All posts

EU Voluntary Standard for Sustainability Reporting: Draft Delegated Regulation and the Value Chain Cap Explained

Blog
Conceptual display of the EU ESG value chain cap and corporate sustainability reporting on a modern office desk.
Draft Delegated Regulation
Ref. Ares(2026)4624010 – Published 6 May 2026
The value chain cap is now a legally binding instrument.
The European Commission has published the draft Delegated Regulation that elevates the VSME from a non-binding Recommendation into EU law – and sets a formal ceiling on the sustainability data that larger companies can demand from their supply chains.

On 6 May 2026, the Commission released the draft that operationalises Article 29ca of the Accounting Directive, as introduced by the Omnibus I Directive (EU) 2026/470. The instrument does two things simultaneously: it creates a standardised voluntary reporting framework for companies below 1,000 employees, and it defines the upper boundary – the value chain cap – of what in-scope reporting undertakings may require from those companies for CSRD reporting purposes.

For every undertaking classified as “protected” under the Omnibus I framework, there is now a statutory right to refuse data requests that exceed this ceiling. For in-scope reporting entities, value chain questionnaires must be redesigned to respect it.

01

The legal architecture

The path from soft law to binding regulation ran through three instruments in twelve months. The VSME standard – developed by EFRAG and submitted to the Commission in December 2024 – was first adopted as Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710 on 30 July 2025. When the Omnibus I Directive entered into force on 18 March 2026, it empowered the Commission to adopt a delegated act establishing the standard. This draft is that act.

I
Omnibus I Directive
(EU) 2026/470 – Entered into force 18 March 2026. Empowers delegated act under Art. 29ca.
II
Voluntary Standard
Draft Delegated Regulation – Based on VSME Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710. Two modules, 20 disclosures.
III
Value Chain Cap
Art. 3 of the Regulation – Only “necessary” disclosures fall within the cap. Applies from FY 2027.

When seeking to obtain information about their value chain, reporting undertakings are prohibited from requiring from protected undertakings information exceeding the information to be disclosed pursuant to the voluntary standard.

02

Are you protected? What can be required from you?

The value chain cap does not cover the entire voluntary standard. Only disclosures classified as “necessary” sit within it. Disclosures marked “voluntary”, “necessary if applicable”, or “sector consideration” fall above the cap – meaning an undertaking can share them if it chooses, but cannot be compelled to do so for CSRD purposes. The protection level also depends on company size: micro-undertakings with 10 employees or fewer receive additional shielding, as several environmental disclosures become voluntary for that group.

Value chain cap explorer
Select your organisation’s employee count to see which disclosures fall within the cap, which are conditional, and which you can decline.
How many employees does your organisation have?
0%
Within cap (protected)
Conditional (if applicable)
Above cap (can refuse)
Not applicable

The standard retains the two-module architecture of the VSME. The Basic Module (disclosures B1 to B11) covers general information, environmental metrics (energy, GHG, pollution, biodiversity, water, waste), social metrics (workforce characteristics, health and safety, remuneration and training) and governance metrics (corruption and bribery). The Comprehensive Module (C1 to C9) extends into strategy, climate transition, human rights and revenue from sensitive sectors. Applying the Basic Module is a prerequisite for the Comprehensive Module – an undertaking cannot selectively apply the latter without completing the former. For each disclosure, the standard specifies one of four categories: necessary, necessary if applicable, voluntary, or consideration when reporting sector information. A few disclosures carry differentiated treatment depending on whether the undertaking has more or fewer than 10 employees.

03

What changed from the VSME Recommendation

The Commission’s explanatory memorandum emphasises that changes have been “kept to a minimum” to avoid raising the cap threshold. Any significant addition to the voluntary standard would lower the protection for value chain companies. The modifications fall into three categories.

Alignment with the Simplified ESRS
The voluntary standard has been adjusted for consistency with the revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards being adopted through a parallel delegated act. This reduces the number of datapoints compared to the original VSME.
Formalisation of the value chain cap
Annex II of the Regulation now provides an explicit list of disclosures that fall within the cap, distinguished by employee threshold (above or below 10). This was not present in the Recommendation, which had no enforcement mechanism.
Strengthened micro-undertaking proportionality
Environmental disclosures that are “necessary” for companies with more than 10 employees become “voluntary” for those with 10 or fewer. This places them above the cap for the smallest firms, offering additional protection from disproportionate requests.

The double materiality assessment, which remains central to full ESRS reporting, is not required under the voluntary standard. This reflects its proportionate design. Similarly, no assurance is required – the Regulation explicitly exempts voluntary reporters from the obligation to seek external verification.

04

Who uses this data – and why it matters

Appendix C of the voluntary standard maps each disclosure to three downstream regulatory frameworks. This mapping is designed for the users of the data – banks evaluating lending risk, asset managers meeting SFDR principal adverse impact reporting, and benchmark administrators – rather than the reporting undertakings themselves.

SFDR
B3, B4, B5, B7, B9, B10, B11 map to mandatory PAI indicators
EBA
B1 and C3–C4 align with Pillar 3 climate risk templates
BMR
B3, B9, B10, B11 feed EU Climate Transition Benchmark factors

For banks with thousands of SME borrowers, the practical implication is standardisation. ESG data intake can now be structured around a single, legally defined framework – replacing ad hoc questionnaires with a consistent data model. For SMEs, the benefit is equally tangible: responding to one standard replaces the burden of processing overlapping, uncoordinated requests from multiple counterparties.

It is important to note the cap’s scope limitation. It applies exclusively to information gathering for CSRD sustainability reporting under the Accounting Directive. Data requests required under other EU or national legislation – the EU Deforestation Regulation, the Forced Labour Regulation, sector-specific prudential requirements – remain unaffected. Contractual information exchanges outside CSRD reporting purposes are also beyond the cap’s reach.

05

Implementation timeline

Jul 2025
VSME adopted as Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710
Feb 2026
Omnibus I Directive published in the Official Journal
May 2026
Draft Delegated Regulation published. Feedback period opens.
Entry into force
Third day after OJ publication. Voluntary reporting available immediately.
1 Jan 2027
Value chain cap (Art. 3) applies for FY beginning on or after this date.

The Regulation enters into force on the third day following publication in the Official Journal and is directly applicable in all Member States without transposition. The voluntary reporting provisions (Article 2) apply immediately, while the enforceable cap mechanism (Article 3) activates from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 – regardless of whether a reporting undertaking has opted for voluntary early application of the Simplified ESRS for FY 2026.

06

What undertakings should consider now

For companies with fewer than 1,000 employees, those already applying the VSME under the 2025 Recommendation can continue with minimal disruption – the Commission has deliberately maintained continuity. For those that have not yet adopted a structured reporting approach, the standard provides a framework to respond to value chain data requests efficiently and to improve positioning with financial counterparties. The ESG reporting readiness assessment can help determine which frameworks apply to a given organisation.

For in-scope reporting undertakings, the delegated act requires a redesign of value chain data collection. Questionnaires sent to suppliers must align with the cap: only “necessary” disclosures can be required, and protected undertakings must be informed of their statutory right to refuse anything beyond that level. The Omnibus I Directive introduced a self-declaration mechanism: reporting undertakings may rely on a statement from value chain partners confirming that they fall within the protected category, unless that declaration is manifestly incorrect. This reduces the administrative burden of verifying employee thresholds across complex supply chains.

A three-year transitional provision provides additional flexibility. For the first three years of reporting, undertakings unable to obtain all required information from their value chain may explain the reasons, document their efforts, and describe plans to obtain the missing data. After three years, direct collection or documented estimates are required. This graduated approach recognises that data flows between large reporting entities and their smaller suppliers will take time to mature.

At Generation Impact Global, our platform supports the full VSME disclosure set across both modules – from structured data collection through to XBRL-ready output – and maps each datapoint to the downstream SFDR, EBA Pillar 3 and Benchmark Regulation frameworks that data users depend on.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between the VSME Recommendation and the new Delegated Regulation?

Does the value chain cap apply to all ESG data requests?

Is assurance required for voluntary reporters?

When does the value chain cap take effect?

Are micro-undertakings treated differently?

Can protected undertakings share information voluntarily beyond the cap?

Related news