to ensure long-term predictable frameconditions for industry, particularly relating to access to renewable power at competitive prices and effective measures to mitigate against carbon leakage. In 2024 the Norwegian government entered into an agreement with the main trade unions and industry associations on a framework for the CO2-compensation scheme toward 2030. The agreement included the removal of the CO2-price floor, the introduction of a funding cap at 7 BNOK, and a climate and energy-connection where the companies eligible for compensation is required to spend 40 percent of the compensation on climate and energy-measures. Details on the climate and energy-connection, including what measures that the companies can include, will be set in the Norwegian CO2-compensation scheme. In July 2023 onshore wind-development in Norway was included in the plan and buildings-act, providing local municipalities with effective veto-power. Following the changes in regulation, Hydro has worked to build understanding for the need for more renewable power in municipalities and regions. Hydro has established an office in Washington D.C. with the objective to support Hydro’s leading position in recycling and extrusion business in the U.S. market. Norway signed an MoU with the U.S. government on trade of critical minerals. Hydro supports collaboration on high-standard, market-oriented trade. Hydro is supportive to increased trade between Norway and the U.S., and Hydro will continue to work towards predictable and competitive framework conditions for the aluminium sector in the U.S. In 2024, a total of 16 full-time equivalents (FTE) were dedicated to public affairs and lobbying. This includes persons in Norway, EU, Brazil and the U.S. Within the EU, lobbying activities are publicly reported through the EU Transparency Register. In the U.S., Hydro is registered and complying with the Lobby Disclosure Act. To get an overview of Hydro’s memberships in different industry associations see Hydro.com. According to Hydro’s global directives, Hydro may not make financial contributions to political parties. Hydro has no indications that such contributions took place in 2024.
# 93
Interests and views of stakeholders Engaging with Hydro’s stakeholders helps the company understand what is expected of it, what is important to them, how Hydro impacts them and how Hydro can solve common challenges. Hydro consults affected stakeholders to identify, assess, and manage material social, health, safety, environmental, and economic impacts associated with its activities and business relationships. Dialogue with affected stakeholders gives input to action plans to manage Hydro’s impacts and the views of affected stakeholders are integrated in the reporting on sustainability topics to Hydro management. Hydro strives to act in an ethical and transparent manner, and gather views from interested parties, aiming for a common understanding of the decisions that are made so Hydro can act with integrity in everything it does. Hydro’s engagement includes representatives of affected stakeholders, such as unions, work councils, local community groups and non-governmental organizations, suppliers, business partners, customer representatives, and industry associations. Hydro also engages and partners with sustainability experts from academia, and actively engages users of Hydro’s sustainability statements such as authorities, banks, and investors on Hydro’s sustainability ambitions and progress toward Hydro’s sustainability goals. Information on Hydro’s engagement of affected stakeholders is described in the chapters Own workforce, Workers in the value chain and Affected communities. Stakeholder engagement is organized both at the corporate level and in the business areas through local community meetings, bilateral engagement of individual stakeholders, national, and international multi-stakeholder meetings, and through industry associations. All business areas have a forum for dialogue between management and union or employee representatives.
# 94
Market • Commodity and stock exchanges • Competitors • Customers • Insurers and banks • Partners and joint ventures • Suppliers • Other business relations
Owners Owners and shareholders • The Norwegian government • Financial markets • Analysts • Traders • Brokers • Ratings agencies
Society Academia • Authorities • Industry associations • Lobby groups • Local communities • Media • National and international unions • NGOs • Politicians • Public offices • R&D funding bodies
Internal Board of Directors • Employee representatives • Employees
# 95
Hydro’s engagement includes representatives of affected stakeholders, such as unions, work councils, local community groups and non-governmental organizations, suppliers, business partners, customer representatives, and industry associations. Hydro also engages and partners with sustainability experts from academia, and actively engages users of Hydro’s sustainability statements such as authorities, banks, and investors on Hydro’s sustainability ambitions and progress toward Hydro’s sustainability goals. Information on Hydro’s engagement of affected stakeholders is described in the chapters Own workforce, Workers in the value chain and Affected communities. Stakeholder engagement is organized both at the corporate level and in the business areas through local community meetings, bilateral engagement of individual stakeholders, national, and international multi-stakeholder meetings, and through industry associations. All business areas have a forum for dialogue between management and union or employee representatives.
# 96
Engaging with Hydro’s stakeholders helps the company understand what is expected of it, what is important to them, how Hydro impacts them and how Hydro can solve common challenges. Hydro consults affected stakeholders to identify, assess, and manage material social, health, safety, environmental, and economic impacts associated with its activities and business relationships. Dialogue with affected stakeholders gives input to action plans to manage Hydro’s impacts and the views of affected stakeholders are integrated in the reporting on sustainability topics to Hydro management. Hydro strives to act in an ethical and transparent manner, and gather views from interested parties, aiming for a common understanding of the decisions that are made so Hydro can act with integrity in everything it does.
# 97
Hydro’s engagement includes representatives of affected stakeholders, such as unions, work councils, local community groups and non-governmental organizations, suppliers, business partners, customer representatives, and industry associations. Hydro also engages and partners with sustainability experts from academia, and actively engages users of Hydro’s sustainability statements such as authorities, banks, and investors on Hydro’s sustainability ambitions and progress toward Hydro’s sustainability goals.
# 98
Hydro’s major sites in Europe and Brazil are unionized. Extrusions has a major presence in North America, and 44 percent of Hydro’s employees in North America are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Overall, 67 percent Hydro’s global workforce are covered by collective agreements. Collective bargaining takes place at a frequency agreed with the local unions. See Note S1.6 in the appendix, for more details. In Norway, non-organized workers typically benefit from the same compensation adjustments negotiated at the industry level. In addition, workers on individual agreements may receive adjustments based on company and individual performance, and external benchmarking. In regions where union representation is no
[020010] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-4 Restatements of information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Restatement | Restatements of Information | ||
2-4-a: Restatements of information made from previous reporting periods | ||||
2-4-a: Restatements of information made from previous reporting periods | 2-4-a-i: Explanation of the reasons for restatements | 2-4-a-ii: Explanation of the effect of restatements | ||
1 | 2023 | Ref #99 |
# 99
Hydro’s sustainability statements in the Annual Report 2024 have been prepared in compliance with ESRS. • Hydro’s assessment and presentation of material sustainability matters were updated in 2024 based on the guidance issued by EFRAG. • Consumers and end users are no longer considered a material topic, as Hydro does not have a material impact on, and is not exposed to material risks associated with individuals who consume goods for personal use, based on an improved understanding of ESRS definitions of consumers and end users
• The presentation of material impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) in relation to each ESRS topical standard in the Materiality assessment section is changed to better distinguish between actual and potential impacts, and to improve alignment of sustainability related risks with the aggregated risk profile presented in the Risk update. • The presentation of Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions has been updated to comply with ESRS E1 requirements. Historical GHG emissions have been recalculated to provide comparative data. • Sustainability metrics and indicators that were presented in the sustainability statements in 2023, but that are considered not relevant for material IROs, have been moved to the Appendix. Metrics in the appendix are part of Hydro’s management report, approved by the Board of Directors, and subject to the same level of control and external assurance as the sustainability statements. No material errors in prior periods have been identified, but some minor corrections have been made in individual metrics. Such corrections are described in the note to the respective metrics
[020020] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-7 Employees - Breakdown by Gender | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Gender | Employees, Breakdown By Gender | |||||||||||||||||
2-7-a: Total number of employees | 2-7-b-i: Total number of permanent employees | 2-7-b-ii: Total number of temporary employees | 2-7-b-iii: Total number of non-guaranteed hours employees | 2-7-b-iv: Total number of full-time employees | 2-7-b-v: Total number of part-time employees | ||||||||||||||
2-7-a: Total number of employees | Reason for omission (2-7-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-a) | 2-7-b-i: Total number of permanent employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-i) | 2-7-b-ii: Total number of temporary employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-ii) | 2-7-b-iii: Total number of non-guaranteed hours employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-iii) | 2-7-b-iv: Total number of full-time employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-iv) | 2-7-b-v: Total number of part-time employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-v) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-v) | ||
1 | Female |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
2 | Male |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
3 | Other |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
4 | Not reported |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
[020030] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-7 Employees - Breakdown by Region | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Region | Employees, Breakdown By Region | |||||||||||||||||
2-7-a: Total number of employees | 2-7-b-i: Total number of permanent employees | 2-7-b-ii: Total number of temporary employees | 2-7-b-iii: Total number of non-guaranteed hours employees | 2-7-b-iv: Total number of full-time employees | 2-7-b-v: Total number of part-time employees | ||||||||||||||
2-7-a: Total number of employees | Reason for omission (2-7-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-a) | 2-7-b-i: Total number of permanent employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-i) | 2-7-b-ii: Total number of temporary employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-ii) | 2-7-b-iii: Total number of non-guaranteed hours employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-iii) | 2-7-b-iv: Total number of full-time employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-iv) | 2-7-b-v: Total number of part-time employees | Reason for omission (2-7-b-v) | Explanation for reason for omission (2-7-b-v) | ||
1 | Brazil |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
2 | Norway |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
3 | USA |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
||||||||||||
4 | Other |
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
|
[020040] GRI 2 - General Disclosures - Disclosure 2-19 Remuneration policies | Highest governance body | Senior executives |
---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Remuneration Policies | ||
2-19-a: Description of remuneration policies | Ref #100 | Ref #101 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a) | ||
2-19-a-i: Description of remuneration policies for fixed pay and variable pay | Ref #102 | Ref #103 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a-i) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a-i) | ||
2-19-a-ii: Description of remuneration policies for sign-on bonuses or recruitment incentive payments | Ref #104 | Ref #105 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a-ii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a-ii) | ||
2-19-a-iii: Description of remuneration policies for termination payments | Ref #106 | Ref #107 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a-iii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a-iii) | ||
2-19-a-iv: Description of remuneration policies for clawbacks | Ref #108 | Ref #109 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a-iv) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a-iv) | ||
2-19-a-v: Description of remuneration policies for retirement benefits | Ref #110 | Ref #111 |
Reason for omission (2-19-a-v) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-a-v) | ||
2-19-b: Description of how remuneration policies relate to their objectives and performance in relation to the management of the organization’s impacts | Ref #112 | Ref #113 |
Reason for omission (2-19-b) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (2-19-b) |
[030000] GRI 3 - Material Topics | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |
Disclosure 3-1 Process to determine material topics | |
3-1-a: Description of the process to determine material topics | Ref #114 |
3-1-a-i: Description of how impacts have been identified across the organization's activities and business relationships | Ref #115 |
3-1-a-ii: Description of how impacts have been prioritized for reporting based on their significance | Ref #116 |
3-1-b: Stakeholders and experts whose views have informed the process of determining material topics | Ref #117 |
Disclosure 3-2 List of material topics |
• [030010] GRI 3 - Material Topics - Disclosure 3-2 List of material topics and Disclosure 3-3 Management of material topics |
3-2-b: Changes to the list of material topics compared to the previous reporting period | Ref #118 |
# 114
Materiality assessment Hydro assesses material sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities according to the ESRS concept and requirements of double materiality. The assessment is validated by Hydro’s disclosure committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The materiality assessment is based on input from Hydro’s subject matter experts in group functions for climate, environment, social responsibility, health and safety, communication and investor relations, compensation and benefits, diversity, inclusion and belonging, compliance, and enterprise risk management, as well as input from risk management and sustainability functions in each business area. Involvement of the risk management resources in the materiality assessment process supports the identification and further evaluation of sustainability related impacts and risks. The views of Hydro’s stakeholders are integrated in the materiality assessment that is updated every year. Hydro’s group functions and business areas summarize input provided to them through their engagement with affected stakeholders, and their interaction with external sustainability experts and users of Hydro’s sustainability statement.
Impact materiality is assessed in terms of actual and potential, positive and negative sustainability impacts from Hydro’s own activities and/or business relationships in the upstream and downstream value chain. The assessment of impacts is in accordance with the GRI Standards and OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct. The materiality of impacts is assessed based on the severity and likelihood of impacts occurring. When exercising judgment on whether an impact is considered material, reference is made to the primary consequence scales in Hydro’s global ERM directive. For environmental impacts, reference is also made to the environmental consequence scales in Hydro’s Guidance for HSE Incidents management. For human rights impacts, reference is made to the metrics for assessing severity of human rights impacts defined in the ICMM Human Rights Due Diligence Guidance Financial materiality is assessed in terms of risk of negative reputational, financial or commercial consequences for Hydro that are associated with sustainability topics, as well as potential sustainability related upside risks, or opportunities, for Hydro. The materiality of risks and opportunities is assessed based on the likelihood and magnitude of anticipated effects on Hydro’s performance, financial position, cash flow, access to finance or cost of capital. All identified sustainability related impacts, risks and opportunities, including risks arising from Hydro’s potential sustainability impacts and dependencies, that are considered material for affected stakeholders or users of Hydro’s sustainability statements are presented on the next four pages and described in the sustainability statement. These sustainability related risks are prioritized in the same way as other risks Hydro is exposed to, however, not all sustainability related risks in the sustainability statements are specifically highlighted in Hydro’s aggregate risk profile described in the Risk review section. Hydro’s sustainability statements include separate chapters on all material sustainability topics covered by ESRS. In addition, Hydro has included one Hydro specific sustainability topic: Legacy impact. The chapter for each material sustainability topic includes a description of Hydro’s sustainability context and dependencies (“why it matters”). The chapters also include a section on “our approach,” which presents Hydro’s due diligence and stakeholder engagement on identified IROs for the sustainability matter, as well as relevant disclosures on policies, strategy, actions, targets and metrics in relation to the sustainability topic.
# 115
Hydro assesses material sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities according to the ESRS concept and requirements of double materiality. The assessment is validated by Hydro’s disclosure committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The materiality assessment is based on input from Hydro’s subject matter experts in group functions for climate, environment, social responsibility, health and safety, communication and investor relations, compensation and benefits, diversity, inclusion and belonging, compliance, and enterprise risk management, as well as input from risk management and sustainability functions in each business area. Involvement of the risk management resources in the materiality assessment process supports the identification and further evaluation of sustainability related impacts and risks. The views of Hydro’s stakeholders are integrated in the materiality assessment that is updated every year. Hydro’s group functions and business areas summarize input provided to them through their engagement with affected stakeholders, and their interaction with external sustainability experts and users of Hydro’s sustainability statement.
# 116
All identified sustainability related impacts, risks and opportunities, including risks arising from Hydro’s potential sustainability impacts and dependencies, that are considered material for affected stakeholders or users of Hydro’s sustainability statements are presented on the next four pages and described in the sustainability statement. These sustainability related risks are prioritized in the same way as other risks Hydro is exposed to, however, not all sustainability related risks in the sustainability statements are specifically highlighted in Hydro’s aggregate risk profile described in the Risk review section.
# 117
Hydro assesses material sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities according to the ESRS concept and requirements of double materiality. The assessment is validated by Hydro’s disclosure committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The materiality assessment is based on input from Hydro’s subject matter experts in group functions for climate, environment, social responsibility, health and safety, communication and investor relations, compensation and benefits, diversity, inclusion and belonging, compliance, and enterprise risk management, as well as input from risk management and sustainability functions in each business area. Involvement of the risk management resources in the materiality assessment process supports the identification and further evaluation of sustainability related impacts and risks. The views of Hydro’s stakeholders are integrated in the materiality assessment that is updated every year. Hydro’s group functions and business areas summarize input provided to them through their engagement with affected stakeholders, and their interaction with external sustainability experts and users of Hydro’s sustainability statement.
# 118
Consumers and end users are no longer considered a material topic, as Hydro does not have a material impact on, and is not exposed to material risks associated with individuals who consume goods for personal use, based on an improved understanding of ESRS definitions of consumers and end users.
The presentation of Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions has been updated to comply with ESRS E1 requirements. Historical GHG emissions have been recalculated to provide comparative data
[030010] GRI 3 - Material Topics - Disclosure 3-2 List of material topics and Disclosure 3-3 Management of material topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Material Topic | Material Topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclosure 3-3 Management of material topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-3-a: Description of the actual and potential, negative and positive impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including impacts on their human rights | 3-3-b: Is the organization involved with the negative impacts through its activities or as a result of its business relationships? | 3-3-b: Involvement with negative impacts - description of activities | 3-3-b: Involvement with negative impacts - description of business relationships | 3-3-c: Description of policies or commitments | 3-3-d: Description of actions to manage the topic and related impacts | 3-3-e-i: Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions | 3-3-e-ii: Goals | 3-3-e-ii: Targets | 3-3-e-ii: Indicators | 3-3-e-iii: Effectiveness of actions, including progress toward goals and targets | 3-3-e-iv: Lessons learned and how these have been incorporated into operational policies and procedures | 3-3-f: Description of how engagement with stakeholders has informed the actions (as described in 3-3-d) | 3-3-f: Description of how engagement with stakeholders has informed whether actions have been effective (as described in 3-3-e) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-3-d-i: Description of actions to prevent or mitigate potential negative impacts | 3-3-d-ii: Description of actions to address actual negative impacts | 3-3-d-ii: Description of actions to provide for or cooperate in remediation of actual negative impacts | 3-3-d-iii: Description of actions to manage positive impacts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
List of likely material topics for Mining Sector | List of applicable disclosures for Mining Sector | List of applicable disclosures (Sector agnostic) | Reason for omission (Disclosure 3-3) | Explanation for reason for omission (Disclosure 3-3) | 3-3-a: Description of the actual and potential, negative and positive impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including impacts on their human rights | Reason for omission (3-3-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-a) | 3-3-b: Is the organization involved with the negative impacts through its activities or as a result of its business relationships? | Reason for omission (3-3-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-b) | 3-3-b: Involvement with negative impacts - description of activities | Reason for omission (3-3-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-b) | 3-3-b: Involvement with negative impacts - description of business relationships | Reason for omission (3-3-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-b) | 3-3-c: Description of policies or commitments | Reason for omission (3-3-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-c) | 3-3-d: Description of actions to manage the topic and related impacts | Reason for omission (3-3-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-d) | 3-3-d-i: Description of actions to prevent or mitigate potential negative impacts | Reason for omission (3-3-d-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-d-i) | 3-3-d-ii: Description of actions to address actual negative impacts | Reason for omission (3-3-d-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-d-ii) | 3-3-d-ii: Description of actions to provide for or cooperate in remediation of actual negative impacts | Reason for omission (3-3-d-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-d-ii) | 3-3-d-iii: Description of actions to manage positive impacts | Reason for omission (3-3-d-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-d-iii) | 3-3-e-i: Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions | Reason for omission (3-3-e-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-i) | 3-3-e-ii: Goals | Reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | 3-3-e-ii: Targets | Reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | 3-3-e-ii: Indicators | Reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-ii) | 3-3-e-iii: Effectiveness of actions, including progress toward goals and targets | Reason for omission (3-3-e-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-iii) | 3-3-e-iv: Lessons learned and how these have been incorporated into operational policies and procedures | Reason for omission (3-3-e-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-e-iv) | 3-3-f: Description of how engagement with stakeholders has informed the actions (as described in 3-3-d) | Reason for omission (3-3-f) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-f) | 3-3-f: Description of how engagement with stakeholders has informed whether actions have been effective (as described in 3-3-e) | Reason for omission (3-3-f) | Explanation for reason for omission (3-3-f) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | E1 Climate change |
|
|
Ref #119 | Organization's activities | Ref #120 | Ref #121 | Ref #122 | Ref #123 | Ref #124 | Ref #125 | Ref #126 | Ref #127 | Ref #128 | Ref #129 | Ref #130 | Ref #131 | Ref #132 | Ref #133 | Ref #134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | E2 Pollution |
|
|
|
Ref #135 | Organization's activities | Ref #136 | Ref #137 | Ref #138 | Ref #139 | Ref #140 | Ref #141 | Ref #142 | Ref #143 | Ref #144 | Ref #145 | Ref #146 | Ref #147 | Ref #148 | Ref #149 | Ref #150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | E3 Water |
|
|
Ref #151 | Organization's activities | Ref #152 | Ref #153 | Ref #154 | Ref #155 | Ref #156 | Ref #157 | Ref #158 | Ref #159 | Ref #160 | Ref #161 | Ref #162 | Ref #163 | Ref #164 | Ref #165 | Ref #166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems |
|
|
Ref #167 | Organization's activities | Ref #168 | Ref #169 | Ref #170 | Ref #171 | Ref #172 | Ref #173 | Ref #174 | Ref #175 | Ref #176 | Ref #177 | Ref #178 | Ref #179 | Ref #180 | Ref #181 | Ref #182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | E5 Resource use and circular economy |
|
|
|
Ref #183 | Organization's activities | Ref #184 | Ref #185 | Ref #186 | Ref #187 | Ref #188 | Ref #189 | Ref #190 | Ref #191 | Ref #192 | Ref #193 | Ref #194 | Ref #195 | Ref #196 | Ref #197 | Ref #198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | E6 Legacy assets |
|
Ref #199 | Organization's activities | Ref #200 | Ref #201 | Ref #202 | Ref #203 | Ref #204 | Ref #205 | Ref #206 | Ref #207 | Ref #208 | Ref #209 | Ref #210 | Ref #211 | Ref #212 | Ref #213 | Ref #214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | E7 Own workforce |
|
|
Ref #215 | Organization's activities | Ref #216 | Ref #217 | Ref #218 | Ref #219 | Ref #220 | Ref #221 | Ref #222 | Ref #223 | Ref #224 | Ref #225 | Ref #226 | Ref #227 | Ref #228 | Ref #229 | Ref #230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | E8 Workers in the value chain |
|
|
|
Ref #231 | Organization's activities | Ref #232 | Ref #233 | Ref #234 | Ref #235 | Ref #236 | Ref #237 | Ref #238 | Ref #239 | Ref #240 | Ref #241 | Ref #242 | Ref #243 | Ref #244 | Ref #245 | Ref #246 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | E9 Affected communities |
|
|
Ref #247 | Organization's activities | Ref #248 | Ref #249 | Ref #250 | Ref #251 | Ref #252 | Ref #253 | Ref #254 | Ref #255 | Ref #256 | Ref #257 | Ref #258 | Ref #259 | Ref #260 | Ref #261 | Ref #262 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | E10 Business conduct |
|
|
Ref #263 | Organization's activities and business relationships | Ref #264 | Ref #265 | Ref #266 | Ref #267 | Ref #268 | Ref #269 | Ref #270 | Ref #271 | Ref #272 | Ref #273 | Ref #274 | Ref #275 | Ref #276 | Ref #277 | Ref #278 | Ref #279 |
# 119
Hydro's industrial processes generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that contribute to climate change, primarily because of the energy used in alumina refining and primary aluminium production and the process emissions from the electrolysis process in primary aluminium production. Hydro also depends on energy and material inputs that are associated with GHG emissions in Hydro’s value chain. At the same time, Hydro contributes significantly to climate change mitigation through its production of renewable energy, low-carbon primary aluminium, and recycled aluminium of post-consumer scrap. The aluminium Hydro produces is also a strategically important input material to many technologies that enable the green transition, including the development of renewable energy. Hydro is exposed to climate related risks such as acute or chronic changes in rainfall patterns, flooding, shortages of water or other natural resources, variations in sea levels, storm patterns, and intensities as well as temperature changes. Such risks can impact the integrity of Hydro’s assets or cause disruptions to Hydro’s operations or to Hydro’s value chain. The transition to a low-carbon economy can also pose risks to Hydro, including higher costs for greenhouse gas emissions and production inputs, or changes to market prices for aluminium based products. However, the transition to a 1.5-degree economy also presents significant opportunities for Hydro. Aluminium is an enabler for the transition away from fossil fuels and other activities that generate greenhouse gases. Aluminium demand in sectors such as renewable power production, transport and electrification are expected to grow as companies, states and society work to reach its commitments to reduce GHG emissions. Aluminium can save significant amounts of energy and GHG emissions in the use phase due to its lightweight properties, and building facades in aluminium can lead to lower operating costs and enable buildings to generate as much energy as they use during operation. In addition, Hydro aims to enable other sectors to decarbonize and transform to a low-carbon economy by utilizing its industrial and energy competence to develop renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind, and solar.
# 120
Negative impacts on climate change associated with GHG emissions from fossil fuel use, as well as process emissions from the production of primary aluminium. Value chain impacts on climate change associated with the carbon footprint of raw materials that Hydro depends on in its aluminium production processes.
# 121
Net-zero Hydro Hydro has a defined ambition to reduce GHG emissions from own operations and to reach net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 or earlier. To concretize this ambition Hydro has established a technology and decarbonization roadmap for how to reduce direct and indirect GHG emissions by 10 percent by 2025 and 30 percent by 2030, from a 2018 baseline.2)
Hydro has participated in the International Aluminium Institute’s (IAI) work to develop a GHG emission reduction pathway for primary aluminium production toward 2050 consistent with the Paris Agreement. The analysis is based on the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 1.5-degree scenario, combined with IAI’s analysis of demand in the aluminium market and material flows. Hydro’s net-zero ambitions and decarbonization pathway is in line with IAI’s emission reduction pathway for the aluminium sector and the 1.5-degree scenario. When the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi) has developed a sectoral decarbonization approach (SDA) for the aluminium sector, Hydro will consider verifying the climate strategy against SBTi.
• Net-zero Hydro: Reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 30 percent by 2030 and become a net-zero Hydro by 2050 or earlier • Net-zero products: Deliver net-zero products to Hydro’s customers and reduce upstream Scope 3 GHG emissions per tonnes of aluminium by 30 percent by 2030 • Net-zero society: Use Hydro’s industrial and energy competence to contribute to the transition to a net-zero society.
# 122
Our approach Hydro identifies and measures impacts on climate change by calculating and managing its GHG emissions from all its operations and from material parts of its value chain. Hydro’s methodologies are aligned with international standards including the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and industry standards from the International Aluminium Institute (IAI). Hydro engages with a broad set of stakeholders on climate related issues, including industry organizations, international standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union. Strategy and transition plan Hydro’s climate strategy and transition plan is an integral part of its overall business strategy. Hydro’s net-zero ambitions are based on a successful transition to a 1.5-degree economy, and are in line with climate science and the Paris agreement. Hydro’s climate strategy consists of three pillars, aiming to reduce the climate impact of its operations and create business opportunities by enabling its customers and society to do the same: • Net-zero Hydro: Reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 30 percent by 2030 and become a net-zero Hydro by 2050 or earlier • Net-zero products: Deliver net-zero products to Hydro’s customers and reduce upstream Scope 3 GHG emissions per tonnes of aluminium by 30 percent by 2030 • Net-zero society: Use Hydro’s industrial and energy competence to contribute to the transition to a net-zero society The climate strategy is integrated in the ELT’s remuneration and followed up as a quarterly KPI on the CEO’s balanced scorecard. See the remuneration report for more information. Hydro’s climate strategy is integrated in the overall strategy as set by the Executive Leadership Team. The business areas are responsible for Hydro’s performance and implementation of the climate strategy. All significant investment decisions are assessed for their impact on Hydro’s climate strategy according to Hydro’s policies addressing climate change mitigation. A thorough description of Hydro's climate related impacts and how Hydro works to prevent, mitigate and remediate these, is provided in the white paper 'Positioning Hydro for the just and green transition' from 2025.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) – Decarbonizing existing operations To accelerate decarbonization of the aluminium industry and make Hydro’s existing aluminium smelters fit for the future, Hydro is developing carbon capture and storage (CCS) solutions that can be retrofitted into aluminium plants already in operation. Through capturing off-gases at Hydro’s existing smelters, the company aims to reduce emissions from the electrolysis process. In addition, and as a supplement, Hydro is exploring options for direct air capture (DAC) units at its smelters. For some capture technologies, this has the advantage that process heat can be recovered for use in the DAC unit, lowering power demand and operational costs. Hydro has evaluated more than 50 CCS technologies and developed a roadmap for testing and piloting the most promising up to industrial scale. The most likely outcome will be a combination of off-gas capture and direct air capture to eliminate 100 percent of the emissions. 2. HalZero chloride process – Decarbonizing new smelter capacity HalZero is a new production process for primary aluminium that emits oxygen instead of carbon dioxide (CO2). In the HalZero process, alumina is chlorinated and becomes aluminium chloride. Through closed loop processes, the electrolysis will be greenhouse gas emission free. The HalZero process differs significantly from the current production of primary aluminium and is being developed for use in new production facilities. Construction of Hydro’s HalZero test facility in Porsgrunn, Norway, is proceeding according to plan. For the next step, the feasibility study is ongoing and the project will proceed through the next phases towards construction of an industrial scale pilot facility by 2030. The HalZero process will be applicable for greenfield aluminium plants or brownfield replacement of obsolete potlines, where the smelter infrastructure can be re-used. This way Hydro can fully decarbonize the smelting process by eliminating emissions from both electrolysis and anode baking. 3. Net-Zero aluminium through scaling up volumes of post-consumer scrap (PCS) Aluminium recycling requires 95 percent less energy than the production of primary aluminium while still offering high-quality aluminium. Hydro is developing recycling technology and low-carbon products based on post-consumer scrap (PCS), and plans to improve its recycling capacity to sort and utilize more complex PCS aluminium. Hydro has already produced Hydro CIRCAL, which is a certified recycled and low-carbon product, with more than 75 percent PCS. Hydro CIRCAL has a market leading CO2 footprint of 1.9 kg of CO2e/kg aluminium, down from previously being 2.3 kg of CO2e/kg. This is done through advances in sourcing, sorting and traceability of post-consumer aluminium scrap. At Hydro’s recycling plant in Clervaux in Luxembourg, the company has also produced 130 tonnes of near-zero carbon aluminium with 100 percent post-consumer aluminium scrap, Hydro CIRCAL 100R, with a carbon footprint below 0.5 kg CO2e per kg aluminium. Hydro will make key capacity investments over the medium term to ensure its recycling portfolio can facilitate the increasing demand for Hydro CIRCAL and invest in technologies to increase usage of endconsumer scrap while securing access to scrap. Hydro has continued to strengthen its recycling position in 2024 by opening a new aluminium recycling plant in Szekesfehervar in Hungary with capacity of 90,000 tonnes, investing in a new recycling facility in Høyanger in Norway with capacity of 36,000 tonnes and investments in upgrading the recycling facility in Atessa in Italy to further increase the recycling capacity. Please see the Resource use and circular economy chapter for more information about recycling.
Hydro REDUXA is Hydro’s other brand of low-carbon aluminium using renewable energy from water, wind and solar in the production phase. This can reduce the full value chain carbon footprint per kg of aluminium to 4.0 kgCO2e per kilo aluminium, which is significantly less than the global average of 14.8. The production capacity for near-zero carbon aluminium will be developed in line with market demand for this near zero-carbon aluminium. This is also reflected in the ambition to deliver Hydro REDUXA 2.0 with a carbon footprint of less than 2 tonnes of CO2e per mt of aluminium by 2030. Hydro CIRCAL and Hydro REDUXA supports both margin and volume growth. Hydro earns additional premiums or volume commitments on its low-carbon products, and many customers choose Hydro’s aluminium due to its low-carbon footprint. Greener sourcing and scope 3 emissions Hydro reports Scope 3 emissions based on the guidelines issues by the International Aluminium Institute (IAI) Scope 3 Tool Guidance. Hydro is a large purchaser of raw materials and energy, including aluminium and the metal required for alloys. The aluminium Hydro purchases externally to supply its casthouses, recyclers and extrusion plants, and the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of this aluminium, makes up the majority of Hydro’s scope 3 emissions. As Hydro considers the carbon footprint of process scrap as equal to its metal origin, Hydro’s upstream scope 3 emissions are significant when including externally sourced metal. Hydro aims to source aluminium metal with a lower-carbon footprint and to increase the use of post-consumer scrap in its metal production. In 2022, Hydro set emissions reduction targets for upstream scope 3 emissions to reduce total upstream scope 3 emissions by 15 percent by 2030, and to reduce upstream scope 3 emissions per tonne aluminium delivered to the market by 30 percent by 2030. Both targets refer to a 2018 baseline. Downstream scope 3 emissions were not included in the targets as these emissions are more difficult to influence and control, and since upstream emissions represents 93 percent of the total scope 3 emissions. The 2024 results show that Hydro has reduced its total upstream scope 3 emissions by 44 percent, compared to the 2018 baseline. Per tonnes aluminium delivered to market, Hydro has already reduced its emissions by 40 percent. The reductions are mainly due to more conscious sourcing of metal, but also due to less volumes in Extrusions. Going forward, upstream scope 3 emissions may increase, both in total and per tonne, due to higher activity and thus more external metal input. Hydro is currently considering setting a net-zero target also for upstream scope 3 emissions. Net-zero society Net-zero society is an important pillar in Hydro’s climate strategy, with a defined ambition to use Hydro’s competence and capabilities to enable a net-zero society. The transition to a net-zero society must be a just and fair transition, which means a transition that is as fair and inclusive as possible to everyone concerned. Hydro’s approach to a just transition is further described in the chapters on Own workforce, Workers in the value chain and Affected communities. To move to a net-zero society, the world needs more renewable electricity generation and mechanisms to store that energy. Hydro is investing in renewable energy solutions, including projects that increase renewable electricity generation capacity and technologies to store energy. In addition, low-carbon aluminium is an enabling material for the green transition in different markets. Hydro Rein Hydro Rein is a leading provider of renewable energy solutions to industry. Hydro Rein supports Hydro and other industrial companies to decarbonize through large renewables energy projects in addition to onsite generation, energy efficiency, energy storage and flexibility management. Hydro Rein currently has a diversified portfolio of more than 60 renewable energy projects in core markets in the Nordics and Brazil, in addition to a pipeline of energy solutions projects in Europe and North America. During second quarter 2024, Hydro Rein and Macquarie Asset Management became partners to further accelerate Hydro Rein's growth in renewable energy. The two companies were already partners in a large-scale onshore wind farm in the northeast of Brazil which became commercially operational in fourth quarter 2024 and is estimated to avoid 11,767 KT CO2e over the project life. Through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), this project will supply electricity to Hydro’s bauxite mine in Paragominas and its alumina refinery in Alunorte in order to reach Hydro’s GHG reduction target. Hydro has been partnering with Macquarie since 2017 to enable the development of renewable energy capacity. Batteries The Batteries business unit in Hydro Energy was established in 2020 with an ambition to invest and grow sustainable battery materials companies. The portfolio includes Hydrovolt, E-magy, Lithium de France, Northvolt, Corvus and Vianode. In fourth quarter 2024, Hydro increased the ownership of Hydrovolt to 68 percent. To strengthen the focus on Hydro’s 2030 strategy and address challenging market conditions in the batteries sectors, battery materials will no longer be strategic growth areas for Hydro and the Batteries businesses unit will therefore be phased out.
# 123
Hydro is working to assess the potential consequences and necessary mitigating actions, and plans needed to adapt for climate change. The findings from the updated climate assessment are being integrated in Hydro’s risk management system. Several of Hydro’s assets have already undertaken significant upgrades to manage climate related risks such as the effects of increased precipitation and associated flood risks.
Market risk Hydro will benefit from increased demand for low-carbon aluminium, as customers decarbonize their value chains. The demand for lowcarbon aluminium is expected to grow at a higher rate than the overall demand for aluminium. In parallel, demand for (low-carbon) aluminium could strengthen further as aluminium substitutes steel, copper or other metals, in sectors such as production of renewable energy and thermal technologies, transport, construction and real estate. In an opposite scenario, the demand for aluminium could decline if Hydro does not succeed with the decarbonization of its value chain in line with its technology roadmap for net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. If Hydro fails to develop and implement HalZero, or other electrolysis technology while competing industries succeed in their decarbonization efforts, this could result in decreased demand for aluminium as steel or other metals substitute aluminium. Similar risks apply if Hydro does not succeed with retrofitting carbon capture at existing facilities. This can impact the value of Hydro’s existing aluminium smelters.
Technology risk New technology must be developed and implemented for production of primary aluminium in a net-zero GHG emission economy. Hydro is developing new, emission free, technology for use in future aluminium production facilities. In addition, Hydro is assessing options to implement carbon capture solutions at the existing smelters. For Hydro to retain the strategic benefit of lower-carbon emissions, developing technology that can be fitted to existing production facilities at an affordable price is important, and not succeeding in this constitutes a technological risk. In other parts of Hydro’s value chain, the company can achieve net-zero emissions with existing technologies, provided sufficient renewable energy is available at competitive prices in the regions. Potential carbon lock-in in the aluminium value chain Carbon lock-in occurs when fossil fuel assets continue to be used, despite the possibility to substituting them with low-emission alternatives. For Hydro, carbon lock-in is primarily a risk associated with fossil fuel dependencies in the production of the electricity used for aluminium production. At Hydro’s joint venture in Qatalum, Qatar, the electricity used for primary aluminium production is provided from an integrated natural gas-fired plant. The fuel switch project in Alunorte is an intermediate step towards full decarbonization of alumina refining by 2040 and this is therefore not considered as a long-term lock-in effect on GHG emissions
# 124
Climate related physical risks refer to the impact on business performance by climate related acute and/or chronic changes in rainfall patterns, flooding, shortages of water or other natural resources, variations in sea levels, storm patterns and intensities as well as temperatures. Such risks can result in flooding of facilities, interruptions to production processes, infrastructure failures and potential accidents. To understand and mitigate climate related physical risks for Hydro’s operations, the company has performed several climate risk assessments. In 2018, Hydro modelled future weather patterns and their impact on its facilities based on climate models and scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In 2023, Hydro updated the physical climate risk assessment, which included modelling the risk of climate related events in the current situation, in addition to RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in a 2030, 2040 and 2050 scenario.
Climate change adaptation and the transition to a 1.5-degree economy poses both opportunities and risks to Hydro. The company has assessed regulatory risks, market risks and technology risks consistent with a 1.5-degree scenario. As a result, Hydro’s long-term positioning, and operational and financial planning, reflect the company’s assessment of transition risks in a 1.5-degree scenario. The transition can lead to stricter regulations and more ambitious climate targets may drive costs within parts of Hydro’s asset base. The overall portfolio will likely benefit from such trends, as it will increase the demand and value of Hydro’s low-carbon products and portfolio. Aluminium is widely acknowledged as an enabler for the green transition and the low-carbon aluminium Hydro produces is a key lever to reduce scope 3 emissions for customers across several industry sectors. Hydro is well positioned to benefit from the transition to netzero GHG emissions and generates significantly lower GHG emissions than the industry average. The average carbon intensity of Hydro’s aluminium production is below the 2030 and 2035 targets in the 1.5 degree scenario that the International Aluminium Institute has defined for the aluminium industry. The carbon footprint of aluminium production is highly dependent on the source of electricity used to produce the metal. Hydro’s footprint reflects the fact that the majority of its primary production facilities use electricity from renewable sources.
Regulatory risks As the aluminium and alumina markets are global markets, relative competition between countries and regions influences which production sites will be viable in the future. In general, Hydro will benefit from globally aligned initiatives which sets a price on CO2 emissions and supports renewable energy use. Additionally, regulatory initiatives providing low-emission energy at competitive prices will benefit Hydro's existing production facilities. In the opposite scenario, Hydro will have a disadvantage if significant carbon taxes are imposed on emissions in countries or regions where Hydro’s production is placed, while similar regulation is not introduced in competing regions. Situations with severe limitations in availability of renewable electricity where Hydro’s production facilities are located will be a disadvantage for the company’s aluminium related assets. Hydro’s energy producing assets are renewable only, with the majority being hydropower in Norway. Hydro is also engaged in production of power from solar and wind resources, currently mainly in partnership with other companies and the majority of the projects are in development phase. These assets will benefit from stricter regulations on CO2 emissions. However, specific regulations might impact the competitiveness and value of individual facilities.
Internal carbon pricing A large amount of Hydro’s aluminium operations falls within the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Hydro purchases and surrenders allowances (EUAs) to fulfil the company’s compliance obligations under the EU ETS, and receives a proportion of free EUAs. The amount of purchased and received EUAs is publicly available information at a national level by the respective local EU ETS authorities. Hydro uses the EU ETS carbon price in internal decision making processes inside and outside of the EU/EEA, and the cost of carbon is integrated in financial and operational decisions. By including a carbon price in Hydro’s analysis, costs related to CO2 emissions become a variable operational cost at plant level and CO2 price expectations influence future investment decisions. Hydro's part owned primary aluminium producer, Alouette, is also subject to carbon market compliance obligations (under the Québec cap-and-trade system which is part of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI)).
# 125
Hydro identifies and measures impacts on climate change by calculating and managing its GHG emissions from all its operations and from material parts of its value chain. Hydro’s methodologies are aligned with international standards including the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and industry standards from the International Aluminium Institute (IAI). Hydro engages with a broad set of stakeholders on climate related issues, including industry organizations, international standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union.
To understand and mitigate climate related physical risks for Hydro’s operations, the company has performed several climate risk assessments. In 2018, Hydro modelled future weather patterns and their impact on its facilities based on climate models and scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In 2023, Hydro updated the physical climate risk assessment, which included modelling the risk of climate related events in the current situation, in addition to RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in a 2030, 2040 and 2050 scenario. Hydro is working to assess the potential consequences and necessary mitigating actions, and plans needed to adapt for climate change. The findings from the updated climate assessment are being integrated in Hydro’s risk management system. Several of Hydro’s assets have already undertaken significant upgrades to manage climate related risks such as the effects of increased precipitation and associated flood risks.
Hydro is also engaged in production of power from solar and wind resources, currently mainly in partnership with other companies and the majority of the projects are in development phase. These assets will benefit from stricter regulations on CO2 emissions. However, specific regulations might impact the competitiveness and value of individual facilities.
# 126
Positive impacts on climate change mitigation associated with generation of renewable energy, development of new renewable energy assets, and production of low-carbon primary and secondary aluminium.
# 127
Hydro is working to assess the potential consequences and necessary mitigating actions, and plans needed to adapt for climate change. The findings from the updated climate assessment are being integrated in Hydro’s risk management system. Several of Hydro’s assets have already undertaken significant upgrades to manage climate related risks such as the effects of increased precipitation and associated flood risks
Hydro identifies and measures impacts on climate change by calculating and managing its GHG emissions from all its operations and from material parts of its value chain. Hydro’s methodologies are aligned with international standards including the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and industry standards from the International Aluminium Institute (IAI). Hydro engages with a broad set of stakeholders on climate related issues, including industry organizations, international standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union.
# 128
Net-zero Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2050 or earlier
Net-zero Hydro: Reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 30 percent by 2030 and become a net-zero Hydro by 2050 or earlier
Net-zero products: Deliver net-zero products to Hydro’s customers and reduce upstream Scope 3 GHG emissions per tonnes of aluminium by 30 percent by 2030
Net-zero society: Use Hydro’s industrial and energy competence to contribute to the transition to a net-zero society
# 129
10% Reduction in Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2025
30% Reduction in Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2030
30% Reduction in upstream Scope 3 GHG emissions per tonnes aluminium by 2030
# 130
E1.1 Total greenhouse gas emissions based on ownership equity
E1.2 Indirect (scope 3) greenhouse gas emissions
E1.3Greenhouse gas emissions intensity
16.1% Reduced Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, against 2018 baseline
8.98 Million tonnes Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions (location based), by ownership equity
1.52 Tonnes Scope 1 GHG emissions per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process
11.08 Million tonnes upstream Scope 3 emissions by ownership equity
# 131
16.1% Reduced Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, against 2018 baseline
8.98 Million tonnes Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions (location based), by ownership equity
1.52 Tonnes Scope 1 GHG emissions per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process
11.08 Million tonnes upstream Scope 3 emissions by ownership equity
• Fuel switch from heavy fuel oil to natural gas at Alunorte (~434,000 tonnes CO2e reduction at Alunorte3 )) Completion Q4 2024 • Three x 60MW electrical boilers installed (~248,000 tonnes of CO2e reduction at Alunorte3)) Completion Q4 2024 • 2030: Potential for additional four electrical boilers to be installed and coal to be substituted with Biomass, achieving a 70% reduction at Alunorte Verification ongoing • Renewable PPAs Ongoing • Smelter process improvements Ongoing • Casting, recycling, extrusion and other improvements Ongoing • Biomethane in casting and anode production (at Sunndal) Implementation • Emission-free plasma technology for remelting (at Sunndal) Pilot testing • Green hydrogen in casting (at Høyanger) Pilot testing • Exploring technology to decarbonize calcination in B&A Exploring • CO2-free PPAs across portfolio Continuous • Develop HalZero technology with implementation towards 2050 Industrial scale pilots by 2030 • Develop carbon capture and storage solution to decarbonize existing smelters Industrial scale pilots by 2030 • Develop anodes with biomaterial mix R&D • Implement carbon removal to cover any residual emissions R&D
# 132
Hydro is working to assess the potential consequences and necessary mitigating actions, and plans needed to adapt for climate change. The findings from the updated climate assessment are being integrated in Hydro’s risk management system. Several of Hydro’s assets have already undertaken significant upgrades to manage climate related risks such as the effects of increased precipitation and associated flood risks.
# 133
Hydro engages with a broad set of stakeholders on climate related issues, including industry organizations, international standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union. Hydro also engages and partners with customers in different industries to deliver low-carbon aluminium and to develop technical solutions for low-carbon products.
# 134
Hydro engages with a broad set of stakeholders on climate related issues, including industry organizations, international standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, such as Norway, Brazil and the U.S., as well as with regional structures like the European Union. Hydro also engages and partners with customers in different industries to deliver low-carbon aluminium and to develop technical solutions for low-carbon products.
# 135
Aluminium production carries an inherent risk of pollution, linked to process emissions to air and water, and the potential for accidental spills or leakages. There is also risk of pollution in the supply chain for raw materials. Such pollution can have a negative impact on the local environment and local communities if not managed correctly. Hydro’s business activities are subject to emissions regulations, including local emission permits, as well as regional and international regulation of emissions. Stricter regulations related to emissions and pollution could impose new requirements on Hydro’s operations and value chain, which in turn could affect cash flow or impose capital investments to reduce the emissions from Hydro’s activities in the medium and long-term. Incidents resulting in spills, leakages and other non-compliance with emission permits can result in fines and remediation costs that have an impact on Hydro’s financial performance. Pollution linked to historical activities, at both existing operations and legacy sites, may also require active intervention and remediation. Actual or perceived pollution impacts on local communities can result in operational shutdown, legal disputes or negative reputational effects.
# 136
Potential negative impacts associated with unintended or accidental emissions of pollutants to air or water from alumina refining or primary aluminium production. Potential negative impacts associated with unintended or accidental emissions of pollutants to air or water in Hydro's supply chain for raw materials and energy.
# 137
Hydro’s Global Procedure on Environmental Management, which is approved by the EVP People and HSE, requires that all operational sites that are fully owned or operated by Hydro, identify, control, and appropriately monitor material emissions to air and water from its operations, in accordance with the environmental licensing and applicable legal requirements. T
In 2024, Hydro joined World Economic Forum’s Alliance for Clean Air, a cross sector initiative to the social and environmental benefits of collective action to reduce air pollution. As an Alliance Member, Hydro has worked with the Stockholm Environment Institute to develop inventories and baselines of material air pollutants, linked to its electricity sourcing and wider value chain. This data will be used as input for future disclosures and target setting, with the goal of reducing air pollutant emissions linked to Hydro’s full value chain.
Hydro’s products are subject to compliance declarations according to different EU and U.S. legislations. This includes registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH) and restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS) in the EU, and the Toxic Substances Control Act and California’s proposition 65 in the U.S. This gives Hydro’s customers assurance that its aluminium profiles do not contain the prohibited substances above the defined limits.
# 138
Hydro has established a voluntary target to halve material non-GHG emissions (i.e. SO2, NOx and PM emissions to air) by 2030, from a 2017 baseline. These emissions are primarily linked to fossil fuel consumption in Hydro’s operations. To achieve this target, sites are required to decarbonize their processes where feasible. For more information about Hydro’s efforts to decarbonize and reduce emissions, see chapter on Climate change. In 2024, total emissions of SO2, NOx and PM10 were 57 percent, 67 percent and 37 percent lower, respectively, than the 2017 baseline. A key driver for this improvement has been the replacement of heavy fuel oil with natural gas at Hydro’s refinery, Alunorte. Additionally, to align more closely with the measurement hierarchy stated in ESRS E2, Alunorte changed its reporting approach in 2024 to report directly measured emissions of SO2 and NOx from its processes, through periodic sampling, instead of using the default emission factors taken from the Norwegian Authorities. This approach gives a closer approximation of actual emissions released, accounting for the technology and process efficiency at the site. Hydro has set targets to reduce fluoride emissions from its fully owned smelters. These smelters currently perform below the EU regulatory emission limit for existing smelters (0.6 kg F/t Al) and the average is also below EU regulatory emission limit for new smelters (0.35 kg F/t Al). Hydro will continue to invest in upgrades of gas treatment centers and strive for operational excellence such that individual smelter performances are all below the 0.35 kg F/t Al limit Inorganic mercury compounds are naturally occurring trace element within bauxite. Due to the high temperatures in the refining process, elemental mercury is produced and can be emitted to air and water. Hydro’s alumina refinery has a wastewater treatment plant to mitigate emissions to water that treats all liquid effluents prior to discharge. To reduce emissions of mercury to air, Hydro has initiated a project to install four non-condensable gases units (condensers) on Alunorte’s eight digestor lines. The first condenser was installed in 2018, as a pilot, and its technical performance was monitored prior to the installation of the remaining units. A second condenser was installed in 2023 and entered into operation in 2024. The third condenser was installed in 2024 and will be operational in early 2025. The final condenser will be installed and operational by end of 2025.
Incidents resulting in spills, leakages, or other non-compliances with environmental performance standards, could potentially result in material pollution. To minimize the risk of material pollution, operational sites are required to implement suitable process controls, inspection and maintenance routines and additional controls, such as secondary containment. In the events of an actual spill, incidents are assessed and classified according to the severity of impact. See Note E2.2 for reported spills and leakages and Note E2.3 for information on environmental permits.
# 139
Emissions and mitigating actions in the aluminium value chain Activity Emissions Mitigating actions Bauxite mining Water discharges to environment: suspended solids Clarification basins Alumina refining Water discharges to environment: pH and suspended solids Two step water treatment process, consisting of pH adjustment and clarification SO2, NOx and PM emissions to air Alunorte fuel switch project to replace HFO with LNG by 2025, reduction of coal use towards 2030 Fugitive PM emissions to air in dry season Water spraying of roads and open areas; use of non-woven geotextile materials (aka. Bidim) to cover bauxite residue deposits Mercury emissions to air and water Mercury condensers by end 2025, and wastewater treatment Primary aluminium production Water discharges to environment Wastewater treatment plants; oil separators; containment basins Fluoride emissions to air Alumina fed dry scrubbers SO2 and PM emissions to air Seawater fed wet scrubbers (fully owned smelters) Other emissions to air from casthouse and anode baking furnaces Bag filters Aluminium recycling Other emissions to air from casthouse Bag filters (where legally required) Extruded products Water discharges to environment (where applicable)* Wastewater treatment plants; oil separators; containment basins
# 140
Hydro has established a voluntary target to halve material non-GHG emissions (i.e. SO2, NOx and PM emissions to air) by 2030, from a 2017 baseline. These emissions are primarily linked to fossil fuel consumption in Hydro’s operations. To achieve this target, sites are required to decarbonize their processes where feasible. For more information about Hydro’s efforts to decarbonize and reduce emissions, see chapter on Climate change. In 2024, total emissions of SO2, NOx and PM10 were 57 percent, 67 percent and 37 percent lower, respectively, than the 2017 baseline. A key driver for this improvement has been the replacement of heavy fuel oil with natural gas at Hydro’s refinery, Alunorte. Additionally, to align more closely with the measurement hierarchy stated in ESRS E2, Alunorte changed its reporting approach in 2024 to report directly measured emissions of SO2 and NOx from its processes, through periodic sampling, instead of using the default emission factors taken from the Norwegian Authorities. This approach gives a closer approximation of actual emissions released, accounting for the technology and process efficiency at the site. Hydro has set targets to reduce fluoride emissions from its fully owned smelters. These smelters currently perform below the EU regulatory emission limit for existing smelters (0.6 kg F/t Al) and the average is also below EU regulatory emission limit for new smelters (0.35 kg F/t Al). Hydro will continue to invest in upgrades of gas treatment centers and strive for operational excellence such that individual smelter performances are all below the 0.35 kg F/t Al limit Inorganic mercury compounds are naturally occurring trace element within bauxite. Due to the high temperatures in the refining process, elemental mercury is produced and can be emitted to air and water. Hydro’s alumina refinery has a wastewater treatment plant to mitigate emissions to water that treats all liquid effluents prior to discharge. To reduce emissions of mercury to air, Hydro has initiated a project to install four non-condensable gases units (condensers) on Alunorte’s eight digestor lines. The first condenser was installed in 2018, as a pilot, and its technical performance was monitored prior to the installation of the remaining units. A second condenser was installed in 2023 and entered into operation in 2024. The third condenser was installed in 2024 and will be operational in early 2025. The final condenser will be installed and operational by end of 2025.
Incidents resulting in spills, leakages, or other non-compliances with environmental performance standards, could potentially result in material pollution. To minimize the risk of material pollution, operational sites are required to implement suitable process controls, inspection and maintenance routines and additional controls, such as secondary containment. In the events of an actual spill, incidents are assessed and classified according to the severity of impact. See Note E2.2 for reported spills and leakages and Note E2.3 for information on environmental permits.
# 141
Hydro’s Global Procedure on Environmental Management, which is approved by the EVP People and HSE, requires that all operational sites that are fully owned or operated by Hydro, identify, control, and appropriately monitor material emissions to air and water from its operations, in accordance with the environmental licensing and applicable legal requirements. These emissions are typically subject to regulatory controls and requirements such as emission limits, abatement and monitoring. The requirements are reflected in the operational licenses and will differ depending on the type of activity and applicable regulatory frameworks. Hydro’s most significant emissions to air are linked to fossil fuel consumption in alumina refining and process emissions linked to primary aluminium production. The largest non-GHG emissions are sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), particulate matter (PM) and fluoride (F). SO2 and NOx emissions to air are primarily from the use of oil and coal as an energy source for the refining of bauxite to alumina. Another large contributor to Hydro’s total SO2 emissions to air is related to the aluminium electrolysis process in smelters. Where technically feasible, Hydro has implemented seawater fed scrubbers in order to reduce SO2 emissions. The largest emission to water is the sulfur captured by these seawater scrubbers. See Note E2.1 for an overview of emissions to air and water. Hydro uses ozone depleting substances in certain applications in its Brazilian operations and to some extent also in Extrusions. In 2024, Hydro used in total 8.2 tonnes of such substances in its operations. The reported value corresponds to the purchased amount of such substances and can vary significantly according to the need of refilling existing cooling devices. In Brazil, such substances are managed and reported according to Brazilian legal requirements. In Hydro Extrusions, hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) accounts for around one third of ozone depleting substances. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is not a material risk for Hydro. The chemical content of the ore is the primary cause of AMD and is typically associated with sulfur bearing metals, which is not present in bauxite mines in Brazil. To avoid incidents of pollution and mitigate impacts in the event of a spill or other unplanned event, all sites are required to have performed risk assessments, and establish action plans and controls to manage the risk, such as emergency action procedure, secondary containment, and storage basins. Hydro’s global procedures for health risk management and environment management require all operational sites that are fully owned or operated by Hydro, identify, risk assess, minimize, evaluate for substitution and appropriately manage all hazardous materials or substances, purchased or generated in its processes, that have the potential to cause ill health, or to negatively impact the environment. Hydro’s products are subject to compliance declarations according to different EU and U.S. legislations. This includes registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH) and restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS) in the EU, and the Toxic Substances Control Act and California’s proposition 65 in the U.S. This gives Hydro’s customers assurance that its aluminium profiles do not contain the prohibited substances above the defined limits. Stakeholders and potentially affected communities can use AlertLine as a communication tool to report environmental and social issues concerning Hydro operations. See Business Conduct chapter for more information about AlertLine. In 2024, Hydro joined World Economic Forum’s Alliance for Clean Air, a cross sector initiative to the social and environmental benefits of collective action to reduce air pollution. As an Alliance Member, Hydro has worked with the Stockholm Environment Institute to develop inventories and baselines of material air pollutants, linked to its electricity sourcing and wider value chain. This data will be used as input for future disclosures and target setting, with the goal of reducing air pollutant emissions linked to Hydro’s full value chain.
# 143
Hydro identifies and assesses potential pollution impacts from all its operations by assessing risk of accidental spills, leakages, or other unplanned events and by monitoring emissions to air and water from its operations in the aluminium value chain based on the Best Available Techniques Reference documentation (BREF) for the non-ferrous metals industries. Hydro has established action plans and controls to manage potential pollution impacts, such as spill kits, secondary containment, storage basins. Environmental incidents are classified based on potential and actual impact; all material incidents, as well as all emissions to air and water above the thresholds defined in the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR), are reported in the Pollution chapter.
# 144
Hydro has established a voluntary target to halve material non-GHG emissions (i.e. SO2, NOx and PM emissions to air) by 2030, from a 2017 baseline.
# 147
57% Reduction in SO2 against baseline 67% Reduction in NOx against baseline 37% Reduction in particulate matter emissions against baseline
# 148
Incidents resulting in spills, leakages, or other non-compliances with environmental performance standards, could potentially result in material pollution. To minimize the risk of material pollution, operational sites are required to implement suitable process controls, inspection and maintenance routines and additional controls, such as secondary containment. In the events of an actual spill, incidents are assessed and classified according to the severity of impact. See Note E2.2 for reported spills and leakages and Note E2.3 for information on environmental permits.
# 149
Hydro engages regulators, local authorities and communities directly on its environmental management and potential incidents of pollution. Potentially affected stakeholders or communities can use Hydro's grievance mechanism, AlertLine, to report environmental and social issues concerning Hydro operations. Hydro also engages civil society on environmental issues. This includes Hydro's membership in the World Economic Forum’s Alliance for Clean Air to promote collective action to reduce air pollution and works with the Stockholm Environment Institute to develop value chain inventories and baselines of material air pollutants.
# 150
Hydro engages regulators, local authorities and communities directly on its environmental management and potential incidents of pollution. Potentially affected stakeholders or communities can use Hydro's grievance mechanism, AlertLine, to report environmental and social issues concerning Hydro operations. Hydro also engages civil society on environmental issues. This includes Hydro's membership in the World Economic Forum’s Alliance for Clean Air to promote collective action to reduce air pollution and works with the Stockholm Environment Institute to develop value chain inventories and baselines of material air pollutants.
# 151
Hydro depends on the supply of water as an ecosystem service and withdraws large volumes of water for beneficiation and pumping at its Paragominas mining operations, steam generation in the Bayer process at the Alunorte alumina refinery, and for cooling and operations in Hydro’s primary aluminium and recycling processes. Freshwater withdrawals can have a negative impact on local water resources in the event of drought. Hydro’s hydropower operations can have a positive impact on flood control and water flow. Potential negative impacts on water based ecosystems in the catchment areas are described in the biodiversity and ecosystems chapter. Hydro is exposed to water related risks associated with seasonal rainfall or drought, which can cause disruptions in the availability of water for electricity generation, cooling, operations, infrastructure, and logistics services in Hydro’s value chain. Climate change can exacerbate the scale and frequency of such risks.
# 153
Hydro manages the quality of discharges to the external environment to ensure that Hydro operates within the relevant permit limits and regulatory frameworks. For information about emissions to water, refer to the Pollution chapter.
# 154
Hydro identifies and assesses potential water impacts by monitoring water withdrawals and water use at all production assets, and follows the International Council on Mining & Metals’ (ICMM) standards and requirements for measuring and reporting its water interaction and the quality of water discharges. Hydro uses the WRI Aqueduct tool to analyze Hydro’s freshwater footprint in water stressed areas. Hydro's operational sites are screened for water related risks, and develops management plans and context relevant targets to address any material risks identified.
# 155
Potential negative impacts on water based ecosystems in the catchment areas are described in the biodiversity and ecosystems chapter. Hydro is exposed to water related risks associated with seasonal rainfall or drought, which can cause disruptions in the availability of water for electricity generation, cooling, operations, infrastructure, and logistics services in Hydro’s value chain. Climate change can exacerbate the scale and frequency of such risks.
# 156
Hydro depends on the supply of water as an ecosystem service and withdraws large volumes of water for beneficiation and pumping at its Paragominas mining operations, steam generation in the Bayer process at the Alunorte alumina refinery, and for cooling and operations in Hydro’s primary aluminium and recycling processes. Freshwater withdrawals can have a negative impact on local water resources in the event of drought.
Hydro uses the WRI Aqueduct tool to analyze Hydro’s freshwater footprint in water stressed areas, defined as locations with high or extremely high baseline water stress. Approximately one percent of Hydro’s freshwater withdrawals are related to operational assets located in water stressed areas, so over exploitation of natural water resource availability is not considered material for Hydro today. In addition, and due to seasonal heavy rainfall in Northern Brazil, managing flood risk is also a priority for both the mining operation and alumina refinery. With future climate change scenarios, location specific changes to the availability of water resources may occur. Such risks were evaluated in the physical climate risk assessment that was updated in 2023, described in the climate change chapter.
# 157
Hydro’s Global Procedure for Water Stewardship, approved by EVP Chief Financial Officer, requires all operational sites that are fully owned or operated by Hydro, evaluate water related risks and opportunities at a catchment scale and develop management plans to address any material risks identified. While there are no group wide targets for water, operational sites must develop context relevant targets and maintain a sufficiently detailed water balance account to reflect the site’s water risk exposure and comply with the International Council on Mining & Metals’ (ICMM’s) requirements for water reporting. Operational sites must also manage the quality of water discharges and run-off to fulfil legal permit limits and mitigate potential negative impacts to the environment and harm to the health and livelihoods of affected communities, within the operation’s area of influence.
Around 77 percent of Hydro’s total water withdrawal occurs in Norway from fjords (sea water) and rivers (fresh water) that supply these fjords. These water sources are vast and are not significantly affected by Hydro’s operations. All seawater withdrawal in Norway is used in gas treatment centers, enabling the primary production smelters to reduce dust, SO2 and fluoride emissions to air. To address local water risks, Hydro has implemented strategies to minimize surface water withdrawals at its mining and refining operations in Brazil.
In 2024, 26 percent of Hydro’s surface water withdrawals was rainwater, primarily captured at Alunorte and Paragominas. Approximately 76 percent of Paragominas’ water demand was met by recovery of water from the beneficiation process, and eight percent from water captured in the reservoirs, significantly reducing dependency on water withdrawals from the Parariquara river. Alunorte receives a large volume of water entrained in the bauxite product it receives through the pipeline from Paragominas, totalling 11.5 million m3 in 2024. 45 percent of this water was reused in the refining process. Hydro has also implemented water-use efficiency programs in the Extrusion business to reduce water intensity and operational costs.
Hydro continuously works with voluntary and mandatory rehabilitation and restoration measures in the waterways, and continues to develop its understanding of how to improve the ecological status of water bodies that are impacted by hydropower operations. Hydro also works with initiatives to reduce the risk of erosion and sedimentation around the reservoirs, such as reinforcement of reservoir edges with stones and gravel.
# 159
Hydro has established an overview of all surface water bodies impacted by its operations, as well as ecological and chemical status and mitigation measures, to ensure follow up of the WBMPs and that Hydro is in line with concession requirements. Hydro may be ordered to implement mandatory measures for impacted water bodies within specific deadlines. Current WBMPs were approved by the Norwegian Government in October 2022 and are valid until 2027. There is an ongoing process to establish WBMPs for the period 2027-2032.
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values are site specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters, or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does not have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in Hydro’s consolidated reporting. Hydro monitors water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All water use in construction and development of new energy projects is supplied by third parties.
# 160
Current WBMPs were approved by the Norwegian Government in October 2022 and are valid until 2027. There is an ongoing process to establish WBMPs for the period 2027-2032.
To address local water risks, Hydro has implemented strategies to minimize surface water withdrawals at its mining and refining operations in Brazil
# 161
Hydro continuously works with voluntary and mandatory rehabilitation and restoration measures in the waterways, and continues to develop its understanding of how to improve the ecological status of water bodies that are impacted by hydropower operations. Hydro also works with initiatives to reduce the risk of erosion and sedimentation around the reservoirs, such as reinforcement of reservoir edges with stones and gravel.
# 162
E3.1 Water interaction
Water withdrawal, by source
Water discharges, by destination
Total water consumption
Total Water reused/recycled
# 163
34 Number of sites in water stressed areas
1.2 million m3 Freshwater withdrawals in water stressed areas
68.9 million m3 Water recycled or reused
# 164
To address local water risks, Hydro has implemented strategies to minimize surface water withdrawals at its mining and refining operations in Brazil.
# 165
Hydro engages regulators, local authorities and communities directly on water related issues. For the hydropower operations in Norway, water resources are followed up by authorities through regional water management plans, in line with the EU Water Framework Directive.
# 166
Hydro engages regulators, local authorities and communities directly on water related issues. For the hydropower operations in Norway, water resources are followed up by authorities through regional water management plans, in line with the EU Water Framework Directive.
# 167
As a global aluminium and energy company, Hydro recognizes the material impact its global operations and their associated value chain can have on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Hydro’s activities are relevant to all five of the main drivers of nature loss: • Land and water use change • Direct exploitation of natural resources • Climate change • Pollution • Introduction of invasive, alien species Hydro’s operations are also dependent upon ecosystem services provided by nature, including the provision of water, regulation of climate, and protection from physical hazards, like floods and landslides. Aluminium production is also dependent on the supply of energy, raw materials and other services that can impact biodiversity and ecosystems at the local, regional, and global level. It is Hydro’s responsibility to manage the risks associated with these impacts and dependencies where they occur in the company’s operations and business activities. Stricter regulations related to impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems could impose new requirements on Hydro’s operations and value chain, which in turn could have a financial or reputational effect on Hydro. This could impose capital investments to reduce the impact of the company’s activities in the medium and long-term. Expectations from customers, investors, and banks could affect Hydro’s financial performance, cost of capital, or access to finance in the medium or long-term. The effects could be both positive and negative for Hydro, depending on the development of stakeholders’ expectations and the impact of Hydro’s activities to its peers.
# 168
Impacts associated with land use change in mining operations and new renewable energy development, and impacts from water use change in hydropower operations. Impacts associated with greenhouse gas emissions and potential incidents of pollution in alumina refining and primary aluminium production. Impacts associated with sourcing of energy and raw materials. Potential impacts associated invasive species introduction resulting from transportation of materials to and from Hydro operations.
# 169
Hydro has implemented a policy, Global Procedure for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, which covers all wholly owned or operated assets and are approved by EVP Chief Financial Officer. The procedure establishes minimum requirements for biodiversity risk management in operations, new project development, and merger and acquisition processes.
# 170
Hydro identifies and assesses impacts, risks and dependencies on biodiversity in its operations and value chain according to the LEAP methodology. Hydro conducts environmental impact assessments for its operations, new project development, and in relation to merger and acquisition processes. The assessments identify potential impact on biodiversity and ecosystem services within the operation’s area of influence and assess the materiality of these impacts to the operation, environment and affected communities. This assessment shall also identify and describe any priority biodiversity features or ecosystem services that occur within the operation’s area of influence and consider the full lifecycle of the operation, including closure. On going impacts are monitored by tracking the impact of land use change on local biodiversity and ecosystems. Sites located near biodiversity sensitive areas, their potential impacts and mitigation measures are disclosed in the Biodiversity chapter. Any accidents that result in pollution are assessed and classified according to actual and potential impacts. The impacts of water withdrawal and emissions are estimated using a lifecycle assessment model.
# 171
Hydro has developed a strong reforestation program that seeks to mitigate the impact of forest removal through timebound targets to replant and reforest the areas. Currently, Hydro works to progressively rehabilitate mined areas available for reforestation and replant these areas within two complete hydrological seasons, referred to as Hydro’s 1:1 rehabilitation target. In addition to rehabilitating mined areas, there is also a need to eventually rehabilitate long-term infrastructure, like the tailings storage facilities, when no longer required to support operations. Read more information about Hydro’s tailings management in the chapter Resource use and circular economy. Due to the clay like nature of the tailings material, a specialized rehabilitation technique must be developed. Hydro has ongoing research into developing this technique, amending tailings with organic material like green manure and decaying wood, with some promising results at pilot scale (Barral das Neves et al. 2024). To increase Hydro’s knowledge and secure a science based approach to biodiversity management and forest rehabilitation, the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC) was first established in 2013 and renewed in 2023 for a further five years. BRC consists of the University of Oslo and its Brazilian partners Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Federal University of Pará, and Federal Rural University of the Amazon, in addition to Hydro.
The scope of the consortium is to create an environmental research program connected to the mining operations. The aim is to strengthen Hydro’s ability to preserve natural biodiversity and to better rehabilitate the areas where the company mines bauxite. Twenty five research projects have been funded to date and a new research program was developed in 2023 to support the renewed BRC agreement. Announced in 2023, Hydro has also increased its No Net Loss ambition for biodiversity for the bauxite mine. In addition to achieving No Net Loss for the future expansion of the mine, Hydro will also include impacts that have occurred since 2020 for the existing mining footprint as well. As part of delivering on this No Net Loss roadmap, Hydro has established a partnership with a Brazilian Research Institution that is actively engaged in scientific research on biodiversity restoration within the Amazon biome. Hydro has also entered into partnership with three Brazilian NGOs, Imazon, CEA and IPAM, which are dedicated to the conservation and sustainable development of the Brazilian Amazon. This multistakeholder partnership, called Corridor Program, will explore opportunities to scale biodiversity projects that can also generate sustainable income for local communities. In September 2024, Hydro entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the MercedesBenz Group, which is now an active partner of the program. For quantitative information on land use and rehabilitation in Paragominas, see Note E4.4. There are specific closure plan requirements for the Paragominas mine including rehabilitation of the mine and tailings ponds. In addition, there is a similar requirement for the bauxite residue disposal areas at Alunorte. Read more about closure management in the Legacy impact chapter and bauxite residue disposal in Resource use and circular economy. Actions to minimize impacts in hydropower operations Hydro is an active member of the International Hydropower Association (IHA) and Renewables Norway’s sustainability network, working actively together with energy industry associations to address negative impacts on nature for new projects and operations. The company takes a scientific approach to managing its biodiversity impacts through collaboration with other power producers in Norway, as well as supporting and collaborating with research on nature impacts from renewable energy. In operations, Hydro always follows the relevant requirements stated within concessions and regulation established by the authorities, including the implementation of mitigation actions where required. In relation to renewal of concessions, rehabilitation projects are carried out in rivers and lakes to improve fish habitats and aesthetic qualities. The company also monitors the impact of its operations on aquatic life in rivers connected to catchment areas. As per end of 2024, Hydro has two revisions of its hydropower concessions in process, Fortun-Granfasta and Vigelandsfoss. Hydro is awaiting approval from The Norwegian Water Resource and Energy Directorate (NVE). For Fortun-Granfasta, all necessary studies have been carried out and filed with NVE. Hydro has proposed several restoration and improvement activities targeting aquatic biodiversity. For Vigelandsfoss, biodiversity studies on fish have been performed as part of the concession applicatio, and measures to reduce impacts to eel are proposed. Independently of concession renewals, Hydro is performing biodiversity risk assessments for all its operated hydropower and wind power in Norway. The risk assessments are being carried out by a third party specialist, with the aim of identifying the main risks to priority biodiversity features impacted by these operations. These assessments are planned to be finalized in 2025. In Hydro’s regulated river basins, there is a potential for habitat improvements for fish, and aquatic fauna and flora. Therefore, following the completion of biodiversity risk assessments, the company plans to establish Biodiversity Action Plans by the end of 2025, to be implemented in the operational system, to systematicallyperform mitigation activities targeted on biodiversity risks from operations. This will include both mandatory and voluntary measures to reduce risks to biodiversity. As part of Hydro’s hydropower operations today, measures are implemented to reduce impacts to biodiversity. The measures are summarized in the table below. Risks to wild reindeer is also a consideration for Hydro. As part of operation and project execution, there are mitigating measures undertaken to avoid impacts to wild reindeer, such as investigating the reindeer herd position before activities are carried out. However, Hydro recognizes the need to get a better understanding on the impacts from the hydropower production and new projects. Hydro also needs a more systematic approach for reducing the impacts to wild reindeer and their habitats. Hydro has therefore established dialogues with Norsk Villreinsenter Sør, to support the development of a wild reindeer strategy during 2025. According to the Norwegian Whitepaper on wild reindeer (Stortingsmelding 18 2023-24), establishment of national action plans to improve the population is ongoing and Hydro is engaging in the discussions for areas where it operates. This includes Hardangervidda and Setesdal-Ryfylke.
Actions to minimize impacts in development of wind and solar power Hydro’s joint venture, Hydro Rein, applies the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy as early as possible in project development to avoid and minimize project impact upon biodiversity and ecosystems as much as is practically and technically feasible. Hydro Rein is developing biodiversity management/action plans to align existing projects to international standards (IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles), using the projects’ fauna and flora monitoring campaigns to enable the identification of significant residual impacts to priority biodiversity features. Additional impacts on biodiversity caused during the construction and operation phase of the project, are addressed and mitigated as part of the construction and operational activities. To support the company’s biodiversity ambitions, the company works with project partners and qualified specialists to perform additional biodiversity studies, such as Collision Risk Modelling, Critical Habitat Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessments in project areas and surroundings so the company can define its project specific biodiversity strategies. There has been no vegetation suppression in Hydro Rein’s projects during 2024, but there are ongoing reforestation measures related to past vegetation removals in Hydro Rein’s Brazilian projects. These measures include continuous monitoring with the support from local qualified specialists in biodiversity management. All Brazilian projects in Hydro Rein’s portfolio have explicit vegetation compensation commitments, compliant with local regulation, which can include the operation of seedling nurseries and reforestation actions in project area, surroundings, or even other areas located within the same hydrological basin.
# 172
Biodiversity actions plans to work towards No Net Loss of priority biodiversity features
Release of water to maintain ecological flow, winter and summer Release of fish in reservoirs and rivers, planting fertilized eggs and yolk sac fry, etc.
Release of minimum water flow Salmon ladders and other fish passages both on ponds/thresholds and at natural migration barriers (two way fish passage) Restoration in water bodies Controlled effect power production
Salmon ladders and other fish passages both on ponds/thresholds and at natural migration barriers (two way fish passage)
Site specific measures and involvement of relevant externals before entering into wild reindeer areas
Participation in relevant fora (action plans per wild reindeer area) Removal or closure of relevant roads, in dialogue with authorities and relevant stakeholders
# 173
Biodiversity actions plans to work towards No Net Loss of priority biodiversity features
Release of water to maintain ecological flow, winter and summer Release of fish in reservoirs and rivers, planting fertilized eggs and yolk sac fry, etc.
Release of minimum water flow Salmon ladders and other fish passages both on ponds/thresholds and at natural migration barriers (two way fish passage) Restoration in water bodies Controlled effect power production
Salmon ladders and other fish passages both on ponds/thresholds and at natural migration barriers (two way fish passage)
Site specific measures and involvement of relevant externals before entering into wild reindeer areas
Participation in relevant fora (action plans per wild reindeer area) Removal or closure of relevant roads, in dialogue with authorities and relevant stakeholders
# 174
Stricter regulations related to impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems could impose new requirements on Hydro’s operations and value chain, which in turn could have a financial or reputational effect on Hydro. This could impose capital investments to reduce the impact of the company’s activities in the medium and long-term. Expectations from customers, investors, and banks could affect Hydro’s financial performance, cost of capital, or access to finance in the medium or long-term. The effects could be both positive and negative for Hydro, depending on the development of stakeholders’ expectations and the impact of Hydro’s activities to its peers.
Hydro has developed this strategy as part of its transition plan to align with the 2030 objective and targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework agreement and address the main drivers of nature loss most relevant to its business model. By doing so, Hydro aims to contribute meaningfully to the global effort to transition to a nature positive future.
# 175
Hydro has implemented a policy, Global Procedure for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, which covers all wholly owned or operated assets and are approved by EVP Chief Financial Officer. The procedure establishes minimum requirements for biodiversity risk management in operations, new project development, and merger and acquisition processes. The requirements include assessments to identify potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services within the operation’s area of influence and to assess the materiality of these impacts to the operation, environment, and affected communities. The assessment shall identify and describe priority biodiversity features or ecosystem services that occur within the operation’s area of influence, consider the full lifecycle of the operation, including closure, and establish requirements for mitigation actions according to the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy
# 178
E4.1 Threatened species within Hydro’s area of influence
E4.2 Land use and rehabilitation in Paragominas
# 179
Actions to minimize impacts in development of wind and solar power Hydro’s joint venture, Hydro Rein, applies the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy as early as possible in project development to avoid and minimize project impact upon biodiversity and ecosystems as much as is practically and technically feasible. Hydro Rein is developing biodiversity management/action plans to align existing projects to international standards (IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles), using the projects’ fauna and flora monitoring campaigns to enable the identification of significant residual impacts to priority biodiversity features. Additional impacts on biodiversity caused during the construction and operation phase of the project, are addressed and mitigated as part of the construction and operational activities. To support the company’s biodiversity ambitions, the company works with project partners and qualified specialists to perform additional biodiversity studies, such as Collision Risk Modelling, Critical Habitat Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessments in project areas and surroundings so the company can define its project specific biodiversity strategies. There has been no vegetation suppression in Hydro Rein’s projects during 2024, but there are ongoing reforestation measures related to past vegetation removals in Hydro Rein’s Brazilian projects. These measures include continuous monitoring with the support from local qualified specialists in biodiversity management. All Brazilian projects in Hydro Rein’s portfolio have explicit vegetation compensation commitments, compliant with local regulation, which can include the operation of seedling nurseries and reforestation actions in project area, surroundings, or even other areas located within the same hydrological basin
# 180
Hydro has developed a strong reforestation program that seeks to mitigate the impact of forest removal through timebound targets to replant and reforest the areas. Currently, Hydro works to progressively rehabilitate mined areas available for reforestation and replant these areas within two complete hydrological seasons, referred to as Hydro’s 1:1 rehabilitation target. In addition to rehabilitating mined areas, there is also a need to eventually rehabilitate long-term infrastructure, like the tailings storage facilities, when no longer required to support operations. Read more information about Hydro’s tailings management in the chapter Resource use and circular economy. Due to the clay like nature of the tailings material, a specialized rehabilitation technique must be developed. Hydro has ongoing research into developing this technique, amending tailings with organic material like green manure and decaying wood, with some promising results at pilot scale (Barral das Neves et al. 2024). To increase Hydro’s knowledge and secure a science based approach to biodiversity management and forest rehabilitation, the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC) was first established in 2013 and renewed in 2023 for a further five years. BRC consists of the University of Oslo and its Brazilian partners Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Federal University of Pará, and Federal Rural University of the Amazon, in addition to Hydro.
# 181
Hydro engages local authorities and people in local communities directly on biodiversity and ecosystems impacts, including recreational impacts, from on going operations as well as the planning and execution of new projects. To increase Hydro’s knowledge and secure a science based approach to biodiversity management and forest rehabilitation, Hydro supports the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC). Hydro has also established a partnership and actively engage with two Brazilian NGOs in the State of Pará on the conservation and sustainable development of the Brazilian Amazon. For its hydropower operations, Hydro engages the International Hydropower Association and Renewables Norway, as well as the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research to take a scientific approach to managing biodiversity impacts.
# 182
Hydro engages local authorities and people in local communities directly on biodiversity and ecosystems impacts, including recreational impacts, from on going operations as well as the planning and execution of new projects. To increase Hydro’s knowledge and secure a science based approach to biodiversity management and forest rehabilitation, Hydro supports the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC). Hydro has also established a partnership and actively engage with two Brazilian NGOs in the State of Pará on the conservation and sustainable development of the Brazilian Amazon. For its hydropower operations, Hydro engages the International Hydropower Association and Renewables Norway, as well as the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research to take a scientific approach to managing biodiversity impacts.
# 183
Hydro’s aluminium manufacturing processes are resource intensive and depend on non-renewable resources. Hydro’s operations also generate significant resource outflows, including different waste streams. Managing resource dependencies and waste streams are key to reduce operational and compliance costs, exposures to price volatility, and supply chain disruptions in material sourcing, as well as the environmental footprint in Hydro’s supply chain. Hydro’s integrated value chain, including captive renewable energy generation, traceable, secure material supply, and integrated recycling operations, as well as aluminium’s inherent properties of durability, lightweight, and recyclability, position the company for commercial and financial opportunities in the transition to a more circular and less resource intensive economy
# 184
Value chain impacts associated with Hydro's dependency on raw materials for alumina refining and primary aluminium production. Impacts associated with resource outflows, including tailings from mining operations, bauxite residue from alumina refining and waste generation from operations in the aluminium value chain.
# 185
Hydro’s Global Procedure for Environmental management define the company’s ambition towards a circular economy by promoting efficient use of resources and continuous improvement in waste management. The procedure is approved by the EVP for People and HSE, and all employees are responsible for working in accordance with this procedure. The line management is responsibility to ensure the global procedure is implemented and the required information, training, instruction, supervision, and auditing systems are in place. Hydro is currently updating their sustainability procedures and directives to include more information about circular economy expectations
# 186
Hydro identifies and assesses impacts, risks, and dependencies associated with resource use and circular economy by measuring its resource use and resource outflows from all operations. This includes energy and raw material use for production processes, recycled content in resource inflows, as well as the generation of tailings, residue and waste from its operations, and the waste treatment and disposal methods for different waste streams.
# 187
Hydro’s technology and decarbonization roadmap and strategic focus on metal recycling aims to contribute to a circular economy by supplying the transition to a low-carbon and resource efficient economy with sustainable materials use through partnerships and innovative business models. To enable this transition, Hydro has set up a framework to prioritize sectors, geographies, suppliers, and customers to take a proactive approach to integrate circular economy principles in business development around three main pillars: innovate for circularity, recycling and sorting, and waste to value. Hydro’s Global Procedure for Environmental management define the company’s ambition towards a circular economy by promoting efficient use of resources and continuous improvement in waste management. The procedure is approved by the EVP for People and HSE, and all employees are responsible for working in accordance with this procedure. The line management is responsibility to ensure the global procedure is implemented and the required information, training, instruction, supervision, and auditing systems are in place. Hydro is currently updating their sustainability procedures and directives to include more information about circular economy expectations
# 188
One of the main challenges related to recycling of post-consumer scrap is to make sure the quality of the metal is preserved in the recycling process, and to identify the alloys and properties of the used metal Hydro purchases. The metal must be collected and properly sorted, before being recycled back to high-quality products. Hydro has developed proprietary technology allowing it to separate different aluminium alloys and continue to develop sorting technology further through the company’s R&D efforts. The Hydro CIRCAL product line, offering aluminium with at least 75 percent postconsumer scrap, has among the lowest environmental footprints in the aluminium industry
# 189
Hydro’s aluminium manufacturing processes are resource intensive and depend on non-renewable resources. Hydro’s operations also generate significant resource outflows, including different waste streams. Managing resource dependencies and waste streams are key to reduce operational and compliance costs, exposures to price volatility, and supply chain disruptions in material sourcing, as well as the environmental footprint in Hydro’s supply chain. Hydro’s integrated value chain, including captive renewable energy generation, traceable, secure material supply, and integrated recycling operations, as well as aluminium’s inherent properties of durability, lightweight, and recyclability, position the company for commercial and financial opportunities in the transition to a more circular and less resource intensive economy
# 190
Hydro has made progress on diversifying its recycled product portfolio to be able to utilize a broader range of scrap types. Hydro acquired a Polish recycled foundry alloy producer, Alumetal, in 2023 and made progress on integrating the company and realizing synergy potential with the existing extrusion ingot portfolio. An upgrade and expansion of Alumetal’s Kety plant is currently underway. Operations are ramping up in Hydro’s greenfield plants opened in 2023, advanced extrusion ingot recycler in Cassopolis, Michigan, USA and the forge stock plant in Rackwitz, Germany. . During 2024, Hydro announced a decision to invest in the state-of-the-art specialty extrusion ingot recycler Torija in Spain with the total capacity of 120,000 tonnes.
Circular economy is also identified as a material opportunity for Hydro
# 191
To enable this transition, Hydro has set up a framework to prioritize sectors, geographies, suppliers, and customers to take a proactive approach to integrate circular economy principles in business development around three main pillars: innovate for circularity, recycling and sorting, and waste to value.
# 192
Eliminate landfill of all recoverable waste by 2040
Recycling is an important part of Hydro’s 2030 strategy
Hydro’s goal is to increase post-consumer scrap utilization through advanced sorting capabilities combined with multiple product outlets.
# 194
E5.1 Resource inflows
E5.2 Resource outflows – Products and materials
E5.3 Resource outflows –Waste
Waste directed to disposal, by disposal operation
Waste diverted from disposal, by recovery operation
# 195
451 kt Recycled post-consumer scrap
19 % of total waste directed to landfill
43 % SPL to landfill
# 196
The amount of generated waste sent to landfill increased in 2024, thereby raising the percentage of waste-to-landfill from 15 percent in 2023 to 19 percent in 2024. This trend was not driven by a worsening in Hydro's waste management performance, but by an improvement in waste accounting and management at Alunorte. In 2024, Alunorte conducted a comprehensive review of its waste management systems to provide a more complete and accurate accounting of wastes deposited on DRS1. This effort serves as a step for its long-term strategy to eliminate waste-to-landfill by 2040. Additionally, several circularity initiatives were implemented to reduce landfill disposal, such as repurposing materials and promoting the reuse and recycling of waste streams. These actions reflect Hydro's commitment to advancing waste circularity and minimizing environmental impacts. Although this adjustment presents itself as a negative development in Hydro's aggregated statistics for 2024, it is a critical step toward longterm improvements. Hydro expects to see continued progress in real performance and further advancements in waste circularity in 2025.
Waste management is part of Hydro’s Global Procedure for Environmental management. Hydro’s goal is to first minimize the amount of waste produced in its operations, and then reuse or recycle it. When this is not possible, the company shall deposit it in a secure way in compliance with regulatory standards and legal requirements. All targets related to waste is set by Hydro on a voluntary basis and are not imposed by legislation or regulations
# 197
Hydro has strategic partnerships with many customers to design and develop more sustainable products. The company engages industry associations, standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, as well as with regional structures like the European Union, on topics related to the environmental and social impacts of resource use. Hydro engages local authorities and communities directly in relation to tailings and bauxite residue management through on-site inspections, third party audits. Hydro engages several commercial partners and supports R&D projects connected to management and utilization of bauxite residue, and has established partnerships to develop more circular solutions to other waste streams
# 198
Hydro has strategic partnerships with many customers to design and develop more sustainable products. The company engages industry associations, standard setters, and local stakeholders in countries where it has significant operations, as well as with regional structures like the European Union, on topics related to the environmental and social impacts of resource use. Hydro engages local authorities and communities directly in relation to tailings and bauxite residue management through on-site inspections, third party audits. Hydro engages several commercial partners and supports R&D projects connected to management and utilization of bauxite residue, and has established partnerships to develop more circular solutions to other waste streams
# 199
Operations that are conducted in compliance with regulatory requirements, and in line with best industry practices and available technologies can still have legacies. Examples of legacies are tailings facilities which require continuous management and emergency preparedness, waterbodies and land areas that have been contaminated by past operations, impacted land and vegetation that must be restored, and legacy sites which are sites where the operations have been terminated and measures to comply with closure obligations are being implemented. Legacies typically require management and funding many years after the industrial activity that created them ceased. Inevitably Hydro’s 119 year history of industrial activities has resulted in environmental and social legacies. In addition, legacies have been transferred into Hydro’s portfolio through mergers & acquisitions. The main risk related to legacy management is failure to identify legacy risks and opportunities early enough, which could result in negative impacts on health, safety or the environment, and create unnecessary cost, and reputational damage for the company. Managing legacies is an important responsibility for Hydro to protect the environment and human health. History has shown that inferior tailings facility management can in the worst case compromise public safety. Over the past decade, several tailings facility failures within the global mining industry have resulted in hundreds of fatalities, severe environmental and social harm, and substantial financial losses. In countries with a large mining sector, there is an increasing concern that legacies from mining operations represent a financial risk to the society since there have been several cases where mining companies have gone bankrupt prior to fulfilling their remediation or closure obligations. Managing the potential impact of Hydro’s industrial legacy on local communities and the environment is therefore key to building trust, and to managing sustainability related risks in Hydro. There is a high degree of uncertainty related to the financial effects of legacies, because the timing, scope, and cost of remediation and closure obligations is unpredictable. Environmental authorities have a large room for judgement when it comes to enforcing the environmental laws and it is difficult to foresee far in advance what will be required. In general, requirements tend to increase over time as more knowledge about the environmental issues and its impacts becomes available, and as new or improved remediation techniques are being developed. Going forward, the risk of extreme weather events due to climate change is expected to be a driver for increased legacy management requirements. See Note 4.1 to the financial statements for details on uncertain assets and liabilities, including asset retirement obligations.
# 200
Potential incidents or accidents affecting the health and safety of people or the environment near legacy industrial sites.
# 201
Hydro’s governance structure for tailings management is clearly defined. The governance structure starts at Hydro’s Board of Directors. Independent reviews by the Independent Tailings Review Board (ITRB) are carried out twice per year for the tailings facilities at Alunorte and Paragominas and annually for the tailings facilities at Schwandorf. By August 2023, the conformance of the Alunorte’s and Mineração Paragominas’ tailings facilities was assessed and confirmed through a self-assessment in line with the ICMM’s Conformance Protocol. A third party validation was undertaken in 2024 and attested the conformance of Valley, TDA, DRS1, and DRS2 to GISTM. GISTM implementation is ongoing at the three closed tailings facilities at the Schwandorf legacy site and is on track to achieve conformance by the August 5, 2025, deadline. The Marienschachthalde tailings facility in Stulln has been classified as safely closed in accordance with the GISTM definition.2 The remaining two facilities in Stulln (Grube Erna 1 and 2) are expected to reach safe closure status by the second quarter of 2025. More information, including Hydro’s Tailings Management Policy, the GISTM Public Disclosure Report and GISTM conformance status, can be found at Hydro.com.
# 202
Impacts and risks are assessed through on going assessment of legacy sites and industrial operations. Sites are screened for potential impacts and risks, land and waterbodies near material industrial sites are tested for pollution. Hydro's legacy project has developed a methodology to evaluate legacy risks and their potential financial effects for Hydro.
# 203
By implementing a proactive approach to legacy management, Hydro aims to identify risks and opportunities at an earlier stage to enable the development and implementation of robust and cost efficient solutions which are in line with stakeholder expectations. Through Hydro’s legacy and closure management program, the company aims to avoid or minimize the creation of additional legacies as well as to minimize impacts of legacies from the past. Hydro manages risks and opportunities throughout all phases of an asset’s life cycle, including investment (design/construction or acquisition), operation, closure and post-closure. Failure to identify legacy impacts and costs in the design/construction phase of a new asset or in acquisition processes could lead to future remediation and closure costs which are disproportionate in size to the benefit of the investment. This risk is mitigated through the implementation of corporate governance requirements that mandate financial assessment with respect to legacy aspects during project planning and acquisition evaluations.
# 204
The main risk related to legacy management is failure to identify legacy risks and opportunities early enough, which could result in negative impacts on health, safety or the environment, and create unnecessary cost, and reputational damage for the company. Managing legacies is an important responsibility for Hydro to protect the environment and human health. History has shown that inferior tailings facility management can in the worst case compromise public safety. Over the past decade, several tailings facility failures within the global mining industry have resulted in hundreds of fatalities, severe environmental and social harm, and substantial financial losses. In countries with a large mining sector, there is an increasing concern that legacies from mining operations represent a financial risk to the society since there have been several cases where mining companies have gone bankrupt prior to fulfilling their remediation or closure obligations. Managing the potential impact of Hydro’s industrial legacy on local communities and the environment is therefore key to building trust, and to managing sustainability related risks in Hydro. There is a high degree of uncertainty related to the financial effects of legacies, because the timing, scope, and cost of remediation and closure obligations is unpredictable. Environmental authorities have a large room for judgement when it comes to enforcing the environmental laws and it is difficult to foresee far in advance what will be required. In general, requirements tend to increase over time as more knowledge about the environmental issues and its impacts becomes available, and as new or improved remediation techniques are being developed. Going forward, the risk of extreme weather events due to climate change is expected to be a driver for increased legacy management requirements. See Note 4.1 to the financial statements for details on uncertain assets and liabilities, including asset retirement obligations.
Failure to manage tailings facilities properly could compromise the safety of workers and the local community as well as cause significant environmental, social, and financial damage.
Hydro commits to best practice tailings management to protect the health and safety of people, host communities and the environment. Hydro plans, designs, constructs, operates, maintains, closes, and relinquishes its tailings facilities in accordance with regulatory compliance requirements, internal company standards, the International Council on Mining and Metal (ICMM) framework, and the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) practices. Furthermore, Hydro is committed to implement the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM), which requires that tailings facilities operated by Hydro with Extreme or Very high potential consequences1 conform to the standard by August 5, 2023, while other tailings facilities operated by Hydro not in a state of safe closure, will conform to the standard by August 5, 2025. Hydro is a member of ICMM which is one of the three co-conveners of GISTM alongside UN Environment Program (UNEP) and PRI, an investor initiative in partnership with UNEP Finance Initiative and UN Global Compact.
# 205
By implementing a proactive approach to legacy management, Hydro aims to identify risks and opportunities at an earlier stage to enable the development and implementation of robust and cost efficient solutions which are in line with stakeholder expectations. Through Hydro’s legacy and closure management program, the company aims to avoid or minimize the creation of additional legacies as well as to minimize impacts of legacies from the past. Hydro manages risks and opportunities throughout all phases of an asset’s life cycle, including investment (design/construction or acquisition), operation, closure and post-closure.
Implementation of best available technologies and methods is key to reduce impacts and risks further. At Alunorte, Hydro has invested in press filters and are implementing progressive closure (as opposed to end of life closure) to: i) minimize possible negative impacts on the environment, such as dust; ii) demonstrate the closure method early; and iii) avoid that the entire closure burden is shifted to the end of operations. In Paragominas, Hydro is implementing the dry backfilling method. The company also has a comprehensive R&D program aiming to transform the tailings materials into by products such as materials for the construction sector. See also the chapter on Resource use and circular economy, which describes tailings and bauxite residue in more detail, including how Hydro is pursuing reduction, reuse, and remediation technologies and methodologies to minimize impacts from tailings.
The Aluchemie anode producer, which is a joint operation company owned by Hydro (47 percent) and Rio Tinto (53 percent), located near Rotterdam in the Netherlands, closed its operation at the end of 2021. Demolition of buildings and infrastructure continued, and the implementation of the site wide environmental remediation activities was initiated in 2024, and progresses according to the schedule and in line with the remediation strategy defined with the relevant authorities. The property is owned by the Rotterdam Port Authority and Aluchemie is required to return the site to the same condition existing in 1962, before the plant was constructed. The remediation program is expected to be completed in 2025. At the Kurri Kurri legacy site in Australia, the construction of an onsite, engineered containment cell and remediation of the site was completed in August 2024. The cell is being managed under a longterm environmental management plan with the completion of the independent audit undertaken by a NSW EPA accredited auditor, consolidating the key site investigations and validation of completed remediation, expected in Q2 2025.
GISTM implementation is ongoing at the three closed tailings facilities at the Schwandorf legacy site and is on track to achieve conformance by the August 5, 2025, deadline. The Marienschachthalde tailings facility in Stulln has been classified as safely closed in accordance with the GISTM definition.2 The remaining two facilities in Stulln (Grube Erna 1 and 2) are expected to reach safe closure status by the second quarter of 2025
# 206
Inevitably Hydro’s 119 year history of industrial activities has resulted in environmental and social legacies. In addition, legacies have been transferred into Hydro’s portfolio through mergers & acquisitions.
# 207
In Brazil, the Albras site, in collaboration with the Secretary of Environment and Sustainability of the state of Pará (Semas), has carried out additional environmental assessment in the former waste disposal area (ADRS). This assessment, conducted in accordance with Brazilian environmental legislation, is a part of a stepwise process aimed at evaluating and managing potentially contaminated land. It reflects the company’s commitment to identifying, assessing, and responsibly managing any historical impacts from its operations.
Implementation of best available technologies and methods is key to reduce impacts and risks further. At Alunorte, Hydro has invested in press filters and are implementing progressive closure (as opposed to end of life closure) to: i) minimize possible negative impacts on the environment, such as dust; ii) demonstrate the closure method early; and iii) avoid that the entire closure burden is shifted to the end of operations. In Paragominas, Hydro is implementing the dry backfilling method. The company also has a comprehensive R&D program aiming to transform the tailings materials into by products such as materials for the construction sector. See also the chapter on Resource use and circular economy, which describes tailings and bauxite residue in more detail, including how Hydro is pursuing reduction, reuse, and remediation technologies and methodologies to minimize impacts from tailings.
For the Marienschachthalde tailings facility, the execution of the closure plan, including the final inspection by mining authorities, was completed in 2024. A post closure groundwater monitoring program will continue until 2029 or until mining authorities approve the discontinuation.
# 208
The company aims to avoid or minimize the creation of additional legacies as well as to minimize impacts of legacies from the past.
After several years of thorough mapping, investigations, testing and planning, the execution of the remediation project started in 2023. The aim of the project is to isolate the environmental toxins to prevent them from spreading and to prevent uptake in the food chain. The project is expected to be completed in 2025.
At the legacy bauxite residue facilities at Schwandorf in Germany, key activities in 2024 included the planning and site preparations for a new water treatment as well as implementation of the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM). Both the water treatment plant and the GISTM implementation is expected to be completed in 2025.
# 209
Several decades ago, Hydro’s operations at Herøya in Norway caused contamination of the nearby fjord, Gunneklevfjorden. In 2018, the Norwegian Environmental Agency (NEA) ordered Hydro to remediate the fjord by capping the fjord bed with clean geologic materials. After several years of thorough mapping, investigations, testing and planning, the execution of the remediation project started in 2023. The aim of the project is to isolate the environmental toxins to prevent them from spreading and to prevent uptake in the food chain. The project is expected to be completed in 2025.
# 211
Several decades ago, Hydro’s operations at Herøya in Norway caused contamination of the nearby fjord, Gunneklevfjorden. In 2018, the Norwegian Environmental Agency (NEA) ordered Hydro to remediate the fjord by capping the fjord bed with clean geologic materials. After several years of thorough mapping, investigations, testing and planning, the execution of the remediation project started in 2023. The aim of the project is to isolate the environmental toxins to prevent them from spreading and to prevent uptake in the food chain. The project is expected to be completed in 2025. At Stulln in Germany, Hydro continued to execute a structured remediation and reclamation plan in collaboration with authorities at the former fluorspar mines dated back to the 1920s in Germany. The projects involve securing of underground mining structures, and reshaping and closure of tailings facilities to mitigate potential risk to the public and to the environment. For the Marienschachthalde tailings facility, the execution of the closure plan, including the final inspection by mining authorities, was completed in 2024. A post closure groundwater monitoring program will continue until 2029 or until mining authorities approve the discontinuation.
At the legacy bauxite residue facilities at Schwandorf in Germany, key activities in 2024 included the planning and site preparations for a new water treatment as well as implementation of the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM). Both the water treatment plant and the GISTM implementation is expected to be completed in 2025. The Aluchemie anode producer, which is a joint operation company owned by Hydro (47 percent) and Rio Tinto (53 percent), located near Rotterdam in the Netherlands, closed its operation at the end of 2021. Demolition of buildings and infrastructure continued, and the implementation of the site wide environmental remediation activities was initiated in 2024, and progresses according to the schedule and in line with the remediation strategy defined with the relevant authorities. The property is owned by the Rotterdam Port Authority and Aluchemie is required to return the site to the same condition existing in 1962, before the plant was constructed. The remediation program is expected to be completed in 2025. At the Kurri Kurri legacy site in Australia, the construction of an onsite, engineered containment cell and remediation of the site was completed in August 2024. The cell is being managed under a longterm environmental management plan with the completion of the independent audit undertaken by a NSW EPA accredited auditor, consolidating the key site investigations and validation of completed remediation, expected in Q2 2025.
# 212
Several decades ago, Hydro’s operations at Herøya in Norway caused contamination of the nearby fjord, Gunneklevfjorden. In 2018, the Norwegian Environmental Agency (NEA) ordered Hydro to remediate the fjord by capping the fjord bed with clean geologic materials. After several years of thorough mapping, investigations, testing and planning, the execution of the remediation project started in 2023. The aim of the project is to isolate the environmental toxins to prevent them from spreading and to prevent uptake in the food chain. The project is expected to be completed in 2025.
# 213
Potentially affected stakeholders are engaged directly and through local media, and informed and consulted when potential impacts have been identified. Local authorities and NGOs are also engaged on impact assessments to identify potential risks.
# 214
Potentially affected stakeholders are engaged directly and through local media, and informed and consulted when potential impacts have been identified. Local authorities and NGOs are also engaged on impact assessments to identify potential risks.
# 215
Hydro has a responsibility to provide a safe and inclusive work environment for all workers, including own employees, temporary employees, agency workers, and contractors. Hydro values human life above all other considerations and will not compromise the health and safety of those working for the company or affected by its activities. Hydro believes a safe work environment also promotes efficiency and lower operating costs. Hydro relies on a safe, healthy, competent, and engaged workforce to ensure quality and efficiency in all operations. Safeguarding the rights, health, and safety of the workforce, while fostering a culture for learning, equal treatment, and opportunities is essential for attracting and developing talent, ultimately enhancing the company’s performance. Hydro’s organizational culture, which emphasizes learning and development, innovation, leadership, and belonging aligns with the company’s strategic priorities and drives success. Conversely, an adverse psychosocial work environment or accidents that affect the health and safety of Hydro’s workforce can result in disruption of business operations. Such incidents may result in legal proceedings, fines or other financial consequences, and damage to the company’s reputation, which can erode trust in both the short, medium and long-term. Failure to comply with applicable regulations for working conditions, equal treatment and/or reporting on workforce related issues could also result in fines and negative reputation. Hydro positively impacts employees by offering secure employment, learning and development, fair wages, and social protection. However, potential negative impacts can arise from unintended incidents of discrimination, harassment, or accidents resulting in injury, illness, or even fatalities involving employees or contractors. Hydro’s workers are exposed to a variety of safety risks that, if not controlled, could result in accidents leading to injuries or fatalities. The inherent risks of negative impacts on health and safety are higher when performing non-routine work such as building and construction projects, and in work related to energy, work at height, mobile equipment, overhead cranes, confined spaces, molten metal and projects.
# 216
Potential fatal or life changing accidents affecting own workforce. Potential incidents of discrimination or harassment affecting own workforce.
# 217
As part of Hydro’s human rights due diligence, the company maps salient potential and actual human rights impacts across its operations. See the position statement on human rights due diligence for more information about the company’s human rights management and due diligence approach. Hydro is committed to, and has a human rights policy based on, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and other global frameworks that define human rights principles for businesses.
Hydro’s health and safety activities are governed by the company’s HSE policy and the Global HSE Directive, which are owned by the EVP for People and HSE, and applicable for all own employees and contractors. Health and safety standards are aligned with ISO standards. Health and safety are identified as salient human rights with potential adverse impacts on employees and contractors across Hydro’s operations. Hydro’s ambition is to provide safe and healthy workplaces, promote health and wellbeing, and prevent work related injuries and illness.
# 218
Impacts and risks are identified and assessed using employee engagement surveys, grievance mechanisms including AlertLine, root cause reviews of incidents affecting employees, health and safety network meetings, and regular employee reviews meetings conducted by line managers.
# 219
Hydro identifies and monitors its impact on own employees and contractors according to the same standards, Code of Conduct, and other governing policies and documents, including the HSE Policy and Hydro’s people strategy. The EVP People and HSE, the highest ranking official in this area, is responsible for guiding Hydro’s approach to health, safety, and workforce engagement concerning impacts and risks. The operationalization of this is delegated to the HSE and People organizations in the Business Areas, respectively. Hydro identifies and measures impacts on its workforce through direct involvement of employees in incident identification and investigation, regular network meetings within Business Areas, employee reviews, and engagement surveys. As part of Hydro’s human rights due diligence, the company maps salient potential and actual human rights impacts across its operations. See the position statement on human rights due diligence for more information about the company’s human rights management and due diligence approach. Hydro is committed to, and has a human rights policy based on, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and other global frameworks that define human rights principles for businesses. Health and safety, discrimination and harassment, and vulnerable individuals and groups have been identified as salient human rights risk areas related to own workforce. See the sections on occupational health and safety, and diversity, inclusion and belonging for more information. Hydro’s human rights policy explicitly addresses forced or compulsory labor and child labor, but these are not identified as salient risks for Hydro’s own workforce. Regarding other potential human rights impacts, see the section on labor rights.
# 220
Hydro drives safety improvements by systematically reducing risks, training personnel, and regularly following up by line management and safety delegates. All injuries and high risk incidents are investigated to find root causes, and to share lessons learned between Hydro sites. Employees are engaged on health and safety issues through frequent network meetings across the business areas. Hydro works continuously to avoid damage to property and loss of production. Hydro has developed a comprehensive health and safety management system, and the company’s manufacturing sites are certified to internationally recognized health and safety standards. Hydro embraces digital tools where possible and has developed an advanced incident management system, self-assessment tools, risk management processes, e-learning training modules, a digital HSE assistant using Artificial Intelligence etc., all easily accessible to employees. In addition, Hydro has strengthened its behavioral tools using human performance techniques and the consistent use of peer-to-peer job observations. Hydro has developed employee assistance programs at site level to support affected workers. This includes as a minimum psychological support for those needed, but also include other types of support depending on the area they operate in, such as financial advice.
Just Transition The green transition will create new employment opportunities as well as changes to existing ones. Innovations in Hydro’s production methods and advancement of technologies risks the automation of jobs. Additionally, Hydro’s focus on decarbonization must not exacerbate social inequalities or discrimination. Hydro has developed a framework for supporting a just transition, through which the company seeks to contribute to positive development in the societies where it operates, including for its own workforce. The framework is focused around three key outcomes: People have human rights protected and have access to equal opportunities; Local communities are resilient in a changing world; and People have the necessary skills and jobs for the future low-carbon economy. Hydro contributes towards these outcomes in its own workforce by respecting and promoting human rights, supporting positive local development in the local communities where its employees live and work, and through developing skills and jobs relevant to the future low-carbon economy. In 2024, Hydro continued to develop and deliver learning and skills development for all its employees. Hydro also works to increase inclusiveness among Hydro employees and tracks the perception of inclusiveness in the Hydro Inclusion Index, which is part of the biannual Hydro Monitor survey. See Note S1.2 for Hydro employee engagement metrics.
# 221
Hydro shall be a leading company in its industry in occupational health and safety. This will be achieved through consistent implementation of the management system with committed and visible leadership, and full engagement of all employees and others who work with the company. The CEO HSE Committee is the strategic decision making committee for all main HSE related matters for the Hydro group. The committee is led by the President & CEO, and consists of the members of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) and the head of global HSE. Hydro’s health and safety activities are governed by the company’s HSE policy and the Global HSE Directive, which are owned by the EVP for People and HSE, and applicable for all own employees and contractors. Health and safety standards are aligned with ISO standards. Health and safety are identified as salient human rights with potential adverse impacts on employees and contractors across Hydro’s operations. Hydro’s ambition is to provide safe and healthy workplaces, promote health and wellbeing, and prevent work related injuries and illness.
The focus on mental health and wellbeing has continued with numerous initiatives during the year to raise awareness, including mental health webinars, quarterly wellbeing topics addressing stress management, heat stress management, workplace hygiene and lighting. In addition, more workshops were run in different countries together with Human Resources and HSE managers to increase the competence related to stress and wellbeing. Toolkits such as psychological safety training for leaders and burnout prevention training have been developed. To ensure a systematic approach to the psychosocial work environment, Hydro has established a new psychosocial risk indicator (PRI) as part of its employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor. A process for follow up of the PRI has been developed, including guidelines and tools.
Hydro is committed to the protection of people, environment, physical assets, data and information. Hydro anticipates and prepares for potentially adverse incidents with crisis potential to maintain business and operational continuity. To prepare for and respond to intentional, unintentional and/or naturally occurring disasters, and to protect people and critical assets, Hydro adapts and initiates security measures depending on the evolving risk picture. Hydro’s emergency preparedness plans enable effective response to high risk incidents and crises, ensuring an effective, cohesive, integrated and timely response to any business disruption, regardless of origin, scale or complexity. Hydro has emergency preparedness plans in place that are regularly exercised against known and identified hazards. Security in Hydro includes a proactive security risk management process, based on analysis, to enable appropriate mitigating actions and accurate and timely decision making. Security guards are employed on a regular basis to protect Hydro’s personnel and assets. No armed personnel are used in Hydro’s security operations. Firearm related incidents and robberies continued to occur in 2024 in relation to Hydro’s operations in Paragominas, Alunorte and Mexico. No Hydro personnel were injured in these events and resulting security mitigation measures were employed to further protect personnel and prevent against other incidents. Global conflict, especially the war in Ukraine, continues to put pressure on international relationships increasing political tensions and elevating the potential risk of sabotage. The Israeli-HamasHizbullah conflict has added to international uncertainty surrounding terror related events and possible conflict escalation in the Middle East. Group Security closely monitors the security risks in Brazil and maintains close contact with both Hydro plants in Mexico with a monthly security call implemented to ensure security mitigation measures are aligned with the developments and threat. Regular security updates are disseminated to all Hydro Business Areas with information and advice provided on any associated travel, security or emergency mitigation measures which may be required due to the war in Ukraine and the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Hydro continues to ensure its security operations conform to the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, ensuring an ethical approach to the delivery of security services. Hydro is responsible for infrastructure and functions on local and regional levels that can be critical to society, and the company operates large scale production sites where a crisis could influence community interests and safety in general. Hence, Hydro is subject to control and follow up by relevant national authorities. Hydro has emergency plans in place by site, Business Area and at group level, and the company exercises and validates these plans regularly. Twenty emergency and crisis management workshops, with risk mapping at their core, were held in 2024, planned and exercised by Group HSE. Based on evolving complex scenarios these workshops were conducted at department, plant, Business Unit, Business Area and Corporate Emergency Team (CET) levels. They help to link the process of security and emergency response, crisis management, and business continuity and recovery from the plant through to business area level and above. In addition, all sites are required to exercise emergency preparedness and response training as a minimum on an annual basis or more frequently based on identified hazards and risks or as stipulated by local laws and regulations Hydro’s strategy to prepare for future pandemics is based on cooperation with local authorities and compliance with rules complemented by a flexible range of Hydro specific responses, robust emergency preparedness and business continuity plans. Where applicable, guidelines and regulations from national authorities such as those pertaining to travel restrictions, social distancing, home office or complete societal lockdowns, have been reflected in Hydro’s internal policies and procedures. Hydro evaluates its key pandemic related risks and vulnerabilities through security and business resilience assessments, which support the preparation and review of business-continuity plans. Measures that have been used and could be reinstated include stock level increases for raw materials to reduce Hydro’s exposure to supply chain disruptions and cash preservation measures to reduce cost, capital expenditures and ensure adequate liquidity to face the financial impact of potential shutdowns.
# 222
We grow Hydro’s purpose is to create a viable organization that empowers people to grow. The company invests in skills development aligned with both business and individual needs to achieve its business strategy and to be an attractive employer. Hydro provides opportunities for personal and professional growth opportunities, aiming to foster a continuous learning culture based on growth mindset among leaders and employees, where learning is integrated into daily work. Learning and development is offered through a blend of on the job training, social initiatives such as networking, mentoring and peer-topeer learning, along with formal learning programs. Hydro’s learning platform offers content from various learning providers and esteemed universities. In addition, every employee engages in an annual appraisal dialogue with their leader to discuss and document development goals and activities. See Note S1.4 for metrics related to completed training activities in 2024. We lead Leadership is a key lever for Hydro’s organizational success. Hydro has developed a leadership framework that combines valid research with Hydro’s unique needs, enabling leaders to effectively deliver the business strategy and embody Hydro’s values. This framework underpins Hydro’s leadership processes, development programs and tools. In 2024, Hydro continued to deploy this framework through its people processes, with established leadership criteria supporting the selection, development and succession of leaders. Leadership development and succession planning for critical positions remain strategic people priorities as Hydro moves towards 2030. To cultivate a strong pipeline of leaders with diverse experience, Hydro aims to rotate leaders across different parts of the organization, and offer development initiatives and programs tailored to the needs of both leaders and specialists. We innovate Innovation is the third pillar of the People Strategy, where technology and digital tools serve as enablers for better decision making and help freeing up time for value adding activities. We belong Belonging is the final pillar of the new people strategy. The ambition is that together Hydro creates a healthy and inclusive environment where everybody's contributions matter.
# 223
To assess the risk and identify cases of discrimination and harassment, Hydro uses an internal grievance mechanism, AlertLine. Group Internal Audit and Investigation (GIA&I) is responsible for overseeing all alerts that are reported through Hydro’s AlertLine. The team assesses the relevance and severity of the Alerts, and is responsible for investigating the ones classified as severe. GIA&I consults a Review Committee comprised of representatives from Legal, HR and Compliance and supports line management and staff functions in their investigations or other follow up activities. See Note G1.1 for metrics related to cases associated with discrimination and harassment received through AlertLine.
The focus on mental health and wellbeing has continued with numerous initiatives during the year to raise awareness, including mental health webinars, quarterly wellbeing topics addressing stress management, heat stress management, workplace hygiene and lighting. In addition, more workshops were run in different countries together with Human Resources and HSE managers to increase the competence related to stress and wellbeing. Toolkits such as psychological safety training for leaders and burnout prevention training have been developed. To ensure a systematic approach to the psychosocial work environment, Hydro has established a new psychosocial risk indicator (PRI) as part of its employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor. A process for follow up of the PRI has been developed, including guidelines and tools.
# 224
Hydro’s ambitious people strategy towards 2030 focuses on learning and development, innovation, leadership, and belonging. These global strategic priorities are supported by targets and activities that address the specific needs and challenges of the business areas.
# 225
0 fatalities or life changing injuries
25% women overall and in leadership position by 2025s
78% score on the Inclusion Index by 2024
# 226
S1.1 Characteristics of Hydro’s employees by gender and region
Number of employees
Number of permanent employees
Number of temporary employees
Number of non-guaranteed hour employees
Number of full-time employees
Number of part-time employees
S1.2Diversity, inclusion and belonging
Inclusion Index (II)
Employee Engagement Index (EEI)
Psycosocial Risk Index (PRI)
Integrity Culture Index (ICI)
S1.3 Health and safety
Total recordable injuries, lost-time injuries, and fatal accident
High risk incidents (HRI)
Occupational illness rate and sick leave
# 227
75% score on the Inclusion Index
24%/21% women overall / in leadership positions
1/1 fatality /life-changing injury in consolidated operations
# 228
The total recordable injuries rate in 2024 was 2.0 per million hours worked, compared to 2.4 in 2023. An improvement is seen in the number of injuries occurred to own employees. The majority of injuries were relatively minor. However, there was one fatality involving a contractor at the aluminium smelter Albras in Brazil. Action plans and global learning plans have been established and implementation is ongoing. There was also one life changing accident at Albras, when a contractor lost two fingers. The deployment of fatality prevention procedures, and associated life saving rules and behaviors continued in 2024. This contributed to a continued reduction in the number and rates of high risk incidents with the potential to be life changing, however, there was an increase in the high risk incidents with the potential to be fatal. Key initiatives include a self-assessment process for critical programs, electrical committees reviewing high risk incidents and required controls to be put in place, digitalizing systems and tools with integrated artificial intelligence functionality increasing the quality of the root cause investigations and risk assessments, monthly deep-dive incident data analyzes to support continuous improvement through root cause and use identification, and defining actions to prevent incidents from recurring. Quarterly health, safety, security, and environment network meetings are used to connect specialists from all business areas to discuss findings and actions taken from high risk incidents, and to share best practice and innovative solutions. Hydro also increased its emphasis on installing engineering controls to prevent high risk incidents from occurring. Hydro’s approach to continual improvement of physical and chemical occupational health is based on work environment risk assessments (WERA), and implementation of risk reduction measures followed up through an associated key performance indicator. WERA provides a systematic approach for evaluating the exposure of similar exposure groups, identifying the most exposed work operations and measures can be implemented before ill health occurs, which applies to both own employees and contractors. The group online HSE tool, IMS, provides a WERA module to facilitate the work process and ensure transparency.
# 229
Hydro engages its employees on health and safety issues through frequent health and safety network meetings in business areas. Engagement on diversity and inclusion issues is primarily done through employee reviews and the range of initiatives sponsored by members of the Executive Leadership Team.
# 230
Hydro engages its employees on health and safety issues through frequent health and safety network meetings in business areas. Engagement on diversity and inclusion issues is primarily done through employee reviews and the range of initiatives sponsored by members of the Executive Leadership Team.
# 231
With a network of over 30,000 suppliers across more than 40 countries and 30,000 customers worldwide, Hydro exerts a substantial impact throughout its value chain. Upholding a responsible value chain is a core component of Hydro’s Just Transition framework, which outlines the company’s ambition to fostering a future that is both environmentally sustainable and socially equitable. Hydro may positively influence workers by creating job opportunities. By establishing rigorous standards for suppliers regarding human and labor rights, and by actively engaging, influencing, and collaborating with them to enhance their human rights commitments and management practices, Hydro can contribute to increasing access to decent work for a greater number of individuals, ensuring their rights are upheld. However, Hydro’s procurement includes raw materials, products and services from industries and regions that present inherent risks to workers’ rights. Within a complex and extensive supply chain, the potential negative impacts on workers affected by Hydro’s operations can be significant. These may include violations of rights, challenges related to decent working conditions, limited access to a safe and healthy working environment, and the risk of accidents or unforeseen incidents leading to injuries, illness, or fatalities. Failure to deliver on requirements and expectations for workers' safety and rights in the value chain can lead to loss of public trust and operational disruptions.
# 232
Potential fatal or life changing accidents affecting workers in the value chain. Potential incidents resulting in breaches of the rights of workers in the value chain.
# 233
The process is described in more detail in the document Human Rights Due Diligence in Hydro available on Hydro’s website under Policies and Tools. Hydro is an active member of the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) and promotes ASI’s certification program to its aluminium suppliers for the sustainable development of their operations.
The mandatory process for due diligence of all suppliers is described in the company wide procedure, Sustainability in the supply chain.
Hydro’s Supplier Code of Conduct sets out the minimum sustainability requirements for all its suppliers. The code is based on internationally recognized standards such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labor Organization, ILO Core Conventions.
Hydro engages and collaborates with stakeholders internally and externally when relevant, to help inform and evaluate the effectiveness of its approach to responsible sourcing. See the human rights due diligence process and the section on Partnerships for more information.
# 234
Contractors working on Hydro's sites are subject to the same requirements and due diligence on health, safety and worker's rights as Hydro's own workforce. Impacts and risks on other workers in the value chain are identified and assessed by performing supplier due diligence activities using data on inherent risk of negative impacts by geography and industry. High and medium risk suppliers are subject to further due diligence using self-assessments, screening tools, direct engagement and audits to determine residual risk of negative impacts, and direct engagement on corrective action plans related to residual risk of negative impacts.
# 235
Hydro’s approach to responsible sourcing is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct and can be summarized in three steps: 1. Mapping of risks and due diligence activities All suppliers are subject to a qualification process, including a screening for risks related to human rights and workers’ rights. As part of creating a common and consistent approach to supply chain management, suppliers in Hydro categorized as medium or high inherent risk, are subject to further screening, using either qualified third party ratings or standard self-assessment forms combined with desktop research. If further due diligence is needed, Hydro conducts a comprehensive review or audit of the supplier to assess if it meets Hydro’s requirements before any agreements are signed. For suppliers with a high inherent sustainability risk, follow-up assessments shall be conducted regularly during contract period. If any non-compliance with Hydro’s requirements is identified, the supplier is subjected to a corrective action plan where mitigative actions are outlined to address the gaps. This plan is designed to ensure that all identified gaps are closed effectively. The mandatory process for due diligence of all suppliers is described in the company wide procedure, Sustainability in the supply chain. 2. Clear expectations Hydro’s Supplier Code of Conduct sets out the minimum sustainability requirements for all its suppliers. The code is based on internationally recognized standards such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labor Organization, ILO Core Conventions. The principles set out in Hydro’s Supplier Code of Conduct are made binding through contractual clauses. Hydro’s Supplier Code of Conduct requires suppliers to conduct due diligence in their own supply chain, and sustainable procurement expectations are reflected in Hydro’s supplier self-assessments, which is specified in its contracts and assessed in visits and audits. 3. Support and development Hydro builds its relationship with its suppliers on mutual trust and development. Hydro works to strengthen and improve its suppliers’ sustainability performance through efforts such as dialogue, knowledge sharing, innovation processes, incentives, and supplier development programs. Hydro actively discusses and promotes human and workers’ rights. While failure to comply with Hydro’s Supplier Code of Conduct may as a last resort result in a termination of the contract, Hydro always seeks to work with its suppliers with intention of continuous improvement as long as it considers this to be in the best interest of the people in its supply chain. As a part of Hydro’s work to strengthen its procurement processes, the company has also incorporated living wage requirements. According to the supplier Code of Conduct, wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall as a minimum meet national legal or industry standards, whichever is higher. Wages should be sufficient to cover basic needs and provide some discretionary income. Hydro engages and collaborates with stakeholders internally and externally when relevant, to help inform and evaluate the effectiveness of its approach to responsible sourcing. See the human rights due diligence process and the section on Partnerships for more information.
# 236
Salient human rights risks affecting workers in the value chain In the aluminium value chain several stages present heightened human rights risks, particularly in the sourcing of raw materials and metals. While all the identified salient risks may be relevant across the value chain, each process step, from bauxite mining to smelting and the use of traders as intermediaries, carries specific concerns. To mitigate these risks, Hydro places significant emphasis on ensuring suppliers achieve ASI (Aluminium Stewardship Initiative) certification, as this provides a comprehensive framework for responsible production, sourcing, and governance for the bauxite, alumina and aluminium flow. For the other supply chains, Hydro focuses on engagement with tier one suppliers and progressively aim to deepen our understanding and oversight further upstream where we see additional risks. Initial screenings guide the adaptation of our due diligence checklists, which are further strengthened by third party assessments, such as those provided by EcoVadis. This risk-based approach supports targeted interventions at critical points in the value chain, addressing specific concerns at each stage. 1. Sourcing of Bauxite Direct sourcing to the Alunorte refinery in Barcarena, Brazil, comes from two mines: Hydro’s own mine Paragominas (70%) and the MRN mine in Trombetas (30%). Both mines are ASI certified. These bauxite sources provide close to 100 percent of the supply to the alumina production going to Hydro’s Norwegian smelters and 100 percent to the Albras smelter. Hydro also has an indirect link to bauxite sources through metal procured to its smelters, casthouses and extruders. In total for both direct and indirect sourcing in 2024, more than 80 percent of the bauxite can be traced back to mines in Brazil and Australia, where Hydro has a good overview of the risks. The third biggest bauxite source, at approximately 8 percent, is indirectly sourced from Guinea. Most of this comes from two mines in Guinea, both of which are ASI certified. However, given the challenging situation in Guinea, Hydro monitors the situation continuously. The remaining 10 percent of the indirectly sourced bauxite are spread on small volumes from different mines across the world. Risks that receive special considerations include land conflicts, labor rights issues such as decent working conditions and health and safety, as well as environmental impacts, which can infringe on human rights. 2. Alumina refining In addition to the bauxite from Paragominas and MRN, the refining process at Alunorte requires electric energy, coal, caustic soda, fuel oil and lime. Coal is sourced from suppliers with mines located in Colombia. As the combination of product category and country is consider a high risk, the suppliers are continuously monitored, through desktop screening and engagement with the suppliers, depending on the findings identified, at regular intervals. Suppliers in high-risk categories are also subjected to on-site assessments. Caustic soda is sourced from the U.S., while the energy, fuel oil and lime come from Brazil. They are subjected to continuous standard due diligence processes that has not identified any material issues in 2024. Situated in the upstream part of the value chain with, Hydro sees similar heightened risks for workers in the value chain as for the bauxite part related to decent working conditions and environmental
For Hydro’s smelters, the key risk commodities outside of alumina have been identified as alloys, anodes and external aluminium used to accelerate the casting process. Key risks in smelting include forced or exploitative labor in alloy and anode production, particularly in China, and the difficulty in tracing materials traded through intermediaries. Close to 100 percent of the alumina used by Hydro’s smelters in Norway comes from the company’s Alunorte refinery. If additional alumina is needed for balancing, the sources are either ASI certified or subject to Hydro audits. The aluminium Hydro produces typically contains between one and 11 percent alloys. Most of the alloys are sourced from China, either through traders or directly from refineries. These are mostly long-term and strategic contracts lasting for many years. Hydro conducts regular audits of the refineries for a range of topics including sustainability issues. When Hydro has negative findings or observations, the company establishes improvement plans with the suppliers. Hydro also sources around 40 percent of the anodes for its Norwegian smelters, directly from producers in China on annual or multi-annual contracts. The rest is produced by Hydro either in Norway or Slovakia, and the suppliers are subjected to the same processes as for alloys sourcing. The metal Hydro sources to its smelters are traded through the London Metal Exchange, which requires the brands to verify compliance with OECD due diligence requirements, reducing the need for Hydro to run independent assessment of these supplies. 4. Casting and extrusions Since Hydro’s casting capacity exceeds its own smelting production, cold metal is also acquired from external sources and traders. Sourcing metal from traders introduces extra challenges related to human rights due diligence due to more complex traceability of the materials. Without full transparency into the origin of the metal, there is a heightened risk of being linked to suppliers who may engage in unethical labor practices. In 2024, Hydro started to map the flow of metals beyond external smelters to better understand where the alumina and bauxite originates. As described above under Sourcing of Bauxite, the vast majority of the bauxite comes from a handful of countries and from mines that are either ASI certified, or that Hydro has supplier-specific data on. Hydro will continue to develop a better understanding of this flow and the mines that are linked to the company, also for smaller volumes, and then assess whether further due diligence may be needed. 5. Recycling As production of recycled aluminium increases, so does Hydro’s demand for scrap. The nature of scrap sourcing is local, and the vast majority of scrap suppliers will be in the immediate vicinity of Hydro’s recyclers. In 2024, approximately 80 percent of externally sourced scrap was supplied by vendors in the same country as Hydro’s recyclers, with close to 92 percent of the scrap suppliers residing in Europe, Canada or the U.S. In addition, Hydro sources some volumes of process scrap from the Middle East. Hydro has a bespoke due diligence process for smaller and local scrap suppliers based on the in-depth knowledge from the scrap sourcing teams. For the larger suppliers, including the ones in the Middle East, Hydro categorizes scrap suppliers as high sustainability risk and assesses them accordingly. Recycling introduces risks such as informal labor arrangements among smaller local suppliers, which may lead to exploitative practices like poor working conditions. There are also challenges in ensuring full supply chain transparency, particularly with process scrap from the Middle East. Additionally, improper handling of scrap materials can create occupational health hazards. 6. Construction, maintenance and logistics Hydro prioritizes human rights due diligence across logistics, construction, and maintenance services to ensure that these workflows are conducted responsibly. Logistics services and transportation carry risks related to excessive working hours, unsafe conditions, and the exploitation of migrant workers. Construction and maintenance on Hydro’s sites may present risks related to hazardous work environments and the potential for unfair labor practices, including wage theft and elements of forced labor. Maintenance services, which are essential for safe operations, also pose occupational risks if safety measures are not strictly followed. To address these risks, Hydro requires that its standards are implemented and conduct audits to verify compliance. 7. Renewable energy production value chain Hydro’s energy production sourcing share risks with those found throughout the raw materials supply chains for aluminium. This includes an indirect risk associated with mining and refining processes in the lower tiers for products and equipment needed for power generation. Components such as generators and turbines require a range of input materials, such as copper, steel and nickel, that have concentrated supply chains associated with upstream social and environmental risks. Hydro will continue to develop a better understanding of the material flows related to energy production sourcing activities with a special focus on souring activities for electromechanical equipment in 2025. Hydro Energy has a selection of investments in the battery value chain, which can be exposed to human rights risks in relation to the extraction and processing of minerals. This includes a 24.1 percent ownership in the maritime energy storage systems company Corvus, which has around 150 suppliers globally, including battery manufacturers. Corvus is sourcing battery cells from Chinese suppliers, which means there are known sector level risks as well as raw material sourcing risks. Hydro Energy has actively supported Corvus's work with supply chain sustainability and included Corvus’ in a human rights risk assessment on China in early 2024. Corvus also publishes its own transparency act statement in accordance with the Norwegian Transparency Act, where further information can be found. Hydro Energy also owns 0.6 percent of Swedish cell manufacturer Northvolt, which has similar risks in their supply chains.
# 237
Due diligence of customers Hydro follows closely regulations for sanctions or restrictions on countries and specific companies. Hydro regularly screens customers and business partners for any potential sanctions. In addition to this, Hydro conducts a sustainability due diligence process before it enters new sales contracts with partners in countries with identified high human rights risks. In 2024, several new business opportunities were assessed and discussed to identify any potential adverse human rights impacts related to the projects and country of operation. Hydro continues to engage in several external networks to understand how to efficiently implement human rights due diligence downstream in its value chain. Supplier and business partner screening As part of the integrity risk management process, more than 9,000 potential or existing counterparties were screened for human rights violations, corruption, money laundering, politically exposed persons, and violations relating to sanctions using the Moody’s Grid integrity risk tool during 2024. New business partners related to most operations are screened before registered in the ERP system. Hydro’s operations in North America also use the denied parties risk tool MK Denial to screen suppliers against 16 official sanction lists multiple times a year. In 2024, approximately 13,600 customers and vendors were screened in MK Denial. All suppliers, customers and other business partners registered in Hydro’s main accounting systems are screened on a weekly basis against recognized international sanction lists. Hydro has developed a spend cube to visualize external spend, measure procurement initiatives, and manage supply chain risk. See Note S2.1 for metrics related to supplier screening and due diligence activities.
# 238
Hydro may positively influence workers by creating job opportunities. By establishing rigorous standards for suppliers regarding human and labor rights, and by actively engaging, influencing, and collaborating with them to enhance their human rights commitments and management practices, Hydro can contribute to increasing access to decent work for a greater number of individuals, ensuring their rights are upheld.
# 239
Findings and impacts Hydro’s risk-based approach directs in-depth due diligence efforts towards critical upstream suppliers within the aluminium value chain, especially in countries with weaker environmental regulations and identified risk of forced labour like conditions. These assessments are supplemented with reviews of suppliers where both sector and country risk may be lower but still well known, for example within logistic services and for larger maintenance and construction projects on our sites. Through Hydro’s audits and reviews in 2024, it has identified three cases of adverse impacts: • In pre-screening of potential supplier, one case of document retention for its sub-supplier was identified. • In pre-screening of potential supplier, lack of overtime payment for its sub-supplier was identified. • In standard supplier audit, one case of insufficient management systems had led to unhygienic working conditions. Hydro takes these issues very seriously and have established corrective action plans in dialogue with the supplier to address the issues and help close the gaps. Of the material issues identified in 2024, all were closed or in the process of being so, by year-end.
# 241
While there were no group wide quantitative targets for engaging directly with workers in the value chain in 2024, Hydro has set a new target to track the share of suppliers that have a corrective action plan in place for human rights residual risks identified in the due diligence process. Hydro will report performance against the new target in 2025.
# 243
Hydro Energy has actively supported Corvus's work with supply chain sustainability and included Corvus’ in a human rights risk assessment on China in early 2024. Corvus also publishes its own transparency act statement in accordance with the Norwegian Transparency Act, where further information can be found. Hydro Energy also owns 0.6 percent of Swedish cell manufacturer Northvolt, which has similar risks in their supply chains.
9,520 Total suppliers screened in 2024
2,878 High and medium sustainability risk suppliers in 2024
# 244
Through regular assessment, follow up and collaboration with selected high risk suppliers, Hydro seeks to contribute to continuous development. Hydro conducted 215 supplier audits in 2024, including topics related to human rights, working conditions and HSE. Key findings from the audits relate to lack of management systems, environmental awareness, compliance controls and emergency preparedness. Around 30 percent of the audits led to action plans, and by the end of 2024, almost 100 percent of the corrective actions proposed by Hydro resulted in improved performance.
# 245
Contractors working on Hydro's sites are engaged directly on health and safety standards the same way as Hydro's own workforce. Other potentially affected workers in the value chain are engaged indirectly though Hydro's requirements and expectations for workers' rights as set out in Hydro's Supplier Code of Conduct.
# 246
Contractors working on Hydro's sites are engaged directly on health and safety standards the same way as Hydro's own workforce. Other potentially affected workers in the value chain are engaged indirectly though Hydro's requirements and expectations for workers' rights as set out in Hydro's Supplier Code of Conduct.
# 247
As a global aluminium and energy company with mining interests, Hydro’s operations impact communities in association with its own operations and operations in Hydro’s value chain. Hydro’s business activities impact a large number of people in local communities positively through job creation and local value creation. Hydro contributes to the societies to which it belongs by offering decent jobs and by paying taxes and fees. In some communities, Hydro also establishes and maintains infrastructure and supports social programs and investments. Hydro’s business also has the potential to adversely impact local communities. The company’s approach to identifying and addressing such impacts is described in this chapter. Hydro can only succeed as a company if the communities around its operations also succeed. The company depends on local institutions and infrastructure, and trust and good relationships with local communities are of key importance to Hydro’s operations. Failure to deliver on local communities’ requirements and expectations towards Hydro’s environmental and social responsibilities can lead to loss of public trust and operational disruptions.
# 248
Potential incidents affecting the rights of people in local communities. Potential accidents negatively impacting the health and safety of people in local communities.
# 249
Hydro’s commitment to respect the human rights of affected communities associated with our operations and value chain, and to manage any potential or actual adverse impacts is set out in the company’s Human Rights Policy, which is approved by the Executive Leadership Team (ELT). The operational responsibility for ensuring that engagement with affected communities is conducted as set out in the policy is delegated to the business areas. The policy is aligned with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Hydro’s commitment to respect human rights is guided by internationally recognized human rights and labor standards, including those contained in the International Bill of Human Rights. The policy provides reference to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (International Labor Organization, ILO, Convention 169) and other conventions relevant to affected communities. All affected communities are covered by the policy. The policy includes Hydro’s commitment to be particularly attentive to the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples, as well as traditional communities, in particular with regards to their rights to self-determination, to lands which they traditionally occupy, to their customs, traditions and institutions, and to their free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). In the policy, Hydro also commits to be particularly attentive to the rights of human rights defenders, considering in particular their rights to freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and to protest against Hydro’s business and operations. Hydro’s approach to human rights due diligence in relation to the rights of communities and indigenous peoples specifically is also set out in Hydro’s Human Rights Policy, and detailed further in the Position Statement on Human Rights Due Diligence. Potential or actual adverse impacts on local communities are managed through this process. If Hydro identifies adverse human rights impact that the company has caused or contributed to, Hydro works to cooperate in, promote access to and/or provide remediation.
# 250
Impacts and risks are identified and assessed by mapping the local sustainability context and transition challenges where Hydro operates using data on inherent risk of negative impacts by geography and industry. Potential human rights impacts are further assessed by direct engagement of potentially affected stakeholders through stakeholder dialogue to understand what is expected of the company, what is important to local communities, how Hydro impacts them and how the company can solve common challenges.
# 251
Potential and actual adverse impacts As part of Hydro’s human rights due diligence process, the company identifies the risk of salient human rights impacts on affected communities. The risks are identified through Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessment process, and additional processes for new projects and investments, drawing on internal and third-party human rights assessments, internal and external expertise, and other relevant sources. Any actual adverse impacts and specific risks are identified through the ongoing human rights due diligence process. In cases where mitigating actions are implemented, these are documented as part of Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessments and human rights data collection, and effects are monitored to the extent possible. For information about cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve affected communities in own operations or in the value chain (ref. ESRS S3-1), see note G1.1 in the Business Conduct chapter.
# 252
Hydro uses human rights risk levels per country to help guide its human rights management. The risk levels are based on a range of independent human rights sources, such as the UN Human Development Index and the TI Corruption Perception Index. Hydro’s assessments are also based on Hydro’s internal risk evaluation and, for the aluminium production and sourcing, drawing on materiality assessments conducted by the International Aluminium Institute (IAI), on the severity and likelihood of potential impacts on people at the different stages of aluminium production. Hydro has identified salient risks of adverse impacts on affected communities for some parts of the aluminium production process. Hydro has not identified salient risk of adverse impacts on affected communities in the extrusions and recycling part of its aluminium business. Hydro’s fully owned primary metal plants are located in Norway, which has been assessed as a low-risk country related to adverse impacts on human rights in affected communities associated with Hydro’s aluminium production. In addition to Hydro’s Norwegian production, Hydro is the main indirect shareholder of Albras primary metal and the alumina refinery Alunorte in Barcarena, Brazil. Hydro also owns the bauxite mine Paragominas. Hydro has identified the inherent risks related to communities in Northern Brazil as the most salient due to the combination of the country and regional risk and the industrial processes conducted in this part of the production process. The industrial industrial processes within aluminium production carry an inherent risk of pollution, linked to process emissions to air and water, and the potential for accidental spills or leakages. Such emissions can have a negative impact on the local environment and local communities if not managed correctly. Hydro’s business activities are subject to emissions regulations, including local emission permits, as well as regional and international regulation of emissions. Hydro’s approach to environmental management is covered in the chapter Pollution. This is closely linked to the health and safety of local communities, which has been identified as a salient human rights risk across Hydro’s business. Hydro has not identified the risk of adverse impacts on affected communities to be salient in its own operations in Hydro’s energy business. Please see the section “Affected communities in value chain including joint ventures and joint operations” for information about other identified salient human rights risks and impact in relation to joint ventures and the value chain in Hydro’s energy business. Context specific salient human rights risks are described in the section “Affected communities in value chain including joint ventures and joint operations” and in the section “Joint ventures and value chain,” where applicable
# 253
Grievance mechanism Canal Direto is Hydro’s operational level grievance mechanism open to all external stakeholders in Brazil and targeted specifically at affected communities. The mechanism allows community members to raise their concerns anonymously. Grievances are assessed according to the criticality of each case. The process follows the criteria for effective grievance mechanisms set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The effectiveness of the grievance mechanism is monitored through dialogue with the affected communities, monitoring of the type and volume of cases received, as well as through a satisfaction survey for users. In 2024, the Canal Direto registered 633 grievances via telephone, online form and email. Of the registrations, 92 percent were identified and eight percent anonymous. 84 percent were related to requests for information and the most frequently registered topics were sponsorships, job and career opportunities at Hydro, visits to operations, donations, commercial matters, auctions and interest in research, innovation and new technologies. See also note G1.1 for further details about grievances received through Canal Direto in 2024. Human Rights Impact Assessment Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas began the implementation of a Human Rights Action Plan to mitigate risks in the operations in 2020. A new Human Rights Impact Assessment of Hydro’s operations in the state of Pará is currently underway, conducted by an external consultancy. As part of this process, a baseline study has been conducted, and the findings and recommendations are expected in 2025. Community dialogue Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas have implemented a structured approach to effective and inclusive engagement with diverse communities in the region. Hydro engages in dialogue with community groups, traditional groups and civil society organizations which represent women, children, human rights defenders or other underrepresented and at risk groups in the local communities. Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives Since 2018 Hydro has supported, by Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives, the Sustainable Barcarena Initiative (SBI) to enhance community dialogue. This is an independent forum to support sustainable development in Barcarena. The overall aim is to bring local stakeholders together to discuss challenges and opportunities, strengthen capabilities and decide about the main social investments supported by the Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF). In 2024, about 178 community leaders participated in meetings, dialogues, or programs organized by the initiative. SBI also plays an important role coordinating the financing rounds of Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF) to ensure Hydro’s social investments meet the local community’s needs. In 2024, HSF supported 36 community based projects.
# 254
Hydro’s business activities impact a large number of people in local communities positively through job creation and local value creation. Hydro contributes to the societies to which it belongs by offering decent jobs and by paying taxes and fees. In some communities, Hydro also establishes and maintains infrastructure and supports social programs and investments.
# 255
Affected communities in value chain including joint ventures and joint operations Aluminium production Based on an assessment of country and regional risk, the industrial processes and affected communities in the surrounding areas, Hydro has not identified significant risks of adverse human rights impacts for affected communities linked to Hydro’s joint venture operations outside Brazil. This includes one joint asset, Alouette (Canada), and one joint operation, Tomago (Australia), which are in the vicinity of indigenous or traditional communities. Potential and actual impacts identified in the external aluminium value chain are covered in the chapter Workers in the value chain. Energy This section describes potential and actual adverse impacts on affected communities in Hydro’s renewable energy value chain and joint venture operations. The projects mentioned below are the ones where Hydro assesses the inherent risk to affected communities to be the highest. Solar and wind projects in Brazil Hydro Rein is a joint venture owned by Hydro and Macquarie Asset Management and an important supplier of renewable energy to Hydro. Hydro Rein has a minority stake in two solar plant complexes in Brazil, Mendubim and Boa Sorte, that started operations during 2024. Hydro Rein also has a minority stake in the wind park Ventos de São Zacarias, which is currently under construction. Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas own 98 percent of the voting rights and 10 percent of the equity in these projects. In 2024, six families were resettled due to the construction of Ventos de São Zacarias. Two families were resettled due to the construction of Mendubim. The families were engaged in a participatory consultation process on the resettlement process and the definition of appropriate mitigation measures. A Resettlement Action Plan has been developed in accordance with IFC Performance Standards and mitigation is monitored in line with this. To address the impact on the families’ livelihood, a “Livelihood Restoration Plan” has been established and will be monitored. Follow up with some of the resettled families show that they are satisfied, follow up is still to be conducted with some of the families. There are two self-identified Quilombola communities in the vicinity of the Ventos de São Zacarias project. The project is engaging in FPIC consultations with the communities in accordance with ILO Convention 169 and the IFC Performance Standards. Compensation actions agreed upon by the stakeholders in FPIC consultation are either ongoing or completed. Wind project in Sweden Hydro Rein is a joint venture partner of Stor-Skjälsjön, a wind farm in the northern part of Sweden which entered into full operation at the end of 2024. Four nearby Sami communities were initially consulted about their land use, and only Ohredahke sameby reported use of the northern area of the project for occasional reindeer winter grazing. Oherdahke Sami community acts as the focal point for the overall Sami community dialogue. During development, the project engaged in dialogue with the nearby Sami communities as a part of the regular public consultation process and during the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. The dialogue was facilitated by a project representative speaking the Sami language, with the objective of gathering input on the use of the project area to minimize the impacts from construction and operation on their livelihoods and cultural practices of reindeer husbandry. Based on the dialogue, the parties agreed on mitigation measures that were included as permit conditions. The measures include minimizing project activities during winter grazing period, unless otherwise agreed upon by the affected community. The project annually, and as needed during construction and operation, informs the nearby Sámi communities about construction, maintenance, services, repair, and potential ice-related risks at the wind farm to minimize disturbances to reindeer husbandry and support their planning. The support also extends to relocating reindeer if needed. In addition, the project has previously provided support to affected Sámi communities for reindeer infrastructure. The agreed mitigation measures with the Sami Communities have been followed and the implementation of these permit conditions are reported to the supervisory authority on an annual basis. Power purchase agreement in Norway In Norway, Hydro has an offtake agreement with Nordic Wind Power DA for delivery of power from the Fosen wind power installation. Nordic Wind Power is a minority owner of Fosen Vind DA. The projects on the Fosen peninsula are located within Sami reindeer grazing land. Agreements on mitigating measures and compensation for extra costs during the construction phase were previously entered into with the two affected reindeer herding groups. In October 2021, the Norwegian supreme court determined that the construction of the wind park had not sufficiently taken into account the rights of the Sami population. In December 2023, the Sør-Fosen Sijte reindeer herding district and Fosen Vind entered into an agreement. In March 2024, an agreement was reached between Nord-Fosen Siida and Fosen Vind. Hydro has been and will continue to monitor the situation. Power purchase agreements in Brazil Hydro has several offtake agreements in Brazil. In general, Hydro assesses the human rights risks to be high in relation to the construction of hydropower dams in the country. Environmental impacts with a resulting impact on local communities, land issues and gaps in FPIC processes have been assessed as the most significant risks. Please see the chapter Workers in the value chain for information about Hydro’s processes for managing supply chain risks. Input material for hydropower and clean energy systems Hydro is procuring a wide range of products and equipment needed for power production. Copper, cobalt, lithium and nickel are key transition minerals and input material for several components needed for energy production and the infrastructure development of clean energy systems. These minerals are key inputs in electromechanical components for hydropower operations, such as generators, turbines and cables, as well as energy storage systems (BESS), solar and wind. Although these minerals are important enablers of the green transition, their extraction and associated supply chains can cause harm to the environment and may negatively impact the land rights of local community members, including indigenous communities. Hydro will continue to map and assess impacts from mining, processing and refining of materials used in key products and components for power production.
# 256
Hydro has established a framework through which the company seeks to contribute to a transition that leaves no one behind, in line with the UN’s 2030 Agenda (“Just Transition Framework”).
# 257
Improve lives and livelihoods wherever Hydro operates by contributing to Improve lives and livelihoods wherever Hydro operates by contributing to
Improve lives and livelihoods wherever Hydro operates by contributing to Resilient local communities in a changing world
Improve lives and livelihoods wherever Hydro operates by contributing to Skills and jobs for the future low-carbon economy
# 259
A risk associated with decarbonization efforts is that social inequalities increase as new technologies introduce the need for a different type of skillset or bring other changes to the labor market. To address this, Hydro’s Just Transition framework includes a focus on ensuring that people have the necessary skills and jobs for the future low-carbon economy. Hydro’s ambition is to equip 500,000 people with essential skills for the future economy by 2030. The insight from measuring the people reached and the impact of its initiatives make Hydro better equipped to select and execute future initiatives with a positive impact. In 2024, Hydro reached more than 44,000 people, which makes the total number reached since 2018 to 241,000 people. Hydro is still on track to reach the target of 500,000 by year end 2030. Continuous improvement of current initiatives and the development of new high impact initiatives are important focus areas.
# 260
A key element in Hydro’s Just Transition framework is to strengthen the societies and communities where it operates. The way Hydro does this differs from country to country and between communities. The main contribution is generated from the company’s operations through production and purchase of goods and services, direct and indirect job creation, and tax payments. While Hydro’s approach to supporting resilience varies depending on the local context, a common factor is the partnership approach, working with local partners with strong knowledge of the local context, as well as strong engagement with local community representatives. Hydro has a number of social programs aimed at building local community resilience. Some of its community investments and programs are linked to for example mining license requirements in Brazil and regulated watersheds in Norway, while others are voluntary commitments. The programs target education, economic growth, decent work, entrepreneurship, capacity building and the strengthening of institutions. In 2024, Hydro spent around NOK 300 million in total on community investments, investments through Hydro Sustainability Fund, charitable donations, sponsorships and TerPaz (local community centres). Excluding TerPaz, there is a 30 percent increase compared to the prior year, mainly due to the increased community efforts in Brazil and an increase in the Hydro Sustainability Fund. Please see the Note S3.1 for more information. In 2024, Hydro piloted a program to increase funding to projects aligned with the company’s Just Transition Framework in the communities where it operates. The project invited employees to apply for support for external partners, such as community organizations, to conduct projects supporting a just transition in the local community. 36 projects were selected for support in the pilot phase. Hydro also supports local communities through the transfer of competence that takes place through the company’s cooperation with universities and research institutions. This includes the cooperation with three academic institutions in Pará, Brazil, and the University of Oslo through the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway. In addition, Hydro provides scholarships to selected PhD candidates doing research relevant for its business areas. Hydro is also the sponsor of a professorship in Norway and has several adjunct professors among its own employees. See the section on partnerships in the Business Conduct chapter for more information.
# 261
Potentially affected stakeholders in local communities are engaged directly through stakeholder dialogues and through local media, and informed and consulted when potential impacts have been identified. Local authorities and NGOs are also engaged on impact assessments to identify potential risks.
# 262
Potentially affected stakeholders in local communities are engaged directly through stakeholder dialogues and through local media, and informed and consulted when potential impacts have been identified. Local authorities and NGOs are also engaged on impact assessments to identify potential risks.
# 263
As a global aluminium and renewable energy company with operations in more than 40 countries and interaction with a large number of business partners including more than 30,000 suppliers, Hydro depends on transparency, trust, ethical conduct and compliance throughout its organization and value chain. Compliance with applicable laws, regulations and Hydro’s policies, procedures and guidelines can help mitigate a range of risks, including those associated with corruption, competition, economic sanctions, human rights, security, health, safety, environment, data privacy, and corporate reporting requirements. Failure to comply with applicable regulations and expectations for responsible business conduct can result in loss of license to operate and could expose Hydro to investigations, administrative, criminal and civil sanctions such as fines and penalties, materially impacting financial results. In addition, there could be adverse consequences for individuals and reputational damage for the company.
# 264
A breach of cyber security could result in a broad range of impacts including HSE events, financial and reputational, operational disruptions and the leakage of private or confidential data.
# 265
Failure to comply with applicable regulations and expectations for responsible business conduct can result in loss of license to operate and could expose Hydro to investigations, administrative, criminal and civil sanctions such as fines and penalties, materially impacting financial results. In addition, there could be adverse consequences for individuals and reputational damage for the company.
# 266
Hydro is committed to applying ethical business practices and compliance throughout its organization and supply chain. Hydro’s board approved Code of Conduct creates the foundation that supports its efforts to do the right things, and to always act with integrity throughout its global organization, wherever it operates and conducts business, on behalf of Hydro.
Hydro’s AntiCorruption Program provides an overview of the main elements in Hydro’s anti-corruption efforts, which includes risk assessments, tone from the top, policies and procedures, training and communication, third party risk management, reporting and investigation, and disciplinary measures.
Hydro’s global data protection constitutes the company’s binding corporate rules for data protection (BCR) and ensures compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
# 267
Hydro identifies inherent risk of corruption and other business conduct issues through corruption indexes and other screening tools, and assess potential impacts and risks through supplier and business partner due diligence processes. Hydro monitors business conduct incidents through cases reported to line management, supporting staff functions, Hydro’s grievance mechanisms, AlertLine and Canal Direto, quarterly and year end compliance reporting from its business areas, and information collected from Hydro’s legal and compliance departments
# 268
Hydro is committed to applying ethical business practices and compliance throughout its organization and supply chain. Hydro’s board approved Code of Conduct creates the foundation that supports its efforts to do the right things, and to always act with integrity throughout its global organization, wherever it operates and conducts business, on behalf of Hydro. In Hydro, compliance is defined as adherence to applicable laws and regulations as well as Hydro’s governance documents. Specific policies and procedures as well as guidelines have been established to assist line management to adhere to Hydro’s compliance requirements. Special emphasis is made on reducing the risk of noncompliance within financial reporting, anti-corruption, competition, data privacy, economic sanctions, human rights, security, health, safety and environment. Hydro’s compliance system is based on a clear governance structure defining roles and responsibilities regarding compliance and all compliance related activities undertaken throughout the company. Compliance risk governance owners define group wide policies and procedures and are responsible for a establishing a training and awareness plans. For legal entities where Hydro holds less than 100 percent of the voting rights, Hydro is working through their boards of directors to promote the principles in Hydro’s Code of Conduct and its governance documents. In 2024, Hydro continued to strengthen the compliance program through various updates and improvements. The management of compliance risks are integrated in Hydro’s business planning, enterprise risk management and follow up process, including relevant risk-mitigating actions and relevant key performance indicators. The progress of actions as well as any noncompliance matters are addressed in the quarterly internal board meetings that each business area has with the CEO, and an annual compliance report is submitted to the Board of Directors. The chief compliance officer reports to the Board of Directors through the Board Audit Committee at his own discretion. In addition, he participates in all Board Audit Committee meetings and provides quarterly compliance updates to the audit committee. He also meets with the Board of Directors periodically Hydro monitors business conduct incidents through cases reported to line management, supporting staff functions, Hydro’s grievance mechanism, AlertLine, quarterly and year-end compliance reporting from its business areas, and information collected from Hydro’s legal and compliance departments. Hydro’s employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor, benchmarks employee perception of Hydro’s integrity culture. The score is measured against external benchmarks and is part of the KPIs of the CEO scorecard. In 2024, the integrity culture index was measured again and the scores showed a positive trend since 2020. Hydro is committed to building a culture of trust where employees are comfortable to ask questions, seek guidance, raise concerns, and report suspected violations to the Code of Conduct, applicable laws or regulations or Hydro’s obligations. Concerns and complaints can be raised with local management, but employees may also raise the issue directly with Human Resources, HSE, union representatives, Compliance or Legal. Employees, on-site contractors, and others may also use Hydro’s confidential reporting channel, the AlertLine, where concerns can be reported to Group Internal Audit & Investigation. The AlertLine allows anonymous reporting and is available in several languages. Reports can be made online or via toll-free phone numbers listed at Hydro’s intranet and on Hydro.com. Hydro does not tolerate retaliation against anyone who speaks up in good faith to ask a question, raises a concern, reports a suspected violation or participates in an internal company investigation. For further information about the use of Hydro’s global reporting channel and the AlertLine, see Note G1. The Chief Audit Executive (CAE) is independent from the line organization and reports to Hydro’s Board of Directors and the Board Audit Committee. The CAE participates in all Board Audit Committee meetings and provides quarterly updates to the Committee and Corporate Management on matters reported through the AlertLine and internal audit activities. Hydro’s Group Internal Audit & Investigation has resources in Norway, Brazil, and North America.
# 269
Anti-corruption Acting with integrity and combating corruption is an essential part of what Hydro considers responsible business conduct. Hydro does not tolerate any forms of bribery or corruption, including facilitation payments and kickbacks. Further, Hydro is committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations to fight corruption and bribery, including the UN Convention against corruption. Through Hydro’s comprehensive compliance framework, the company works systematically to combat corruption and ensure compliant behavior throughout its global organization. Hydro’s AntiCorruption Program provides an overview of the main elements in Hydro’s anti-corruption efforts, which includes risk assessments, tone from the top, policies and procedures, training and communication, third party risk management, reporting and investigation, and disciplinary measures. The key pillars of the compliance framework are illustrated in the figure, below. Functions involved in commercial activities and interactions with government officials, especially in regions with heightened inherent corruption risk, are most at risk and hence targeted for compliance training. Data protection and cybersecurity Hydro’s global data protection constitutes the company’s binding corporate rules for data protection (BCR) and ensures compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Designated data privacy coordinators for all business areas and staff functions form part of the data privacy network chaired by the head of data privacy. Hydro is continuously working on the robustness of the data privacy network, which is seen as a key point for a well functioning data privacy program. With a program established in 2018, Hydro has also worked on several data privacy program improvements in procedures and supporting processes to ensure continuous fit to the business. Cybercrime is increasing globally, exposing Hydro to a range of threats to the integrity, availability and confidentiality of its systems. Threats may include attempts to access information, ransomware attacks, destructive installation of viruses, denial of service and other digital security breaches. A breach of cyber security could result in a broad range of impacts including HSE events, financial and reputational, operational disruptions and the leakage of private or confidential data. Hydro’s CFO is the executive sponsor and owner of Hydro’s group wide multiyear cyber security improvement program following the cyber attack on Hydro in 2019. Further, the Board Audit Committee exercises oversight over Hydro’s aggregated risk profile, where cyber security risk is regularly assessed. Cyber security risk assessment is an integrated part of Hydro’s enterprise risk management system, in order to facilitate the business areas’ awareness on cyber security risk to their critical assets and operations. Critical assets both in plants and in the enterprise IT platform are subject to security monitoring as well as internal and external requirements to security. All personnel with access to sensitive information are bound to secrecy and required to handle information according to corporate guidelines and requirements. Hydro’s enterprise IT platform provides services as digital collaboration, enterprise resource planning, personnel databases and systems for external reporting. This platform is being modernized to withstand the developing cyber security threats and also segregated from plant industrial control systems. Offensive security testing of the enterprise IT platform as well as critical assets in the plants is also executed on a regular basis. Employee’s personal awareness and behavior is important to mitigate cyber risk. Cyber security training for all 13,000 IT users and role specific training for Industrial Control System users are conducted yearly. Training of crisis management relating to cyber security incident scenarios is also conducted at regular intervals on group level. Compliance training In Hydro, compliance awareness training is provided on a range of topics and consists of classroom-training, workshops, town hall meetings and various e-learning modules. The Code of Conduct states that all employees are expected to participate in required training. In 2024, training was provided on topics in anti-corruption, Hydro’s code of Conduct, competition law, data privacy, trade sanctions, human rights, integrity and market regulations. Companywide campaigns on the revised Code of Conduct and on data privacy were run 2024. Hydro also provides anti-corruption training to selected third parties, including suppliers. Compliance training is mainly carried out by Group Compliance and Group Legal, but other group functions and compliance professionals in the business areas also carry out compliance training. See Note G1.3 in appendix for metrics on compliance training and Note S1.4 in appendix for metrics on training activities completed by Hydro’s employees in 2024. There is a yearly compliance deep dive session for the board Audit Committee.
# 270
Management of relationships with suppliers Combating corruption and respecting human rights are integral to Hydro’s supplier requirements. See the Workers in the value chain chapter for information about Hydro’s supply chain and how the company screens its suppliers and business partners. Hydro tracks on-time payment statistics to prevent late payments to suppliers, with automatic dashboards to track performance on a daily basis for approx. 80 percent of Hydro’s units globally. Payment terms vary between categories of purchase, between regions, and by type of business. In 2024 for upstream units, the average payment term days were 33, while for downstream units it was 45 days. 92 percent of invoices were paid on time in line with agreed-upon terms.
# 271
Hydro’s employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor, benchmarks employee perception of Hydro’s integrity culture. The score is measured against external benchmarks and is part of the KPIs of the CEO scorecard. In 2024, the integrity culture index was measured again and the scores showed a positive trend since 2020
Hydro can contribute to responsible business conduct through its regular engagement with suppliers, customers, and business partners. By being vocal about compliance and ESG topics, consistently acting with integrity, following ethical standards, and requiring counterparts to adhere to the same standards, Hydro can have a positive impact on business conduct more broadly.
Hydro also aims to have a positive impact on the fight against bribery, corruption, and human rights breaches through participation in partnerships and industry associations, and by actively engaging with public authorities and other stakeholders on these issues
# 272
Hydro monitors business conduct incidents through cases reported to line management, supporting staff functions, Hydro’s grievance mechanism, AlertLine, quarterly and year-end compliance reporting from its business areas, and information collected from Hydro’s legal and compliance departments. Hydro’s employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor, benchmarks employee perception of Hydro’s integrity culture. The score is measured against external benchmarks and is part of the KPIs of the CEO scorecard. In 2024, the integrity culture index was measured again and the scores showed a positive trend since 2020. Hydro is committed to building a culture of trust where employees are comfortable to ask questions, seek guidance, raise concerns, and report suspected violations to the Code of Conduct, applicable laws or regulations or Hydro’s obligations. Concerns and complaints can be raised with local management, but employees may also raise the issue directly with Human Resources, HSE, union representatives, Compliance or Legal. Employees, on-site contractors, and others may also use Hydro’s confidential reporting channel, the AlertLine, where concerns can be reported to Group Internal Audit & Investigation. The AlertLine allows anonymous reporting and is available in several languages. Reports can be made online or via toll-free phone numbers listed at Hydro’s intranet and on Hydro.com. Hydro does not tolerate retaliation against anyone who speaks up in good faith to ask a question, raises a concern, reports a suspected violation or participates in an internal company investigation. For further information about the use of Hydro’s global reporting channel and the AlertLine, see Note G1.
# 273
Commitment to building a culture of integrity and trust
Hydro is committed to applying ethical business practices and compliance throughout its organization and supply chain. Hydro’s board approved Code of Conduct creates the foundation that supports its efforts to do the right things, and to always act with integrity throughout its global organization, wherever it operates and conducts business, on behalf of Hydro.
# 274
The European Green Deal is a roadmap on policies to achieve carbon neutrality in the EU by 2050 and includes policies to develop markets for low-carbon and circular products, in combination with stricter targets for emission reduction. Hydro sees interesting opportunities in both this roadmap, and the Critical Raw Materials Act and Net Zero Industry Act.
# 275
G1.1 Non-compliance with business conduct standards
G1.2Non-compliance with laws and regulations
# 276
Non-compliance cases are normally reported to line management and/or supporting staff functions including Group Compliance, Group Internal Audit and Investigations, Human Resources, Legal, HSE, Finance and Accounting. Non-compliances can also be reported through Hydro’s AlertLine, which offers the possibility of anonymous reporting, unless otherwise prohibited by local law, or Canal Direto, the grievance channel designed for external stakeholders in Brazil. See Note G1.1 for further information. Potential non-compliance cases being reported, shall go through an initial assessment. If an investigation is launched, it is often let by Group Internal Audit & Investigations. In some cases, when deemed appropriate, external third parties carry out the investigation. A group wide procedure defines the process and approach for investigations. Group Internal Audit & Investigations ensures an independent and objective investigation and reporting of the results. Non-compliances with laws and regulations Significant non-compliance cases are defined as all material pending or threatened litigation and claims to which a consolidated Hydro company is party. Instances of non-compliance with laws or regulations that have resulted in a fine of NOK 1 million being issued by a public authority, as well as relevant developments in cases that could have a material reputational or financial impact, are reported below. No new non-compliances with laws and regulations that resulted in significant fines were registered in 2024. See Note G1.2 for more information. The remaining aspects of the previously reported case involving environmental compliance issues in Hydro’s casthouse The Dalles, Oregon, U.S. were resolved On December 11, 2023, Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC was sentenced in accordance with a negotiated plea agreement. Under the plea agreement, the company admitted to a federal misdemeanor violation of the Clean Air Act. In parallel, the company entered into a three-year Administrative Agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Suspension and Debarment Division with respect to this matter. The company timely submitted its first annual report on September 26, 2024 and is in material compliance with its obligations under the Administrative Agreement. No material inc
# 277
The cases below are developments in 2024 related to lawsuits filed after the 2018 Alunorte Rainfall event by associations or public entities. For an overview of the Alunorte rainfall event, please see Hydro’s Annual Report 2018. On August 1, 2019: About 100 Individuals from Abaetetuba and Barcarena (State of Pará) filed a lawsuit against Alunorte. The case relates to the 2018 rainfall event and claims for compensation for alleged environmental damage. Currently there are 142 lawsuits filed by these individuals with the same allegations and requests. Of these 142 cases, in 102 cases the Court issued a decision to stay the cases until a final decision under another collective lawsuit related to the 2018 event related to the same facts and allegations is rendered. The remaining 40 cases are ongoing and pending a decision on the request to stay the cases by the lower Court. Other collective lawsuits were previously filed by Cainquiama and other associations in Brazil after the 2018 rainfall event alleging pollution from Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas, as well as impact on the communities located in Barcarena and surroundings. All these lawsuits are pending a decision at the lower court level. On February 5, 2021, Cainquiama and nine Brazilian individuals filed a lawsuit with the Rotterdam District Court, in the Netherlands, against Hydro’s Dutch entities and Norsk Hydro ASA (Hydro) seeking compensation for alleged financial damages and personal injuries suffered as a result of Alunorte and Albras activities in the municipality of Barcarena, Brazil. According to the plaintiffs, Hydro’s Dutch entities and Hydro are part of Alunorte and Albras’ corporate group and therefore should be liable for alleged environmental violations caused in the municipality of Barcarena throughout the years. An interim judgement on certain procedural aspects of the lawsuit was rendered by the Rotterdam court in May 2024, and the case will proceed to a hearing on the merits scheduled for March 2025. Other cases In 2019, Cainquiama filed a lawsuit claiming compensation for alleged delay in the implementation of the fuel switch project at Alunorte. In a court decision issued by the Pará lower court in May 2024, the companies were ordered to pay BRL 50 million in moral damage. The defending companies do not agree with the decision as the fuel switch was timely implemented and have appealed the decision. Following an overflow of storm water from the bauxite residue deposits at Alunorte in 2009, there are still legal issues pending. In 2012, more than 5,400 lawsuits related to the overflow were filed by individuals with the local court. Of the 5,400 lawsuits, only two are still ongoing pending final decision. All the other lawsuits were closed with favorable decision to Alunorte. Besides these cases, there are also two class actions filed by local associations under which unfavorable decisions were issued against Alunorte. The decisions understood that Alunorte was liable for damages and, therefore, compensation should be paid. One of the cases is pending a decision by the Court of Appeal and for the other case the Superior Court of Justice denied Alunorte’s appeal based on procedural rules. This case is pending an enforcement decision and in Alunorte’s view there are severe legal errors in the decision that must be addressed. In addition, a criminal lawsuit was also filed by the Federal Public Prosecutor Office (MPF) on this same event. In July 2024, the Federal lower Court understood that Alunorte was liable for alleged environmental damages and, therefore, should pay a penalty of BRL 100 million. Alunorte disagree with the decision and has appealed.
# 278
Hydro engages its major shareholder, the Norwegian state, on compliance and business conduct in quarterly meetings and engages local authorities, civil society, and industry associations and other companies regularly. Hydro also participates in the development of industry practices through engagement with organizations such as Transparency International Norway, the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network, the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) and the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI).
# 279
Hydro engages its major shareholder, the Norwegian state, on compliance and business conduct in quarterly meetings and engages local authorities, civil society, and industry associations and other companies regularly. Hydro also participates in the development of industry practices through engagement with organizations such as Transparency International Norway, the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network, the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) and the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI).
[040000] GRI 101 - Biodiversity | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024 | |
Disclosure 101-1 Policies to halt and reverse biodiversity loss | |
101-1-a: Description of policies or commitments to halt and reverse biodiversity loss and how these are informed by the 2050 Goals and 2030 Targets in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework | |
101-1-b: Extent to which policies or commitments apply to the organization’s activities and business relationships | |
101-1-c: Goals and targets to halt and reverse biodiversity loss | |
101-1-c: The goals and targets to halt and reverse biodiversity loss are informed by scientific consensus | |
101-1-c: Start date for the base year | |
101-1-c: End date for the base year | |
101-1-c: Indicators used to evaluate progress | |
Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts | |
Application of Mitigation Hierarchy | |
101-2-a-i: Description of actions taken to avoid negative impacts on biodiversity | |
101-2-a-ii: Description of actions taken to minimize negative impacts on biodiversity that were not avoided | |
101-2-a-iii: Description of actions taken to restore and rehabilitate affected ecosystems | |
101-2-a-iii: Goals of the restoration and rehabilitation | |
101-2-a-iii: Description of how stakeholders are engaged throughout the restoration and rehabilitation actions | |
101-2-a-iv: Description of actions taken to offset residual negative impacts on biodiversity | |
101-2-a-v: Description of transformative actions taken and additional conservation actions taken | |
Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity by Site |
• [040010] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts - Most significant impacts on biodiversity by site |
Actions Taken to Offset Residual Negative Impacts on Biodiversity |
• [040020] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts - Actions taken to offset residual negative impacts on biodiversity |
101-2-d: List of sites with the most significant impacts on biodiversity that have a biodiversity management plan | |
101-2-d: Explanation of why the other sites do not have a biodiversity management plan | |
101-2-e: Description of how synergies are enhanced and trade-offs are reduced between actions taken to manage biodiversity and climate change impacts | |
101-2-f: Description of how the organization ensures that the actions taken to manage impacts on biodiversity avoid and minimize negative impacts and maximize positive impacts for stakeholders | |
Disclosure 101-3 Access and benefit-sharing | |
101-3-a: Description of the process to ensure compliance with access and benefit-sharing regulations and measures | |
101-3-b: Description of voluntary actions taken to advance access and benefit-sharing that are additional to legal obligations or when there are no regulations and measures | |
Disclosure 101-4 Identification of biodiversity impacts | |
101-4-a: Explanation of how the organization has determined which of the sites and which products and services in the supply chain have the most significant actual and potential impacts on biodiversity | |
Disclosure 101-5 Locations with biodiversity impacts | |
Sites with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity |
• [040030] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-5 Locations with Biodiversity Impacts - Sites with the Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity |
Product and Services in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity |
• [040040] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-5 Locations with Biodiversity Impacts - Product and Services in the Supply Chain with the Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity |
Disclosure 101-6 Direct drivers of biodiversity loss | |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, by Site | |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change |
• [040050] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources |
• [040060] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution |
• [040070] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species |
• [040080] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, by Product and/or Service | |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Country |
• [040090] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Country |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Country |
• [040100] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Country |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Country |
• [040110] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Country |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Country |
• [040120] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Country |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Jurisdiction |
• [040130] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Jurisdiction |
Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Jurisdiction |
• [040140] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Jurisdiction |
101-6-f: Contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled, including standards, methodologies, and assumptions used | |
Disclosure 101-7 Changes to the state of biodiversity |
• [040170] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-7 Changes to the State of Biodiversity |
101-7-b: Contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled, including standards, methodologies, and assumptions used | |
Disclosure 101-8 Ecosystem services |
• [040180] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-8 Ecosystem Services |
101-8-b: Explanation of how the ecosystem services and beneficiaries are or could be affected by the organization's activities |
[040010] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts - Most significant impacts on biodiversity by site | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity by Site | |||||
101-2-b-i: Size of the area under restoration or rehabilitation (in hectares) | 101-2-b-ii: Size of the area restored or rehabilitated (in hectares) | ||||||
101-2-b-i: Size of the area under restoration or rehabilitation (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-2-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-b-i) | 101-2-b-ii: Size of the area restored or rehabilitated (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-2-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-b-ii) | ||
1 | |||||||
2 |
[040020] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts - Actions taken to offset residual negative impacts on biodiversity | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Biodiversity Offset | Actions Taken to Offset Residual Negative Impacts on Biodiversity | |||||||||||||||||
101-2-c-i: Goals of the offset | 101-2-c-ii: Geographic location of the offset | 101-2-c-iii: Principles of good offset practices are met | 101-2-c-iii: Explanation of how principles of good offset practices are met | 101-2-c-iv: The offset is certified or verified by a third party | 101-2-c-iv: Explanation of how the offset is certified or verified by a third party | ||||||||||||||
101-2-c-i: Goals of the offset | Reason for omission (101-2-c-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-i) | 101-2-c-ii: Geographic location of the offset | Reason for omission (101-2-c-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-ii) | 101-2-c-iii: Principles of good offset practices are met | Reason for omission (101-2-c-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-iii) | 101-2-c-iii: Explanation of how principles of good offset practices are met | Reason for omission (101-2-c-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-iii) | 101-2-c-iv: The offset is certified or verified by a third party | Reason for omission (101-2-c-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-iv) | 101-2-c-iv: Explanation of how the offset is certified or verified by a third party | Reason for omission (101-2-c-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-2-c-iv) | ||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[040030] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-5 Locations with Biodiversity Impacts - Sites with the Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Sites with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity | |||||||||||||||||
101-5-a: Location | 101-5-a: Size (in hectares) | 101-5-b: The site is in or near an ecologically sensitive area | 101-5-b: Distance of the site to ecologically sensitive area | 101-5-b: Type of ecologically sensitive area | 101-5-c: Activities that take place at each site | ||||||||||||||
101-5-a: Location | Reason for omission (101-5-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-a) | 101-5-a: Size (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-5-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-a) | 101-5-b: The site is in or near an ecologically sensitive area | Reason for omission (101-5-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-b) | 101-5-b: Distance of the site to ecologically sensitive area | Reason for omission | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-b) | 101-5-b: Type of ecologically sensitive area | Reason for omission (101-5-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-b) | 101-5-c: Activities that take place at each site | Reason for omission (101-5-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-c) | ||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[040040] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-5 Locations with Biodiversity Impacts - Product and Services in the Supply Chain with the Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Product and Services in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity | |||||
101-5-d: Countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with the products and services take place | 101-5-d: Other countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with the products and services take place | ||||||
101-5-d: Countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with the products and services take place | Reason for omission (101-5-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-d) | 101-5-d: Other countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with the products and services take place | Reason for omission (101-5-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-5-d) | ||
1 | |||||||
2 |
[040050] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | ||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | ||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[040060] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Type of Wild Species Harvested | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources | |||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | |||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | |||
1 | ||||||||||||||
2 |
[040070] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Type of Pollutant Generated | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution | ||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | |||||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | Reason for omission (101-6-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-c) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[040080] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Site with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species | ||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | ||||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | Reason for omission (101-6-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-d) | ||
1 | ||||
2 |
[040090] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Country | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Country | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Country | ||||||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | |||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | |||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[040100] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Country | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Country | Type of Wild Species Harvested | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Country | |||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | ||||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | ||||
1 | |||||||||||||||
2 |
[040110] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Country | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Country | Type of Pollutant Generated | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Country | ||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | ||||||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | Reason for omission (101-6-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-c) | ||||
1 | ||||||
2 |
[040120] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Country | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Country | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Country | ||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | |||||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | Reason for omission (101-6-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-d) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[040130] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Other Country or Jurisdiction | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Land and Sea Use Change, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | ||||||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | |||||||||||||||||
101-6-a-i: Size of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Cut-off date or reference date of natural ecosystem converted | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem before conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-i: Type of ecosystem after conversion of natural ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-i) | 101-6-a-ii: Size of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem before conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | 101-6-a-ii: Type of ecosystem after conversion of intensively used or modified ecosystem | Reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-a-ii) | |||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[040140] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Other Country or Jurisdiction | Type of Wild Species Harvested | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Exploitation of Natural Resources, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | |||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | ||||||||||||
101-6-b-i: Quantity of wild species harvested | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-i: Level of extinction risk | Reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-i) | 101-6-b-ii: Water withdrawal (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | 101-6-b-ii: Water consumption (in megaliters) | Reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-b-ii) | ||||
1 | |||||||||||||||
2 |
[040150] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Other Country or Jurisdiction | Type of Pollutant Generated | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Pollution, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | ||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | ||||||
101-6-c: Quantity of pollutant generated | Reason for omission (101-6-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-c) | ||||
1 | ||||||
2 |
[040160] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-6 Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product or Service | Other Country or Jurisdiction | Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss, Reporting by Product and/or Service in Supply Chain with Most Significant Impacts on Biodiversity Where Activities Lead or Could Lead to Introduction of Invasive Alien Species, Breakdown by Jurisdiction | ||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | |||||
101-6-d: Description of how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | Reason for omission (101-6-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-6-d) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[040170] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-7 Changes to the State of Biodiversity | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Type of Affected or Potentially Affected Ecosystem | Sites with Affected or Potentially Affected Ecosystems | ||||||||
101-7-a-ii: Ecosystem size for the base year (in hectares) | 101-7-a-iii: Ecosystem condition for the base year | 101-7-a-iii: Ecosystem condition for the current reporting period | |||||||||
101-7-a-ii: Ecosystem size for the base year (in hectares) | Reason for omission (101-7-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-7-a-ii) | 101-7-a-iii: Ecosystem condition for the base year | Reason for omission (101-7-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-7-a-iii) | 101-7-a-iii: Ecosystem condition for the current reporting period | Reason for omission (101-7-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-7-a-iii) | |||
1 | |||||||||||
2 |
[040180] GRI 101 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 101-8 Ecosystem Services | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Site | Sites Where Ecosystem and Beneficiaries are Affected or Potentially Affected by Organizations Activities | |||||
101-8-a: List of ecosystem services affected or potentially affected by the organization’s activities | 101-8-a: List of beneficiaries affected or potentially affected by the organization’s activities | ||||||
101-8-a: List of ecosystem services affected or potentially affected by the organization’s activities | Reason for omission (101-8-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-8-a) | 101-8-a: List of beneficiaries affected or potentially affected by the organization’s activities | Reason for omission (101-8-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (101-8-a) | ||
1 | |||||||
2 |
[050000] GRI 201 - Economic Performance | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 201: Economic Performance 2016 | |
Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed | |
201-1-a: Is the data for direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D) presented on an accruals or cash basis? | Accruals basis |
201-1-a: Justification for the decision, if the direct economic value generated and distributed data (EVG&D) are presented on a cash basis | |
201-1-a-i: Direct economic value generated: revenues |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-ii: Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments; |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-ii: Operating costs |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-ii: Employee wages and benefits | |
201-1-a-ii: Payments to providers of capital |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-ii: Payments to government |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-ii: Community investments |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
201-1-a-iii: Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’. |
Actuals (NOK)
Actuals (NOK)
|
Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed, Reporting by Country |
• [050010] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed, Reporting by Country |
Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed Reporting by Regional Level |
• [050020] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed, Reporting by Regional Level |
Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed Reporting by Market Level |
• [050030] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed, Reporting by Market Level |
201-1-b: Criteria used for defining significance | Ref #280 |
Disclosure 201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change | |
201-2-a: Risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue, or expenditure | Ref #281 |
201-2-a-i: Description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other | Ref #282 |
201-2-a-ii: Description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity | Ref #283 |
201-2-a-iii: Financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken | Ref #284 |
201-2-a-iv: Methods used to manage the risk or opportunity | Ref #285 |
201-2-a-v: Costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity | Ref #286 |
A system is in place to calculate the financial implications or costs, or to make revenue projections when compiling the information specified in Disclosure 201-2 | False |
201-2-2.2: Plans and timeline to develop systems to calculate the financial implications or costs, or to make revenue projections | |
Disclosure 201-3 Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans | |
201-3-a: Estimated value of the plan's liabilities, if these liabilities are met by the organization’s general resources | |
A separate fund exists to pay the plan’s pension liabilities | |
201-3-b-i: Extent to which the scheme’s liabilities are estimated to be covered by the assets that have been set aside to meet them | |
201-3-b-ii: Basis on which that estimate has been arrived at | |
201-3-b-iii: When that estimate was made | |
201-3-c: Explanation of the strategy adopted by the employer to work towards full coverage, and the timescale by which the employer hopes to achieve full coverage, if a fund set up to pay the plan’s pension liabilities is not fully covered | |
201-3-d: Percentage of salary contributed by employee | |
201-3-d: Percentage of salary contributed by employer | |
201-3-e: Level of participation in retirement plans | |
Disclosure 201-4 Financial assistance received from government | |
201-4-a: Total monetary value of financial assistance received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-i: Total monetary value of tax relief and tax credits received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-ii: Total monetary value of subsidies received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-iii: Total monetary value of investment grants, research and development grants, and other relevant types of grant received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-iv: Total monetary value of awards received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-v: Total monetary value of royalty holidays received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-vi: Total monetary value of financial assistance from Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) received during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-vii: Total monetary value of financial incentives received from any government during the reporting period | |
201-4-a-viii: Total monetary value of other financial benefits received or receivable from any government for any operation during the reporting period | |
Financial Assistance Received from Government, Reporting by Country |
• [050040] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-4 Financial assistance received from government, Reporting by Country |
201-4-c: Is any government present in the shareholding structure? | |
201-4-c: Extent to which any government is present in the shareholding structure |
# 281
Climate change related risks comprise climate related physical events that may impact the integrity of Hydro’s assets (physical risks) as well as strategic challenges arising from climate related policies, regulations and customers' demand for net-zero or low-emission solutions (transition risks). Physical risks could result from climate related acute and/or chronic changes in rainfall patterns, flooding, shortages of water or other natural resources, variations in sea levels, storm patterns and intensities as well as temperatures. Transition risks could result from an increased demand for low-carbon products and solutions, higher costs for greenhouse gas emissions and production inputs, as well as changes to market prices for aluminium based products.
IAI emission projection pathways toward 2050 Hydro has participated in the International Aluminium Institute’s (IAI) work to develop a GHG emission reduction pathway for primary aluminium production toward 2050 consistent with the Paris Agreement. The analysis is based on the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 1.5-degree scenario, combined with IAI’s analysis of demand in the aluminium market and material flows. Hydro’s net-zero ambitions and decarbonization pathway is in line with IAI’s emission reduction pathway for the aluminium sector and the 1.5-degree scenario. When the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi) has developed a sectoral decarbonization approach (SDA) for the aluminium sector, Hydro will consider verifying the climate strategy against SBTi.
Transition risks related to carbon taxes, dependency on electricity, and development of technologies for netzero emission primary aluminium production. Physical risks associated with changes in rainfall patterns, flooding, shortages of water or other natural resources, variations in sea levels, storm patterns and intensities as well as temperatures. Market opportunities associated with premiums for delivering lower-carbon aluminium products and Hydro's production of strategic input materials to technologies that enable the transition to a net-zero GHG emissions economy. Opportunities associated with development of new renewable energy assets
# 282
Climate related physical risks Climate related physical risks refer to the impact on business performance by climate related acute and/or chronic changes in rainfall patterns, flooding, shortages of water or other natural resources, variations in sea levels, storm patterns and intensities as well as temperatures. Such risks can result in flooding of facilities, interruptions to production processes, infrastructure failures and potential accidents. To understand and mitigate climate related physical risks for Hydro’s operations, the company has performed several climate risk assessments. In 2018, Hydro modelled future weather patterns and their impact on its facilities based on climate models and scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In 2023, Hydro updated the physical climate risk assessment, which included modelling the risk of climate related events in the current situation, in addition to RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in a 2030, 2040 and 2050 scenario. Hydro is working to assess the potential consequences and necessary mitigating actions, and plans needed to adapt for climate change. The findings from the updated climate assessment are being integrated in Hydro’s risk management system. Several of Hydro’s assets have already undertaken significant upgrades to manage climate related risks such as the effects of increased precipitation and associated flood risks.
Regulatory risks As the aluminium and alumina markets are global markets, relative competition between countries and regions influences which production sites will be viable in the future. In general, Hydro will benefit from globally aligned initiatives which sets a price on CO2 emissions and supports renewable energy use. Additionally, regulatory initiatives providing low-emission energy at competitive prices will benefit Hydro's existing production facilities. In the opposite scenario, Hydro will have a disadvantage if significant carbon taxes are imposed on emissions in countries or regions where Hydro’s production is placed, while similar regulation is not introduced in competing regions. Situations with severe limitations in availability of renewable electricity where Hydro’s production facilities are located will be a disadvantage for the company’s aluminium related assets. Hydro’s energy producing assets are renewable only, with the majority being hydropower in Norway. Hydro is also engaged in production of power from solar and wind resources, currently mainly in partnership with other companies and the majority of the projects are in development phase. These assets will benefit from stricter regulations on CO2 emissions. However, specific regulations might impact the competitiveness and value of individual facilities.
# 283
Negative impacts on climate change associated with GHG emissions from fossil fuel use, as well as process emissions from the production of primary aluminium. Value chain impacts on climate change associated with the carbon footprint of raw materials that Hydro depends on in its aluminium production processes. Positive impacts on climate change mitigation associated with generation of renewable energy, development of new renewable energy assets, and production of low-carbon primary and secondary aluminium.
# 284
Hydro’s sustainability position enables profitable growth and a cost of capital advantage. To access favorable financing, Hydro published a green and sustainability linked financing framework in 2022. The financial products supported by this Framework use, respectively, the EU Taxonomy and Hydro’s climate strategy as a basis, with KPIs linked to GHG emissions and recycling of post-consumer scrap. CICERO Shades of Green has provided a Second Party Opinion on the Framework, and rated it Excellent on Governance and “medium green” overall. Per December 31, 2024, Hydro has not issued any green financing instruments, but report taxonomy aligned CapEx and other Taxonomy KPIs in the disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852. Hydro established a Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) programme on November 7, 2022, approved by Euronext Dublin and the Central Bank of Ireland. The EMTN programme provides a framework for issuance of euro medium term notes up to an aggregate amount of EUR 5 billion. Hydro’s first NOK 3 billion sustainability-linked bonds under the new framework and EMNT programme were issued on November 30, 2022, making Hydro the first investment grade Norwegian company to issue sustainability-linked notes. Alunorte signed a USD 200 million sustainability-linked loan in 2022. The seven year loan facility is structured as a sustainability-linked loan, swapped to fixed rate. The sustainability link was incorporated in the facility and interest rate swap, linking pricing to performance on the GHG emission reduction target to be achieved through the Alunorte fuel switch project. In 2019, Hydro signed a USD 1.6 billion revolving multicurrency credit facility with the margin linked to Hydro’s GHG emission targets. The margin under the facility will be adjusted based on Hydro’s progress to meet its annual targets to reduce GHG emissions by 10 percent by the end of 2025. In 2024, Hydro’s GHG emissions were 16.1 percent lower than the 2018 baseline, following Hydro’s decarbonization strategy approach (see Note E1.1), thus reaching Hydro’s 2025 target. This was mainly due to fuel switch and early implementation of electric boilers at Alunorte, and curtailments in Aluminium Metal and Hydro Extrusions. With expected restart of some of these curtailments, Hydro’s emissions is expected to increase in 2025. Hydro still expects to meet the target of 10 percent emissions reductions by 2025.
# 285
Bauxite mining and Alumina refining Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery is among the most energy efficient refineries in the world. Over the past decade, the company has initiated numerous projects prioritizing emissions reduction through a comprehensive energy transition. This strategy includes switching from heavy fuel oil to natural gas and incorporating biomass as a fuel source. The ongoing Fuel Switch Project aims to replace heavy fuel oil with natural gas. This initiative is further supported by the installation of electric boilers, marking a significant advancement in the refinery's electrification efforts. The success of this project has paved the way for the construction of two additional electric boilers, expected to be operational by the end of 2024. It is estimated that the fuel switch and these electric boilers will reduce emissions by in total 1,100,000 tCO2e when completed and contribute to the development of critical infrastructure that benefits the region. The fuel switch project and additional electric boilers will together reduce GHG emissions at Alunorte by 70 percent towards 2030. Alunorte is also adopting biomass fuel, currently utilizing a blend of açaí pits and coal, with plans to transition to boilers that operate entirely on biomass. Furthermore, the refinery is establishing solar and wind farms in Brazil’s Northeast to sustainably meet its energy demands and reducing its reliance on third party energy suppliers by 2025. Alunorte and Albras are working with Hydro Rein to secure renewable power access and supply to its factories. MPSA (Paragominas bauxite mine) is advancing its emissions reduction objectives through key initiatives focused on renewable energy and fleet upgrades. To tackle emissions from its primary source, MPSA is transitioning its vehicle fleet to electric and biofuelpowered models, currently operating two electric trucks with plans to include more. Additionally, the unit has launched a pilot project to enhance energy efficiency through renewable energy by integrating solar panels on water tanks. This project aims to develop sustainable energy on site while minimizing water evaporation. Primary aluminium production Toward 2050, Hydro is exploring different paths to net-zero emission primary aluminium production, including Hydro’s proprietary HalZero technology for new smelters, CO2 capture at existing smelters, and scaling up use of post-consumer aluminium scrap. See the net-zero products section for information on these technologies. Hydro is also exploring alternatives to replace fossil energy in the casthouses and in the anode production. These include a biomethane project at Sunndal which will reduce emissions by 20,000 tonnes of CO2e each year and testing emission free plasma technology to enable electrification of the remelting process in casthouses by using the same renewable energy that powers Hydro’s primary smelters. In 2023, Hydro produced the world's first successful batch of recycled aluminium with green hydrogen as an energy source at the casthouse in Navarra in Spain. In 2024, Hydro decided to continue the project with a three year pilot for green hydrogen at the recycling plant at Hydro Høyanger. In the pilot, Hydro will partly replace natural gas with green hydrogen in one remelting furnace, and develop solutions and technology with global potential. Recycling 100 percent post-consumer aluminium scrap by using zero emission energy sources such as green hydrogen is the fastest way to produce net-zero aluminium. This pilot project is therefore an important part of Hydro's long-term strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and strengthen Hydro’s position as a leading player in low-carbon aluminium. The pilot is under development with the aim to start production in 2026. To replace fossil carbon anodes, Hydro is also exploring bio carbon and is participating in two R&D programs supported by the Norwegian Research Council related to this. The project consists of two workstreams, substituting parts of the packing coke in the baking furnace with bio-carbon and using bio-material in the anode for the electrolysis process. On the bio-material side there are several challenges related to safe storage and handling, processing, and product qualities. Partnership with both research institutions and material producers/suppliers have been established, and tests are ongoing at laboratory and pilot scale level. Hydro has a 75,000 tonne per year technology pilot at Karmøy in Norway with stable and excellent performance, one of the world’s most climate and energy efficient primary aluminium production facilities. Hydro is now in the process of implementing technology elements from the Karmøy Technology Pilot in its existing primary aluminium smelters, improving performance and financial robustness. This includes the Husnes line B in Norway, which started production in 2020, and as a part of the regular maintenance and relining of Hydro’s electrolysis cells in all smelters, presently at Sunndal. Extrusions In Hydro Extrusions, the sites are working on different initiatives and actions to lower their GHG emissions associated with energy and electricity consumption. This includes power purchasing agreements (PPAs) with renewable power producers, improved energy efficiency through benchmarking, process improvements and investing in new equipment. Many plants are also working with partners and governments to evaluate the possibilities of installing on-site renewable power generation, such as solar panels and windmills. At the extrusion plant in Drunen, Hydro is exploring production of renewable gas from waste material from the automotive industry as an alternative to its natural gas supply. This innovative solution addresses two challenges: it reduces the volume of plastic waste and reduces the consumption of natural gas. If the laboratory scale tests can be successfully scaled up for industrial use and if environmental studies confirm improvements, full operations could begin in early 2026. Electricity production Power is a significant input in the aluminium industry and critical to meet global climate targets. To reduce emissions, aluminium must be produced using cleaner energy solutions like renewable power throughout the value chain. More than 70 percent of the electricity used in Hydro’s production of primary aluminium is based on renewable power. While Hydro's refinery in Brazil is transitioning to more sustainable fuel sources to mitigate emissions in upstream operations, Hydro’s primary aluminium production in Norway is powered by close to 100 percent renewable energy by following a location based approach. In order to ensure continued supply of renewable power to Hydro’s operations in Norway, the company operates 40 hydropower plants with a combined output of 13.7 TWh renewable electricity in a normal year. Adjusted for ownership shares, Hydro’s captive hydropower production is 9.4 TWh in a normal year. In addition, Hydro operates a wind farm and purchase more than 9 TWh of renewable power annually in the Nordic market under long-term contracts. Hydro is also investing in upgrades and new projects to increase renewable power production and expand installed capacity in existing hydropower systems in Norway. As part of this, Hydro is seeking solutions to enable energy more efficiently and increase flexibility in Hydro’s power systems to make better use of the power grid. Hydro has taken an investment decision for the project Illvatn in Sogn. A plan for substantial increase in installed capacity in the Røldal-Suldal (RSK) power system is also established, with a filed application for concession. Hydro is also supporting the development of green industries through long-term electricity contracts with businesses and industrial companies. Illvatn project - Pumped storage Hydropower plant Hydro is exploring opportunities to reduce upstream emissions during the construction and upgrades of existing hydropower facilities, as well as in the development of new power projects. By identifying emission reduction measures early in the decision process, Hydro can use climate budgets to ensure a structured and actionable approach to reduce the environmental impact from projects. In the early phase of the Illvatn project, Hydro conducted an assessment to identify options for reducing emissions, including the potential use of low-carbon materials and strategies to lower fuel consumption, reduce emissions from onsite construction activities, and optimize transportation to and from the site. The project has established a climate budget with the aim of reducing emissions throughout the project execution phase.
# 286
Sustainable financing in Hydro Hydro’s sustainability position enables profitable growth and a cost of capital advantage. To access favorable financing, Hydro published a green and sustainability linked financing framework in 2022. The financial products supported by this Framework use, respectively, the EU Taxonomy and Hydro’s climate strategy as a basis, with KPIs linked to GHG emissions and recycling of post-consumer scrap. CICERO Shades of Green has provided a Second Party Opinion on the Framework, and rated it Excellent on Governance and “medium green” overall. Per December 31, 2024, Hydro has not issued any green financing instruments, but report taxonomy aligned CapEx and other Taxonomy KPIs in the disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852. Hydro established a Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) programme on November 7, 2022, approved by Euronext Dublin and the Central Bank of Ireland. The EMTN programme provides a framework for issuance of euro medium term notes up to an aggregate amount of EUR 5 billion. Hydro’s first NOK 3 billion sustainability-linked bonds under the new framework and EMNT programme were issued on November 30, 2022, making Hydro the first investment grade Norwegian company to issue sustainability-linked notes. Alunorte signed a USD 200 million sustainability-linked loan in 2022. The seven year loan facility is structured as a sustainability-linked loan, swapped to fixed rate. The sustainability link was incorporated in the facility and interest rate swap, linking pricing to performance on the GHG emission reduction target to be achieved through the Alunorte fuel switch project. In 2019, Hydro signed a USD 1.6 billion revolving multicurrency credit facility with the margin linked to Hydro’s GHG emission targets. The margin under the facility will be adjusted based on Hydro’s progress to meet its annual targets to reduce GHG emissions by 10 percent by the end of 2025. In 2024, Hydro’s GHG emissions were 16.1 percent lower than the 2018 baseline, following Hydro’s decarbonization strategy approach (see Note E1.1), thus reaching Hydro’s 2025 target. This was mainly due to fuel switch and early implementation of electric boilers at Alunorte, and curtailments in Aluminium Metal and Hydro Extrusions. With expected restart of some of these curtailments, Hydro’s emissions is expected to increase in 2025. Hydro still expects to meet the target of 10 percent emissions reductions by 2025. Note: In 2023, Hydro's GHG emissions were 11.9 percent lower than the 2018 baseline. This was misstated as 6.5 percent in the 2023 an
[050020] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed, Reporting by Regional Level | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Regional Level | Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed, Reporting by Regional Level | |||||||||||||||||||||||
201-1-a-i: Direct economic value generated: revenues | 201-1-a-ii: Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments; | 201-1-a-ii: Operating costs | 201-1-a-ii: Employee wages and benefits | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to providers of capital | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to government | 201-1-a-ii: Community investments | 201-1-a-iii: Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’. | ||||||||||||||||||
201-1-a-i: Direct economic value generated: revenues | Reason for omission (201-1-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-i) | 201-1-a-ii: Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments; | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Operating costs | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Employee wages and benefits | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to providers of capital | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to government | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Community investments | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-iii: Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’. | Reason for omission (201-1-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-iii) | ||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[050030] GRI 201 - Economic Performance - Disclosure 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed, Reporting by Market Level | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Market Level | Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed Reporting by Market Level | |||||||||||||||||||||||
201-1-a-i: Direct economic value generated: revenues | 201-1-a-ii: Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments; | 201-1-a-ii: Operating costs | 201-1-a-ii: Employee wages and benefits | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to providers of capital | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to government | 201-1-a-ii: Community investments | 201-1-a-iii: Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’. | ||||||||||||||||||
201-1-a-i: Direct economic value generated: revenues | Reason for omission (201-1-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-i) | 201-1-a-ii: Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments; | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Operating costs | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Employee wages and benefits | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to providers of capital | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Payments to government | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-ii: Community investments | Reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-ii) | 201-1-a-iii: Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’. | Reason for omission (201-1-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (201-1-a-iii) | ||
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[060000] GRI 202 - Market Presence | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 202: Market Presence 2016 | |
Disclosure 202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage |
• [060010] GRI 202 - Market Presence - Disclosure 202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage |
202-1-b: A significant proportion of other workers (excluding employees) performing the organization’s activities are compensated based on wages subject to minimum wage rules | False |
202-1-b: Description of actions taken to determine whether these workers are paid above the minimum wage | |
202-1-c: Is a local minimum wage absent or variable at significant locations of operation, by gender? | Ref #287 |
202-1-c: Which minimum wage is being used (in circumstances in which different minimums can be used as a reference) | Ref #288 |
202-1-d: Definition used for 'significant locations of operation' | Ref #289 |
Disclosure 202-2 Proportion of senior management hired from the local community |
• [060020] GRI 202 - Market Presence - Disclosure 202-2 Proportion of senior management hired from the local community |
202-2-b: Definition used for 'senior management' | Ref #290 |
202-2-c: Geographical definition of 'local' | Ref #291 |
202-2-d: Definition used for 'significant locations of operation' | Ref #292 |
# 287
Hydro does not report on entry level wage but has conducted a comprehensive analysis of overaell compensation as part of its living wage project. See the section on living wage and notes on remuneration in the Own workforce section of the annual report. The ratio of highest paid base salary and median base salary for all employees in Norway is presented in the Disclosures pursuant to the Norwegian Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act in the Own workforce section of the annual report.
# 288
Hydro does not report on entry level wage but has conducted a comprehensive analysis of overaell compensation as part of its living wage project. See the section on living wage and notes on remuneration in the Own workforce section of the annual report. The ratio of highest paid base salary and median base salary for all employees in Norway is presented in the Disclosures pursuant to the Norwegian Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act in the Own workforce section of the annual report.
[060010] GRI 202 - Market Presence - Disclosure 202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Significant Location of Operation | Gender | Ratios of Standard Entry Level Wage by Gender Compared to Local Minimum Wage | |||||
202-1-a: A significant proportion of employees are compensated based on wages subject to minimum wage rules | 202-1-a: Ratio of entry level wage to the minimum wage | |||||||
202-1-a: A significant proportion of employees are compensated based on wages subject to minimum wage rules | Reason for omission (202-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (202-1-a) | 202-1-a: Ratio of entry level wage to the minimum wage | Reason for omission (202-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (202-1-a) | |||
1 | Norway | Women | False |
[060020] GRI 202 - Market Presence - Disclosure 202-2 Proportion of senior management hired from the local community | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Significant Location of Operation | Proportion of Senior Management Hired from Local Community | ||
202-2-a: Percentage of senior management that are hired from the local community | ||||
202-2-a: Percentage of senior management that are hired from the local community | Reason for omission (202-2-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (202-2-a) | ||
1 | Production sites in Norway |
pure
|
||
2 | Aluminium Metal management team Norway |
pure
|
||
3 | Extrusions management team Norway |
pure
|
||
4 | Paragominas, Pará Brazil |
pure
|
||
5 | Barcarena, Pará Brazil |
pure
|
||
6 | Bauxite & Alumina management team Brazil |
pure
|
[070000] GRI 203 - Indirect Economic Impacts | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016 | |
Disclosure 203-1 Infrastructure investments and services supported | |
203-1-a: Extent of development of significant infrastructure investments and services supported | |
203-1-b: Current or expected impacts on communities and local economies | |
203-1-c: Are the investments and services commercial, in-kind, or pro bono engagements? | |
Disclosure 203-2 Significant indirect economic impacts | |
203-2-a: Examples of significant identified indirect economic impacts | |
203-2-b: Significance of the indirect economic impacts in the context of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities |
[080000] GRI 204 - Procurement Practices | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016 | |
Disclosure 204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers | |
204-1-a: Percentage of the procurement budget used for significant locations of operation that is spent on suppliers local to that operation | |
204-1-b: Geographical definition of 'local' | |
204-1-c: Definition used for 'significant locations of operation' |
[090000] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 205 Anti-corruption 2016 | |
Disclosure 205-1 Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | |
205-1-a: Total number of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | |
205-1-a: Percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | |
205-1-b: Significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment | Ref #293 |
Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures | |
Disclosure of communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, breakdown by region |
• [090010] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption - Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, Breakdown by Region |
Disclosure of communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, breakdown by employee category |
• [090020] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption - Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, Breakdown by Employee Category |
Disclosure of communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, breakdown by type of business partner |
• [090030] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption - Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, Breakdown by Type of Business Partner |
205-2-c: Description, if the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to any other persons or organizations | |
Disclosure 205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | |
205-3-a: Total number of confirmed incidents of corruption |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
205-3-a: Nature of confirmed incidents of corruption | Ref #294 |
205-3-b: Total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
205-3-c: Total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
205-3-d: Public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases | Ref #295 |
# 293
All Hydro's activities are assessed at business area level in connection with the annual business planning process. In e.g. B&A, all plants have also been individually assessed.
As part of the integrity risk management process, more than 9,000 potential or existing counterparties were screened for human rights violations, corruption, money laundering, politically exposed persons, and violations relating to sanctions using the Moody’s Grid integrity risk tool during 2024.
Acting with integrity and combating corruption is an essential part of what Hydro considers responsible business conduct. Hydro does not tolerate any forms of bribery or corruption, including facilitation payments and kickbacks. Further, Hydro is committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations to fight corruption and bribery, including the UN Convention against corruption. Through Hydro’s comprehensive compliance framework, the company works systematically to combat corruption and ensure compliant behavior throughout its global organization. Hydro’s AntiCorruption Program provides an overview of the main elements in Hydro’s anti-corruption efforts, which includes risk assessments, tone from the top, policies and procedures, training and communication, third party risk management, reporting and investigation, and disciplinary measures. The key pillars of the compliance framework are illustrated in the figure, below. Functions involved in commercial activities and interactions with government officials, especially in regions with heightened inherent corruption risk, are most at risk and hence targeted for compliance training.
# 294
Acting with integrity and combating corruption is an essential part of what Hydro considers responsible business conduct. Hydro does not tolerate any forms of bribery or corruption, including facilitation payments and kickbacks. Further, Hydro is committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations to fight corruption and bribery, including the UN Convention against corruption. Through Hydro’s comprehensive compliance framework, the company works systematically to combat corruption and ensure compliant behavior throughout its global organization. Hydro’s AntiCorruption Program provides an overview of the main elements in Hydro’s anti-corruption efforts, which includes risk assessments, tone from the top, policies and procedures, training and communication, third party risk management, reporting and investigation, and disciplinary measures. The key pillars of the compliance framework are illustrated in the figure, below. Functions involved in commercial activities and interactions with government officials, especially in regions with heightened inherent corruption risk, are most at risk and hence targeted for compliance training.
[090020] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption - Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, Breakdown by Employee Category | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Communication and Training about Anti-Corruption Policies and Procedures, Breakdown by Employee Category | |||||||||||
205-2-b: Total number of employees that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | 205-2-b: Percentage of employees that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | 205-2-e: Total number of employees that have received training on anti-corruption | 205-2-e: Percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption | ||||||||||
205-2-b: Total number of employees that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | Reason for omission (205-2-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-b) | 205-2-b: Percentage of employees that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | Reason for omission (205-2-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-b) | 205-2-e: Total number of employees that have received training on anti-corruption | Reason for omission (205-2-e) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-e) | 205-2-e: Percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption | Reason for omission (205-2-e) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-e) | ||
1 | |||||||||||||
2 |
[090030] GRI 205 - Anti-corruption - Disclosure 205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures, Breakdown by Type of Business Partner | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Type of Business Partner | Communication and Training about Anti-Corruption Policies and Procedures, Breakdown by Type of Business Partner | |||||
205-2-c: Total number of business partners that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | 205-2-c: Percentage of business partners that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | ||||||
205-2-c: Total number of business partners that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | Reason for omission (205-2-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-c) | 205-2-c: Percentage of business partners that the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | Reason for omission (205-2-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (205-2-c) | ||
1 | |||||||
2 |
[100000] GRI 206 - Anti-competitive Behavior | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 206 Anti-competitive behavior 2016 | |
Disclosure 206-1 Legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices | |
206-1-a: Number of legal actions pending during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior in which the organization has been identified as a participant | |
206-1-a: Number of legal actions completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior in which the organization has been identified as a participant | |
206-1-a: Number of legal actions pending during the reporting period regarding violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant | |
206-1-a: Number of legal actions completed during the reporting period regarding violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant | |
206-1-b: Main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgements |
[110000] GRI 207 - Tax | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 207: Tax 2019 | |
Disclosure 207-1 Approach to tax | |
207-1-a: Description of the approach to tax | |
207-1-a-i: The organization has a tax strategy | |
207-1-a-i: Link to this strategy if publicly available | |
207-1-a-ii: Governance body or executive-level position within the organization that formally reviews and approves the tax strategy | |
207-1-a-ii: Frequency of review of the tax strategy | |
207-1-a-iii: Description of the approach to regulatory compliance | |
207-1-a-iv: Description of how the approach to tax is linked to the business and sustainable development strategies of the organization | |
Disclosure 207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management | |
207-2-a: Description of the tax governance and control framework | |
207-2-a-i: Governance body or executive-level position within the organization accountable for compliance with the tax strategy | |
207-2-a-ii: Description of how the approach to tax is embedded within the organization | |
207-2-a-iii: Description of the approach to tax risks, including how risks are identified, managed, and monitored | |
207-2-a-iv: Description of how compliance with the tax governance and control framework is evaluated | |
207-2-b: Description of the mechanisms to raise concerns about the organization’s business conduct and the organization’s integrity in relation to tax | |
207-2-c: Description of the assurance process for disclosures on tax including, if applicable, a link or reference to the external assurance report(s) or assurance statement(s) | |
Disclosure 207-3 Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax | |
207-3-a: Description of the approach to stakeholder engagement and management of stakeholder concerns related to tax | |
207-3-a-i: Approach to engagement with tax authorities | |
207-3-a-ii: Approach to public policy advocacy on tax | |
207-3-a-iii: Description of the processes for collecting and considering the views and concerns of stakeholders, including external stakeholders | |
Disclosure 207-4 Country-by-country reporting | |
Reporting by Country |
• [110010] GRI 207 - Tax - Disclosure 207-4 Country-by-country reporting, Reporting by Country |
Reporting by Tax Jurisdiction |
• [110020] GRI 207 - Tax - Disclosure 207-4 Country-by-country reporting, Reporting by Tax Jurisdiction (tax jurisdictions that are not countries) |
207-4-c: Time period covered by the information reported in Disclosure 207-4 : Start date | |
207-4-c: Time period covered by the information reported in Disclosure 207-4 : End date | |
207-4-2.2.1: Explanation for the difference, if data reported for Disclosures 207-4-b-iv, vi, vii, and viii does not reconcile with the audited consolidated financial statements, or the financial information filed on public record |
[110020] GRI 207 - Tax - Disclosure 207-4 Country-by-country reporting, Reporting by Tax Jurisdiction (tax jurisdictions that are not countries) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Tax Jurisdiction | Reporting by Tax Jurisdiction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
207-4-a: All tax jurisdictions where the entities included in the organization’s audited consolidated financial statements, or in the financial information filed on public record, are resident for tax purposes (tax jurisdictions that are not countries) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
207-4-b-i: Names of the resident entities | 207-4-b-ii: Primary activities of the organization | 207-4-b-iii: Number of employees | 207-4-b-iii: Basis of calculation of the number of employees | 207-4-b-iv: Revenues from third-party sales | 207-4-b-v: Revenues from intra-group transactions with other tax jurisdictions | 207-4-b-vi: Profit/loss before tax | 207-4-b-vii: Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents | 207-4-b-viii: Corporate income tax paid on a cash basis | 207-4-b-ix: Corporate income tax accrued on profit/loss | 207-4-b-x: Reasons for the difference between corporate income tax accrued on profit/loss and the tax due if the statutory tax rate is applied to profit/loss before tax | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
207-4-b-i: Names of the resident entities | Reason for omission (207-4-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-i) | 207-4-b-ii: Primary activities of the organization | Reason for omission (207-4-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-ii) | 207-4-b-iii: Number of employees | Reason for omission (207-4-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-iii) | 207-4-b-iii: Basis of calculation of the number of employees | Reason for omission (207-4-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-iii) | 207-4-b-iv: Revenues from third-party sales | Reason for omission (207-4-b-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-iv) | 207-4-b-v: Revenues from intra-group transactions with other tax jurisdictions | Reason for omission (207-4-b-v) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-v) | 207-4-b-vi: Profit/loss before tax | Reason for omission (207-4-b-vi) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-vi) | 207-4-b-vii: Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents | Reason for omission (207-4-b-vii) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-vii) | 207-4-b-viii: Corporate income tax paid on a cash basis | Reason for omission (207-4-b-viii) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-viii) | 207-4-b-ix: Corporate income tax accrued on profit/loss | Reason for omission (207-4-b-ix) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-ix) | 207-4-b-x: Reasons for the difference between corporate income tax accrued on profit/loss and the tax due if the statutory tax rate is applied to profit/loss before tax | Reason for omission (207-4-b-x) | Explanation for reason for omission (207-4-b-x) | ||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
[120000] GRI 301 - Materials | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 301: Materials 2016 | |
Disclosure 301-1 Materials used by weight or volume |
• [120010] GRI 301 - Materials - Disclosure 301-1 Materials Used by Weight or Volume |
Disclosure 301-2 Recycled input materials used | |
301-2-a: Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture primary products and services | |
Disclosure 301-3 Reclaimed products and their packaging materials |
• [120020] GRI 301 - Materials - Disclosure 301-3 Reclaimed Products and Their Packaging Materials |
Product category | |
301-3-b: Explanation of how the data for this disclosure has been collected | Ref #296 |
[120010] GRI 301 - Materials - Disclosure 301-1 Materials Used by Weight or Volume | Non-renewable material | Renewable material |
---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Materials Used by Weight or Volume | ||
301-1-a: Total weight of materials that are used to produce and package the organization’s primary products and services | ||
Reason for omission (301-1-a) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (301-1-a) | Ref #297 | Ref #298 |
301-1-a: Total volume of materials that are used to produce and package the organization’s primary products and services |
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Reason for omission (301-1-a) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (301-1-a) |
[120020] GRI 301 - Materials - Disclosure 301-3 Reclaimed Products and Their Packaging Materials | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Product category | Product category | ||
301-3-a: Percentage of reclaimed products and their packaging materials | ||||
301-3-a: Percentage of reclaimed products and their packaging materials | Reason for omission (301-3-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (301-3-a) | ||
1 | NA | Not applicable | Ref #299 |
[130000] GRI 302 - Energy | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 302: Energy 2016 | |
Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization | |
302-1-a: Total fuel consumption within the organization from non-renewable sources (in joules or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-a: Fuel types used from non-renewable sources | Ref #300 |
302-1-b: Total fuel consumption within the organization from renewable sources (in joules or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-b: Fuel Types used from renewable sources | Ref #301 |
302-1-c-i: Total electricity consumption (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-c-ii: Total heating consumption (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-c-iii: Total cooling consumption (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-c-iv: Total steam consumption (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) |
Actuals (MWh)
Actuals (MWh)
|
302-1-d-i: Total electricity sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | |
302-1-d-ii: Total heating sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | |
302-1-d-iii: Total cooling sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | |
302-1-d-iv: Total steam sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | |
302-1-e: Total energy consumption within the organization (in joules or multiples) | |
302-1-f: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #302 |
302-1-g: Source of the conversion factors used | |
Disclosure 302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organization | |
302-2-a: Energy consumption outside of the organization, in joules or multiples | |
302-2-b: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | |
302-2-c: Source of the conversion factors used | |
Disclosure 302-3 Energy intensity |
• [130010] GRI 302 - Energy - Disclosure 302-3 Energy intensity |
Disclosure 302-4 Reduction of energy consumption | |
302-4-a: Amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives (in joules or multiples) | |
302-4-b: Types of energy included in the reductions | |
302-4-c: Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption | |
302-4-c: Rationale for choosing the basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption | |
302-4-d: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | |
302-4-2.7.2: Description of whether energy reduction is estimated, modeled, or sourced from direct measurements | |
302-4-2.7.2: The methods used if energy reduction is based on estimation or modeling | |
Disclosure 302-5 Reductions in energy requirements of products and services | |
302-5-a: Reductions in energy requirements of sold products and services achieved during the reporting period (in joules or multiples) | |
302-5-b: Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption | |
302-5-b: Rationale for choosing the basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption | |
302-5-c: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used |
# 300
Coal
Electricity
Diesel / gasoil
Gasoline
Heat
Heavy oil
Light fuel oil
Natural gas
Natural gas liquids
Other hydrocarbons
# 302
Total energy consumption in Hydro’s consolidated activities, reported by energy carrier. Energy consumption includes energy generated by Hydro operations as well as purchased energy. Energy consumption includes energy losses in hydroelectric plants. Other energy sources reported includes heating, cooling and steam generated in Hydro operations as well as purchased steam and heat in the Extrusions business area
All fully-owned smelters, 6 remelters and 19 Extrusion sites are also certified according to the ISO 50001 Energy Management systems, representing 66 percent of Hydro's total electricity consumption. Renewable energy as a share of total energy consumption in Hydro’s consolidated activities is estimated to 41.2 percent in 2024. Renewable energy consumption is estimated based on total energy consumption by energy carrier and data on country specific energy mix in the electricity grid from the International Energy Agency (IEA) updated in 2023. Electricity derived from biofuels, waste, hydro, geothermal, solar, wind and tide are considered renewable. Around 3 percent of the energy consumption is from nuclear sources based on the country specific grid mix.
[130010] GRI 302 - Energy - Disclosure 302-3 Energy intensity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Source of Energy Included in Energy Intensity Ratio | Organization-Specific Metric (Denominator) Chosen to Calculate Energy Intensity Ratio | Source of Energy Included in Energy Intensity Ratio | ||||||
302-3-a: Energy intensity ratio for the organization | 302-3-c: Types of energy included in the energy intensity ratio | ||||||||
Value of the denominator | 302-3-a: Energy intensity ratio for the organization | Reason for omission (302-3-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (302-3-a) | 302-3-c: Types of energy included in the energy intensity ratio | Reason for omission (302-3-c) | Explanation for Reason for omission (302-3-c) | |||
1 | Within the organization | per tonne alumina |
Actuals (pure)
|
Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #303 | ||||
2 | Within the organization | per tonne aluminium |
Actuals (pure)
|
Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #304 | ||||
3 | Within the organization | per NOK million revenues |
Actuals (pure)
|
Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #305 |
[140000] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 303: Water and Effluents 2018 | |
Disclosure 303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource | |
303-1-a: Description of how the organization interacts with water | |
303-1-a: Description of how and where water is withdrawn, consumed, and discharged | |
303-1-a: Description of water-related impacts the organization has caused or contributed to, or that are directly linked to its operations, products, or services by its business relationships (e.g., impacts caused by runoff) | |
303-1-b: Description of the approach used to identify water-related impacts, including the scope of assessments, their timeframe, and any tools or methodologies used | |
303-1-c: Description of how water-related impacts are addressed | |
303-1-c: Description of how the organization works with stakeholders to steward water as a shared resource | |
303-1-c: Description of how it engages with suppliers or customers with significant water-related impacts | |
303-1-d: Explanation of the process for setting any water-related goals and targets that are part of the approach to managing water and effluents | |
303-1-d: Explanation of how the water-related goals and targets relate to public policy and the local context of each area with water stress | |
Disclosure 303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts | |
303-2-a: Description of any minimum standards set for the quality of effluent discharge | |
303-2-a: Description of how the minimum standards set for the quality of effluent discharge were determined | |
303-2-a-i: Description of how standards for facilities operating in locations with no local discharge requirements were determined | |
303-2-a-ii: Description of any internally developed water quality standards or guidelines | |
303-2-a-iii: Description of any sector-specific standards considered | |
303-2-a-iv: Description of whether the profile of the receiving waterbody was considered | |
Disclosure 303-3 Water withdrawal | |
303-3-a: Total water withdrawal from all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (MMcf)
Actuals (MMcf)
|
303-3-b: Total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress (in megaliters) |
Actuals (MMcf)
Actuals (MMcf)
|
Water Withdrawal, Breakdown by Sources of Water |
• [140010] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-3 Water withdrawal |
Third-party Water Withdrawal, Breakdown by Sources of Water |
• [140020] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-3 Water withdrawal - Third-party water withdrawal from all areas with water stress |
303-3-d: Contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Ref #306 |
Disclosure 303-4 Water discharge | |
303-4-a: Total water discharge to all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (Ml)
Actuals (Ml)
|
Water Discharge, Breakdown by Type of Destination |
• [140030] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-4 Water discharge, Breakdown by Type of Destination |
Third-party water is sent for use to other organizations | False |
303-4-a-iv: Volume of third-party water sent for use to other organizations (in megaliters) | |
Water Discharge, Breakdown by Category |
• [140040] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-4 Water discharge, Breakdown by Category |
303-4-c: Total water discharge to all areas with water stress (in megaliters) |
Actuals (MMcf)
Actuals (MMcf)
|
303-4-d: Priority substances of concern for which discharges are treated | Ref #307 |
303-4-d-i: Description of how priority substances of concern were defined | Ref #308 |
303-4-d-i: Any international standard, authoritative list, or criteria used to define priority substances of concern | Ref #309 |
303-4-d-ii: Approach for setting discharge limits for priority substances of concern | Ref #310 |
303-4-d-iii: Number of incidents of non-compliance with discharge limits | |
303-4-e: Contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Ref #311 |
Disclosure 303-5 Water consumption | |
303-5-a: Total water consumption from all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (Ml)
Actuals (Ml)
|
303-5-b: Total water consumption from all areas with water stress (in megaliters) |
Actuals (MMcf)
Actuals (MMcf)
|
303-5-c: Change in water storage, if water storage has been identified as having a significant water-related impact (in megaliters) | |
303-5-d: Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Ref #312 |
303-5-d: Description of whether the information is calculated, estimated, modeled, or sourced from direct measurements, and the approach taken for this | Ref #313 |
# 306
Total water withdrawal by country and water interaction in Hydro consolidated activities. All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values are site specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters, or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does not have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in Hydro’s consolidated reporting. Hydro monitors water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All water use in construction and development of new energy projects is supplied by third parties.
# 307
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting. We monitor water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All water use in construction and development of new energy projects is supplied by third parties.
# 308
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting. We monitor water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All water use in construction and development of new energy projects is supplied by third parties.
# 309
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable
# 310
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting. We monitor water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All water use in construction and development of new energy projects is supplied by third parties.
# 311
Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting
# 312
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting. We monitor water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All
# 313
All operations related to the aluminium value chain maintain a water balance, in line with regulatory requirements and the minimum disclosure requirements dictated by ICMM’s Water 2021 Water Reporting: Good practice guide. This includes volumes of withdrawals (by quality and source), discharge (by quality and destination), consumption (by type) and the percentage of the operational water demand met by water reuse and /or recycling, if applicable. Methods for calculating these values is site-specific. Where operational sites receive their water supply from third-parties, like the municipal water infrastructure, the quantities are based on invoiced volumes across the year. In operations that manage their own water extraction and discharges, the data can be directly measured using flow meters or inferred from pumping capacity and run times. Hydro does have instances of “Other Managed Water” (i.e., water that needs to be actively managed by does not enter the operational water system used to supply the operational water demand), so this parameter is not included in our consolidated reporting. We monitor water use in the construction and development of new energy projects, including water for construction processes and human consumption. Water consumption in Hydro Rein’s projects are not material in volume compared to consumption in other activities. All
[140010] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-3 Water withdrawal | Surface water | Surface water | Surface water | Groundwater | Groundwater | Groundwater | Seawater | Seawater | Seawater | Produced water | Produced water | Produced water | Third-party water | Third-party water | Third-party water |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | |
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | ||||||
Water Withdrawal | |||||||||||||||
303-3-a: Total water withdrawal from all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
|||
Reason for omission (303-3-a) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | ||||||||||||
Explanation for reason for omission (303-3-a) | Ref #314 | Ref #315 | Ref #316 | ||||||||||||
303-3-b: Total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress (in megaliters) | |||||||||||||||
Reason for omission (303-3-b) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |
Explanation for reason for omission (303-3-b) | Ref #317 | Ref #318 | Ref #319 | Ref #320 | Ref #321 | Ref #322 | Ref #323 | Ref #324 | Ref #325 | Ref #326 | Ref #327 | Ref #328 | Ref #329 | Ref #330 |
[140020] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-3 Water withdrawal - Third-party water withdrawal from all areas with water stress | Surface water | Groundwater | Seawater | Produced water |
---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Third-party Water Withdrawal, Breakdown by Sources of Water | ||||
303-3-b-v: Third-party water withdrawal from all areas with water stress (in megaliters) | ||||
Reason for omission (303-3-b-v) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Explanation for reason for omission (303-3-b-v) | Ref #331 | Ref #332 | Ref #333 | Ref #334 |
[140030] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-4 Water discharge, Breakdown by Type of Destination | Surface water | Groundwater | Seawater | Third-party water |
---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Water Discharge | ||||
303-4-a: Total water discharge to all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Reason for omission (303-4-a) | ||||
Explanation for reason for omission (303-4-a) |
[140040] GRI 303 - Water and Effluents - Disclosure 303-4 Water discharge, Breakdown by Category | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) |
---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Water Discharge, Breakdown by Category | ||
303-4-a: Total water discharge to all areas (in megaliters) |
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Actuals (Mm3)
Actuals (Mm3)
|
Reason for omission (303-4-a) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (303-4-a) | ||
303-4-c: Total water discharge to all areas with water stress (in megaliters) | ||
Reason for omission (303-4-c) | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Explanation for reason for omission (303-4-c) | Ref #335 | Ref #336 |
[150000] GRI 304 - Biodiversity | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016 | |
Disclosure 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas |
• [150010] GRI 304 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas |
Disclosure 304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity | |
304-2-a-i: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to construction or use of manufacturing plants, mines, and transport infrastructure | Ref #337 |
304-2-a-ii: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to pollution | Ref #338 |
304-2-a-iii: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to introduction of invasive species, pests, and pathogens | |
304-2-a-iv: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to reduction of species | |
304-2-a-v: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to habitat conversion | |
304-2-a-vi: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variation | |
304-2-b-i: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to species affected | |
304-2-b-ii: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to extent of areas impacted | |
304-2-b-iii: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to duration of impacts | |
304-2-b-iv: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reversibility or irreversibility of the impacts | |
Disclosure 304-3 Habitats protected or restored | |
304-3-a: Size of all habitat areas protected or restored | |
304-3-a: Location of all habitat areas protected or restored | |
304-3-a: The success of the restoration measure was or is approved by independent external professionals | |
304-3-b: Partnerships exist with third parties to protect or restore habitat areas distinct from where the organization has overseen and implemented restoration or protection measures | |
304-3-c: Status of each area based on its condition at the close of the reporting period | |
304-3-d: Standards, methodologies, and assumptions used | |
Disclosure 304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations |
• [150020] GRI 304 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations |
Level of Extinction Risk |
# 337
Aluminium value chain The total land use footprint of Hydro's aluminium value chain operations is ca. 25,000 ha. This footprint intersects with eight terrestrial habitat types, following the IUCN habitat classification system. The majority of the footprint, ca. 23,000 ha, relates to the upstream bauxite and alumina activities, which are located within the habitat type "Forest - Subtropical/Tropical moist lowland." Within Hydro’s aluminium value chain operations, the most material impact on biodiversity through land use change occurs at Hydro’s bauxite mine located in the municipality of Paragominas, in the State of Pará, Brazil. This region is located within the Brazilian Amazon, in an area defined as the “Arc of Deforestation,” and is characterized by extensive deforestation for cattle ranching and soy production. Hydro’s mine covers an area of ca. 18,700 ha., which, prior to the mine, was a mixture of primary and secondary forest, and agricultural land. The primary forest, although considered natural habitat, has been historically impacted by selective logging to remove the tallest commercially valuable trees from the area. Despite this history of human impacts on the area, the remaining forest is still representative of a specific biome in the Amazon, called the Belem Endemism Centre (BEC), and supports a number of threatened fauna and flora species, some of which are endemic to the region. Hydro takes measures to minimize and restore impacts to these biodiversity features within the mine’s environmental management strategy. Paragominas’ expansion of its mining activity beyond the boundary line shown in the land use map was driven by the strategic location of bauxite deposits and the scaling up of activities on Plateau Miltônia 3 (M3). Expansion into these new areas is governed by long-term agreements with landowners and adhere to a rigorous environmental licensing process. They also include areas defined as Legal Reserves (ARLs). As established by Brazilian national legislation, ARLs support sustainable management practices, fostering the coexistence of conservation efforts with responsible land use. The expansion of mining, including those with ARLs (394 ha in 2024), meets the requirements of national legislation and has authorization from the competent environmental agency as well as is underpinned by comprehensive studies on environmental impacts, mitigation, and compensation measures, and a commitment to restoring affected areas in compliance with regulatory requirements and Hydro’s own commitments to biodiversity management. Aside from the direct impact of land use change on nature, it is well documented that climate change, pollution, and extraction of natural resources can also contribute to negative pressures on biodiversity and ecosystems. Information about Hydro’s aluminium value chain related GHG emissions, other emissions to air, and interactions with water, including strategy and targets, can be found in the Climate change, Pollution and Water chapters. Hydropower operation and development Hydropower development and operation can significantly alter both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Impacts from operations are due to hydrological and morphological changes in water bodies, such as varying water levels in reservoirs and rivers, and reduced transport of sediments. Hydropower operations have a larger indirect influence area due to intake of water from the whole catchment area, with impacts to the habitat connectivity of all adjacent landscapes and ecosystems. Upgrades of existing hydropower systems and new projects will require land use for construction of roads, spoil heaps, and laydown areas, which can impact terrestrial biodiversity. Wind and solar energy operations and development Hydro operates the wind park Tonstad in Norway, with 51 wind turbines. The operation of the wind turbines has impacts to biodiversity and ecosystems through habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation and impacts to migratory birds and bats, however, there is a lack of monitoring data to confirm the extent. Construction of the park has impacted the natural flora, with area use for roads, laydown areas, cables and wind turbines. In addition, the construction activities have impacted the natural flora with introduction of invasive (blacklisted) species, drainage and revegetation with non-natural species. In general, noise, lights and onsite vehicles impacts the natural fauna. Hydro’s joint venture, Hydro Rein, develops new wind and solar projects. Large areas of land are needed to accommodate renewable energy infrastructure, and wind and solar farms can pose significant pressure to biodiversity and ecosystems. The significance of impacts will vary depending on the current land use and level of degradation of the previous habitat and the geographic location. The most important impacts include habitat conversion, degradation and fragmentation. Both onshore wind and ground mounted solar create barrier effects to biodiversity movement. Specific examples of such biodiversity pressures include: • Collisions of birds, prey, and bats with wind turbines, solar panels, and transmission lines. • Electrocution of birds and bats on transmission lines. • Disturbance and displacement of fauna due to noise, dust and vibration from construction activities. • Fauna road kills due to development of roads and infrastructure.
# 338
Water discharges to environment: suspended solids
Water discharges to environment: pH and suspended solids
SO2, NOx and PM emissions to air
Fugitive PM emissions to air in dry season
Mercury emissions to air and water
Water discharges to environment
Fluoride emissions to air
SO2 and PM emissions to air
Other emissions to air from casthouse and anode baking furnaces
Other emissions to air from casthouse
Water discharges to environment (where applicable)
[150010] GRI 304 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Operational Site Owned, Leased, Managed in or Adjacent to Protected Areas and Areas of High Biodiversity Value Outside Protected Areas | Operational Sites Owned, Leased, Managed in or Adjacent to Protected Areas and Areas of High Biodiversity Value Outside Protected Areas | ||||||||||||||||||||
304-1-a-i: Geographic location | 304-1-a-ii: Subsurface and underground land that may be owned, leased, or managed | 304-1-a-iii: Position in relation to the protected area or the high biodiversity value area outside protected areas | 304-1-a-iv: Type of operation | 304-1-a-v: Size of operational site | 304-1-a-vi: Biodiversity value characterized by the attribute of the protected area or area of high biodiversity value outside the protected area | 304-1-a-vii: Biodiversity value characterized by listing of protected status | ||||||||||||||||
304-1-a-i: Geographic location | Reason for omission (304-1-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-i) | 304-1-a-ii: Subsurface and underground land that may be owned, leased, or managed | Reason for omission (304-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-ii) | 304-1-a-iii: Position in relation to the protected area or the high biodiversity value area outside protected areas | Reason for omission (304-1-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-iii) | 304-1-a-iv: Type of operation | Reason for omission (304-1-a-iv) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-iv) | 304-1-a-v: Size of operational site | Reason for omission (304-1-a-v) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-v) | 304-1-a-vi: Biodiversity value characterized by the attribute of the protected area or area of high biodiversity value outside the protected area | Reason for omission (304-1-a-vi) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-vi) | 304-1-a-vii: Biodiversity value characterized by listing of protected status | Reason for omission (304-1-a-vii) | Explanation for reason for omission (304-1-a-vii) | ||
1 | Paragominas |
|
Ref #339 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #340 | ||||||||||||||
2 | Alunorte |
|
Ref #341 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #342 | ||||||||||||||
3 | Albras |
|
Ref #343 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #344 | ||||||||||||||
4 | Ardal |
|
Ref #345 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #346 | ||||||||||||||
5 | Hoyanger |
|
Ref #347 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #348 | ||||||||||||||
6 | Husnes |
|
Ref #349 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #350 | ||||||||||||||
7 | Karmoy |
|
Ref #351 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #352 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Qatalum |
|
Ref #353 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #354 | ||||||||||||||
9 | Slovalco |
|
Ref #355 | In the area | Office |
Actuals (sqkm)
|
Terrestrial ecosystem | Ref #356 |
[150020] GRI 304 - Biodiversity - Disclosure 304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations | Critically endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable | Near threatened | Least concern |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Level of Extinction Risk | |||||
304-4-a: Total number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by the operations of the organization |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
||
Reason for omission (304-4-a) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | |||
Explanation for reason for omission (304-4-a) | Ref #357 | Ref #358 |
[160000] GRI 305 - Emissions | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI-305: Emissions 2016 | |
Disclosure of Emission Topic management disclosures | |
305-1.2: Offsets were used to meet the GHG emissions targets | False |
305-1.2: Type | |
305-1.2: Amount (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-1.2: Criteria or scheme of which offsets are part | |
Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | |
305-1-a: Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (MtCO2e)
Actuals (MtCO2e)
|
305-1-b: Gases included in the calculation | |
305-1-c: Biogenic CO2 emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (MtCO2e)
Actuals (MtCO2e)
|
The base year is applicable for the calculation | False |
305-1-d: Start date for the base year | |
305-1-d: End date for the base year | |
Details of base year for direct (scope 1) GHG emissions | |
305-1-d-i: The rationale for choosing the base year | |
305-1-d-ii: Emissions in the base year (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-1-d-iii: The context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions | |
305-1-e: Source of the emission factors | Ref #359 |
305-1-e: Global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source | Ref #360 |
305-1-f: Consolidation approach for emissions | Equity Share |
305-1-g: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #361 |
Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-a: Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (MtCO2e)
Actuals (MtCO2e)
|
305-2-c: If available, the gases included in the calculation of location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
The base year is applicable for the calculation of location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | False |
305-2-d: Start date for the base year for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d: End date for the base year for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
Details of base year for gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d-i: The rationale for choosing the base year for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d-ii: Location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in the base year (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-2-d-iii: The context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-e: Source of the emission factors for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | Ref #362 |
305-2-e: The global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source for location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | Ref #363 |
Gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions are applicable | True |
305-2-b: Gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (MtCO2e)
Actuals (MtCO2e)
|
305-2-c: If available, the gases included in the calculation of market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
The base year is applicable for the calculation of market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | False |
305-2-d: Start date for the base year for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d: End date for the base year for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
Details of base year for gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d-i: The rationale for choosing the base year for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-d-ii: Market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in the base year (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-2-d-iii: The context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | |
305-2-e: Source of the emission factors for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | Ref #364 |
305-2-e: The global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source for market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | Ref #365 |
305-2-f: Consolidation approach for emissions | Equity Share |
305-2-g: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #366 |
Disclosure 305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | |
305-3-a: Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (MtCO2e)
Actuals (MtCO2e)
|
305-3-b: If available, the gases included in the calculation | |
305-3-c: Biogenic CO2 emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) |
Actuals (tCO2e)
Actuals (tCO2e)
|
305-3-d: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions categories and activities included in the calculation | Ref #367 |
The base year is applicable for the calculation | False |
305-3-e: Start date for the base year | |
305-3-e: End date for the base year | |
Details of base year for gross other indirect (scope 3) GHG emissions | |
305-3-e-i: The rationale for choosing the base year | |
305-3-e-ii: Emissions in the base year (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-3-e-iii: The context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions | |
305-3-f: Source of the emission factors | Ref #368 |
305-3-f: The global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source | Ref #369 |
305-3-g: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #370 |
Disclosure 305-4 GHG emissions intensity |
• [160010] GRI 305 - Emissions - Disclosure 305-4 GHG emissions intensity |
Disclosure 305-5 Reduction of GHG emissions | |
305-5-a: Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-5-a: Location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-5-a: Market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-5-a: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
305-5-b: Gases included in the calculation |
|
305-5-c: Start date for the base year | |
305-5-c: End date for the base year | |
305-5-c: Baseline | |
305-5-c: Rationale for choosing the base year or baseline | |
305-5-e: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #371 |
305-5-2.9.5: Reductions from offsets (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | |
Disclosure 305-6 Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) | |
305-6-a: Production of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) (in metric tons of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent) |
Actuals (t)
Actuals (t)
|
305-6-a: Imports of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) (in metric tons of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent) |
Actuals (t)
Actuals (t)
|
305-6-a: Exports of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) (in metric tons of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent) |
Actuals (t)
Actuals (t)
|
305-6-b: Substances included in the calculation | Ref #372 |
305-6-c: Source of the emission factors used | Ref #373 |
305-6-d: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Ref #374 |
Disclosure 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions |
• [160020] GRI 305 - Emissions - Disclosure 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions |
305-7-b: Source of the emission factors used | |
305-7-c: Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used. | |
305-7-2.13.4: The basis on which figures were estimated, if estimations are used due to a lack of default figures |
# 359
The emission factors used to calculate Scope 1 GHG emissions from fossil fuel consumption have been updated using the UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting (DEFRA 2023).
# 360
The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of non-CO2 greenhouse gases have been updated according to IPPC AR6. The changes have been applied to historical emissions and GHG emissions reported in previous annual reports have been updated accordingly.
# 361
Direct GHG emissions (scope 1) are calculated based on anode consumption during the electrolysis process and use of fossil fuels. PFC emissions are calculated based on automatic process measurements and comprise CF4 and C2F6 that are formed during anode effect situations in the electrolytic cells. Anode effect is mainly a result of production instability, e.g. in connection to power outages. The reported direct emissions are comparable to Scope 1 emissions as defined by the GHG protocol. All GHG emissions reported have been converted to CO2 equivalents (CO2e).
# 362
Indirect GHG emissions (scope 2) are calculated based on Hydro’s consumption of electricity. Reported indirect emissions cover GHG emissions from purchased electricity and emissions from the gas-fired power plant in Qatalum. The table shows Hydro’s emissions according to the location based method in the revised GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance and uses emission factors from the International Energy Agency (IEA) which is updated on an annual basis
# 363
The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of non-CO2 greenhouse gases have been updated according to IPPC AR6.
# 364
For 2024, Hydro is also reporting scope 2 emissions according to the market-based approach in line with the requirements in ESRS. Hydro has green power purchase agreements (PPAs) that cover electricity consumption in Norway and some of the extrusion plants in Europe and in North America. Some of Hydro’s extrusions sites have also installed on-site solar-panels and windmills. The PPAs in Norway cover 100 percent of the electricity consumption in Norway, and about 60 percent is covered by an internal PPA with Hydro Energy where the energy attribute certificates are cancelled. The rest of the energy consumption in Norway is covered by green PPAs, but the energy attribute certificates (EAC) are not cancelled by the energy supplier. For Hydro sites that have not installed on-site renewable energy generation or do not have a power purchase agreement with EACs, residual mix emission factors are used to calculate scope 2 emissions according to the market-based approach. The residual mix emission factors applied are either from AiB, NORSUS, Green-e, the Australian Government or IEA. For Hydro sites with on-site renewable electricity generation, the emission factor for electricity is set to zero, and for sites with a green PPA where the EACs are cancelled, the emission factors stated in the PPAs are applied, or set to zero if not defined
# 365
The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of non-CO2 greenhouse gases have been updated according to IPPC AR6.
# 366
Indirect GHG emissions (scope 2) are calculated based on Hydro’s consumption of electricity. Reported indirect emissions cover GHG emissions from purchased electricity and emissions from the gas-fired power plant in Qatalum. The table shows Hydro’s emissions according to the location based method in the revised GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance and uses emission factors from the International Energy Agency (IEA) which is updated on an annual basis
# 367
Purchased goods and services
Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)
Upstream transportation and distribution
Downstream transportation
Processing of sold products
Investments
# 368
Reported Scope 3 emissions are based on a combination of supplier-specific primary data and estimations based on statistical averages and generic emission factors.
# 369
The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of non-CO2 greenhouse gases have been updated according to IPPC AR6
# 370
Indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions are reported for emissions related to purchased goods and services, fuel and energy related activities, upstream transportation and distribution, downstream transportation and distribution, and processing of sold products. The calculation and reporting of Hydro’s Scope 3 emissions are based on principles from the International Aluminium Institute’s (IAI) Scope 3 Calculation Tool Guidance 2022 and its definition of material Scope 3 categories.
# 371
Breakdown of reported direct GHG emissions in consolidated activities, by greenhouse gas type. Amounts are reported in CO2-equivalents for each GHG type. GRI reference: GRI 305-5 (2016). Direct GHG emissions per GHG type - consolidated activities
# 372
The reported value corresponds to the purchased amount of such substances and can vary significantly according to the need of refilling existing cooling devices. In Brazil, such substances are managed and reported according to Brazilian legal requirements. In Hydro Extrusions, hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) accounts for around one third of ozone depleting substances.
# 373
Hydro uses ozone depleting substances in certain applications in its Brazilian operations and to some extent also in Extrusions. In 2024, Hydro used in total 8.2 tonnes of such substances in its operations. The reported value corresponds to the purchased amount of such substances and can vary significantly according to the need of refilling existing cooling devices. In Brazil, such substances are managed and reported according to Brazilian legal requirements. In Hydro Extrusions, hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) accounts for around one third of ozone depleting substances.
# 374
Hydro uses ozone depleting substances in certain applications in its Brazilian operations and to some extent also in Extrusions. In 2024, Hydro used in total 8.2 tonnes of such substances in its operations. The reported value corresponds to the purchased amount of such substances and can vary significantly according to the need of refilling existing cooling devices. In Brazil, such substances are managed and reported according to Brazilian legal requirements. In Hydro Extrusions, hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) accounts for around one third of ozone depleting substances.
[160010] GRI 305 - Emissions - Disclosure 305-4 GHG emissions intensity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Organization Specific Metric (Denominator) Chosen to Calculate GHG Emissions Intensity Ratio | GHG Emissions Intensity Reporting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305-4-a: Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-a: Location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-a: Market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-a: Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-a: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions intensity ratio | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions intensity ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of the denominator | 305-4-a: Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-a) | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-d) | 305-4-a: Location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-a) | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-d) | 305-4-a: Market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-a) | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-d) | 305-4-a: Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-a) | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-d) | 305-4-a: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-a) | 305-4-d: Gases included in the calculation of other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions intensity ratio | Reason for omission (305-4-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (305-4-d) | ||
1 | Refining at Alunorte alumina refinery Tonne CO2e per tonne alumina | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #375 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #376 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #377 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #378 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #379 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #380 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #381 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #382 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #383 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #384 |
# 375
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 376
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 377
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 378
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 379
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 380
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 381
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 382
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 383
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
# 384
Hydro reports GHG intensity at the Alunorte alumina refinery and GHG intensity of the electrolysis process from Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity, which are operational performance indicators in Hydro. GHG intensity of alumina refining is calculated based on the total GHG emissions and production volumes at Hydro’s Alunorte alumina refinery. The reported GHG intensity covers all alumina refining in Hydro. GHG intensity of the electrolysis process is calculated based on greenhouse gas emissions and production volumes in Hydro’s smelters, based on ownership equity. This is an operational target that excludes extraordinary emissions resulting from e.g. start up of curtailed capacity. The methodology for calculation is site specific and historical figures may be subject to change. GHG intensity based on net revenue is calculated based on total Scope 1, Scope 2 location based, and material Scope 3 emissions, divided by total revenue as reported in the consolidated income statement.
The implementation of electric boilers for steam generation at Alunorte and process improvements have resulted in an improvement in emissions per tonne alumina refined compared to previous years. For the GHG intensity per tonne aluminium from the electrolysis process, Slovalco was excluded in 2022 due to production curtailment. GHG intensity based on net revenue and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions was 114.3 tonnes (location based) and 138.1 tonnes (marked based) of per NOK million in 2024. This is an ESRS reporting requirement, but not an operational target for Hydro, as the value will vary depending on market prices than explaining changes in actual emissions. The value is calculated based on total GHG emissions reported in the appendix, and net revenue from consolidated activities from Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statement.
[160020] GRI 305 - Emissions - Disclosure 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions | Nitrogen Oxides (Nox) | Sulfur Oxides (Sox) | Particulate Matter (PM) | Other standard categories of air emissions identified in relevant regulations | Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP) | Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) | Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Categories of Significant Air Emissions | |||||||
305-7-a: Significant air emissions (in kilograms or multiples) |
Actuals (kg)
Actuals (kg)
|
Actuals (kg)
Actuals (kg)
|
Actuals (kg)
Actuals (kg)
|
Actuals (kg)
Actuals (kg)
|
|||
Reason for omission (305-7-a) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | ||||
Explanation for reason for omission (305-7-a) | Ref #385 | Ref #386 | Ref #387 |
[170000] GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 306: Effluents and Waste 2016 | |
Disclosure 306-3 Significant spills | |
306-3-a: Total number of recorded significant spills |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
306-3-a: Total volume of recorded significant spills |
Actuals (Ml)
Actuals (Ml)
|
Spill that was reported in the organization’s financial statements |
• [170010] GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste - Disclosure 306-3 Significant spills |
306-3-c: Impacts of significant spills | Ref #388 |
# 388
Spillages and leakages to the external environment (soil, water or air) are registered in Synergi and/or in IMS, Hydro’s reporting tools for incidents regarding health, safety, security and environment. Spills and leakages reported in Note E2.2 comprise incidents that have resulted in emissions to the external environment that are categorized as severe or major, i.e. unintended and sustained spills and leakages. A spillage or leakage can be reclassified according to changes in the actual consequence of the spillage or leakage, and historical figures are updated accordingly. Several reported incidents can be closely related and therefore classified as the same spillage.
[170010] GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste - Disclosure 306-3 Significant spills | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Information for Spill that was reported in Organization’s Financial Statements | Information for Spill that was reported in Organization’s Financial Statements | |||||||||||
306-3-b-i: Location of spill | 306-3-b-ii: Volume of spill | 306-3-b-iii: Material of spill | 306-3-b-iii: Other material of spill | ||||||||||
306-3-b-i: Location of spill | Reason for omission (306-3-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-3-b-i) | 306-3-b-ii: Volume of spill | Reason for omission (306-3-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-3-b-ii) | 306-3-b-iii: Material of spill | Reason for omission (306-3-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-3-b-iii) | 306-3-b-iii: Other material of spill | Reason for omission (306-3-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-3-b-iii) | ||
1 | Spill | Not applicable | Ref #389 | Not applicable | Ref #390 | Not applicable | Ref #391 |
[180000] GRI 306 - Waste | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 306: Waste 2020 | |
Disclosure 306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | |
306-1-a-i: Description of inputs that lead or could lead to significant actual and potential waste-related impacts | |
306-1-a-i: Description of activities that lead or could lead to significant actual and potential waste-related impacts | |
306-1-a-i: Description of outputs that lead or could lead to significant actual and potential waste-related impacts | |
306-1-a-ii: Description of whether the significant actual and potential waste-related impacts relate to waste generated in the organization’s own activities or to waste generated upstream or downstream in its value chain | |
Disclosure 306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts | |
306-2-a: Actions, including circularity measures, taken to prevent waste generation in the organization's own activities and upstream and downstream in its value chain | |
306-2-a: Actions taken to manage significant impacts from waste generated | |
306-2-b: The waste generated by the organization in its own activities is managed by a third party | |
306-2-b: Description of the processes used to determine whether the third party manages waste in line with contractual or legislative obligations | |
306-2-c: Processes used to collect and monitor waste-related data | |
Disclosure 306-3 Waste generated | |
306-3-a: Total weight of waste generated (in metric tons) | |
Category of Waste Composition |
• [180010] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-3 Waste generated |
306-3-b: Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | Ref #392 |
Disclosure 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal | |
306-4-a: Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
306-4-b: Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
306-4-c: Total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Waste Diverted from Disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste |
• [180020] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste |
Waste Diverted from Disposal Breakdown by Recovery Operation |
• [180030] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal, Breakdown by Recovery Operation |
306-4-e: Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | Ref #393 |
Disclosure 306-5 Waste directed to disposal | |
306-5-a: Total weight of waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
306-5-b: Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
306-5-c: Total weight of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Waste Directed to Disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste |
• [180040] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-5 Waste directed to disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste |
Waste Directed to Disposal, Breakdown by Disposal Operation |
• [180050] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-5 Waste directed to disposal, Breakdown by Disposal Operation |
306-5-e: Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | Ref #394 |
# 392
Waste is measured and reported according to a harmonized categorization within Hydro, based on the common names of key waste streams relevant to its operations (e.g. bauxite residue, SPL, waste caustic soda). This facilitates aggregation of data at a group level and avoids the use of multiple waste codes for the same waste category. Operations maintain more detailed waste registries that align with local requirements and legislation. Note that a lack of standardized methodologies for classifying, measuring and reporting waste across jurisdictions, industries and waste handling operations is a significant source of measurement uncertainty. Changing methodologies over time also creates challenges in comparing consolidated waste data from one year to another. Waste treatment operations can occur both onsite and offsite treatment. In many cases, waste is managed by third parties, which are required to adhere to the Hydro Supplier Code of Conduct. All Hydro locations are required to ensure safe transport of hazardous waste in accordance with global and local regulations, and evaluate critical waste receivers and include these in a supplier development system.
# 394
The amount of generated waste sent to landfill increased in 2024, thereby raising the percentage of waste-to-landfill from 15 percent in 2023 to 19 percent in 2024. This trend was not driven by a worsening in Hydro's waste management performance, but by an improvement in waste accounting and management at Alunorte. In 2024, Alunorte conducted a comprehensive review of its waste management systems to provide a more complete and accurate accounting of wastes deposited on DRS1. This effort serves as a step for its long-term strategy to eliminate waste-to-landfill by 2040. Additionally, several circularity initiatives were implemented to reduce landfill disposal, such as repurposing materials and promoting the reuse and recycling of waste streams. These actions reflect Hydro's commitment to advancing waste circularity and minimizing environmental impacts. Although this adjustment presents itself as a negative development in Hydro's aggregated statistics for 2024, it is a critical step toward longterm improvements. Hydro expects to see continued progress in real performance and further advancements in waste circularity in 2025
[180020] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Category of Waste Composition | Waste Diverted from Disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste | ||
306-4-a: Weight of waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) | ||||
306-4-a: Weight of waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) | Reason for omission (306-4-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-4-a) | ||
1 | Anode butts |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
2 | Dross |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
3 | Fly & bottom ash |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
4 | SPL |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
5 | Spent caustic soda |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
6 | Other waste |
Actuals (kT)
|
[180030] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal, Breakdown by Recovery Operation | Preparation for Reuse | Preparation for Reuse | Preparation for Reuse | Recycling | Recycling | Recycling | Other recovery operations | Other recovery operations | Other recovery operations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | |
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | ||||
Waste Diverted from Disposal Breakdown by Recovery Operation | |||||||||
306-4-b: Weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Reason for omission (306-4-b) | |||||||||
Explanation for reason for omission (306-4-b) | |||||||||
306-4-c: Weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Reason for omission (306-4-c) | |||||||||
Explanation for reason for omission (306-4-c) |
[180040] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-5 Waste directed to disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Category of Waste Composition | Waste Directed to Disposal, Breakdown by Composition of Waste | ||
306-5-a: Weight of waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) | ||||
306-5-a: Weight of waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) | Reason for omission (306-5-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (306-5-a) | ||
1 | Anode butts |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
2 | Dross |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
3 | Fly & bottom ash |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
4 | SPL |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
5 | Spent caustic soda |
Actuals (kT)
|
||
6 | Other waste |
Actuals (kT)
|
[180050] GRI 306 - Waste - Disclosure 306-5 Waste directed to disposal, Breakdown by Disposal Operation | Incineration (with energy recovery) | Incineration (with energy recovery) | Incineration (with energy recovery) | Incineration (without energy recovery) | Incineration (without energy recovery) | Incineration (without energy recovery) | Landfilling | Landfilling | Landfilling | Other disposal operations | Other disposal operations | Other disposal operations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | Onsite | Offsite | |
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |||||
Waste Directed to Disposal, Breakdown by Disposal Operation | ||||||||||||
306-5-b: Weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Reason for omission (306-5-b) | ||||||||||||
Explanation for reason for omission (306-5-b) | ||||||||||||
306-5-c: Weight of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal (in metric tons) |
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Actuals (kT)
Actuals (kT)
|
Reason for omission (306-5-c) | ||||||||||||
Explanation for reason for omission (306-5-c) |
[190000] GRI 308 - Supplier Environmental Assessment | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI-308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016 | |
Disclosure 308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | |
308-1-a: Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | |
Disclosure 308-2 Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | |
308-2-a: Number of suppliers assessed for environmental impacts |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
308-2-b: Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts | |
308-2-c: Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts identified in the supply chain | Ref #395 |
308-2-d: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of the assessment | |
308-2-e: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | |
308-2-e: Reasons why relationships with suppliers were terminated as a result of assessment |
# 395
The most significant actual negative impacts in our supply chain are associated with the extraction of the raw materials, especially coal. Furthermore, we consider the most significant potential negative environmental impacts to be related to possible environmental accidents related to the transportation of raw materials such as coal and fuel oil to our mining sites as well as the transportation of coke, pitch anodes, alumina and fluorides to our primary metal production sites
[200000] GRI 401 - Employment | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 401: Employment 2016 | |
Disclosure 401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover |
• [200010] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, Reporting by Age Group • [200020] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, Reporting by Gender • [200030] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Region |
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Age Group | |
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Gender | |
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Region | |
Disclosure 401-2 Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees |
• [200040] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-2 Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part time employees |
401-2-b: Definition used for 'significant locations of operation' | Ref #396 |
[200010] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, Reporting by Age Group | Under 30 Years old | 30 To 50 Years old | Over 50 Years old |
---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Age Group | |||
401-1-a: Total number of new employee hires during the reporting period | |||
Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | Ref #397 | Ref #398 | Ref #399 |
401-1-a: Total rate of new employee hires during the reporting period | |||
Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | Ref #400 | Ref #401 | Ref #402 |
401-1-b: Total number of employee turnover during the reporting period | |||
Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | Ref #403 | Ref #404 | Ref #405 |
401-1-b: Total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period | |||
Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | Ref #406 | Ref #407 | Ref #408 |
[200020] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, Reporting by Gender | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Gender | New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Gender | |||||||||||
401-1-a: Total number of new employee hires during the reporting period | 401-1-a: Total rate of new employee hires during the reporting period | 401-1-b: Total number of employee turnover during the reporting period | 401-1-b: Total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period | ||||||||||
401-1-a: Total number of new employee hires during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | 401-1-a: Total rate of new employee hires during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | 401-1-b: Total number of employee turnover during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | 401-1-b: Total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | ||
1 | Women | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #409 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #410 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #411 | Information unavailable or incomplete | Ref #412 |
[200030] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-1 New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Region | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Region | New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover, by Region | |||||||||||
401-1-a: Total number of new employee hires during the reporting period | 401-1-a: Total rate of new employee hires during the reporting period | 401-1-b: Total number of employee turnover during the reporting period | 401-1-b: Total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period | ||||||||||
401-1-a: Total number of new employee hires during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | 401-1-a: Total rate of new employee hires during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-a) | 401-1-b: Total number of employee turnover during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | 401-1-b: Total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period | Reason for omission (401-1-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-1-b) | ||
1 | NA | Not applicable | Ref #413 | Not applicable | Ref #414 | Not applicable | Ref #415 | Not applicable | Ref #416 |
[200050] GRI 401 - Employment - Disclosure 401-3 Parental Leave | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Gender | Parental Leave | |||||||||||||||||
401-3-a: Total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave | 401-3-b: Total number of employees that took parental leave | 401-3-c: Total number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended | 401-3-d: Total number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work | 401-3-e: Return to work rate of employees that took parental leave | 401-3-e: Retention rate of employees that took parental leave | ||||||||||||||
401-3-a: Total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave | Reason for omission (401-3-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-a) | 401-3-b: Total number of employees that took parental leave | Reason for omission (401-3-b) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-b) | 401-3-c: Total number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended | Reason for omission (401-3-c) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-c) | 401-3-d: Total number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work | Reason for omission (401-3-d) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-d) | 401-3-e: Return to work rate of employees that took parental leave | Reason for omission (401-3-e) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-e) | 401-3-e: Retention rate of employees that took parental leave | Reason for omission (401-3-e) | Explanation for reason for omission (401-3-e) | ||
1 | Women | Not applicable | Ref #417 |
Actuals (pure)
|
Not applicable | Ref #418 | Not applicable | Ref #419 | Not applicable | Ref #420 | Not applicable | Ref #421 |
[210000] GRI 402 - Labor or Management Relations | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 402: Labor/Management Relations 2016 | |
Disclosure 402-1 Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes | |
402-1-a: Minimum number of weeks’ notice typically provided to employees prior to the implementation of significant operational changes that could substantially affect them | |
402-1-a: Minimum number of weeks’ notice typically provided to the representatives prior to the implementation of significant operational changes that could substantially affect them | |
402-1-b: The notice period and provisions for consultation and negotiation are specified in collective bargaining agreements |
[220000] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 | |
Disclosure 403-1 Occupational health and safety management system | |
403-1-a: For employees and for workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, a statement of whether an occupational health and safety management system has been implemented | |
403-1-a-i: The system has been implemented because of legal requirements | |
403-1-a-i: List of the requirements | |
403-1-a-ii: The system has been implemented based on recognized risk management and/or management system standards/guidelines | |
403-1-a-ii: List of the standards/guidelines | |
403-1-b: Description of scope of workers, activities, and workplaces covered by the occupational health and safety management system | |
403-1-b: Explanation of whether and, if so, why any workers, activities, or workplaces are not covered | |
Disclosure 403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | |
403-2-a: For employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, description of the processes used to identify work-related hazards and assess risks on a routine and non-routine basis | |
403-2-a: Description of processes used to apply the hierarchy of controls in order to eliminate hazards and minimize risks | |
403-2-a-i: Description of how the organization ensures the quality of these processes, including the competency of persons who carry them out | |
403-2-a-ii: Description of how the results of these processes are used to evaluate and continually improve the occupational health and safety management system | |
403-2-b: Description of the processes for workers to report work-related hazards and hazardous situations | |
403-2-b: Explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals from reporting work-related hazards and hazardous situations | |
403-2-c: Description of the policies and processes for workers to remove themselves from work situations that they believe could cause injury or ill health | |
403-2-c: Explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals from removing themselves from work situations that they believe could cause injury or ill health | |
403-2-d: Description of the processes used to investigate work-related incidents | |
403-2-d: Description of the processes used to identify hazards and assess risks relating to work-related incidents | |
403-2-d: Description of the processes used to determine corrective actions using the hierarchy of controls | |
403-2-d: Description of the processes used to determine improvements needed in the occupational health and safety management system | |
Disclosure 403-3 Occupational health services | |
403-3-a: For employees and for workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, description of the occupational health services’ functions that contribute to the identification and elimination of hazards and minimization of risks | |
403-3-a: Explanation of how the organization ensures the quality of these services and facilitates workers’ access to them | |
Disclosure 403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety | |
403-4-a: For employees and for workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, description of the processes for worker participation and consultation in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the occupational health and safety management system | |
403-4-a: Description of the processes for providing access to and communicating relevant information on occupational health and safety to workers | |
Formal joint management-worker health and safety committees exist | |
403-4-b: Description of their responsibilities, meeting frequency, decision-making authority | |
403-4-b: All workers are represented by these committees | |
403-4-b: Description of why any workers are not represented by these committees | |
Disclosure 403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety | |
403-5-a: For employees and for workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, description of any occupational health and safety training provided to workers, including generic training as well as training on specific work-related hazards, hazardous activities, or hazardous situations | |
Disclosure 403-6 Promotion of worker health | |
403-6-a: For employees and for workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, explanation of how the organization facilitates workers’ access to non-occupational medical and healthcare services, and the scope of access provided | |
403-6-b: Description of any voluntary health promotion services and programs offered to workers to address major non-work-related health risks, including the specific health risks addressed | |
403-6-b: Description of how the organization facilitates workers’ access to these services and programs | |
Disclosure 403-7 Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships | |
403-7-a: Description of the approach to preventing or mitigating significant negative occupational health and safety impacts that are directly linked to its operations, products, or services by its business relationships, and the related hazards and risks | |
Disclosure 403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | |
The organization has implemented an occupational health and safety management system based on legal requirements and/or recognized standards/guidelines | |
Disclosure of employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization |
• [220010] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety - Disclosure 403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system |
403-8-b: No workers have been excluded from this disclosure | |
403-8-b: Explanation of why any workers have been excluded, including the types of worker excluded | |
403-8-c: Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled | |
Disclosure 403-9 Work-related injuries |
• [220020] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety - Disclosure 403-9 Work Related Injuries |
403-9-c: Work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury | Ref #422 |
403-9-c-i: How work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury have been determined | Ref #423 |
403-9-c-ii: Which work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury have caused or contributed to high-consequence injuries during the reporting period | Ref #424 |
403-9-c-iii: Actions taken or underway to eliminate work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | Ref #425 |
403-9-d: Actions taken or underway to eliminate other work-related hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | Ref #426 |
403-9-e: Basis of calculation of rates | Based on 200,000 hours worked |
403-9-f: No workers have been excluded from this disclosure | False |
403-9-f: Explanation of why any workers have been excluded, including the types of worker excluded | |
403-9-g: Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled | Ref #427 |
Disclosure 403-10 Work-related ill health |
• [220030] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety - Disclosure 403-10 Work-related ill health |
403-10-c: Work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health | Ref #428 |
403-10-c-i: How work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health have been determined | Ref #429 |
403-10-c-ii: Which work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health have caused or contributed to cases of ill health during the reporting period | Ref #430 |
403-10-c-iii: Actions taken or underway to eliminate work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | Ref #431 |
403-10-d: No workers have been excluded from this disclosure | False |
403-10-d: Explanation of why any workers have been excluded, including the types of worker excluded | |
403-10-e: Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled | Ref #432 |
# 422
Hydro is committed to the protection of people, environment, physical assets, data and information. Hydro anticipates and prepares for potentially adverse incidents with crisis potential to maintain business and operational continuity. To prepare for and respond to intentional, unintentional and/or naturally occurring disasters, and to protect people and critical assets, Hydro adapts and initiates security measures depending on the evolving risk picture. Hydro’s emergency preparedness plans enable effective response to high risk incidents and crises, ensuring an effective, cohesive, integrated and timely response to any business disruption, regardless of origin, scale or complexity. Hydro has emergency preparedness plans in place that are regularly exercised against known and identified hazards. Security in Hydro includes a proactive security risk management process, based on analysis, to enable appropriate mitigating actions and accurate and timely decision making. Security guards are employed on a regular basis to protect Hydro’s personnel and assets. No armed personnel are used in Hydro’s security operations. Firearm related incidents and robberies continued to occur in 2024 in relation to Hydro’s operations in Paragominas, Alunorte and Mexico. No Hydro personnel were injured in these events and resulting security mitigation measures were employed to further protect personnel and prevent against other incidents. Global conflict, especially the war in Ukraine, continues to put pressure on international relationships increasing political tensions and elevating the potential risk of sabotage. The Israeli-HamasHizbullah conflict has added to international uncertainty surrounding terror related events and possible conflict escalation in the Middle East. Group Security closely monitors the security risks in Brazil and maintains close contact with both Hydro plants in Mexico with a monthly security call implemented to ensure security mitigation measures are aligned with the developments and threat. Regular security updates are disseminated to all Hydro Business Areas with information and advice provided on any associated travel, security or emergency mitigation measures which may be required due to the war in Ukraine and the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Hydro continues to ensure its security operations conform to the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, ensuring an ethical approach to the delivery of security services. Hydro is responsible for infrastructure and functions on local and regional levels that can be critical to society, and the company operates large scale production sites where a crisis could influence community interests and safety in general. Hence, Hydro is subject to control and follow up by relevant national authorities. Hydro has emergency plans in place by site, Business Area and at group level, and the company exercises and validates these plans regularly. Twenty emergency and crisis management workshops, with risk mapping at their core, were held in 2024, planned and exercised by Group HSE. Based on evolving complex scenarios these workshops were conducted at department, plant, Business Unit, Business Area and Corporate Emergency Team (CET) levels. They help to link the process of security and emergency response, crisis management, and business continuity and recovery from the plant through to business area level and above. In addition, all sites are required to exercise emergency preparedness and response training as a minimum on an annual basis or more frequently based on identified hazards and risks or as stipulated by local laws and regulations Hydro’s strategy to prepare for future pandemics is based on cooperation with local authorities and compliance with rules complemented by a flexible range of Hydro specific responses, robust emergency preparedness and business continuity plans. Where applicable, guidelines and regulations from national authorities such as those pertaining to travel restrictions, social distancing, home office or complete societal lockdowns, have been reflected in Hydro’s internal policies and procedures. Hydro evaluates its key pandemic related risks and vulnerabilities through security and business resilience assessments, which support the preparation and review of business-continuity plans. Measures that have been used and could be reinstated include stock level increases for raw materials to reduce Hydro’s exposure to supply chain disruptions and cash preservation measures to reduce cost, capital expenditures and ensure adequate liquidity to face the financial impact of potential shutdowns.
# 428
Hydro shall be a leading company in its industry in occupational health and safety. This will be achieved through consistent implementation of the management system with committed and visible leadership, and full engagement of all employees and others who work with the company. The CEO HSE Committee is the strategic decision making committee for all main HSE related matters for the Hydro group. The committee is led by the President & CEO, and consists of the members of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) and the head of global HSE. Hydro’s health and safety activities are governed by the company’s HSE policy and the Global HSE Directive, which are owned by the EVP for People and HSE, and applicable for all own employees and contractors. Health and safety standards are aligned with ISO standards. Health and safety are identified as salient human rights with potential adverse impacts on employees and contractors across Hydro’s operations. Hydro’s ambition is to provide safe and healthy workplaces, promote health and wellbeing, and prevent work related injuries and illness. Hydro drives safety improvements by systematically reducing risks, training personnel, and regularly following up by line management and safety delegates. All injuries and high risk incidents are investigated to find root causes, and to share lessons learned between Hydro sites. Employees are engaged on health and safety issues through frequent network meetings across the business areas. Hydro works continuously to avoid damage to property and loss of production. Hydro has developed a comprehensive health and safety management system, and the company’s manufacturing sites are certified to internationally recognized health and safety standards. Hydro embraces digital tools where possible and has developed an advanced incident management system, self-assessment tools, risk management processes, e-learning training modules, a digital HSE assistant using Artificial Intelligence etc., all easily accessible to employees. In addition, Hydro has strengthened its behavioral tools using human performance techniques and the consistent use of peer-to-peer job observations. Hydro has developed employee assistance programs at site level to support affected workers. This includes as a minimum psychological support for those needed, but also include other types of support depending on the area they operate in, such as financial advice. The total recordable injuries rate in 2024 was 2.0 per million hours worked, compared to 2.4 in 2023. An improvement is seen in the number of injuries occurred to own employees. The majority of injuries were relatively minor. However, there was one fatality involving a contractor at the aluminium smelter Albras in Brazil. Action plans and global learning plans have been established and implementation is ongoing. There was also one life changing accident at Albras, when a contractor lost two fingers. The deployment of fatality prevention procedures, and associated life saving rules and behaviors continued in 2024. This contributed to a continued reduction in the number and rates of high risk incidents with the potential to be life changing, however, there was an increase in the high risk incidents with the potential to be fatal. Key initiatives include a self-assessment process for critical programs, electrical committees reviewing high risk incidents and required controls to be put in place, digitalizing systems and tools with integrated artificial intelligence functionality increasing the quality of the root cause investigations and risk assessments, monthly deep-dive incident data analyzes to support continuous improvement through root cause and use identification, and defining actions to prevent incidents from recurring. Quarterly health, safety, security, and environment network meetings are used to connect specialists from all business areas to discuss findings and actions taken from high risk incidents, and to share best practice and innovative solutions. Hydro also increased its emphasis on installing engineering controls to prevent high risk incidents from occurring. Hydro’s approach to continual improvement of physical and chemical occupational health is based on work environment risk assessments (WERA), and implementation of risk reduction measures followed up through an associated key performance indicator. WERA provides a systematic approach for evaluating the exposure of similar exposure groups, identifying the most exposed work operations and measures can be implemented before ill health occurs, which applies to both own employees and contractors. The group online HSE tool, IMS, provides a WERA module to facilitate the work process and ensure transparency. The focus on mental health and wellbeing has continued with numerous initiatives during the year to raise awareness, including mental health webinars, quarterly wellbeing topics addressing stress management, heat stress management, workplace hygiene and lighting. In addition, more workshops were run in different countries together with Human Resources and HSE managers to increase the competence related to stress and wellbeing. Toolkits such as psychological safety training for leaders and burnout prevention training have been developed. To ensure a systematic approach to the psychosocial work environment, Hydro has established a new psychosocial risk indicator (PRI) as part of its employee engagement survey, Hydro Monitor. A process for follow up of the PRI has been developed, including guidelines and tools.
[220020] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety - Disclosure 403-9 Work Related Injuries | Employees | Workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization |
---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Work Related Injuries | ||
403-9-a-i: Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Reason for omission (403-9-a-i) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-i) | ||
403-9-a-i: Rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | ||
Reason for omission (403-9-a-i) | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-i) | Ref #433 | Ref #434 |
403-9-a-ii: Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Reason for omission (403-9-a-ii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-ii) | ||
403-9-a-ii: Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) |
pure
pure
|
pure
pure
|
Reason for omission (403-9-a-ii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-ii) | ||
403-9-a-iii: Number of recordable work-related injuries |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Reason for omission (403-9-a-iii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-iii) | ||
403-9-a-iii: Rate of recordable work-related injuries |
pure
pure
|
pure
pure
|
Reason for omission (403-9-a-iii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-iii) | ||
403-9-a-iv: Main types of work-related injury | Ref #435 | Ref #436 |
Reason for omission (403-9-a-iv) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-iv) | ||
403-9-a-v: Number of hours worked | ||
Reason for omission (403-9-a-v) | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission (403-9-a-v) | Ref #437 | Ref #438 |
# 435
Employees are workers under direct supervision of Hydro. For the purpose of recording health and safety statistics, employees include agency workers. Health and safety statistics for employees are included for the period they are employed by or otherwise in service for Hydro.
Total recordable injuries (TRI) is calculated as the sum of lost time injuries (LTI) + restricted work cases (RWC) + medical treatment cases (MTC). LTI is a personal injury at work leading to unfitness for work and absence beyond the day of the accident. RWC is a personal injury at work that does not lead to absence beyond the day of the accident, because of alternative job assignment. MTC is treatment, other than first aid, administered by a physician or registered professional personnel under the standing orders of a physician. High risk incidents (HRI) include major accidents and incidents with major potential. TRI, LTI and HRI rates are calculated based on TRI, LTI and HRI per one million hours worked. Fatal accidents comprise all fatalities resulting from a work-related incident.
# 436
Contractors are workers who are under contract to execute work for Hydro, who are under the direct supervision of the contractor and operate at Hydro premises under Hydro’s indirect supervision. Contractors are included during the period they are employed by or otherwise in service for Hydro. Total recordable injuries (TRI) is calculated as the sum of lost time injuries (LTI) + restricted work cases (RWC) + medical treatment cases (MTC). LTI is a personal injury at work leading to unfitness for work and absence beyond the day of the accident. RWC is a personal injury at work that does not lead to absence beyond the day of the accident, because of alternative job assignment. MTC is treatment, other than first aid, administered by a physician or registered professional personnel under the standing orders of a physician. High risk incidents (HRI) include major accidents and incidents with major potential.
[220030] GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety - Disclosure 403-10 Work-related ill health | Employees | Workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization |
---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Work Related Ill Health | ||
403-10-a-i: Number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
Reason for omission (403-10-a-i) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-10-a-i) | ||
403-10-a-ii: Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health | ||
Reason for omission (403-10-a-ii) | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Explanation for reason for omission (403-10-a-ii) | Ref #439 | Ref #440 |
403-10-a-iii: Main types of work-related ill health | Ref #441 | Ref #442 |
Reason for omission (403-10-a-iii) | ||
Explanation for reason for omission (403-10-a-iii) |
# 441
Occupational illness rate is calculated as incidents of occupational ill health per million working hours. Actual occupational illnesses are defined by Hydro as either illnesses that have been confirmed by relevant authorities/insurance companies or doctors (depending on the national system); or that have led to any kind of permanent disability, disablement pension, loss of function and/or are a listed occupational disease. Occupational illness rate is calculated based on cases per million working hours. Sick leave includes all absence due to illness, measured as number of days lost due to sick leave as a percentage of possible working days excluding holidays. Sick leave is recorded based on local definitions which may differ between countries.
# 442
Occupational illness rate is calculated as incidents of occupational ill health per million working hours. Actual occupational illnesses are defined by Hydro as either illnesses that have been confirmed by relevant authorities/insurance companies or doctors (depending on the national system); or that have led to any kind of permanent disability, disablement pension, loss of function and/or are a listed occupational disease. Occupational illness rate is calculated based on cases per million working hours. Sick leave includes all absence due to illness, measured as number of days lost due to sick leave as a percentage of possible working days excluding holidays. Sick leave is recorded based on local definitions which may differ between countries.
[230000] GRI 404 - Training and Education | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI-404: Training and Education 2016 | |
Disclosure 404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee |
• [230010] GRI 404 - Training and Education - Disclosure 404-1 Average Hours of Training Per Year Per Employee, Reporting by Gender • [230020] GRI 404 - Training and Education - Disclosure 404-1 Average Hours of Training Per Year Per Employee, Reporting by Employee Category |
Disclosure 404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | |
404-2-a: Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills | |
404-2-b: Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment | |
Disclosure 404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews | |
Percentage of Employees Receiving Regular Performance and Career Development Reviews, Reporting by Gender |
• [230030] GRI 404 - Training and Education - Disclosure 404-3 Percentage of Employees Receiving Regular Performance and Career Development Reviews, Reporting by Gender |
[230020] GRI 404 - Training and Education - Disclosure 404-1 Average Hours of Training Per Year Per Employee, Reporting by Employee Category | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Average Hours of Training Per Year Per Employee, Reporting by Employee Category | ||
404-1-a: Average hours of training that the organization’s employees have undertaken during the reporting period | ||||
404-1-a: Average hours of training that the organization’s employees have undertaken during the reporting period | Reason for omission (404-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (404-1-a) | ||
1 | ||||
2 |
[230040] GRI 404 - Training and Education - Disclosure 404-3 Percentage of Employees Receiving Regular Performance and Career Development Reviews, Reporting by Employee Category | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Percentage of Employees Receiving Regular Performance and Career Development Reviews, Reporting by Employee Category | ||
404-3-a: Percentage of total employees who received a regular performance and career development review during the reporting period | ||||
404-3-a: Percentage of total employees who received a regular performance and career development review during the reporting period | Reason for omission (404-3-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (404-3-a) | ||
1 | ||||
2 |
[240010] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Gender | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Governance Body | Gender | Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Gender | ||
405-1-a-i: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | |||||
405-1-a-i: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | Reason for omission (405-1-a-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-a-i) | |||
1 | Board of Directors | women |
pure
|
||
2 | Board of Directors | men |
pure
|
||
3 | Executive Leadership Team | women |
pure
|
||
4 | Executive Leadership Team | men |
pure
|
||
5 | Management levels 0-2 | women |
pure
|
||
6 | Management levels 0-3 | women |
pure
|
[240020] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Age Group | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Governance Body | Age Group | Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Age Group | ||
405-1-a-ii: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | |||||
405-1-a-ii: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | Reason for omission (405-1-a-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-a-ii) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[240030] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Other Indicators of Diversity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Governance Body | Other Indicator of Diversity | Diversity of Governance Bodies, Reporting by Other Indicators of Diversity | ||
405-1-a-iii: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | |||||
405-1-a-iii: Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies | Reason for omission (405-1-a-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-a-iii) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[240040] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Gender | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Gender | Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Gender | ||
405-1-b-i: Percentage of employees per employee category | |||||
405-1-b-i: Percentage of employees per employee category | Reason for omission (405-1-b-i) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-b-i) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[240050] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Age Group | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Age Group | Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Age Group | ||
405-1-b-ii: Percentage of employees per employee category | |||||
405-1-b-ii: Percentage of employees per employee category | Reason for omission (405-1-b-ii) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-b-ii) | |||
1 | Employees | Under 30 Years old |
pure
|
||
2 | Employees | 30 To 50 Years old |
pure
|
||
3 | Employees | Over 50 Years old |
pure
|
[240060] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees, Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Other Indicators of Diversity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Employee Category | Other Indicator of Diversity | Diversity of Employees, Reporting by Other Indicators of Diversity | ||
405-1-b-iii: Percentage of employees per employee category | |||||
405-1-b-iii: Percentage of employees per employee category | Reason for omission (405-1-b-iii) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-1-b-iii) | |||
1 | |||||
2 |
[240070] GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity - Disclosure 405-2 Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Significant Location of Operation | Employee Category | Ratio of Basic Salary and Remuneration of Women to Men | |||||
405-2-a: Ratio of basic salary of women to men | 405-2-a: Ratio of remuneration of women to men | |||||||
405-2-a: Ratio of basic salary of women to men | Reason for omission (405-2-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-2-a) | 405-2-a: Ratio of remuneration of women to men | Reason for omission (405-2-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (405-2-a) | |||
1 | ||||||||
2 |
[250000] GRI 406 - Non-discrimination | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 406: Non-discrimination 2016 | |
Disclosure 406-1 Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken | |
406-1-a: Total number of incidents of discrimination during the reporting period | |
406-1-b: Status of the incidents and actions taken |
[260000] GRI 407 - Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 407: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining 2016 | |
Disclosure 407-1 Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk | |
407-1-a-i: Operations in which workers’ rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk in terms of type of operation | |
407-1-a-i: Suppliers in which workers’ rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk in terms of type of supplier | |
407-1-a-ii: Operations in which workers’ rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk in terms of countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk | |
407-1-a-ii: Suppliers in which workers’ rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk in terms of countries or geographic areas with suppliers considered at risk | |
407-1-b: Measures taken in the reporting period intended to support rights to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining |
[270000] GRI 408 - Child Labor | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 408: Child Labor 2016 | |
Disclosure 408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor | |
408-1-a-i: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor | |
408-1-a-i: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor | |
408-1-a-ii: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of young workers exposed to hazardous work | |
408-1-a-ii: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of young workers exposed to hazardous work | |
408-1-b-i: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor in terms of type of operation | |
408-1-b-i: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor in terms of type of supplier | |
408-1-b-ii: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor in terms of countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk | |
408-1-b-ii: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor in terms of countries or geographic areas with suppliers considered at risk | |
408-1-c: Measures taken in the reporting period intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labor |
[280000] GRI 409 - Forced or Compulsory Labor | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor 2016 | |
Disclosure 409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor | |
409-1-a-i: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor in terms of type of operation | |
409-1-a-i: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor in terms of type of supplier | |
409-1-a-ii: Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor in terms of countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk | |
409-1-a-ii: Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor in terms of countries or geographic areas with suppliers considered at risk | |
409-1-b: Measures taken in the reporting period intended to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor |
[290000] GRI 410 - Security Practices | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 410: Security Practices 2016 | |
Disclosure 410-1 Security personnel trained in human rights policies or procedures | |
410-1-a: Percentage of security personnel who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security | |
410-1-b: Training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel | True |
[300000] GRI 411 - Rights of Indigenous Peoples | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2016 | |
Disclosure 411-1 Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples | |
411-1-a: Total number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period | |
411-1-b: Status of the incidents and actions taken |
[310000] GRI 413 - Local Communities | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 413: Local Communities 2016 | |
Disclosure 413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs | |
413-1-a: Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and/or development programs | |
Disclosure 413-2 Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | |
413-2-a: Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | Ref #443 |
413-2-a-i: Location of operations | Ref #444 |
413-2-a-ii: Significant actual and potential negative impacts of operations | Ref #445 |
# 443
As part of Hydro’s human rights due diligence process, the company identifies the risk of salient human rights impacts on affected communities. The risks are identified through Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessment process, and additional processes for new projects and investments, drawing on internal and third-party human rights assessments, internal and external expertise, and other relevant sources. Any actual adverse impacts and specific risks are identified through the ongoing human rights due diligence process. In cases where mitigating actions are implemented, these are documented as part of Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessments and human rights data collection, and effects are monitored to the extent possible. For information about cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve affected communities in own operations or in the value chain (ref. ESRS S3-1), see note G1.1 in the Business Conduct chapter.
Hydro uses human rights risk levels per country to help guide its human rights management. The risk levels are based on a range of independent human rights sources, such as the UN Human Development Index and the TI Corruption Perception Index. Hydro’s assessments are also based on Hydro’s internal risk evaluation and, for the aluminium production and sourcing, drawing on materiality assessments conducted by the International Aluminium Institute (IAI), on the severity and likelihood of potential impacts on people at the different stages of aluminium production. Hydro has identified salient risks of adverse impacts on affected communities for some parts of the aluminium production process. Hydro has not identified salient risk of adverse impacts on affected communities in the extrusions and recycling part of its aluminium business. Hydro’s fully owned primary metal plants are located in Norway, which has been assessed as a low-risk country related to adverse impacts on human rights in affected communities associated with Hydro’s aluminium production. In addition to Hydro’s Norwegian production, Hydro is the main indirect shareholder of Albras primary metal and the alumina refinery Alunorte in Barcarena, Brazil. Hydro also owns the bauxite mine Paragominas. Hydro has identified the inherent risks related to communities in Northern Brazil as the most salient due to the combination of the country and regional risk and the industrial processes conducted in this part of the production process. The industrial processes within aluminium production carry an inherent risk of pollution, linked to process emissions to air and water, and the potential for accidental spills or leakages. Such emissions can have a negative impact on the local environment and local communities if not managed correctly. Hydro’s business activities are subject to emissions regulations, including local emission permits, as well as regional and international regulation of emissions. Hydro’s approach to environmental management is covered in the chapter Pollution. This is closely linked to the health and safety of local communities, which has been identified as a salient human rights risk across Hydro’s business. Hydro has not identified the risk of adverse impacts on affected communities to be salient in its own operations in Hydro’s energy business. Please see the section “Affected communities in value chain including joint ventures and joint operations” for information about other identified salient human rights risks and impact in relation to joint ventures and the value chain in Hydro’s energy business. Context specific salient human rights risks are described in the section “Affected communities in value chain including joint ventures and joint operations” and in the section “Joint ventures and value chain,” where applicable.
# 444
Affected communities in Northern Brazil Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas’ activities are located in the Amazon, in the state of Pará. This region presents socio-economic challenges similar to other areas in the Amazon, affecting the well being of its residents. Paragominas, the location of the mine, and Barcarena, where the refinery and a smelter are situated, experience low to middle income rates. The cities along the bauxite pipeline Tome-Açú, Moju, Abaetetuba, Acará, and Ipixuna do Pará, experience lower income generation. Pará's water and sanitation services, for example, are below par when compared to other regions in Brazil. These structural challenges particularly affect vulnerable groups, including women, children, the elderly and small farmers. The operations are neighbor to 28 Quilombola communities. According to an assessment by the competent Brazilian agency (FUNAI)1 , there is no demarcated indigenous land within a 10km radius of the pipeline and transmission line. However, Hydro engages in dialogue with self-declared indigenous communities in the region to support their socio-territorial development as part of a broader territorial program. Given the regional history and the current socio-economic context, both Quilombola and non-Quilombola communities in Barcarena, Paragominas and along the bauxite pipeline are at risk of discrimination and economic exclusion. In response to this industry wide and regional context, Hydro has developed several initiatives to increase employment opportunities for these communities, including affirmative action for underrepresented groups, internship and trainee programs aimed at increasing diversity in the workforce, training and 1 National Indigenous People Foundation (FUNAI) a Brazilian governmental protection agency for indigenous interests and their culture. professional development programs and targeted support to educational institutions. As part of the licensing process in Brazil, environmental and social impact assessments are required to propose mitigation for projects with significant impacts. The licenses issued contain the mitigating actions. The municipalities of Tomé-Açu and Acará along the pipeline between Paragominas and Alunorte have had historical land conflicts, which more recently have been driven by disputes over the ownership of oil palm monocultures, involving different groups, such as traditional communities, indigenous people, landowners and companies in the region. In recent years, the conflict has been aggravated by various violent events which have led to physical violence and damage on property. Although Hydro is not a party to the conflicts related to oil palm monocultures, the pipeline crosses this region. This has caused some challenges, which Hydro has sought to mitigate through dialogue, engagement and proposed cooperation initiatives with the groups concerned. Within the Baracarena Industrial District, a group of individuals have illegally occupied an area owned by Alunorte and Albras, which is regulated for industrial purposes. Alunorte and Albras have filed a repossession lawsuit. The Court has recognized the irregularity of the occupation and granted the repossession plea. Currently, the companies are engaging ina mediation process in accordance with relevant legislation to support dialogue and the peaceful enforcement of the repossession order. See also the Business Conduct chapter for information about the lawsuits filed by Cainquiama and developments in on going legal cases. Grievance mechanism Canal Direto is Hydro’s operational level grievance mechanism open to all external stakeholders in Brazil and targeted specifically at affected communities. The mechanism allows community members to raise their concerns anonymously. Grievances are assessed according to the criticality of each case. The process follows the criteria for effective grievance mechanisms set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The effectiveness of the grievance mechanism is monitored through dialogue with the affected communities, monitoring of the type and volume of cases received, as well as through a satisfaction survey for users. In 2024, the Canal Direto registered 633 grievances via telephone, online form and email. Of the registrations, 92 percent were identified and eight percent anonymous. 84 percent were related to requests for information and the most frequently registered topics were sponsorships, job and career opportunities at Hydro, visits to operations, donations, commercial matters, auctions and interest in research, innovation and new technologies. See also note G1.1 for further details about grievances received through Canal Direto in 2024. Human Rights Impact Assessment Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas began the implementation of a Human Rights Action Plan to mitigate risks in the operations in 2020. A new Human Rights Impact Assessment of Hydro’s operations in the state of Pará is currently underway, conducted by an external consultancy. As part of this process, a baseline study has been conducted, and the findings and recommendations are expected in 2025. Community dialogue Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas have implemented a structured approach to effective and inclusive engagement with diverse communities in the region. Hydro engages in dialogue with community groups, traditional groups and civil society organizations which represent women, children, human rights defenders or other underrepresented and at risk groups in the local communities. Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives Since 2018 Hydro has supported, by Hydro Sustainability Fund initiatives, the Sustainable Barcarena Initiative (SBI) to enhance community dialogue. This is an independent forum to support sustainable development in Barcarena. The overall aim is to bring local stakeholders together to discuss challenges and opportunities, strengthen capabilities and decide about the main social investments supported by the Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF). In 2024, about 178 community leaders participated in meetings, dialogues, or programs organized by the initiative. SBI also plays an important role coordinating the financing rounds of Hydro Sustainability Fund (HSF) to ensure Hydro’s social investments meet the local community’s needs. In 2024, HSF supported 36 community based projects. In November 2024, Hydro launched the Corridor Program with Mercedes-Benz. This is a strategic partnership and initiative to promote the social and economic development in the pipeline area, expanding the collaboration to create positive social and environmental impact in the Amazon. Working together with the Brazilian NGOs IPAM, Imazon, and CEA and other partners, Hydro aims to strengthen territorial development by fostering economic opportunities and biodiversity conservation in the communities where it operates, and promoting human rights. The program is aimed at generating social positive impact in the region along the pipeline. The program is in an initial phase and projects, activities and targets are still to be developed. In addition, Alunorte, Albras and Paragominas have a volunteering program for employees to increase internal engagement and address community needs. In 2024, over 3,700 employees participated in the volunteer programs in Brazil. The volunteers organized over 290 different actions, including food basket donations, fundraising, seed planting and training for commu
# 445
Potential and actual adverse impacts As part of Hydro’s human rights due diligence process, the company identifies the risk of salient human rights impacts on affected communities. The risks are identified through Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessment process, and additional processes for new projects and investments, drawing on internal and third-party human rights assessments, internal and external expertise, and other relevant sources. Any actual adverse impacts and specific risks are identified through the ongoing human rights due diligence process. In cases where mitigating actions are implemented, these are documented as part of Hydro’s annual human rights risk assessments and human rights data collection, and effects are monitored to the extent possible. For information about cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve affected communities in own operations or in the value chain (ref. ESRS S3-1), see note G1.1 in the Business Conduct chapter.
[320000] GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016 | |
Disclosure 414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | |
414-1-a: Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria | |
Disclosure 414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | |
414-2-a: Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts |
Actuals (pure)
Actuals (pure)
|
414-2-b: Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts | |
414-2-c: Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain | |
414-2-d: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment | |
414-2-e: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | |
414-2-e: Reasons why supplier relationships were terminated as a result of assessment |
[330000] GRI 415 - Public Policy | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 415: Public Policy 2016 | |
Disclosure 415-1 Political contributions |
• [330010] GRI 415 - Public Policy - Disclosure 415-1 Political contributions |
415-1-b: If applicable, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated | Ref #446 |
[330010] GRI 415 - Public Policy - Disclosure 415-1 Political contributions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sr.No | Country | Recipient or Beneficiary | Political Contributions | ||
415-1-a: Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly | |||||
415-1-a: Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly | Reason for omission (415-1-a) | Explanation for reason for omission (415-1-a) | |||
1 | Norway | NA | Not applicable | Ref #447 |
[340000] GRI 416 - Customer Health and Safety | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety 2016 | |
Disclosure 416-1 Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and service categories | |
416-1-a: Percentage of significant product and service categories for which health and safety impacts are assessed for improvement | |
Disclosure 416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services |
• [340010] GRI 416 - Customer Health and Safety - Disclosure 416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services |
416-2-b: Brief statement that the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, if applicable | |
416-2-2.1.3: Incidents of non-compliance that relate to events in periods prior to the reporting period, if applicable |
[350000] GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling 2016 | |
Disclosure 417-1 Requirements for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-i: Information on the sourcing of components of the product or service is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-ii: Information on the content, particularly with regard to substances that might produce an environmental or social impact, is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-iii: Information on the safe use of the product or service is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-iv: Information on the disposal of the product and environmental or social impacts is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-v: Other information is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-a-v: Explanation of other information required by the organization’s procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
417-1-b: Percentage of significant product or service categories covered by and assessed for compliance with procedures for product and service information and labeling | |
Disclosure 417-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling |
• [350010] GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling - Disclosure 417-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling |
417-2-b: Brief statement that the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, if applicable | |
417-2-2.1.2: Incidents of non-compliance that relate to events in periods prior to the reporting period, if applicable | |
Disclosure 417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications |
• [350020] GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling - Disclosure 417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications |
417-3-b: Brief statement that the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, if applicable | |
417-3-2.2.2: Incidents of non-compliance that relate to events in periods prior to the reporting period, if applicable |
[360000] GRI 418 - Customer Privacy | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 |
---|---|
GRI 418: Customer Privacy 2016 | |
Disclosure 418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data |
• [360010] GRI 418 - Customer Privacy - Disclosure 418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data |
418-1-b: Total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data | |
418-1-c: Brief statement that the organization has not identified any substantiated complaints, if applicable | |
418-1-2.1: A substantial number of reported breaches of customer privacy relate to events in preceding years |
[666666] Topics in Sector Standards determined as not material | Topic 14.8 Closure and rehabilitation | Topic 14.13 Artisanal and small-scale mining | Topic 14.25 Conflict-affected and high-risk areas | Topic 14.23 Payments to governments |
---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Topics in Applicable Sector Standards Determined as Not Material | ||||
Explanation of why the topic applicable for sector standards is determined as not material | Ref #448 | Ref #449 | Ref #450 | Ref #451 |
[777777] Information on Omission | 305-1-b: Gases included in the calculation | 305-2-c: If available, the gases included in the calculation of location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | 305-2-c: If available, the gases included in the calculation of market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | 305-3-b: If available, the gases included in the calculation | 302-1-d-i: Total electricity sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | 302-1-d-ii: Total heating sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | 302-1-d-iii: Total cooling sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | 302-1-d-iv: Total steam sold (in joules, watt-hours or multiples) | 305-5-a: Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | 305-5-a: Location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | 305-5-a: Market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | 305-5-a: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | 305-5-c: Start date for the base year | 305-5-c: End date for the base year | 305-5-c: Baseline | 305-5-c: Rationale for choosing the base year or baseline | 305-5-2.9.5: Reductions from offsets (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) | 303-4-d-iii: Number of incidents of non-compliance with discharge limits | 303-5-c: Change in water storage, if water storage has been identified as having a significant water-related impact (in megaliters) | 304-2-a-iii: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to introduction of invasive species, pests, and pathogens | 304-2-a-iv: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to reduction of species | 304-2-a-v: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to habitat conversion | 304-2-a-vi: Nature of significant direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity with reference to changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variation | 304-2-b-i: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to species affected | 304-2-b-ii: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to extent of areas impacted | 304-2-b-iii: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reference to duration of impacts | 304-2-b-iv: Significant direct and indirect positive and negative impacts with reversibility or irreversibility of the impacts | 301-2-a: Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture primary products and services | 306-3-a: Total weight of waste generated (in metric tons) | 414-2-b: Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts | 414-2-c: Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain | 414-2-d: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment | 414-2-e: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | 414-2-e: Reasons why supplier relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | 308-2-b: Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts | 308-2-d: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of the assessment | 308-2-e: Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | 308-2-e: Reasons why relationships with suppliers were terminated as a result of assessment | 205-1-a: Percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | 205-1-a: Total number of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | Disclosure 302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organization | 302-1-g: Source of the conversion factors used | Disclosure 301-3 Reclaimed products and their packaging materials | Disclosure 306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | Disclosure 306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts | Disclosure 303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource | Disclosure 303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts | Disclosure 101-1 Policies to halt and reverse biodiversity loss | Disclosure 101-2 Management of biodiversity impacts | Disclosure 101-3 Access and benefit-sharing | Disclosure 101-4 Identification of biodiversity impacts | Disclosure 101-5 Locations with biodiversity impacts | Disclosure 101-6 Direct drivers of biodiversity loss | Disclosure 101-7 Changes to the state of biodiversity | Disclosure 101-8 Ecosystem services | Disclosure 403-1 Occupational health and safety management system | Disclosure 403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | Disclosure 403-3 Occupational health services | Disclosure 403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety | Disclosure 403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety | Disclosure 403-6 Promotion of worker health | Disclosure 403-7 Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships | Disclosure 403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | Disclosure 408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor | 410-1-a: Percentage of security personnel who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | 01/01/2024-31/12/2024 | |
Reason for Omission and Explanation for Reason for Omission | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason for omission | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Not applicable | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Information unavailable or incomplete | Information unavailable or incomplete |
Explanation for reason for omission | Ref #452 | Ref #453 | Ref #454 | Ref #455 | Ref #456 | Ref #457 | Ref #458 | Ref #459 | Ref #460 | Ref #461 | Ref #462 | Ref #463 | Ref #464 | Ref #465 | Ref #466 | Ref #467 | Ref #468 | Ref #469 | Ref #470 | Ref #471 | Ref #472 | Ref #473 | Ref #474 | Ref #475 | Ref #476 | Ref #477 | Ref #478 | Ref #479 | Ref #480 | Ref #481 | Ref #482 | Ref #483 | Ref #484 | Ref #485 | Ref #486 | Ref #487 | Ref #488 | Ref #489 | Ref #490 | Ref #491 | Ref #492 | Ref #493 | Ref #494 | Ref #495 | Ref #496 | Ref #497 | Ref #498 | Ref #499 | Ref #500 | Ref #501 | Ref #502 | Ref #503 | Ref #504 | Ref #505 | Ref #506 | Ref #507 | Ref #508 | Ref #509 | Ref #510 | Ref #511 | Ref #512 | Ref #513 | Ref #514 | Ref #515 | Ref #516 |
# 460
Available - Breakdown of reported direct GHG emissions in consolidated activities, by greenhouse gas type. Amounts are reported in CO2-equivalents for each GHG type
# 461
Available - Breakdown of reported direct GHG emissions in consolidated activities, by greenhouse gas type. Amounts are reported in CO2-equivalents for each GHG type
# 462
Available - Breakdown of reported direct GHG emissions in consolidated activities, by greenhouse gas type. Amounts are reported in CO2-equivalents for each GHG type
# 463
Available - Breakdown of reported direct GHG emissions in consolidated activities, by greenhouse gas type. Amounts are reported in CO2-equivalents for each GHG type
# 481
Omission: Not applicable. We do not report fully on 414-2 in terms of numbers and percentages of suppliers with actual and potential negative social impacts.
# 482
Omission: Not applicable. We do not report fully on 414-2 in terms of numbers and percentages of suppliers with actual and potential negative social impacts.
# 483
Omission: Not applicable. We do not report fully on 414-2 in terms of numbers and percentages of suppliers with actual and potential negative social impacts.
# 484
Omission: Not applicable. We do not report fully on 414-2 in terms of numbers and percentages of suppliers with actual and potential negative social impacts.
# 485
Omission: Not applicable. We do not report fully on 414-2 in terms of numbers and percentages of suppliers with actual and potential negative social impacts.
# 486
The business areas have different systems in place - based on different needs - to comply with corporate requirements, i.e. number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts is not consolidated and followed-up on corporate level. Hydro does currently not report fully on this indicator
# 487
The business areas have different systems in place - based on different needs - to comply with corporate requirements, i.e. number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts is not consolidated and followed-up on corporate level. Hydro does currently not report fully on this indicator
# 488
The business areas have different systems in place - based on different needs - to comply with corporate requirements, i.e. number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts is not consolidated and followed-up on corporate level. Hydro does currently not report fully on this indicator
# 489
The business areas have different systems in place - based on different needs - to comply with corporate requirements, i.e. number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts is not consolidated and followed-up on corporate level. Hydro does currently not report fully on this indicator
# 490
All Hydro's activities are assessed at business area level in connection with the annual business planning process. In e.g. B&A, all plants have also been individually assessed.
# 491
All Hydro's activities are assessed at business area level in connection with the annual business planning process. In e.g. B&A, all plants have also been individually assessed.